Dems: Virginia Station Won't Air GOP Climate Change Ad, Citing Factual Errors (VIDEO)

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Dems: Virginia Station Won't Air GOP Climate Change Ad, Citing Factual Errors (VIDEO) stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 07- 2-09 05:20 PM   |   Updated: 08- 2-09 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

Congressional Republicans were dealt a setback Thursday in their attempt to punish Democrats in swing districts for voting for climate change legislation in the House last week.

WDBJ-TV, a Roanoke television station, will not air a National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) ad attacking freshman Rep. Tom Perriello (D-Va.), citing factual inaccuracies, according to Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee communications director Jen Crider. A source familiar with the station's decision confirmed Crider's account; WDBJ general manager Jeff Marks confirmed that the ad would not run, but declined to say why.

"The ad is not running, be we have not characterized why that is," said Marks. "We don't characterize why an ad is not running. We looked into the complaints [from national Democrats], but other than saying that, you really need to find out from the NRCC."

An NRCC source said that Democrats are mischaracterizing the station's decision. "One station has temporarily pulled the ad. The station manager has also informed us that he plans to notify the DCCC about their mischaracterization of what exactly has transpired. The ad is still set to run on the other stations in the local market," said the source.

Marks said the station has made no public statement saying that it rejected the ad for factual reasons. He confirmed that he notified Democrats that he had made no public statements about the ad. He did not reject the assertion that the ad was pulled because it was inaccurate, declining to comment instead.

Earlier, the nonpartisan organization FactCheck.org called the ad "wrong."

Adjudicated FactCheck:

The ad says the bill will result in lost jobs and cost "middle class families" $1,870 a year. That sounds pretty dire, until you consider that this week we posted an item about the Office of the Republican Whip Eric Cantor's claim that the same bill would "impose a national energy tax of up to $3,100." So is the cost of the legislation going down? Did the NRCC make a mistake in its math?

Hardly. While it may seem curious that House Republicans would flog two different cost figures for the proposed legislation, it is indicative of the difficulty in determining how a cap on carbon emissions could affect Americans' electricity bills. The NRCC ad credits a Washington Times editorial for its claim that the Waxman-Markey bill would make electricity prices "skyrocket," costing families $1,870 a year. But the NRCC is wrong.

Here's the ad:

Ryan Grim's book, This Is Your Country On Drugs: The Secret History of Getting High in America, is now on sale


Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

Congressional Republicans were dealt a setback Thursday in their attempt to punish Democrats in swing districts for voting for climate change legislation in the House last week. WDBJ-TV, a Roanoke te...
Congressional Republicans were dealt a setback Thursday in their attempt to punish Democrats in swing districts for voting for climate change legislation in the House last week. WDBJ-TV, a Roanoke te...
Filed by Ryan Grim  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
1456
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 (20 pages total)
photo

"factual errors" are the GOP campaign way of life
swiftboat horse$%^&
subliminal brainwashing- (gwb Dec 2000)
Don't worry, Faux news will pick it up and multiply the BS in it

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:46 PM on 07/02/2009
- roquelaure I'm a Fan of roquelaure 3 fans permalink

My god... journalistic integrity. I hardly know ye.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:44 PM on 07/02/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 (20 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect