Federer Breaks Grand Slam Record At Wimbledon

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Federer Breaks Grand Slam Record At Wimbledon stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

HOWARD FENDRICH | July 5, 2009 11:40 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Roger Federer of Switzerland leaps into the air as he defeater Andy Roddick to win the men's singles championship on the Centre Court at Wimbledon, Sunday, July 5, 2009. (AP Photo/Alastair Grant)

WIMBLEDON, England — Roger Federer was playing for history. Andy Roddick was playing the match of his life.

On and on they dueled, Federer trying for a record-breaking 15th major championship, Roddick striving for his second, in a Wimbledon final that required more games than any Grand Slam title match in the considerable annals of a sport dating to the 1800s.

"Ten games all, final set," intoned the chair umpire. Then, "Twelve games all, final set." And, still later, "Fourteen games all, final set."

They were each other's equal for four full sets and nearly the entire 30-game fifth set. Until Federer, far more experienced in such matters, finally edged ahead, breaking Roddick's serve for the only time in the 77th and last game to close out a 5-7, 7-6 (6), 7-6 (5), 3-6, 16-14 victory Sunday.

The epic match _ the fifth set alone lasted more than 1 1/2 hours _ gave Federer his sixth Wimbledon title. Add that to five from the U.S. Open, three from the Australian Open and one from the French Open, and Federer's Grand Slam total rises to 15, one more than Pete Sampras, who flew in from California on Sunday morning to be on hand.

"He's a legend," Sampras said. "Now he's an icon."

Indeed, Sampras already was among those labeling Federer the greatest tennis player ever, and there's no doubt the 27-year-old from Switzerland keeps bolstering his case.

"It's not really one of those goals you set as a little boy," Federer told the Centre Court crowd during the trophy ceremony, "but, man, it's been quite a career. And quite a month."

Story continues below
advertisement

Federer won the French Open four Sundays earlier to complete a career Grand Slam and tie Sampras with 14 major titles (Margaret Smith Court owns the women's record of 24).

"Sorry, Pete," Roddick said. "I tried to hold him off."

He weathered Federer's career-high 50 aces and his 107 total winners in the longest match and longest fifth set in major final history, topping marks set in 1927.

The tennis gods _ as well as Sampras, Rod Laver and Bjorn Borg, all in front-row seats _ must have enjoyed every moment of the 4-hour, 16-minute tussle. Federer, who can make it all look so easy, was forced to work darned hard to eclipse Sampras' mark, and Roddick was left heartbreakingly close to finally winning Wimbledon.

Roddick dropped to 0-3 in finals at the All England Club, also beaten by Federer in 2004 and 2005. After the match ended on a shanked forehand by the sixth-seeded American, the two men hugged at the net. A mere handshake wouldn't do.

The winner donned a specially tailored white jacket with a gold "15" stitched on the back, while the loser _ a word that hardly seems fair in this case _ slumped in his chair, head bowed, until rising to acknowledge the spectators' chorus of "Rodd-ick! Rodd-ick!"

"Sports, or tennis, is cruel sometimes. We know it," Federer said. "I went through some five-setters in Grand Slam finals, too, and ended up losing. It's hard."

A year ago, on the same lawn, Federer's five-year reign as Wimbledon champion ended in a 9-7 fifth set defeat against his nemesis, Rafael Nadal. Six weeks later, Federer relinquished to Nadal the No. 1 ranking after a record 237 consecutive weeks at the top.

But Nadal did not defend his Wimbledon title, citing sore knees, and Federer not only regained his championship at the All England Club _ the Grand Slam he says means the most to him _ but returns to No. 1 Monday.

"It's staggering that I've been able to play so well for so many years now and stay injury-free," Federer said. "I knew what it took to win the big ones. ... It's crazy that I've been able to win so many in such a short period of time."

Sampras _ whose 14th major title came in his last match, at age 31, at the 2002 U.S. Open _ and his wife appeared in the Royal Box during the changeover after Sunday's third game. Walking to the baseline directly below, Federer acknowledged Sampras with a nod of the head and a little wave.

"I thought, 'I don't want to be rude,' you know?" Federer said.

He wept with joy after his first Grand Slam title at Wimbledon in 2003. And he bawled in the locker room after his 40-match winning streak here ended against Nadal in 2008. This time, Federer kept it together, perhaps because he was too exhausted after a match chock-full of contradictions:

_ Federer's ace count was one shy of the Wimbledon record and, most remarkably, 23 more than Roddick, who is better-known for his knee-buckling serves.

_ Roddick broke serve twice in the first four sets; Federer, considered a superior returner, couldn't come through until the match's concluding game.

_ Federer won both tiebreakers; Roddick is the one who began the day 26-4 in those set-capping races to seven points.

Then there was the most counterintuitive piece of all: that Roddick would even stay close, much less be on the verge of victory, given that he came in 2-18 against Federer, including 0-7 at major tournaments.

Roddick made quite clear, quite quickly, that he is a new-and-improved version, delivering four passing winners by the time the match was 13 minutes old _ three with his backhand, long his weaker side.

And he broke Federer to close the first set. It happened suddenly: Federer won 21 of the first 24 points on his serve, but Roddick took three out of four in a blink, earning the last point of that set with a backhand down the line that drew a wide forehand from Federer.

The crowd roared, sensing an upset. There were more rumblings when Roddick, the 2003 U.S. Open champion, went up 6-2 in the second-set tiebreaker. Here, then, were four chances to take a 2-0 lead in sets.

Roddick might have been forgiven for thinking, "Wow, I'm one point away from leading Roger Federer two sets to none in the Wimbledon final." He certainly played as though burdened by looking ahead, letting all four set points slip from his grasp. Most discouraging was the last, when he wildly misplayed a backhand volley. It was part of a six-point, set-ending run for Federer.

How does someone recover from that? Somehow, Roddick did.

"At that point, like everything else, there's two options: You lay down or you keep going," he said. "The second option sounded better to me."

Roddick lost the third set, too, but rallied to take the fourth, and then came the fifth. Wimbledon doesn't use tiebreakers in fifth sets, and there were times it seemed Federer and Roddick would play into the night.

Federer faced a serious test at 8-8, though, when Roddick earned two break points with a backhand winner down the line. Federer saved the first with a 118 mph service winner, and the second with a volley winner. There was not another break point for either man until Roddick served while trailing 15-14.

At deuce, Roddick sailed a forehand long, giving Federer his seventh break point of the match. Until then, he was 0 for 6. But this was also a championship point, and Federer converted.

"Frustrating, at times, because I couldn't break Andy 'til the very, very end," Federer said. "So satisfaction is maybe bigger this time around to come through, because I couldn't control the match at all."

As he enjoyed the first post-victory moments in the locker room _ a more muted celebration than usual, owing to Roddick's presence _ members of the grounds crew entered and presented him with the Centre Court net. Another keepsake for Federer's ever-more-crowded trophy room.

This was the first Wimbledon with a retractable roof on Centre Court, a modern touch for a stadium that opened in 1922.

But this edition of the tournament wound up being almost entirely dry, with only two matches contested with the roof shut. This final was played with the blue sky above. The tennis gods must have wanted a good view.

WIMBLEDON, England — Roger Federer was playing for history. Andy Roddick was playing the match of his life. On and on they dueled, Federer trying for a record-breaking 15th major championship, ...
WIMBLEDON, England — Roger Federer was playing for history. Andy Roddick was playing the match of his life. On and on they dueled, Federer trying for a record-breaking 15th major championship, ...
Filed by Nico Pitney  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
173
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
photo

For those who still think Federer is the better player.. Look at the score, Federer V Roddick 5-7, 7-6, 7-6, 3-6, 16-14, every time Federer wins its by one game, every time Andy wins its by 2 and 3 games. Federer just won by luck and nothing else. Federer may have won, but Andy was the better player by far.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:41 PM on 07/06/2009
- rroy I'm a Fan of rroy 8 fans permalink

I don't quite know how to describe it but,ever since Andy Roddick became a prominant figure in tennis I have looked upon him as a very likeable guy.Maybe it's because of my own partial Slavick ancestry,or his mannerisms remind me of a very long ago personal friend and buddy of mine.
Because of this I have had an interest in his career and always enjoyed watching him play.I chalked up his seeming inability to win many major titles to a somewhat carefree attitude that he couldn't change any more than a tiger could change it's stripes.
But I got a very definate impression that a new Andy Roddick has come on the scene at Wimbledon,a grown up and still very likeable Andy Roddick who from now will and should be taken seriously.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 AM on 07/06/2009

Federer is the greatest gentleman athlete and tennis champion of all times. Americans used to ugliness in Baseball and Basketball will never understand a true gentleman athlete. Shaving the head, wearing earrings and hanging out in strip clubs does not make an athlete.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:55 AM on 07/06/2009
- sizogee I'm a Fan of sizogee 12 fans permalink
photo

That's not really fair.

"Americans used to ugliness in Baseball and Basketball will never understand a true gentleman athlete."

I disagree. I think Tiger Woods is generally considered a "true gentleman". He's rather popular over here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 07/06/2009
photo

Tiger Woods? Now there 's a sportsman made in Heaven. Class, styles, ability, personality, magnetism, good looking, graceful, uncomplicated, open, warm ... well, one can go on forever.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:58 PM on 07/06/2009
photo

Why are Federer fans so sensitive to criticism of their Dandy hero? Is it because they know he possesses no class or personality whatsoever and they need to detract from the fact? He is bringing the game into disrepute with his lack of style and cold reserve. If you are a champion, you should be an all rounder and not just someone who plays well (and sometimes not so well in his case) OK you can fire back as much as you like but I will not honor you with a reply. Only Andy fans will be answered!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 AM on 07/06/2009
- TheBaffler I'm a Fan of TheBaffler 27 fans permalink
photo

"I will not honor you with a reply."

Translation: I've had my rump handed too many times already in this thread, lost every debate, have no facts, just irrational hatred and ad hominem invective, and now I'm taking my ball and going home!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 PM on 07/06/2009
photo

For you dear mental midget, I will make an exception. Can you just elaborate on something rather than hurl abuse. Then maybe we can debate on a respectable level. You are never too old to learn from your superiors

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:04 PM on 07/06/2009
photo

Hey, did you really make 2000 posts? Wow, you must have a lot of time on your hands buddy. take a break, go away for a while, get a life.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:47 PM on 07/06/2009
- ns88 I'm a Fan of ns88 permalink

If you’re a die-hard Roddick or Nadal fan, the chances are you’re more likely to be dismissive of Federer. The brain is wired as such. One is going to amplify any of Federer’s flaws. This is understandable. And Federer is by no means perfect, both as an individual and as a player.

Personally, I like to see Federer win 22 (plus) grand slams. The bigger his reputation, the bigger will be his charitable foundation. The Roger Federer Foundation will help more underprivileged children as a result. His star power will draw more attention and funds to help the kids. I’m more impressed by his altruistic motive than his game, and that’s saying a lot. I give him credit for not falling in the usual trap, getting a trophy wife and partying like a rock star. The only way to find satisfaction after you have been claimed the greatest is to lose yourself in something bigger than yourself. That is, in helping others.

http://www.rogerfedererfoundation.org/en/vision.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 AM on 07/06/2009
- Olampean I'm a Fan of Olampean 9 fans permalink

What a magnificent exhibition of athleticism and competitiveness!

Set 1 - Roddick, Set 2 - Federer, Set 3 - Federer, Set 4 - Roddick. Then Set 5 - back and forth, back and forth, on and on, two titans locked in the drama of a mighty battle. It was spellbinding!

How sad to reflect back on the Women's Final on the day before. In fact, the magnificence of the Men's Final underscored the tragedy of the day before - the match between Serena and Venus Williams, two titans in their own right.

Set 1 - a wonderful battle, back and forth, back and forth, shot after shot, save after save. Then, Set 2 -
pffffffttt­ttttttttt, match over.

When will the tragedy of the 3-Set format for the Women's game be remedied? Equal pay is wonderful, I'm 100% for it.

But when will the sport of Women's Professional Tennis finally realize the discriminatory disservice they perpetrate on the female competitors (and the fans) by denying them the opportunity to express and experience the true competitive spirit that women possess in equal measure to the men, by giving them a 5-Set format within which to do so?!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:58 AM on 07/06/2009
photo

Physically and emotionally women are very different to men. That does not mean they are in any way inferior or less deserving. But a 3 set format seems to be just right for women's tennis until such times as anomalies like the Williams sisters becomes routine. The Williams are an exceptional case of a woman athlete and no surprise they come from the same mold

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 AM on 07/06/2009
- crazyv I'm a Fan of crazyv 8 fans permalink

curious do women run a shorter marathon? Is the 10,000 meters for women only 6600?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:25 AM on 07/06/2009
- ns88 I'm a Fan of ns88 permalink

Federer is the master of geometry. The way he can hit the ball deep or short at such angles is amazing.

When Federer returns Roddick’s serves, it becomes very dangerous. Federer’s footwork and ground strokes kept getting better after each set as he got more into the game.

Roddick played an amazing match as well. However, when Roddick returns Federer’s serves, it’s not exactly at the same threat level as Roger’s.

Thank you both for an excellent final. Looking forward to seeing you both play in the future. And a special thanks to Roger for reminding us that Tennis is not about power but about grace, strategy, and endurance.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:01 PM on 07/05/2009
- RonNYC I'm a Fan of RonNYC 14 fans permalink
photo

and wearing a blazer out to the court to remind everyone that
you are the one!

such an egomaniac. at least he didn't cry this time.
god forbid he loses.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 AM on 07/06/2009
- ns88 I'm a Fan of ns88 permalink

He can wear a crown and carry a scepter for all I care. I’m not in love with Idols or Icons.

I care about the quality of the game.

If you want personality, join match.com.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 AM on 07/06/2009
- tonewheel I'm a Fan of tonewheel 32 fans permalink
photo

Got the feeling from watching the final that the Brits, for whatever reason, couldn't get their arms around Andy. That was pretty clear with the level of applause, timing of applause, etc.

Perhaps it was because he tossed their favorite days earlier?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 PM on 07/05/2009
- may261989 I'm a Fan of may261989 5 fans permalink

I don't think so. Roddick is pretty popular amongst the Brits. He is a good sport and is very polite, he always accepts the call of the other player when they call it out ( once last night on a crucial point where if he had challenged he would have had a break point).
Federer just had the tide of history in his favour, and he also is a nice chap to boot. So it was purely a case of the crowd siding with the sentimental favourite - nothing against Roddick at all.

The only reason the Brits wanted Murray to succede was because he is British... in fact they are now calling him Scottish... He's British while he's winning, when he loses he's a Scotsman.
Murray suffers from the same affliction Tim Henman suffered from.. both were'nt the most pleasing of characters, so once out there is no ill feeling towards the player who beat them, just the all too clear fact that its been 70 odd years since a Brit has one Wimbledon. doh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:41 AM on 07/06/2009
- jimsey I'm a Fan of jimsey 2 fans permalink

That's an odd take to me, because I was surprised by how much support Andy seemed to have v. Federer who the Brits generally like. The commentators even remarked about that, assuming they were just pulling for the underdog.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 AM on 07/06/2009
- OneTop I'm a Fan of OneTop 92 fans permalink
photo

Not Roger's best outing, but it was good enough.

Andy played as well as I have seen him play in quite some time and there is no shame in losing to Mr. Federer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 PM on 07/05/2009
- banja I'm a Fan of banja 7 fans permalink
photo

I have a whole new respect for Andy Roddick, he played his heart out today. Man, he must be very dissapointed today. He will dream about the 4 set points he blew in the second set and the 2 break points at 8/8 in the fifth set. Federer had an easy draw, he didn't play any top 10 players until the final, Djokovic would have given him a fight. Andy Murray would have won today

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 PM on 07/05/2009
photo

The interviews he gave to news stations after the game reflects his disappointment, giving one word answers and appearing very upset. All things considered, he was the better player and he should have won. He should rise above it and look to the future. well done Andy, you are the greatest in a lot of people's books in your ability, humbleness and character .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 PM on 07/05/2009

"All things considered, he was the better player and should have won." What things are you considering, exactly? Federer is the better player, always has been, and the final score bears it out for today as well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 PM on 07/05/2009

are you kidding me, how can he be a better player? look at FedEx record and Andy's...that speaks for it self. and further more, andy is not the humble type. remember when he was playing the US Open some years back, he was trash talking and he even said then that " This is my house"....and he has not win a grand slam title yet! that was a big turn off. he is just all hype, no substance.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:41 AM on 07/06/2009
photo

But you're assuming Murray or Djokovic would have been nerveless in the final. This was apparently what troubled Federer, and I could certainly see both Djokovic, and particularly Murray with the expectations of a home crowd, find a first Wimbledon final rough going as well. Both of them had bad mental wobbles much earlier in the tournament. The only guy that's fearless is Nadal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:25 PM on 07/05/2009

No one's betterer than Roger Federer!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 PM on 07/05/2009
photo

i think the biggest story out of this tournament was roddick... even though i hate the way he plays(he and ivo are the least interesting to watch-no rallies, no strategy other than SERVE) but roddick really played fabulously against murray and federer- two people i though he'd lose in straight sets to.
federer has never lost a final to anyone other than nadal- so this result had to be expected, much roddick may have announced himself as a major player once again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 PM on 07/05/2009
photo

You're right. Roddick's game is somewhat boring even though he played very well today. He's more or less a one-trick pony. The funny thing is that Federer, the finesse player, out-aced Roddick.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:15 PM on 07/05/2009
- IWantTofu I'm a Fan of IWantTofu 16 fans permalink

Roddick's backhand has improved greatly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 PM on 07/05/2009
- GaryNMaine I'm a Fan of GaryNMaine 6 fans permalink
photo

Yes, Roddick has improved his game this year quite a bit. I suspect that his new coach, Stepanic (sp?) can be credited for bringing him along.

In the past, he has had difficulty dealing with players who approached the net--he couldn't pass well. Also, he picked inappropriate times to approach himself. He also was just an average ground stroker and volleyer. Relied to much on his excellent serve.

His new game is well rounded and more interesting to watch. I suspect he will have a much better future thanks to his new skills, and I won't necessarily change the channel to avoid watching his future matches.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:56 PM on 07/05/2009

Andy may have won if he won the second set but it drove me nuts when he kept going up to the net for no good reason. That hurt him so much!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 PM on 07/05/2009
photo

Shows a lack of game plan on Roddicks part which played into the hands of a shrewd opportunist. But still, Andy kept up the pressure one to one with sheer power and determination, which, for my money, shows that he played a better game.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:52 PM on 07/05/2009

Sorry, but Margaret Court has 24 majors. Yes, eleven of them were the Australian open when few big stars played down there and she choked against Bobby Riggs.

Congratulations to Roger, a class act. Roddick played a great match and I hope that he can win Wimbledon next year.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:27 PM on 07/05/2009

Let's get the facts straight. Federer holds the grand slam record for men.

Steffi Graff holds the grand slam (GS) record overall with 22 grand slam titles. Until Roger obtains his 23rd GS title, he is not the greatest GS winner ever….

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 PM on 07/05/2009
photo

comparisons between men's and women's tennis are never easy/ straight forward, as are comparisons between eras. lets refrain from such claims.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 PM on 07/05/2009
photo

I agree with southwindow.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:16 PM on 07/05/2009
- flyers I'm a Fan of flyers 8 fans permalink

Lets get this straight, men play 3 out of 5 sets, women play 2 out of 3 sets, so you can't compare them. That is why they have two different tours.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:57 PM on 07/05/2009

why not let the women play 5 sets too? they want equal pay right?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:47 AM on 07/06/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect