Social Security number code cracked, study claims

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Social Security number code cracked, study claims stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

RANDOLPH E. SCHMID | 07/ 6/09 05:21 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Ss

WASHINGTON — For all the concern about identity theft, researchers say there's a surprisingly easy way for the technology-savvy to figure out the precious nine digits of Americans' Social Security numbers.

"It's good that we found it before the bad guys," Alessandro Acquisti of Carnegie-Mellon University in Pittsburgh said of the method for predicting the numbers.

Acquisti and Ralph Gross report in Tuesday's edition of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that they were able to make the predictions using data available in public records as well as information such as birthdates cheerfully provided on social networks such as Facebook.

For people born after 1988 _ when the government began issuing numbers at birth _ the researchers were able to identify, in a single attempt, the first five Social Security digits for 44 percent of individuals. And they got all nine digits for 8.5 percent of those people in fewer than 1,000 attempts.

For smaller states their accuracy was considerably higher than in larger ones.

Acquisti said in a telephone interview that he has sent the findings to the Social Security Administration and other government agencies with a suggestion they adopt a more random system for assigning numbers.

Social Security spokesman Mark Lassiter said the public should not be alarmed by the report "because there is no foolproof method for predicting a person's Social Security number."

"The suggestion that Mr. Acquisti has cracked a code for predicting an SSN is a dramatic exaggeration," Lassiter said via e-mail.

Story continues below

However, he added: "For reasons unrelated to this report, the agency has been developing a system to randomly assign SSNs. This system will be in place next year."

The researchers say their report omits some details to make sure they aren't providing criminals a blueprint for obtaining the numbers.

The predictability of the numbers increases the risk of identity theft, which cost Americans almost $50 billion in 2007 alone, Acquisti said.

A problem in the battle against identity thieves is that many businesses use Social Security numbers as passwords or for other forms of authentication, something that was not anticipated when Social Security was devised in the 1930s. The Social Security Administration has long cautioned educational, financial and health care institutions against using the numbers as personal identifiers.

"In a world of wired consumers, it is possible to combine information from multiple sources to infer data that is more personal and sensitive than any single piece of original information alone," he said, warning against providing too much data on social network sites.

Acquisti, who researches the economics of privacy, said he got interested in what could be learned from easily available by looking at social networks, which he termed "a great experiment in self-revelation."

People were willing to include their date of birth and hometown, he said, and he already knew that was part of the information used in issuing Social Security numbers.

So the researchers turned to the SSA's "Death Master File," which lists the numbers of people who have died. The purpose of making that file public is to prevent impostors from assuming the Social Security numbers of deceased people.

But by plotting the data for people listed on the file between 1973 and 2003 the researchers were able to develop patterns for number issuance.

"I was surprised by the accuracy of certain predictions," Acquisti said.

The system can produce a range of possibilities for the last four numbers, making it easier for a computer to test the possibilities until the correct number is found for an individual, Acquisti explained.

In addition, "attackers can exploit various public- and private-sector online services, such as online "instant" credit approval sites, to test subsets of variations to verify which number corresponds to an individual with a given birth date.

While it was well known that the numbers have a geographic component, past studies have used the patterns plus other data to estimate when and where a specific number may have been issued.

"Our work focuses on the inverse, harder, and much more consequential inference: it shows that it is possible to exploit the presumptive time and location of SSN issuance to estimate, quite reliably, unknown SSNs," Acquisti said.

The research was supported by the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Army Research Office, Carnegie-Mellon University and the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center.

___

On the Net:

http://www.pnas.org

WASHINGTON — For all the concern about identity theft, researchers say there's a surprisingly easy way for the technology-savvy to figure out the precious nine digits of Americans' Social Securi...
WASHINGTON — For all the concern about identity theft, researchers say there's a surprisingly easy way for the technology-savvy to figure out the precious nine digits of Americans' Social Securi...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
1348
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (18 pages total)

I am often vehemently opposed to higher levels of intrusiveness for the purpose of security... but maybe it's time for some of those bio-thumbprint thingees

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:15 AM on 07/07/2009
- voter42 I'm a Fan of voter42 7 fans permalink

Your ssn was and remains vulnerable. Those statements you receive yearly, are processed by a contractor, not SSA. At one time SSA was considering giving the contract to prisoners. Only in the last few years has SSA removed the full ssn from the statement.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:39 AM on 07/07/2009
- S1m0n I'm a Fan of S1m0n 105 fans permalink
photo

How would they know if they found it before the bad guys? The bad guys don't tend to issue press releases.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:23 AM on 07/07/2009

Those people born after 1988, whose numbers can be guessed--will there BE Social Security for them?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:10 AM on 07/07/2009
- LillianB I'm a Fan of LillianB 9 fans permalink

Quote: "It's good that we found it before the bad guys".

Doesn't hold water.

First of all, you don't know the bad guys haven't found it. Wouldn't announce it, just use it, right?

Second of all: You are now telling the bad guys HOW to find it, in case they haven't already. In case of the latter, you're telling MORE of the bad guys how they can find it, too.

Geeh, the intelligence you must be in possession of, computer guys....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:06 AM on 07/07/2009

I'm not sure which is scarier: knowing that my SS number can be guessed, or knowing that you thought it was a good idea to tell everyone how to do it...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 AM on 07/07/2009
- rf-hawaii I'm a Fan of rf-hawaii 27 fans permalink

Positively medieval. Social Security Numbers need to have real security added. A personal PIN at the very least.

Duh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:21 AM on 07/07/2009
photo

Guess how many Jelly Beans are in the jar.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 AM on 07/07/2009
- S1m0n I'm a Fan of S1m0n 105 fans permalink
photo

How DID american consumers allow banks and credit companies to create a system in which it is the consumer's obligation to maintain secrecy of a number which safeguards their accounts? And that this number is also one they have tell a fairly wide range of others, from employers to banks to credit providers, making this secret impossible to keep?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 AM on 07/07/2009
- rf-hawaii I'm a Fan of rf-hawaii 27 fans permalink

It's called inertia. The original system worked okay for a while, until we outgrew it. Problem is it's going to cost lots to fix and the banks don't want to pay for it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 AM on 07/07/2009
- S1m0n I'm a Fan of S1m0n 105 fans permalink
photo

..And they won't, until you manage to make it their problem. In my opinion, I pay my bank to look after my money. If someone cons them into giving him money by exploiting the flaws in a system they designed, they just gave away THEIR money, not mine.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:43 AM on 07/07/2009
- loki I'm a Fan of loki 144 fans permalink
photo

I dont think the problem of guessing the numbers, or even using someones number is as big as the problem of no one checking to verify the number goes with the person trying to use it. If they would just run a check, and see that number 888999000 is for john smith, but the person who is trying to use the same number for a job or a loan has a completely different name, it might slow up a lot of illegal use. But companies say it would be to time consuming to do this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 AM on 07/07/2009
photo

Noyournot wrote:
will give you a primer. .....
Our system becomes overburdened with unemployment claims and welfare claims and our system crashes in on itself. in June. 500,000 people were unemployed and that number is growing exponentially every single day. HOW LONG DO YOU THINK WE CAN SUSTAIN THIS?
------------------
Labor Force (those employed and unemployed) do not support your “exponential” statement.
http://www.bls.gov/ro6/fax/cps_tx_us.pdf

This Data table (June 2009) states the total size of the US labor force is 154.9 million. 140.2 are employed and 14.7 million unemployed. The number and percentage for unemployed is growing. The June numbers indicate a 1 tenth of 1 percent change in the U/E rate. (written .10) as compared to May. That is not, in my opinion, an “exponentially” rate of growth.

IMO U/E rate is still a significant measure of the problems in the US economy; a “lagging” indicator- namely the economy improves long before this rate improves. To support that statement:
Please look at this historical table:
http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?data_tool=latest_numbers&series_id=LNS14000000

Graph and table showing the BLS and unemployment rates monthly.

NOTE: monthly unemployment rates for 2001 recession -started in March 2001. A relatively “short” recession ( # months), but unemployment rate still continued to increase after the recession was “over” and GDP grew. Was 4.3 % in March 2001 and peaked at 6.3% in June of 2003 - 26 months later.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 AM on 07/07/2009
- D-V-H I'm a Fan of D-V-H 454 fans permalink
photo

Consider the source. She thinks that we'll all start spending money we don't have in order to reverse the recession.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 AM on 07/07/2009
photo

Please clarify, as to "consider the source"? is that referring to me?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 AM on 07/07/2009
- openlids I'm a Fan of openlids 30 fans permalink
photo

i guess mine every time someone asks for it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 AM on 07/07/2009
- chasethis I'm a Fan of chasethis 244 fans permalink
photo

I give up for the evening. Nothing is posting correctly.

ConservHippie: Re: As I assume the ________ in your hypothesis is "below the belt."

No, I just ran out of creative juice and genuinely hoped someone would fill in the blank.

TJoad--I know the back roads out of McAlester. Go serpentine.

Happy trails.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 AM on 07/07/2009
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

slashdot is having a much more interesting and coherent discussion about this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 AM on 07/07/2009
photo

This is an interesting and coherent discussion. Don't you think?

696-69-6969.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 AM on 07/07/2009
- Ponderus I'm a Fan of Ponderus 338 fans permalink
photo

The new main is the biggestpieceofcrapbsstory I've seen here in weeks. And if those are really lefties on the thread, they're swallowing it hook, line and sinker. I'm ashamed of my own brethren.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 AM on 07/07/2009
- D-V-H I'm a Fan of D-V-H 454 fans permalink
photo

This type of story comes out all the time. When we here from the WH, they say the complete opposite of what was reported.
I have decided to take more wait-and-sees.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 AM on 07/07/2009
- chasethis I'm a Fan of chasethis 244 fans permalink
photo

Some of us breathlessly react at everything without looking deeper, vetting the sources, waiting for the updates, corrections, retractions. Patience is a virtue.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 AM on 07/07/2009
- chasethis I'm a Fan of chasethis 244 fans permalink
photo

correction..."react to"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:10 AM on 07/07/2009
photo

Why has it taken me this long to fan and fave you Ponderus?
Guess may be I will ponder on that question ........

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:18 AM on 07/07/2009
photo

,,,,nice. :)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 AM on 07/07/2009
photo

The biggest threat to the Obama agenda on energy and health care? The ConservaDems.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/06/the-biggest-threat-to-oba_n_226715.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 PM on 07/06/2009
photo

I agree. BTW how were you able to successfully post a link to a H-----P_____ link, every time I've tried to do that its scub a dub city.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 AM on 07/07/2009
photo

I don't know. It doesn't always work. It may still get scrubbed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 AM on 07/07/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (18 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect