Juan Williams Calls Out Bill Kristol For Using Health Care "Scare Tactics" (VIDEO)

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Juan Williams Calls Out Bill Kristol For Using Health Care "Scare Tactics" (VIDEO) stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Huffington Post
First Posted: 07-12-09 06:09 PM   |   Updated: 07-13-09 05:18 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

On "Fox News Sunday" today Juan Williams criticized fellow panelist Bill Kristol for using what he called "scare tactics" in making the case against the current health care reform plan.

Get HuffPost Media On Facebook and Twitter!

On "Fox News Sunday" today Juan Williams criticized fellow panelist Bill Kristol for using what he called "scare tactics" in making the case against the current health care reform plan. ...
On "Fox News Sunday" today Juan Williams criticized fellow panelist Bill Kristol for using what he called "scare tactics" in making the case against the current health care reform plan. ...
Loading...
 
Report Corrections
 
Comments
1039
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (16 pages total)
- WIKANDER I'm a Fan of WIKANDER 6 fans permalink
photo

Way to Go, Juan! This week on the JOURNAL, Bill Moyers spoke with Wendell Potter, a former health insurance executive who left the industry to become an advocate for health care reform. Potter discussed the industry’s history of denying care to members and its extensive efforts to prevent the federal government from creating a “public option” for health insurance to compete with private plans. Check it out on NPR.org!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 PM on 07/13/2009
photo

I agree, it's very worthwhile hearing/reading what Wendell Potter said. A good interview. He clarified the issue for me that the pro-private-mouths are trying to obscure and confuse.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:15 PM on 07/13/2009
photo

I notice Bill gets to make an uninterrupted statement, but when it's Juan's turn, it's good cop/bad cop. Fair and balanced.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:35 PM on 07/13/2009
- Jalel Art I'm a Fan of Jalel Art 2 fans permalink
photo

This is often the case at Faux News.

See - it works this way...after they offer a one-sided opinion, any opposition to their diatribes is equally rebuked for a "balanced and often fair" attack. That way - they can use that mantra - fair and balanced - without feeling guilty for not delivering on what they say they offer.

Recovering alcoholics call it denial.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:10 PM on 07/13/2009

feeling guilty?! lol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:45 PM on 07/13/2009
photo

One of several reasons I don't waste my time watching that program any more. A bunch of bullys.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:20 PM on 07/13/2009
photo

It's such a poor argument by the rightwing.

It's a simple choice.

Who do we trust to decide what treatment we get:

Insurance companies or the people we actually vote to put in office?

I for one wouldn't trust an insurance salesman over the person I voted into office to provide me with expensive healthcare.

And neither do the other 70% of Americans who want a public plan.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 07/13/2009
- Kanuk1 I'm a Fan of Kanuk1 3 fans permalink
photo

so you think that your congressman has a better idea as to what treatment you should get for a particular ailment?????? what planet do you live on?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 07/13/2009
- biglover I'm a Fan of biglover 43 fans permalink

Yes, he does - far better than the insurance companies do. I'll trust my congressman over them anyday.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:49 PM on 07/13/2009
- aftershock I'm a Fan of aftershock 101 fans permalink

"so you think that your congressman has a better idea as to what treatment you should get for a particular ailment??????"

And you think the clerks filing your claims do? Personally I don't trust either but the idea that insurance companies are looking out for people is just laughable. I'm in the middle of fighting a $1500 dental bill right now because my insurance provider claims I went to a dentist who doesn't participate in their plan, even though the dentist is listed on the search function of the dental website. I've even printed and sent a copy of the page from the insurers website it very clearly has the dentist listed as a preferred provider and they're STILL denying the claim

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:50 PM on 07/13/2009
- TEHelms I'm a Fan of TEHelms 13 fans permalink

I don't think you understand. Rather than the congressman or the insurance company making the diagnosis it would be the doctor and the patient!

Wow, now try that on for a concept and stop trying to play make believe that the government would make those decisions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:00 PM on 07/13/2009
- NOV42008 I'm a Fan of NOV42008 10 fans permalink

As long as I get the plan they have. Don't the people pay for their health care plan, then he can pay for mine, and I am garanteed he wouldn't want to be wasting his money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:03 PM on 07/13/2009
- aftershock I'm a Fan of aftershock 101 fans permalink

"I for one wouldn't trust an insurance salesman over the person I voted into office to provide me with expensive healthcare."

I wouldn't trust EITHER.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 PM on 07/13/2009
- Lark817 I'm a Fan of Lark817 12 fans permalink

No one gets between me and my doctor because without insurance, I can't afford to have one. If I did have insurance, they would be between me and my doctor and could possibly limit my choice of doctors.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 07/13/2009

Right there with ya Lark. I work my tuchas off in a hot kitchen and can't afford insurance to see a doctor about my bum knee or any of my other problems. My options are to A) quit work all together so I qualify for medicaid and be labeled a welfare bum or B) get another job so I can finally afford insurance, which may or may not cover me anyway, and then not ever have the time to see a doctor, and/or lose both jobs when my health becomes so poor from being overworked, and therefore lose my insurance too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:15 PM on 07/13/2009

Kristol apparently knows more than whole countries that have national medicine and ignores that private medicine is part of the White House plan. It's the selective references to the Obama plan that conservatives are jumping on. Get a grip: this is about expanding health care, not eliminating private health care. These are not the same concepts.

Note to Kristol: you have a low score on being right about anything you've pontificated on during the last year. Tone it down.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:11 PM on 07/13/2009
photo

Kristol thinks Sarah Palin should be president, so basically his views aren't worth anything.

His ignorance is actually a danger to our country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 PM on 07/13/2009
- Whitley2009 I'm a Fan of Whitley2009 129 fans permalink
photo

Go get''im, Juan. Kristol has failed in over 80% of his predictions in the past year. He is a failure, losing buyers of his little articles, and he is having his last gasps at working as a national "authority" on anything.

I regard him as a Chicken Hawk who never served, but is very quick to order your kids into combat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 PM on 07/13/2009

Guys,
Please please take a second and think.
We are over complicating this issue.

How much does a doctor make every year ?
Lets assume $250,000.
Thats $125/Hour.

How long does each of your visit with the doctor last ?
15 Mins. Thats ~$30.

That is what I mean by Direct pay system. Just like you would pay for a Lawyer or any other service.

You need insurance ONLY for "Catastrophic and emergency issues". And since you eliminated a bulk of visits by the "Direct Option", this premium will be much lower than current level making it more affordable.

If government want to make it insentive for doctors and help poor, lets allow doctors take deductions for any person they help for "Free".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:54 PM on 07/13/2009

My family is already on a direct pay system, only we call it "not having insurance".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 PM on 07/13/2009
- BarryS I'm a Fan of BarryS 34 fans permalink
photo

some capitalist you are. how aboiut overhead:rent, utilities, supplies, staff. when did any doctor you go to charge $30?? 30 years ago?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 PM on 07/13/2009
- biglover I'm a Fan of biglover 43 fans permalink

$30 is most people' co-pay if they have insurance. Otherwise most people either pay the $150 or $200 visit or don't go. That's the problem here but you and kanuki don't seem to have the intelligence to understand

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:52 PM on 07/13/2009
photo

And I want a unicorn.

You don't get everything you want.

Right now you have a choice between sticking with the private murder for profit system or a public option.

Those are your choices.

Anything else is just ignoring reality... and ignoring reality ends up killing people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 PM on 07/13/2009

How long does each of your visit with the doctor last ?
15 Mins. Thats ~$30.

That is what I mean by Direct pay system. Just like you would pay for a Lawyer or any other service.
_________________________________________________

Boy, do you not get economics. The doctor's hourly fee is only a small part of the cost of a visit to a clinic. What about the salaries of nurses, administrators, receptionists and maintenance staff? What about the cost of equipment and supplies, rent or building mortgages? This is the type of fuzzy math that has got our country into the deep doodoo it's in.

A typical visit to my doctor may take just 15-20 minutes, but without insurance it's fee for service at the door, starting at $150 per visit. And you can add to that the cost of any lab work, x-rays or other tests. You can't even shake the doctor's hand and say hello for thirty bucks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:52 PM on 07/13/2009
- aftershock I'm a Fan of aftershock 101 fans permalink

"How much does a doctor make every year ?
Lets assume $250,000.
Thats $125/Hour."

You're missing a lot of costs in there for starters, and that salary is average is probably quite low.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:06 PM on 07/13/2009
- expired I'm a Fan of expired 26 fans permalink

Health Care: The Public Plan Option

These Democratic Senators have NOT agreed to support it:
Senator Blanche Lincoln (D-AR)

Senator Tom Carper (D-DE)

Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA)

Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR)

Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL)

Senator Ben Nelson (D-NE)

Senator Mary Landrieu (D-LA)

Senator Kent Conrad (D-ND)

Senator Max Baucus (D-MT)

Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)

Senator Evan Bayh (D-IN)

Senator Mark Pryor (D-AR)

Senator Joe Lieberman (I-CT)

These names are reported by The Hill here and here

Update: Senator Kay Hagan (D-NC) says she supports a public option.
Update: Senator Jeff Binghaman (D-NM) says he supports a public option.

You can also contact the White House and voice your opinion
Comments: 202-456-1111
Switchboard: 202-456-1414

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:28 PM on 07/13/2009

Why can we not have an agreement between the patient and the doctor, Period ?

Why do we need an insurance company of government to be the middle man.

Guys, please please think.

Government and insurance company are the WASTE in our health care system. They add NO value.

If they were helping, they would not be making money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:37 PM on 07/13/2009
- thisisntme I'm a Fan of thisisntme 2 fans permalink
photo

That would be nice, the problem is who's going to pay for it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 PM on 07/13/2009
- biglover I'm a Fan of biglover 43 fans permalink

It used to be that way until the insurance companies decided that doctors were making too much money and they wanted to control the costs of health care. In the meantime, these health insurance folks made billions off our backs, something the sheeple of the thug party don't get.

Why do you think the health insurance companies don't want this health care reform. They want to keep racking in the billions on our backs. Go to pbs.org and look for Bill Moyers and watch his show this past Friday. He speaks to Wendell Potter who was a big whig at Cigna and left because he had an ephihany. You should watch the show

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 07/13/2009
- joceeco I'm a Fan of joceeco 19 fans permalink
photo

Vote the above listed Senators out of office, and you will see America's economy progress at a much faster pace.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:23 PM on 07/13/2009
photo

For curiosity's sake:

I've read more than a few comments on here mocking healthcare reform. I'll direct my question toward those of you who feel as though everyone is fine the way we are now...

As a nation that has 250M adults, 30M (not mentioning 15M children) of which are not insured/covered by a medical plan, how do you propose we as a nation take care of these individuals? Should we not?

Honestly. Nothing rhetorical about this question at all. Please respond with ideas.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:34 PM on 07/13/2009

Why do you want insurance for everything ?

Why can we not have a system where we directly pay the doctors for things like common flu, viral infection, pregnancy, dental, fractures, etc ?

And have insurance only for the catastrophic and emergency health issues ?

Dems and republicans have one thig in common with their proposals, "INSURANCE".

That is whats wrong with the health care in this country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:41 PM on 07/13/2009
photo

Where did I write that I want insurance for everything?

I wrote nothing about what I want.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:44 PM on 07/13/2009

That would work fine if an office visit for the flu ran $50 or less like it did 25 years ago. But it doesn't. Just walk in the door without insurance and see what the tab is, $200 at least.
Do you have that kind of money to throw around, especially with 3 children who will each pass the flu to the next?

And forget a yearly checkup. Without insurance, that runs $700-$900, not counting the blood work, which runs over a thousand. Or the mammogram, which runs over a thousand counting the x-rays and radiologist. You must have great insurance or are independently wealthy if you have no idea what a terrible burden not having health insurance is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:25 PM on 07/13/2009
- BarryS I'm a Fan of BarryS 34 fans permalink
photo

that's right: single PAYER, to PAY the doctors.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 PM on 07/13/2009
- biglover I'm a Fan of biglover 43 fans permalink

You put pregnancy in that category. Pregnancy is a very dangerous thing. Women are at high risk during pregnancy and especially at child birth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 PM on 07/13/2009
- NOV42008 I'm a Fan of NOV42008 10 fans permalink

Ok, lets say I have insurance for castastrophic and emergency, I go to the hospital thinking I am having a heart attack, the doctor say it is not, the bill for the emergency is $1,000.00, but the insurance want pay it because it was not deemed castastrophic, but I can't afford the $1,000.00. So the next time, I think I am having a heart attack, do I go, or do I not, because I can't afford the cost?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:26 PM on 07/13/2009

Look at Europe and Canada. If it is working there, what is wrong with Americans especially the Republicans. The docs. in America are worried thier salaries would be capped. Why then take the Hippocratic Oath if they do not have the patients interest at heart but dollar signs in their eyes. This system is working in many countries, even the third world countries, execpt in America. Sad.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:47 PM on 07/13/2009
- catgirl212 I'm a Fan of catgirl212 14 fans permalink
photo

Face it the problem is about our culture. Did you see Sicko? The British doctor lives a good life, an nice apt. a BMW, etc. but he knows that there are limits and that just b/c he is a doctor should not expect more houses, more cars and more junk!!!!! We are the most superficial, materialistic, egocentric country. We are going to suffocate in our own filth!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:09 PM on 07/13/2009
- norgotoad I'm a Fan of norgotoad 7 fans permalink

I have to agree with Catgirl. Our culture is based upon ignorance as a strength and intense short sighted self interest. Add to that the John Wayne cowboy myth of "just sucking it up ," and we have American culture. Health care requires planning, and seeing issues beyond our volitional autism. But most Americans are cognitively incapable of planning. We prefer to manage by crisis. Health care catastrophes must happen to us PERSONALLY. Then, and ONLY then, do we "get it." Immediate PERSONAL tragedy is the only thing that radicalizes. But since it is a personal issue, nobody else really sees any crisis at all. We have a "too bad for you" attitude riding on the cowboy myth of rugged stoicism that gets weak at the knees with personal tragedy. So the health care tragedy will be played endlessly on a person by person basis, and nothing will change. Unfortunately, not enough Americans aren't OK with this. And the corporate right wing machine will win. Soo.. there will be no significant health care reform any time soon.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:57 PM on 07/13/2009
photo

All they have to do is make medicare for ages 61 and under...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:30 PM on 07/13/2009

Has Bill Kristol been right about ANYTHING?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:32 PM on 07/13/2009
- Golfer59 I'm a Fan of Golfer59 10 fans permalink
photo

NO and what the heck is with that damn "Nasaly" Laura Ingram??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:37 PM on 07/13/2009
- catgirl212 I'm a Fan of catgirl212 14 fans permalink
photo

No.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 PM on 07/13/2009
- norgotoad I'm a Fan of norgotoad 7 fans permalink

NO. The Republican right wing has been 100% wrong on everything. But the conservative media, yeah CONSERVATIVE corporate media are bound and determined to cram their lies down our throats anyway. Per their hero Dr. Goebbels, "repeated lies become truth." That is what they are counting on. And it has usually worked.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:01 PM on 07/13/2009

The best basic health care is found in the military & those doctors, etc., haven't put their hypocratic oath on the market & they & and their families live well.
Remember when we were young, felt ill, went to the local doctor, got some medicine, & mother gave it to us for a couple days? When it was gone, mother said that the doctor said NOT to give any more. Nowadays, when we go to a doctor & get some medicine, we are on that medicine for the rest of our lives!
Americans ought to get the same basic health care we got in the military paid for by tax dollars with individuals & families having the option of purchasing advanced health care packages of varying types.
About ten years ago the British pound dropped when actuaries discovered that the British pensioners are now living 15 years longer on average. Why? Maybe they don't have the stress & worry about their health care & spend less time in emergency rooms for routine medical needs than we do.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:32 PM on 07/13/2009

Remember the days when you went to the doctor and paid his/her directly for his services ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 PM on 07/13/2009
- Paganus I'm a Fan of Paganus 11 fans permalink
photo

No.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:02 PM on 07/13/2009

I do. I didn't have insurance. So I didn't go unless I was desperately ill. Then I couldn't buy food for weeks. Are you from Canada or an EU country or are you just a troll?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:28 PM on 07/13/2009

Librals are "NUTS" and Rebublicans are "SLIMY".

"NUTS"
For people to even think that we should not have "Profits" in healthcare is "NUTS". Doctors, Medical Assistants, Technologists, Nurses, etc have a family to feed. They live in the same world as we do where they see price fluctuations (Inflations). Every human being is driven in some way by the financial benefits associated with his/her work. Even if we have government provided/Single payer healthcare, wouldn't the employees/doctors want a year-year increase in their salary/benefits ?
Would anyone of you take a pay freeze for the rest of your life ? That is how insane this idea is. Hence it called these people "NUTS"

"SLIMY" - The republicans keep harping about some government bureaucrat making decisions for us. Yet they fail to mention that with today's system, we have an insurance agent making that decision for us. Doctors are scared of the Insurance company. The patient is not the consumer but a cow to scare and then milk it. This is deceit and hence I call them "SLIMY".

Individual Health Care is not complicated. He needs doctors and physicians, Patients trust and belief in God.

This idea of spreading healthcare cost by providing health care INSURANCE for all is absurd.

By following a "Direct Pay & Emergency Insurance" path will may have some (~10 Mil) poor who will be left behind. Guys 10 Million out of 300 Million is NOTHING. We can help them through charity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:23 PM on 07/13/2009

Hi, I'm "NUTS", in the state of Minnesota, where I live, every health insurance company, MUST, by state law be a nonprofit organization. Most hospitals systems in the state are nonprofits as well. Everyone in the health care business still gets paid a salary and people still receive care, profit doesn't enter into the equation. In fact, for various reasons, I would go as far as to say that health care in Minnesota works better, has better outcomes, and costs less.

High deductible insurance programs are a nonstarter, inexpensive, granted, but totally useless for those with chronic hereditary health issues beyond their control. It also makes one have to pay for quality of life procedures like gastric bypass surgery, which is not an easily absorbed cost all one time at $20K. Then there is the quality of life that could be expected for the 10 million who are left behind? Unable to work, need a procedure to improve your quality of life and you are poor? Well tough, you don't have money and you aren't as valuable as a person as an executive working 100 hours a week who is managing to flush his company and the economy down the tubes.

During an economic downturn to the amount of donations to charities goes down and the number of people needing help from charities goes up, especially after the government has fails to provide for and cuts back on those services. That is why your plan does not work.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:36 PM on 07/13/2009
- biglover I'm a Fan of biglover 43 fans permalink

Hi Nuts. I like Nuts. Much better than slimy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 PM on 07/13/2009
- A Bobby I'm a Fan of A Bobby 2 fans permalink

Ok, if we go by what you are saying that I rather be NUTS like the NUTS in France, GB, Canada, Japan, Germany and even some third world countries.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 07/13/2009

My doctor is a businessman who has the usual overhead that businessmen have. In the medical building his office in, is a clinic that does bloodwork and uninalysis and another that does x-rays. They send him results. There are about 8 other doctors in this medical building and an afterhours clinic for evenings and weekends. He is not a salaried civil cervant earining an annual salary. He does however charge the governent a negotiated fee for each office visit, but that is the limit of the government's "intrusion" to how he runs his practise.


My late husband was diagnosed with advanced lung cancer. He was given 3 - 6 months to live. He had chemo and when that stopped working, he was given trial drugs that kept him going enough that he volunteered as a blacksmith and made 2 trips back to his hometown to say good bye. He was diagnosed in November 2004, he died in November 2006.

I live in Ontario, Canada. Access to healthcare is a right of everyone, some pay premiums if they are making a lot of money. Healthcare is cheaper here because the administrative costs are less, less litigeous, seek care before our illnesses become life threatening and almost all women get prenatal care. Are there problems, sure, for some quality of life operations there are waiting lines, getting to see a specialist can be a bit of a chore first time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:17 PM on 07/13/2009

Lets get something straight here. Individuals, other than the extremely wealthy, are NOT making their own choices about which medical procedures are covered today. Insurance companies are. The insurance company's primary goal is profit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:41 PM on 07/13/2009
- Totto I'm a Fan of Totto 43 fans permalink

Finally! Repeat several times a day.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 PM on 07/13/2009
photo

Thank you! Conservatives act like we don't have bureaucrats making these choices already! As long as health is for sale somebody is gonna take a loss - and right now it's us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 PM on 07/13/2009
- iskra I'm a Fan of iskra 170 fans permalink
photo

Actually they aren't making choices.

Deny all claims then see who fights hard enough. Easier than picking and choosing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 PM on 07/13/2009
- tbonehead I'm a Fan of tbonehead 15 fans permalink

rationing is the biggest part of the current system: 1) try to get coverage w/a pre-condition
2) who decides what procedures are going to be covered, regardless of what your doctor thinks 3)
try to get coverage for an alternative therapy that works, and the drug or insurance cos. haven't ordained it. I'm fighting w/insruance co re: pain shots taken after car accident; they want to tell me how much pain I suffered. Rationing! RatiONING! RATIONING! PLEASE!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:06 PM on 07/13/2009
- catgirl212 I'm a Fan of catgirl212 14 fans permalink
photo

Good point. Next time the Repubican talking point comes up, "do you want a bureaucrat making choices for you?" the retort should be, do you want a profit hungry, business men make medical choices for you?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:17 PM on 07/13/2009
- azureblue I'm a Fan of azureblue 19 fans permalink

our congress critters get free, government run socialized health care- the best. And our soldiers also get free, government run, socialized care, both in service and after.
Why can't we? I'd be willing to pay for mine, even.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 07/13/2009
- Anasazi I'm a Fan of Anasazi 10 fans permalink
photo

When the Republican members of Congress get their health care, do they turn to Blue Cross?

No!

They sign up for FEHB coverage http://www.opm.gov/insure/health/eligibility/index.aspp], then tell you the government can't administer your healthcare coverage!

Cognitive dissidence.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 PM on 07/13/2009
- HomerJFong I'm a Fan of HomerJFong 2 fans permalink
photo

I think you mean 'Dissonance', although your version does offer some comedic potential vis a vis the folly of governmental groupthink...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 07/13/2009
- biglover I'm a Fan of biglover 43 fans permalink

Good catcj HomerJ.Fong

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:01 PM on 07/13/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (16 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect