EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Federer Breaks Grand Slam Record At Wimbledon

HOWARD FENDRICH   07/ 6/09 12:40 AM ET   AP

Britain Wimbledon Tennis

WIMBLEDON, England — Roger Federer was playing for history. Andy Roddick was playing the match of his life.

On and on they dueled, Federer trying for a record-breaking 15th major championship, Roddick striving for his second, in a Wimbledon final that required more games than any Grand Slam title match in the considerable annals of a sport dating to the 1800s.

"Ten games all, final set," intoned the chair umpire. Then, "Twelve games all, final set." And, still later, "Fourteen games all, final set."

They were each other's equal for four full sets and nearly the entire 30-game fifth set. Until Federer, far more experienced in such matters, finally edged ahead, breaking Roddick's serve for the only time in the 77th and last game to close out a 5-7, 7-6 (6), 7-6 (5), 3-6, 16-14 victory Sunday.

The epic match _ the fifth set alone lasted more than 1 1/2 hours _ gave Federer his sixth Wimbledon title. Add that to five from the U.S. Open, three from the Australian Open and one from the French Open, and Federer's Grand Slam total rises to 15, one more than Pete Sampras, who flew in from California on Sunday morning to be on hand.

"He's a legend," Sampras said. "Now he's an icon."

Indeed, Sampras already was among those labeling Federer the greatest tennis player ever, and there's no doubt the 27-year-old from Switzerland keeps bolstering his case.

"It's not really one of those goals you set as a little boy," Federer told the Centre Court crowd during the trophy ceremony, "but, man, it's been quite a career. And quite a month."

Federer won the French Open four Sundays earlier to complete a career Grand Slam and tie Sampras with 14 major titles (Margaret Smith Court owns the women's record of 24).

"Sorry, Pete," Roddick said. "I tried to hold him off."

He weathered Federer's career-high 50 aces and his 107 total winners in the longest match and longest fifth set in major final history, topping marks set in 1927.

The tennis gods _ as well as Sampras, Rod Laver and Bjorn Borg, all in front-row seats _ must have enjoyed every moment of the 4-hour, 16-minute tussle. Federer, who can make it all look so easy, was forced to work darned hard to eclipse Sampras' mark, and Roddick was left heartbreakingly close to finally winning Wimbledon.

Roddick dropped to 0-3 in finals at the All England Club, also beaten by Federer in 2004 and 2005. After the match ended on a shanked forehand by the sixth-seeded American, the two men hugged at the net. A mere handshake wouldn't do.

The winner donned a specially tailored white jacket with a gold "15" stitched on the back, while the loser _ a word that hardly seems fair in this case _ slumped in his chair, head bowed, until rising to acknowledge the spectators' chorus of "Rodd-ick! Rodd-ick!"

"Sports, or tennis, is cruel sometimes. We know it," Federer said. "I went through some five-setters in Grand Slam finals, too, and ended up losing. It's hard."

A year ago, on the same lawn, Federer's five-year reign as Wimbledon champion ended in a 9-7 fifth set defeat against his nemesis, Rafael Nadal. Six weeks later, Federer relinquished to Nadal the No. 1 ranking after a record 237 consecutive weeks at the top.

But Nadal did not defend his Wimbledon title, citing sore knees, and Federer not only regained his championship at the All England Club _ the Grand Slam he says means the most to him _ but returns to No. 1 Monday.

"It's staggering that I've been able to play so well for so many years now and stay injury-free," Federer said. "I knew what it took to win the big ones. ... It's crazy that I've been able to win so many in such a short period of time."

Sampras _ whose 14th major title came in his last match, at age 31, at the 2002 U.S. Open _ and his wife appeared in the Royal Box during the changeover after Sunday's third game. Walking to the baseline directly below, Federer acknowledged Sampras with a nod of the head and a little wave.

"I thought, 'I don't want to be rude,' you know?" Federer said.

He wept with joy after his first Grand Slam title at Wimbledon in 2003. And he bawled in the locker room after his 40-match winning streak here ended against Nadal in 2008. This time, Federer kept it together, perhaps because he was too exhausted after a match chock-full of contradictions:

_ Federer's ace count was one shy of the Wimbledon record and, most remarkably, 23 more than Roddick, who is better-known for his knee-buckling serves.

_ Roddick broke serve twice in the first four sets; Federer, considered a superior returner, couldn't come through until the match's concluding game.

_ Federer won both tiebreakers; Roddick is the one who began the day 26-4 in those set-capping races to seven points.

Then there was the most counterintuitive piece of all: that Roddick would even stay close, much less be on the verge of victory, given that he came in 2-18 against Federer, including 0-7 at major tournaments.

Roddick made quite clear, quite quickly, that he is a new-and-improved version, delivering four passing winners by the time the match was 13 minutes old _ three with his backhand, long his weaker side.

And he broke Federer to close the first set. It happened suddenly: Federer won 21 of the first 24 points on his serve, but Roddick took three out of four in a blink, earning the last point of that set with a backhand down the line that drew a wide forehand from Federer.

The crowd roared, sensing an upset. There were more rumblings when Roddick, the 2003 U.S. Open champion, went up 6-2 in the second-set tiebreaker. Here, then, were four chances to take a 2-0 lead in sets.

Roddick might have been forgiven for thinking, "Wow, I'm one point away from leading Roger Federer two sets to none in the Wimbledon final." He certainly played as though burdened by looking ahead, letting all four set points slip from his grasp. Most discouraging was the last, when he wildly misplayed a backhand volley. It was part of a six-point, set-ending run for Federer.

How does someone recover from that? Somehow, Roddick did.

"At that point, like everything else, there's two options: You lay down or you keep going," he said. "The second option sounded better to me."

Roddick lost the third set, too, but rallied to take the fourth, and then came the fifth. Wimbledon doesn't use tiebreakers in fifth sets, and there were times it seemed Federer and Roddick would play into the night.

Federer faced a serious test at 8-8, though, when Roddick earned two break points with a backhand winner down the line. Federer saved the first with a 118 mph service winner, and the second with a volley winner. There was not another break point for either man until Roddick served while trailing 15-14.

At deuce, Roddick sailed a forehand long, giving Federer his seventh break point of the match. Until then, he was 0 for 6. But this was also a championship point, and Federer converted.

"Frustrating, at times, because I couldn't break Andy 'til the very, very end," Federer said. "So satisfaction is maybe bigger this time around to come through, because I couldn't control the match at all."

As he enjoyed the first post-victory moments in the locker room _ a more muted celebration than usual, owing to Roddick's presence _ members of the grounds crew entered and presented him with the Centre Court net. Another keepsake for Federer's ever-more-crowded trophy room.

This was the first Wimbledon with a retractable roof on Centre Court, a modern touch for a stadium that opened in 1922.

But this edition of the tournament wound up being almost entirely dry, with only two matches contested with the roof shut. This final was played with the blue sky above. The tennis gods must have wanted a good view.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST

Filed by Nico Pitney  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 173
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
01:41 PM on 07/06/2009
For those who still think Federer is the better player.. Look at the score, Federer V Roddick 5-7, 7-6, 7-6, 3-6, 16-14, every time Federer wins its by one game, every time Andy wins its by 2 and 3 games. Federer just won by luck and nothing else. Federer may have won, but Andy was the better player by far.
10:59 AM on 07/06/2009
I don't quite know how to describe it but,ever since Andy Roddick became a prominant figure in tennis I have looked upon him as a very likeable guy.Maybe it's because of my own partial Slavick ancestry,o­r his mannerisms remind me of a very long ago personal friend and buddy of mine.
Because of this I have had an interest in his career and always enjoyed watching him play.I chalked up his seeming inability to win many major titles to a somewhat carefree attitude that he couldn't change any more than a tiger could change it's stripes.
But I got a very definate impression that a new Andy Roddick has come on the scene at Wimbledon,­a grown up and still very likeable Andy Roddick who from now will and should be taken seriously.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kiranitisme
Politics
10:55 AM on 07/06/2009
Federer is the greatest gentleman athlete and tennis champion of all times. Americans used to ugliness in Baseball and Basketball will never understand a true gentleman athlete. Shaving the head, wearing earrings and hanging out in strip clubs does not make an athlete.
06:07 PM on 07/06/2009
That's not really fair.

"Americans used to ugliness in Baseball and Basketball will never understand a true gentleman athlete."

I disagree. I think Tiger Woods is generally considered a "true gentleman"­. He's rather popular over here.
07:58 PM on 07/06/2009
Tiger Woods? Now there 's a sportsman made in Heaven. Class, styles, ability, personalit­y, magnetism, good looking, graceful, uncomplica­ted, open, warm ... well, one can go on forever.
10:49 AM on 07/06/2009
Why are Federer fans so sensitive to criticism of their Dandy hero? Is it because they know he possesses no class or personalit­y whatsoever and they need to detract from the fact? He is bringing the game into disrepute with his lack of style and cold reserve. If you are a champion, you should be an all rounder and not just someone who plays well (and sometimes not so well in his case) OK you can fire back as much as you like but I will not honor you with a reply. Only Andy fans will be answered!
photo
TheBaffler
a long the riverrun
08:44 PM on 07/06/2009
"I will not honor you with a reply."

Translatio­n: I've had my rump handed too many times already in this thread, lost every debate, have no facts, just irrational hatred and ad hominem invective, and now I'm taking my ball and going home!
09:04 PM on 07/06/2009
For you dear mental midget, I will make an exception. Can you just elaborate on something rather than hurl abuse. Then maybe we can debate on a respectabl­e level. You are never too old to learn from your superiors
09:47 PM on 07/06/2009
Hey, did you really make 2000 posts? Wow, you must have a lot of time on your hands buddy. take a break, go away for a while, get a life.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:10 AM on 07/06/2009
If you’re a die-hard Roddick or Nadal fan, the chances are you’re more likely to be dismissive of Federer. The brain is wired as such. One is going to amplify any of Federer’s flaws. This is understand­able. And Federer is by no means perfect, both as an individual and as a player.

Personally­, I like to see Federer win 22 (plus) grand slams. The bigger his reputation­, the bigger will be his charitable foundation­. The Roger Federer Foundation will help more underprivi­leged children as a result. His star power will draw more attention and funds to help the kids. I’m more impressed by his altruistic motive than his game, and that’s saying a lot. I give him credit for not falling in the usual trap, getting a trophy wife and partying like a rock star. The only way to find satisfacti­on after you have been claimed the greatest is to lose yourself in something bigger than yourself. That is, in helping others.

http://www­.rogerfede­rerfoundat­ion.org/en­/vision.ht­ml
08:58 AM on 07/06/2009
What a magnificen­t exhibition of athleticis­m and competitiv­eness!

Set 1 - Roddick, Set 2 - Federer, Set 3 - Federer, Set 4 - Roddick. Then Set 5 - back and forth, back and forth, on and on, two titans locked in the drama of a mighty battle. It was spellbindi­ng!

How sad to reflect back on the Women's Final on the day before. In fact, the magnificen­ce of the Men's Final underscore­d the tragedy of the day before - the match between Serena and Venus Williams, two titans in their own right.

Set 1 - a wonderful battle, back and forth, back and forth, shot after shot, save after save. Then, Set 2 -
pffffffttt­ttttttttt, match over.

When will the tragedy of the 3-Set format for the Women's game be remedied? Equal pay is wonderful, I'm 100% for it.

But when will the sport of Women's Profession­al Tennis finally realize the discrimina­tory disservice they perpetrate on the female competitor­s (and the fans) by denying them the opportunit­y to express and experience the true competitiv­e spirit that women possess in equal measure to the men, by giving them a 5-Set format within which to do so?!!!
09:06 AM on 07/06/2009
Physically and emotionall­y women are very different to men. That does not mean they are in any way inferior or less deserving. But a 3 set format seems to be just right for women's tennis until such times as anomalies like the Williams sisters becomes routine. The Williams are an exceptiona­l case of a woman athlete and no surprise they come from the same mold
10:25 AM on 07/06/2009
curious do women run a shorter marathon? Is the 10,000 meters for women only 6600?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:01 PM on 07/05/2009
Federer is the master of geometry. The way he can hit the ball deep or short at such angles is amazing.

When Federer returns Roddick’s serves, it becomes very dangerous. Federer’s footwork and ground strokes kept getting better after each set as he got more into the game.

Roddick played an amazing match as well. However, when Roddick returns Federer’s serves, it’s not exactly at the same threat level as Roger’s.

Thank you both for an excellent final. Looking forward to seeing you both play in the future. And a special thanks to Roger for reminding us that Tennis is not about power but about grace, strategy, and endurance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RonNYC
Ecommerce Professional
12:06 AM on 07/06/2009
and wearing a blazer out to the court to remind everyone that
you are the one!

such an egomaniac. at least he didn't cry this time.
god forbid he loses.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:45 AM on 07/06/2009
He can wear a crown and carry a scepter for all I care. I’m not in love with Idols or Icons.

I care about the quality of the game.

If you want personalit­y, join match.com.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tonewheel
Vote early...and often.
10:29 PM on 07/05/2009
Got the feeling from watching the final that the Brits, for whatever reason, couldn't get their arms around Andy. That was pretty clear with the level of applause, timing of applause, etc.

Perhaps it was because he tossed their favorite days earlier?
12:41 AM on 07/06/2009
I don't think so. Roddick is pretty popular amongst the Brits. He is a good sport and is very polite, he always accepts the call of the other player when they call it out ( once last night on a crucial point where if he had challenged he would have had a break point).
Federer just had the tide of history in his favour, and he also is a nice chap to boot. So it was purely a case of the crowd siding with the sentimenta­l favourite - nothing against Roddick at all.

The only reason the Brits wanted Murray to succede was because he is British... in fact they are now calling him Scottish..­. He's British while he's winning, when he loses he's a Scotsman.
Murray suffers from the same affliction Tim Henman suffered from.. both were'nt the most pleasing of characters­, so once out there is no ill feeling towards the player who beat them, just the all too clear fact that its been 70 odd years since a Brit has one Wimbledon. doh.
02:04 AM on 07/06/2009
That's an odd take to me, because I was surprised by how much support Andy seemed to have v. Federer who the Brits generally like. The commentato­rs even remarked about that, assuming they were just pulling for the underdog.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
OneTop
Uh, is that a beer hall?
10:03 PM on 07/05/2009
Not Roger's best outing, but it was good enough.

Andy played as well as I have seen him play in quite some time and there is no shame in losing to Mr. Federer.
09:36 PM on 07/05/2009
I have a whole new respect for Andy Roddick, he played his heart out today. Man, he must be very dissapoint­ed today. He will dream about the 4 set points he blew in the second set and the 2 break points at 8/8 in the fifth set. Federer had an easy draw, he didn't play any top 10 players until the final, Djokovic would have given him a fight. Andy Murray would have won today
09:48 PM on 07/05/2009
The interviews he gave to news stations after the game reflects his disappoint­ment, giving one word answers and appearing very upset. All things considered­, he was the better player and he should have won. He should rise above it and look to the future. well done Andy, you are the greatest in a lot of people's books in your ability, humbleness and character .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:16 PM on 07/05/2009
"All things considered­, he was the better player and should have won." What things are you considerin­g, exactly? Federer is the better player, always has been, and the final score bears it out for today as well.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TriPod
07:41 AM on 07/06/2009
are you kidding me, how can he be a better player? look at FedEx record and Andy's...t­hat speaks for it self. and further more, andy is not the humble type. remember when he was playing the US Open some years back, he was trash talking and he even said then that " This is my house"....­and he has not win a grand slam title yet! that was a big turn off. he is just all hype, no substance.
10:25 PM on 07/05/2009
But you're assuming Murray or Djokovic would have been nerveless in the final. This was apparently what troubled Federer, and I could certainly see both Djokovic, and particular­ly Murray with the expectatio­ns of a home crowd, find a first Wimbledon final rough going as well. Both of them had bad mental wobbles much earlier in the tournament­. The only guy that's fearless is Nadal.
09:20 PM on 07/05/2009
No one's betterer than Roger Federer!
09:00 PM on 07/05/2009
i think the biggest story out of this tournament was roddick... even though i hate the way he plays(he and ivo are the least interestin­g to watch-no rallies, no strategy other than SERVE) but roddick really played fabulously against murray and federer- two people i though he'd lose in straight sets to.
federer has never lost a final to anyone other than nadal- so this result had to be expected, much roddick may have announced himself as a major player once again.
09:15 PM on 07/05/2009
You're right. Roddick's game is somewhat boring even though he played very well today. He's more or less a one-trick pony. The funny thing is that Federer, the finesse player, out-aced Roddick.
IWantTofu
Evolution. Now a political position.
09:23 PM on 07/05/2009
Roddick's backhand has improved greatly.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
GaryNMaine
Words offer the means to meaning...
09:56 PM on 07/05/2009
Yes, Roddick has improved his game this year quite a bit. I suspect that his new coach, Stepanic (sp?) can be credited for bringing him along.

In the past, he has had difficulty dealing with players who approached the net--he couldn't pass well. Also, he picked inappropri­ate times to approach himself. He also was just an average ground stroker and volleyer. Relied to much on his excellent serve.

His new game is well rounded and more interestin­g to watch. I suspect he will have a much better future thanks to his new skills, and I won't necessaril­y change the channel to avoid watching his future matches.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alexii
08:39 PM on 07/05/2009
Andy may have won if he won the second set but it drove me nuts when he kept going up to the net for no good reason. That hurt him so much!
08:52 PM on 07/05/2009
Shows a lack of game plan on Roddicks part which played into the hands of a shrewd opportunis­t. But still, Andy kept up the pressure one to one with sheer power and determinat­ion, which, for my money, shows that he played a better game.
08:27 PM on 07/05/2009
Sorry, but Margaret Court has 24 majors. Yes, eleven of them were the Australian open when few big stars played down there and she choked against Bobby Riggs.

Congratula­tions to Roger, a class act. Roddick played a great match and I hope that he can win Wimbledon next year.
08:19 PM on 07/05/2009
Let's get the facts straight. Federer holds the grand slam record for men.

Steffi Graff holds the grand slam (GS) record overall with 22 grand slam titles. Until Roger obtains his 23rd GS title, he is not the greatest GS winner ever….
08:55 PM on 07/05/2009
comparison­s between men's and women's tennis are never easy/ straight forward, as are comparison­s between eras. lets refrain from such claims.
09:16 PM on 07/05/2009
I agree with southwindo­w.
08:57 PM on 07/05/2009
Lets get this straight, men play 3 out of 5 sets, women play 2 out of 3 sets, so you can't compare them. That is why they have two different tours.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TriPod
07:47 AM on 07/06/2009
why not let the women play 5 sets too? they want equal pay right?