iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Ruth Madoff's Fur Coat Taken By The Feds

LARRY NEUMEISTER   07/ 3/09 02:59 AM ET   AP

Madoff Scandal

NEW YORK — Federal marshals seized disgraced financier Bernard Madoff's $7 million Manhattan penthouse on Thursday and forced his wife to move out and leave her possessions behind, including a fur coat she had asked to take with her, an official told The Associated Press.

Proceeds from a sale of the property and its contents could be used to help reimburse those who lost billions of dollars investing with Madoff before he confessed to running a Ponzi scheme.

U.S. Marshal Joseph Guccione said the marshals arrived at the property at noon with a court order permitting them to take custody of the apartment and to make anyone living there move out. Guccione said Madoff's wife Ruth had been advised in advance of the marshals' plans and was leaving the residence and surrendering all personal property.

"She will be leaving," he said at midday. "Restitution for the victims is the government's top priority."

Typically, the U.S. Marshals Service changes all locks and secures a property when it seizes a location.

By about 1 p.m. EDT, 67-year-old Ruth Madoff had left. It was not immediately clear where she went to live.

Ruth Madoff first argued with marshals who came to the apartment and asked to stay, then asked if she could take a fur coat with her, a federal official informed of Ruth Madoff's departure told The AP. The official wasn't authorized to discuss details of her encounter with marshals and spoke on condition of anonymity.

Ruth Madoff walked out of the apartment carrying just a straw bag after she was told she couldn't take her coat, the official said.

"This cheap effort to smear Ruth Madoff is meritless _ with a little over two days to pack up her entire life of 68 years and find a new place to live, Ruth still managed to move out right on time, in an orderly fashion and in total compliance with her court approved agreement," said her lawyer, Peter Chavkin. "And it was she who forfeited the furs last Friday as the publicly filed stipulation states."

"These anonymous attacks on her should stop," Chavkin added.

The 71-year-old Madoff was sentenced Monday to 150 years in prison. He pleaded guilty in March to charges that his investment advisory business was a multibillion-dollar Ponzi scheme that wiped out thousands of investors and ruined charities.

Authorities said Madoff had carried out the fraud for at least two decades before confessing to his sons in December that his investment business was a fraud and that he had lost as much as $50 billion.

Last week, Ruth Madoff agreed to give up all of her possessions in return for a promise that federal prosecutors would not pursue $2.5 million not tied to the fraud. The money, though, is not protected from civil legal actions that might be pursued by a court-appointed trustee liquidating Madoff's assets or by investor lawsuits.

Ruth Madoff broke her silence Monday when she said in a statement that her husband "stunned us all with his confession and is responsible for this terrible situation in which so many now find themselves."

Before she agreed on a deal with the government to resolve her finances a week ago, Ruth Madoff had indicated through lawyers that she planned to try to keep the penthouse and an additional $62 million in assets as unrelated to the fraud.

Before the fraud was exposed, the Madoffs had homes in Palm Beach, Fla., the south of France and the tip of Long Island along with the midtown Manhattan penthouse. They also traveled by private jet and yacht.

The couple met at their Queens high school and married in 1959. Ruth Madoff worked with her husband when he started his financial business in 1960 and she reportedly still had an office near his when the fraud was exposed.

Madoff has said he operated his fraud without the knowledge of his family.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

Filed by Nico Pitney  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 361
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
09:13 AM on 07/06/2009
Ruth Madoff should also have to give up that $2.5 million she's getting. If people who she and her husband swindled have to go out and get waitressing and other minimum wage jobs at the age of 70, 75 and 80 to survive, Mrs. Madoff should have to waitress, too.
06:11 PM on 07/05/2009
Oh no! They didn't let her keep the fur coat? How will she stay warm in the winter?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ilovedessert
08:50 PM on 07/05/2009
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY DHE DID NOT GO TO JAIL AS WELL. SHE CLAIMED "I WAS ONLY THE BOOK KEEPER, BOOK KEEPER MY FOOT, SHE WAS THE CFO!

AS IN CROCKED FINANCIAL OFFICER!
05:32 PM on 07/05/2009
the rest of the money was stuffed in the coat....that is why she crying
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jalowe1957
Poisonous epitaphs dished out periodically.
05:06 PM on 07/05/2009
So the Feds seized Ruth Madoff's fur coat?

PETA must be howling with laughter over this.
04:21 PM on 07/05/2009
RUTH MADOFF FUR COAT TAKEN BY THE FEDS
I refuse to accuse Ruth Madoff of being intimately involved in her husband's crimes, because I do not know. I, however, question how much she knew, and when she knew it? She was his bookkeeper, and, I assume she had an accounting background. How then did she account for the cash inflows and outflows in the business? Didn't she find it strange that the money rather than being invested, was being used to purchase assets in her huband's name. If I was a prosecutor, I would need Mrs Madoff, to explain, if she ever wondered, where the company got the resources to pay the exhorbitant rates of interest above the market rates, given that the principal was not being invested. The Feds recently cleared her in the investigations, which leads to more questions.
How can a spouse be the bookkeeper of her husband's business, and not find herself asking many questions, or wondering what was the source of the funds used to purchase a $7 million Penthouse, a yacht, a house in France and another in Florida? Was Mrs Madoff naive, or just turned a "blind eye" to the obvious? The investigations supposedly will continue to find out who were the other players in the scheme, and only time will tell what the outcome will be, and if ,and who else were involved. One thing is sure, Bernie Madoff could not successfully run this scheme by himself for so long.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stagebandman
I try to be nice....
03:56 PM on 07/05/2009
Tell you what, Mrs. Madoff, you can keep all of your personal possessions, if you release all the money from your and Bernie's offshore bank accounts, to make restitution to the thousands of people whose lives you have ruined.
03:39 PM on 07/05/2009
In a divorce, the wife is entitled to half even if she did no work in creating the work.

With that said, she is lying when she says that she did not know her husband was running a scheme. Wives know because they get half in cast of divorce.
03:16 PM on 07/05/2009
Given their long, tight relationship, Ruthie most likely was fully aware of Bernie's ponzi scheme. Anyone who thinks otherwise is living in la-la land.
schatsie
Wall Street is Worse than Vegas
03:26 PM on 07/05/2009
Bingo.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:12 PM on 07/05/2009
It really doesn't matter whether she knew or not. If she did know, her complicity, acquiescence, or whatever, would have gotten her indicted. She benefited from her husband's graft, therefore the riches she acquired as a result of this graft should be forfeited. This happens to middle and lower class people all the time. If the breadwinner screws up, doesn't pay bills, etc., it's the family who suffers. Women get divorced when the husband "trades up" and has to adjust to a less opulent lifestyle. The jails are full of men whose family lost house and possessions because of his crime or lack of breadwinning income, etc. Why should the Madoffs be any different?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trueheart
Member, Endangered Species
11:44 PM on 07/04/2009
"NO Ruthie, you can't have that fur coat...."
Does anyone else think she looks like Ralphie in "A Christmas Story?"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tank77
01:30 PM on 07/05/2009
Laughing out Loud. Yes, now that you mention it. She does look like Ralphie. But alas, she has to leave the Red Rider B-B gun for the feds as well. Awww.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trueheart
Member, Endangered Species
02:21 PM on 07/05/2009
And the leg lamp too?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hulagirrrl
06:24 PM on 07/04/2009
Stories like these are supposed to make "us" feel better and believe that justice prevails, while the leeches work the boys in Washington to open the playing field for even more dangerous deregulated scams.
04:02 PM on 07/04/2009
FINANCIAL INDEPENDENCE DAY - STARVE THE BEAST

We're udnergoing a delveraging process. Expect the DJIA to bottom at 5000 or lower.

Americans are starting to come to their senses. The savings rate reached 6.9% last month,
the highest level in 15 years. This brought the level up to the long-term average. As usual,
the pundits on CNBC have concluded that now that we've reached the average, everything is
roses and the consumer can resume their free spending ways and save our economy. These fools
have no concept of history, averages or cycles. The savings rate has been in a downward
spiral for 30 years. Consumers have lost $14 trillion of net worth and 5,000 per day turn
65. Most people have miniscule retirement savings and 14.7 million are unemployed. The
savings rate will go up for the next two decades as people must save.

hat tip to: http://iamned.blogspot.com 4 the good articles
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
munki
Global to Local now Local to Global
02:20 PM on 07/04/2009
We should not judge her by what is reported by news media.

Soon the truth will come out...

Just like to be logical and fair... no opinion, but she did comply as requested.
03:40 PM on 07/04/2009
just remember her furtive efforts to hide money and jewelry. She is a felon like Bernie.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Foodbuff
10:51 PM on 07/04/2009
Give me a break. What silly nonsense
07:53 AM on 07/04/2009
Wear a good republican cloth coat like Pat Nixon did.
01:50 AM on 07/04/2009
Barbaric woman, wearing the carcasses of defenceless animals. How would she like it if she were made into apparel?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martampa
11:15 PM on 07/03/2009
Guess Ruthie will have to dig into the money, that is probably stashed offshore, to get a new winter coat. Of course there is always a Goodwill store!
08:06 AM on 07/04/2009
I hope she does have money stashed somewhere.

$2.5 million is really not very much, especially when you have no house and the government has taken away all of your personal property including clothing.
09:45 AM on 07/04/2009
Give me a friggin break! I don't know what alternate reality you exist in, but in the real world 2.5 mil in your bank account goes pretty far.
05:03 PM on 07/05/2009
oh cry me a river. Are you for real?
11:01 AM on 07/04/2009
Will she be eligible for Section 8 housing? Now that she rides the subway