White House Acknowledges Officials Were Likely Invited To WaPo Salons

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - White House Acknowledges Officials Were Likely Invited To WaPo Salons stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 07- 2-09 02:59 PM   |   Updated: 07- 2-09 03:26 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Wapo

The White House acknowledged on Thursday that some members of the administration may have been invited to high-priced "salons" sponsored by the Washington Post and featuring corporate executives and lobbyists. But in his daily briefing with the press, spokesman Robert Gibbs said that no one, to his knowledge, had accepted the invitation and that the administration's ethics policy most likely would have prevented them from doing so.

"I think some people in the administration writ large may have been invited," Gibbs acknowledged towards the end of Thursday's briefing. "I do not believe, based on what I have been able to check, that anyone has accepted the invitation. Obviously the [White House] Counsel would have to review an invitation like this, and I think it would likely exceed what the counsel would -- the Salon that the Washington Post is offering would likely exceed what [administration] would feel in this case would be appropriate."

The admission that administration officials were likely contacted to attend the proposed Washington Post gatherings is another interesting tidbit in a story that has consumed much of the journalism and political wor.d on Thursday. Early in the morning, Politico reported that the Post was arranging a series of gatherings that would bring together newspaper officials, lobbyists, industry executives and White House officials for a price ranging from $25,000 to $250,000.

Several reporters at the paper told the Huffington Post that they were outraged by the news, having not been told in advance that management or the business side of the operation were considering the salon idea. Even if they did not partake in the events, these journalists felt that having representatives of industries and companies the paper was tasked with covering pay for access to its staff would irrevocably compromise their credibility. For the Obama White House, the association with lobbyists at these salon events would also create a host of ethical dilemmas.

The issue was made moot (at least for the time being) Thursday afternoon, when Post Publisher Katharine Weymouth canceled the planned events.

Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

The White House acknowledged on Thursday that some members of the administration may have been invited to high-priced "salons" sponsored by the Washington Post and featuring corporate executives and l...
The White House acknowledged on Thursday that some members of the administration may have been invited to high-priced "salons" sponsored by the Washington Post and featuring corporate executives and l...
Loading...
 
Report Corrections
 
Comments
52
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 (2 pages total)
- ApprxAm I'm a Fan of ApprxAm 9 fans permalink
photo

I guess the Washington Post isn't complaining about the White House/ HuffPo's press conference question insertion anymore.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:20 PM on 07/02/2009
- GringoLingo I'm a Fan of GringoLingo 191 fans permalink
photo

"The issue was made moot (at least for the time being) Thursday afternoon, when Post Publisher Katharine Weymouth canceled the planned events."

No it was not. The fact that this event was planned prevents any sensible person from ignoring the facts of the situation.

*) Why would the WaPo charge extraordinary amounts for such an even if they didn't think they could get White House staff to attend?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:43 PM on 07/02/2009
- soupson52 I'm a Fan of soupson52 13 fans permalink

Perhaps wapo's publisher is not too bright? Used to an administration who loved being "on board'?
Your second paragraph is nonsensical, btw.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:58 PM on 07/02/2009
- HAL2 I'm a Fan of HAL2 3 fans permalink
photo

How many times are you going to ask the same question? I now count three times that you post this question in three different ways. I'll answer it for you.

They tried but it didn't work. OK your question has been answered.

STOP POSTING THE SAME QUESTION!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:09 PM on 07/02/2009
photo

Thinking someone will attend and someone attending are entirely two different things.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 07/02/2009

The fact that the even was cancelled when Weymouth got caught with her fingers in the cookie jar does not change the fact that the people who are now in control of this once great paper are morally corrupt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:05 PM on 07/02/2009

The gaul!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:21 PM on 07/02/2009
- Fentwin I'm a Fan of Fentwin 4 fans permalink

What have the French got to do with this?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:17 PM on 07/02/2009
- TFlint I'm a Fan of TFlint 40 fans permalink
photo

gal -- Gaul is old France

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:23 PM on 07/02/2009
photo

gall - gal is slang for girl

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:57 PM on 07/02/2009
- apoyo I'm a Fan of apoyo 40 fans permalink

Bet Dana thought it was a good idea.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 PM on 07/02/2009
photo

Hope, Change & Transparen­cy..... you still buying it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 PM on 07/02/2009
- Melizzy I'm a Fan of Melizzy 18 fans permalink

I will if we get a public health care option. If they can't get that through I see the two party system disentigrating.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:21 PM on 07/02/2009
photo

Yes. Under Bush, the administrators would have been bought and there would have never hit the press.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 07/02/2009
photo

Still playing the blame Bush card? Sorry that card has been trumped a long time ago.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:31 PM on 07/02/2009
- JadedAggie I'm a Fan of JadedAggie 9 fans permalink

Um... Did you even read the article? So now you are guilty for simply being invited to an event?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:54 PM on 07/02/2009
- dennisrs I'm a Fan of dennisrs 32 fans permalink
photo

HA HA More change!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:55 PM on 07/02/2009
- TFlint I'm a Fan of TFlint 40 fans permalink
photo

The Washington Post did this. You are sick to blame the White House.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:24 PM on 07/02/2009
- yankees I'm a Fan of yankees 18 fans permalink

Caught with their hands in the cookie jar! Journalism is dead in the USA.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:10 PM on 07/02/2009
- TeeLolly I'm a Fan of TeeLolly 49 fans permalink

Journalism has been dead for some time now. Remember the run-up to the Iraq war when network and cable coverage HAD to have a Rethug if a Dem was invited? Or the NY Times' placement of everything seriously questioning the wisdom of an Iraq war anywhere buried deep inside? Or the tabloid coverage of the Clinton impeachment, through which Rethugs ensured that every child in America knew about oral sex?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:42 PM on 07/02/2009
- Bernique I'm a Fan of Bernique 39 fans permalink

TeeLolly -- " if a Dem was invited" ??? I didn't see ANY Dems, then.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:46 PM on 07/02/2009

Who's in bed with whom?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:00 PM on 07/02/2009
- sqwerl I'm a Fan of sqwerl 5 fans permalink

yeah, but their is no bias in today's media.....­pffft.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:00 PM on 07/02/2009
- Charmed I'm a Fan of Charmed 28 fans permalink

And the White House also acknowledges that "because of the ethics rules, they would not have been able to accept the invitation­".....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:44 PM on 07/02/2009
photo

A new day and a new administration.

Under Bush, the whole cabinet would have gone.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 07/02/2009
- GringoLingo I'm a Fan of GringoLingo 191 fans permalink
photo

Why would the paper advertise such an event if they could not pull it off? How could they justify charging such amounts to lobbyists if they didn't think the administration staff would attend?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:44 PM on 07/02/2009
photo

Thinking someone will attend and someone attending are entirely two different things.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 07/02/2009

I'm sure they thought someone would attend, then they would have the exclusive and report that President Obama's staff pals around with lobbyists!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:19 PM on 07/02/2009
- saxmaniac I'm a Fan of saxmaniac 6 fans permalink

Appently WAPO forgot there was an election last November, and that "business as usual" is quite different now that a White House with ethics, integrity and brains doesn't automatically sell out to the highest bidder,

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 07/02/2009
- biglover I'm a Fan of biglover 42 fans permalink

Amen!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:23 PM on 07/02/2009
- GringoLingo I'm a Fan of GringoLingo 191 fans permalink
photo

Apparently they were rather confident they could get Obama white house staff to attend such an event based on the amounts they were charging.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:47 PM on 07/02/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect