Francis Collins, Obama's Pick For NIH Chief

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Francis Collins, Obama's Pick For NIH Chief stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

LAURAN NEERGAARD | 07/ 8/09 08:24 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Francis Collins

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is choosing an influential scientist who helped unravel the human genetic code _ and is known for finding common ground between belief in God and science _ to head the National Institutes of Health.

Obama called Dr. Francis Collins "one of the top scientists in the world" in announcing his nomination Wednesday.

"His groundbreaking work has changed the very ways we consider our health and examine disease," Obama said.

The NIH is the nation's premiere medical research agency, directing $29.5 billion to spur innovative science that leads to better health. Collins, an early gene-hunter, would come to the job not just with the scientific credentials, but with a reputation for translating the complexities of DNA into language the everyday American can understand.

The folksy Collins led the Human Genome Project that, along with a competing private company, mapped the genetic code _ or, as he famously called it, "the book of human life."

"It is humbling for me, and awe-inspiring, to realize that we have caught the first glimpse of our own instruction book, previously known only to God," he said at a 2000 White House ceremony marking release of the genome's first draft.

For that work, he was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the highest civilian award. But he may be more widely known for his 2007 best-selling book, "The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief."

And this spring Collins, 59, was named one of GQ Magazine's "Rock Stars of Science," posing in cool shades as part of a publicity campaign to bring celebrity to science.

Story continues below

John Porter, a former Republican congressman from Illinois who now chairs the health advocacy group Research!America called Collins "a perfect choice."

"He knows the science and he is an outstanding leader," Porter said.

Collins promises to make the NIH's important work more understandable not only for patients but for lawmakers who hold the agency's purse strings, said American Heart Association President Dr. Clyde Yancey.

"The real advantage he brings is the ability to translate deep and complex science to the lay population ... in a meaningful way that allows it to be tangible and actionable," he said.

Collins has discovered numerous genes important for diseases, including the one that leads to cystic fibrosis.

But the true power of genetics, he told a meeting of scientists in Washington last month, has yet to be realized as researchers eventually learn enough to provide customized predictions of which diseases really threaten an individual, and personalized care to respond.

Today, "you can get fancy DNA tests for hundreds of dollars," Collins told The Endocrine Society meeting _ but your better bet for now may be a simple family tree of health, checking what ailments Mom, Dad and Grandpa had to predict your own future. "That's a free genetic test of great power."

NIH is familiar turf: Collins spent 15 years as the NIH's chief of genome research, before stepping down last year to, among other things, work with Obama's campaign. He also helped found the BioLogos Foundation, a Web site formed by a group of scientists who say they want to bridge gaps between science and religion.

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is choosing an influential scientist who helped unravel the human genetic code _ and is known for finding common ground between belief in God and science _ to...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is choosing an influential scientist who helped unravel the human genetic code _ and is known for finding common ground between belief in God and science _ to...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
829
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
- RuinedSaint I'm a Fan of RuinedSaint 149 fans permalink
photo

At least he's not a Creation Cultist; those folks think The Flintstones was a documentary.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 PM on 07/08/2009
- Babele I'm a Fan of Babele 34 fans permalink
photo

LMAO!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 PM on 07/08/2009
- therblig I'm a Fan of therblig 39 fans permalink
photo

Kneel before Gazoo!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 PM on 07/08/2009
- KQuark I'm a Fan of KQuark 267 fans permalink
photo

LOL good one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 PM on 07/08/2009
- Gib I'm a Fan of Gib 31 fans permalink

We can be grateful for small mercies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:31 AM on 07/09/2009

Collins comes up on this classic talk between Maher and Dawkins at around 3 min.:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tRpbkpNpgw

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:51 PM on 07/08/2009
photo

Yeah. The problem with this discourse is that it is such a personal attack...and it is no less absolute, narrow and 'religious" in its claim for atheism.

Einstein believed in God, was he a fool?Tolstoy, Pascal, David Bohm (sort of) etc. it really is a personal and individual characteristic and some even claim there is a God gene.

Maher really tries to reduce the argument into a black and white issue and it's offensive to anyone with a brain...believing in God doesn't mean believing in a "talking snake". Genesis is another creation myth like so many in various cultures and in fact it is made up of two different creation myths.

Propagation of faith is a problem but Maher is as narrow as those he is attacking.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:27 PM on 07/08/2009
- ipv4 I'm a Fan of ipv4 15 fans permalink

Einstein did not believe in God in the theistic sense he believe in the nature and the laws that govern it.

Nah , Maher has it right in regards to religion, what makes him narrow minded??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 PM on 07/09/2009
- jcause28 I'm a Fan of jcause28 30 fans permalink
photo

Science is a method. It brings on progress in the natural world. However, it should never be a position or it falls victim to some of the more negative aspects of religion. Not every Christian is a fundamentalist. Making science a position is immature, and goes against the very nature of the method. Collins evidently understands this. I see very little difference between those who try to convert others to their religious view wether it be atheism or christianity or whatever. There will always be religion, and lack there of. The only answer is tolerance for other's personal ideas as long as they do not create direct harm. So instead of outrage at Obama picking an obviously intelligent scientist, perhaps people should get out there and work on the progress of tolerance. People rarely by militant practices, they just become more steadfast and militant themselves. So in turn, many of these so called rationalists act irrational by making the problem they are trying to solve worse.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:47 PM on 07/08/2009
- ipv4 I'm a Fan of ipv4 15 fans permalink

Atheism is not a religion, I had to stop reading right there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:51 PM on 07/08/2009

Facts of nature are facts. Science is merely a method/tool to translate those facts into human language.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 PM on 07/08/2009
- Tazru I'm a Fan of Tazru 63 fans permalink
photo

I agree!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:16 PM on 07/08/2009
- TFlint I'm a Fan of TFlint 42 fans permalink
photo

Always stop reading before you learn something you don't want to know.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 PM on 07/08/2009
- harriscrl3 I'm a Fan of harriscrl3 191 fans permalink

Its not a religion but most importantly its a BELIEF system LIKE RELIGION. The fact that you dont believe in religion doesnt make your belief system any better than someone who does. We need to respect people's choices and differences.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 PM on 07/08/2009
- Babele I'm a Fan of Babele 34 fans permalink
photo

Science is not always a method. It is also fact and it is also law.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:51 PM on 07/08/2009

Facts of nature are facts. Science is merely a method/tool to translate those facts into human language.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 PM on 07/08/2009
- Tazru I'm a Fan of Tazru 63 fans permalink
photo

If I work for the progress of Science, i can also work for tolerance. I am not so confident that faith can work for the progress of Science. I want out of the Dark Ages we have been in for 30 years, I do not see how this will help.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:51 PM on 07/08/2009
- Kalarchis I'm a Fan of Kalarchis 4 fans permalink
photo

It'll help because religion is the reason for those 'Dark Ages,' and the only way to fix that is to bring science to religion. If we show religion that science is okay, it'll stop rejecting it.

Or, if we reject religion for the sake of science, as you seem to want to, then religion will only continue to reject science.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 PM on 07/08/2009
- AtheistUS I'm a Fan of AtheistUS 84 fans permalink
photo

He will not be working for progress of science. This is quite bureaucratic position, basically streaming NIH operations and money. This is not NSF. I wish him good luck and to do good work in there.

Science is not compatible with blind beliefs, including a belief in a god or gods.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 PM on 07/08/2009
photo

Don't you see there are huge variations in Christianity? Many liberal mainline protestants are as appalled as you are with what has happened over the past 30 years. I would even argue it is even *worse* for us because our beliefs have been hijacked to support policies we see as profoundly unchristian. Because of that abuse I have to face your vitriol when issues like this crop up.

Collins worked for Obama during the campaign. He is probably on your side in most non-religious maters. He might be a Christian but he is certainly on the side of science and the Democratic agenda.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:23 PM on 07/08/2009
- TFlint I'm a Fan of TFlint 42 fans permalink
photo

Not every Christian is a Christian. In fact, few are.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 PM on 07/08/2009
- Gib I'm a Fan of Gib 31 fans permalink

A very apt comment. Common sense is not all that common, either.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:34 AM on 07/09/2009
- YEHWEH I'm a Fan of YEHWEH 136 fans permalink
photo

"Obama Taps Man Who Unraveled Human Gene Code" So, he had sex with him?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 PM on 07/08/2009
- Kalarchis I'm a Fan of Kalarchis 4 fans permalink
photo

To all the people saying he's a bad scientist because he believes in God:

Issac Newton was incredibly religious. He believed he was chosen to God to decipher the scripture. Guess we should throw out his laws of motion, universal gravitation, and all of the other things he did for science, huh?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 PM on 07/08/2009
- Kalarchis I'm a Fan of Kalarchis 4 fans permalink
photo

"chosen by God," sorry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:47 PM on 07/08/2009
- ipv4 I'm a Fan of ipv4 15 fans permalink

Nope, we shouldn't, but you still did a good job missing the point.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 PM on 07/08/2009
- Dave24 I'm a Fan of Dave24 14 fans permalink
photo

It's a problem when the religion interferes with the science. Newton's alchemy and belief in God had absolutely nothing to do with the laws of motion, etc. But Collins' rhetoric about mixing the two is dangerous ---- he's a great scientist, but his beliefs are unscientific.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 PM on 07/08/2009
- Kalarchis I'm a Fan of Kalarchis 4 fans permalink
photo

I disagree. Science and religion can mix quite well, as it did for Newton. There are many people, like you, who think that science undoes God. But, there are many people for whom Science + God = only harmony.

Just because you're one of the former doesn't mean the latter are 'dangerous.'

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 PM on 07/08/2009
- Babele I'm a Fan of Babele 34 fans permalink
photo

Most scientists believe in god. As long as their ignorance doesn't interfere with the science, it will all be fine.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 PM on 07/08/2009

"Most scientists believe in god."

I am not so sure about that... but there are still plenty of scientist left who do.

:-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 PM on 07/08/2009
- AtheistUS I'm a Fan of AtheistUS 84 fans permalink
photo

This is incorrect.

90+% of members of our National Academy of Sciences are atheists or at least agnostics. Please google it and get the numbers.

Do not post your own wild guesses.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:16 PM on 07/08/2009
- Patricia84 I'm a Fan of Patricia84 22 fans permalink
photo

No, they don't.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 PM on 07/08/2009

Newton lived in a different era.

Believing that there is a magic creature that created humanity and that it had a human son with super powers who walked on water is the very definition of irrationality. It is undeniably absurd. It doesn't mean everyone who believes this is a fool or should have their entire work discredited, but the belief itself is utterly ridiculous.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 PM on 07/08/2009
- Kalarchis I'm a Fan of Kalarchis 4 fans permalink
photo

Is it really? Or is it just absurd by current standards? Obviously, it wasn't absurd when Newton was around. What we 'know' changes all the time, and sometimes the 'impossible' suddenly becomes possible.

People thought that the Earth going around the Sun was utterly ridiculous. Who knows what new information might arise that changes our opinion of God?

Really, I agree with you that God doesn't make sense, but I just love playing devil's advocate on this topic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:14 PM on 07/08/2009
- Tazru I'm a Fan of Tazru 63 fans permalink
photo

I am going to go barf now, the Dark Ages aren't over yet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 PM on 07/08/2009
- JulieSA I'm a Fan of JulieSA 165 fans permalink
photo

If we started screening government job applicants by their religious beliefs, we would be back in the dark ages.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 PM on 07/08/2009
- Tazru I'm a Fan of Tazru 63 fans permalink
photo

We already do, and we are in the Dark Ages, they started with Saint Ronald Raygun.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 PM on 07/08/2009
- AtheistUS I'm a Fan of AtheistUS 84 fans permalink
photo

This is what is done anyway.

Nobody can seriously assume that an open atheist can take an important government office in US.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 PM on 07/08/2009
- harriscrl3 I'm a Fan of harriscrl3 191 fans permalink

Thank you and Amen pun intended and you point to my fundamental problem with progressives. Being religious is a choice people make just like being non religious is a choice I make. Yes we need to make an attempt to keep religion out of our politics but we need to remember human beings are human beings they dont exist in a vacuum they come with values with culture we need to be aware of them NOT insist that people become blank slate. Our values our identity shape our world and we need to STOP insisting that people throw away their values because its NOT gonna happen. We need to aware of them not hide them. Hiding them is when they become dangerous.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:32 PM on 07/08/2009

Oh please.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:19 PM on 07/08/2009
- Patricia84 I'm a Fan of Patricia84 22 fans permalink
photo

Einstein view on God: "I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals Himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with fates and actions of human beings" and yes that is the Spinoza that was widely seen as the most infamous atheist-heretic of Europe.

You can find more quotes : http://www.einsteinandreligion.com/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 PM on 07/08/2009

By the time of Einstein that concept had long been accepted. No big deal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 PM on 07/08/2009
- AtheistUS I'm a Fan of AtheistUS 84 fans permalink
photo

Yes, you can name Nature and beauty by word 'God' - that is all that is there about god in Einstein views.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:19 PM on 07/08/2009
- Gib I'm a Fan of Gib 31 fans permalink

In fact I think you could simply subsitite "creation" for "creator".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:35 AM on 07/09/2009
photo

Perhaps this mixture of Science and Religion is a decent idea in bringing those so Fe_arfu1 of Science into an understanding of it, is just what we need right now.

Science and Education can deliver massive improvements to our society if it is allowed to make open progress!

If those skeptical of its benefits can have their eyes opened then the progress will come FAR sooner!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:41 PM on 07/08/2009
- mjeffn I'm a Fan of mjeffn 27 fans permalink

I'm skeptical.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:20 PM on 07/08/2009
- dugmaze I'm a Fan of dugmaze 38 fans permalink
photo

Dr. Collins is a perfect fit. He is the missing link between religion and science.

I'm not real religious but I do realize there is a God. I have to be proven things which religion has a hard time doing. So how about somewhere in the middle.

President Obama is fresh breath of air compared to Bush. You just wait and watch science take off.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:41 PM on 07/08/2009
- ipv4 I'm a Fan of ipv4 15 fans permalink

Yea , you realize this??? hmmmmm.. I guess you have seen him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 PM on 07/08/2009
- Babele I'm a Fan of Babele 34 fans permalink
photo

Amazing how some people receive a personal invite to actually meet god. I have been asking for years and it never comes. I guess my ego isn't big enough.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 PM on 07/08/2009
- Tazru I'm a Fan of Tazru 63 fans permalink
photo

YOW, I can't even look anymore!!! I feel sick!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 PM on 07/08/2009

There is no "middle ground" between science and faith. They are completely orthogonal. You can have faith, do science or any combination of those. Dr. Collins is not an ideal fit, merely a popular one. He won't do any worse than most other picks would have, but he will hardly do better, either.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 PM on 07/08/2009
- Tazru I'm a Fan of Tazru 63 fans permalink
photo

Well I guess you are better at stradling those 2 universes then, I don't have faith in that idea.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 PM on 07/08/2009
- AtheistUS I'm a Fan of AtheistUS 84 fans permalink
photo

Good comment. I agree with you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 PM on 07/08/2009

"There is no "middle ground" between science and faith."

I agree insomuch as neither can make a claim with regards to the other, but too often this type of thinking is extended to ight-wing Christians disavowing facts such as the age of the Earth, and atheists and agnostics labeling anyone who maintains religious faith an ignoramus. There is no middle ground to be found because the two do not exist on the same plane, but it is also true that one can accept the knowledge that science provides us while maintaining a faith in the supernatural.

I have seen Dr. Collins speak in person on more than on occasion, and his scientific credentials are beyond reproach. Anyone with familiarity with his work recognizes that he does not allow his religious faith to interfere or guide his exploration of science and utilization of the scientific method to further man's understanding of the natural world. Similarly, one also recognizes that he does not view a supernatural faith as contradictory to the study of the nature and order of our world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:35 PM on 07/08/2009
- AtheistUS I'm a Fan of AtheistUS 84 fans permalink
photo

"He is the missing link between religion and science." - this link does not exist. These two endeavors are not compatible.

"I'm not real religious but I do realize there is a God." - and I realized that there is Santa.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 PM on 07/08/2009
- Squaker I'm a Fan of Squaker 2 fans permalink

I would not have picked a scientist who spends much of his time speaking on supernatural theories instead of natural science

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 PM on 07/08/2009
- Patricia84 I'm a Fan of Patricia84 22 fans permalink
photo

I agree.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 PM on 07/08/2009
- BN2112 I'm a Fan of BN2112 69 fans permalink
photo

Me too!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 PM on 07/08/2009
- Redfox834 I'm a Fan of Redfox834 3 fans permalink
photo

I agree, but at least he's against ID.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 PM on 07/08/2009
- Tazru I'm a Fan of Tazru 63 fans permalink
photo

Those are not even theories, they are faith-based ideas. There is no data of any kind to back them up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 PM on 07/08/2009
- igotthis I'm a Fan of igotthis 6 fans permalink

Of course, you wouldn't. You don't believe in God! But you cannot dispute Dr. Collins's scientific talent and brilliance. So get use to it. There are a lot of us in the world who love science and love a God who created all the wonderful scientific wonders of the earth and of the universe. Thank you President Obama on a great choice!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 PM on 07/08/2009
- BN2112 I'm a Fan of BN2112 69 fans permalink
photo

With all due respect, how can you claim to love science and love God? A god that only exists in people's imaginations and an ancient book with absolutely NO empirical evidence whatsoever. I'm with Dawkins on this one--religion makes claims about the universe they absolutely cannot back up with scientific evidence.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 PM on 07/08/2009
- Tazru I'm a Fan of Tazru 63 fans permalink
photo

I have been "getting used to it" for over 50 years now. I would very much like to have my voice matter without the screen of what religion I believe in. I practice a religion, no belief required, just work.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 PM on 07/08/2009
- AtheistUS I'm a Fan of AtheistUS 84 fans permalink
photo

Dr. Collins is more known for his organizational talent.

And, of course, association with religion pays off pretty well when one applies to a high government office.

But, anyway, he will be there not to do science but to manage NIH. Hopefully he will do reasonably good job.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 PM on 07/08/2009
- Mixpixlix I'm a Fan of Mixpixlix 24 fans permalink

A belief in God and a belief is science are not at odds, in fact they are wonderfully compatible and I'm an agnostic!

Einstein was a believer, so was Salk and Curie and many of the most famous names in science. Unraveling the secrets of tine inner and outer universe is to give God's gilft of curiousity and intelligence full run. As I said to teenager long ago just because we know how somehting is done doesnt mean it's not a miracle. Antibiotics is one example. Lasers and even tragically the atom bomb are all excludes of man's intellignece uncovering part of the grand design of the universe.

I believe, God, if one does exist, is quiet pleased with these efforts. And, far less pleased with the creationists and other who refuse to see the bounty laden table he's laid out before them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 PM on 07/08/2009
- ipv4 I'm a Fan of ipv4 15 fans permalink

Eistein was not a believer. This is a false meme that has been spread about by theist for decades.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:38 PM on 07/08/2009
- Patricia84 I'm a Fan of Patricia84 22 fans permalink
photo

You're probably an agnostic theist. And Einstein was not a believer. He thought religion was childish.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:38 PM on 07/08/2009
photo

Wrong. Einstein was not a believer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:41 PM on 07/08/2009
- Redfox834 I'm a Fan of Redfox834 3 fans permalink
photo

Einstein never believed in any personal God he was a pantheist who revered the universe. On one occasion he spoke highly of Buddhism, an Agnostic religion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 PM on 07/08/2009
- Patricia84 I'm a Fan of Patricia84 22 fans permalink
photo

He wasn't a pantheist.
"The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. "No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this," Einstein to Eric Gutkind, January 3, 1954.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 PM on 07/08/2009
- Tazru I'm a Fan of Tazru 63 fans permalink
photo

Why do people need to spread these myths?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 PM on 07/08/2009
- Redfox834 I'm a Fan of Redfox834 3 fans permalink
photo

Fundamentalists like to start rumors that certain highly educated individuals or devout atheists were closet believers or recant on their deathbed. Fundamentalist like to quote Einstein's "God does not play dice!" and imply he was refering to their God (Be it the Lutheran God, Catholic God, Mormon God, Protestant God, Calvinistic God, Angelican [Episcoplean] God, et al) in order to make them sound more intellectual.

Although I am sure you are aware of this and just asked in exasperation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 PM on 07/08/2009
photo

I've never seen such hateful people. Because he believe in God all of sudden he's not a scientist?

This is absurd. If that's the case, your child science teacher needs to be an atheist....

Why don't yall Shut Up!

We finally got a director at NIH that can talk "laymen" terms for public/private funding so the medical community can make new discoveries.

Which means

MORE MONEY $$$$

MORE JOBS $$$$

BETTER LIFESPAN $$$$

US JOBS$$$

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 PM on 07/08/2009
- Tazru I'm a Fan of Tazru 63 fans permalink
photo

Sure it's no big deal to you, but it matters very much to some of use who wanted Change.

This is just more faith-based Science.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 PM on 07/08/2009

Read his book and them comment!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 PM on 07/08/2009
- bluesky3 I'm a Fan of bluesky3 5 fans permalink

Agreed. Barf.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 PM on 07/08/2009
- jcause28 I'm a Fan of jcause28 30 fans permalink
photo

For a self proclaimed Buddhist, you seem to be lacking the patience and tolerance that the Buddha taught. He said question everything, even what he said... not trash everything because you disagree with it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 PM on 07/08/2009
- Kalarchis I'm a Fan of Kalarchis 4 fans permalink
photo

Faith-based science is science too. Newton believed very, very strongly in God, but that didn't stop him from working on gravity, now did it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 PM on 07/08/2009
photo

Imagine this, an administration appointing a real scientist.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 PM on 07/08/2009
- Tazru I'm a Fan of Tazru 63 fans permalink
photo

Not exactly, look at the book he wrote in 2007!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:32 PM on 07/08/2009
photo

"Obama Taps Man"

somewhere sean hannity is hyperventilating

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:25 PM on 07/08/2009
- BMK I'm a Fan of BMK 8 fans permalink
photo

The real question is, how much does he owe in back taxes?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 PM on 07/08/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect