Frank Ricci: GOP To Showcase Firefighter Sotomayor Ruled Against

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Frank Ricci: GOP To Showcase Firefighter Sotomayor Ruled Against stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS | 07/ 9/09 09:10 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.,right, Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., center, and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y, left, speak on the nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on Capitol Hill, Thursday, July 9, 2009, in Washington. (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)

WASHINGTON — Republicans will use next week's high-profile Senate hearings for Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor to raise concerns about her record on race, gun rights and abortion while Democrats work to defend President Barack Obama's first high court choice as a mainstream judge who sticks to the law.

The two parties offered glimpses Thursday of their strategy going into the weeklong Judiciary Committee hearings that open Monday, announcing outside witnesses who will testify about Sotomayor. Republicans' list of 14 includes New Haven, Conn., firefighter Frank Ricci, a white employee whose reverse discrimination claim was rejected by Sotomayor in an appeals court decision.

Ricci challenged the city's decision to scrap the results of a promotion test because too few minorities scored high enough to qualify. Sotomayor was part of a panel that rejected Ricci's challenge. The Supreme Court reversed that ruling last week.

Republicans point to Sotomayor's decision as evidence she might let her personal and political views _ particularly a belief in racial preferences for minorities _ influence her decisions. They'll also call Ben Vargas, a Puerto Rican firefighter who scored highly on New Haven's promotion exam and was the lone Hispanic joining Ricci in his lawsuit.

Democrats said they've scheduled Sotomayor's mentors, confidantes and other allies, including civil rights leaders and several witnesses who come with GOP credentials. The goal: to portray Sotomayor as a mainstream judge with fans across the ideological spectrum. Among their 15 witnesses are Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau, her first boss after law school; New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who ran as a Republican but became an independent in 2007; Louis Freeh, the former FBI director first named to the federal bench by President George H.W. Bush; and Michael J. Garcia, a former Manhattan U.S. attorney who was appointed by President George W. Bush.

If confirmed _ as is widely expected _ the appellate judge, 55, would be the first Hispanic and the third woman to serve on the nation's highest court.

But first Sotomayor has to endure days in a marble-paneled hearing room under harsh television lights, fielding questions from the 19 senators on the Judiciary panel as the public watches. Behind the scenes, she's cramming for the hearings, which will include at least two days of intense question-and-answer rounds with senators. The outside witnesses will weigh in later, and Sotomayor won't be present.

Among the GOP representatives are Sandy Froman, a National Rifle Association board member and past NRA president who has urged senators to oppose Sotomayor, calling her hostile to the Second Amendment. Also on the Republican list is Charmaine Yoest, head of the anti-abortion rights group Americans United for Life, which says Sotomayor has a "pro-abortion agenda."

Story continues below
advertisement

Liberals expected to testify on Sotomayor's behalf include Wade Henderson, head of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights; Theodore Shaw, former president of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund Inc.; and Democratic Reps. Jose Serrano and Nydia Velazquez, New Yorkers of Puerto Rican descent.

Sotomayor was on Capitol Hill on Thursday for the first time in weeks, meeting with newly sworn-in Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., the most junior member of the Judiciary Committee. She appeared cheerful as she chatted with him before their private talk, telling reporters her broken ankle was feeling much better.

Meanwhile, Republicans previewed the tough treatment she can expect at next week's hearings, keeping up a steady stream of criticism about her record. The Senate's Republican leader, Kentucky's Mitch McConnell, cited an article she wrote raising questions about the propriety of private campaign contributions, and an appellate court ruling in which a panel she joined upheld Vermont's strict limits on raising and spending campaign money.

"Over the past several weeks, we've heard about a number of instances in which Judge Sotomayor's personal views seem to call into question her evenhanded application of the law," McConnell said.

Several of the Senate's Democratic women defended Sotomayor.

"Judge Sotomayor's developed a record as a moderate judge who agrees with her more conservative colleagues far more frequently than she disagrees with them," said New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand.

As Democrats worked to show Sotomayor isn't biased, an independent research group released a new study showing that as a trial judge, she typically handed out tougher prison sentences than her colleagues in the federal courthouse in Manhattan, especially to white-collar criminals.

Nearly half the people Sotomayor sentenced for financial fraud and other white-collar crimes received at least six months in prison, according to an analysis by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University. By contrast, roughly one out of three white-collar convicts received similarly lengthy prison terms from the other trial judges in the Southern District of New York, the study found.

Sotomayor served as a trial judge from 1992 to 1998, when she joined the federal appeals court in New York.

TRAC looked at 7,750 criminal cases handled by 52 judges during that period. Sotomayor presided over 261 of those prosecutions. TRAC obtained the data from the Justice Department under the federal Freedom of Information Act.

___

Associated Press Writer Mark Sherman contributed to this report.

___

On the Net:

Senate Judiciary Committee: http://judiciary.senate.gov/

WASHINGTON — Republicans will use next week's high-profile Senate hearings for Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor to raise concerns about her record on race, gun rights and abortion while Dem...
WASHINGTON — Republicans will use next week's high-profile Senate hearings for Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor to raise concerns about her record on race, gun rights and abortion while Dem...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
922
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (22 pages total)
photo

Ricci suffered injustice and he is angry, we can understand his frustration. He's a common man, and we can't expect him to look long term good for the country.

That being said, Sotomayor should be confirmed. She committed a mistake, but no human is perfect, if you vet any prolific judge you would find one or two disagreeable decisions. Both parties use these tactics to oppose nominees. Sotomayor is very qualified, she knows the law as well as practical application of the law.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 AM on 07/12/2009
- bmora I'm a Fan of bmora 6 fans permalink
photo

Ummkay, reverse discrimination is bad. Ummkay.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 AM on 07/10/2009
photo

She also ruled FOR employees (geologists) and against oil companies because they were colluding to keep wages down.

That is why they hate her: she is not a reliable shill for big business 100% of the time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:45 AM on 07/10/2009
- Appleton I'm a Fan of Appleton 47 fans permalink

Apparently Joe the Plumber had a previous engagement.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:38 AM on 07/10/2009
- The Ghost I'm a Fan of The Ghost 47 fans permalink
photo

The Cry Bay Party picks a Cry Baby to speak for them.

DUH?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 AM on 07/10/2009
- 113 I'm a Fan of 113 7 fans permalink

this whole case is yet another example of the angry white male

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 AM on 07/10/2009
photo

They are feeling threatened. The world is inching toward equality for al.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:46 AM on 07/10/2009
- rf dude I'm a Fan of rf dude 20 fans permalink
photo

Poor "al" - it's all he ever really wanted...
--

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 AM on 07/10/2009
- Petey131 I'm a Fan of Petey131 27 fans permalink

So?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:00 AM on 07/10/2009
- imsosure I'm a Fan of imsosure 26 fans permalink
photo

blah blah blah,so what, like it'll make any difference. People are much more informed with the current access to information, this is nothing more than good ole bot politics trying to run off a very qualified person. I'd bet it won't make any difference.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:33 AM on 07/10/2009
- Whinger I'm a Fan of Whinger 44 fans permalink
photo

GOP strategy, accuse others of being exactly what they themselves are!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:30 AM on 07/10/2009
photo

I don't think, The Republicans can't help them selves, this behavior is the very essence of who they are, and what they stand for,

They really don't understand what they are doing, Latino's are and ever growing demographic.

When the dust settles, We will have nothing left but the remnants of a broken party, Republicans will have solidified their position as a permanent minority party,

This is a fight they can't win! Their time has passed!

Bring It On !!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:23 AM on 07/10/2009
- bobo5 I'm a Fan of bobo5 12 fans permalink

Why doesn't the GOP bring forth gays who have won medals and have been fired from the military?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 AM on 07/10/2009
- RRonin I'm a Fan of RRonin 19 fans permalink
photo

Ahh, White Men, the new oppressed minority!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 PM on 07/09/2009
- stevi I'm a Fan of stevi 3 fans permalink

This picture, you have chosen to run with this headline, is horrible. This is not a warm fuzzy picture of a sympathetic man. I wonder if that was deliberate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 PM on 07/09/2009
- PKatherine I'm a Fan of PKatherine 7 fans permalink
photo

so agreeing with your point. Your probably outraged about the cover of the New Yorker of Sotomeyor??? hmm?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:43 AM on 07/10/2009
- chronic I'm a Fan of chronic 69 fans permalink
photo

Joe the Plumber meet Frank the Firefighter.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 PM on 07/09/2009
- dancucich I'm a Fan of dancucich 12 fans permalink

UFCrock wrote:


"Good, It was ridiculous for her to dismiss the case without hearing it and then writing a crappy one-paragraph opinion."
----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­--------

UFCrock, Judge Sotomayor was one judge a panel of three judges hearing the case.
She did not unilaterally decide not to write a long opinion.

By the way, the trial court judge wrote a 48 page opinion explaining why she ruled against the firefighters. Judge Sotomayor's panel simply upheld that 49 page ruling-which explained their reasoning very well.

Anyone who doesnt understand after reading a 49 page ruling,
probably does not not *want * to understand.

That being said, I am glad Mr Ricci prevailed-The city should not be allowed to change the rules
after the game.

But, that was not Judge Sotomator's fault. She had to deal with the law as it was at that time; She was not free to just make new law-which is what the Supreme Court did.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 PM on 07/09/2009
- guajiro I'm a Fan of guajiro 59 fans permalink

"But, that was not Judge Sotomator's fault. She had to deal with the law as it was at that time; She was not free to just make new law-which is what the Supreme Court did."

Which if I remember correctly, the inconsistent conservatives are always wailing about, that judges shouldn't make decisions, just follow the law. Well, here we have a prime example of conservative hypocrisy; they're upset at her because she followed the law instead of making new law.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 AM on 07/10/2009
- SlinkyTWF I'm a Fan of SlinkyTWF 13 fans permalink
photo

Yep. I love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:18 PM on 07/10/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (22 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect