China Protests: Police Kill 2 Uighurs, Wound A Third

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - China Protests: Police Kill 2 Uighurs, Wound A Third stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

GILLIAN WONG | 07/13/09 09:12 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
China Protest

URUMQI, China — Police fatally shot two Uighur men Monday and wounded a third in western China, where violence has persisted despite the massive numbers of troops sent to restore calm more than a week after deadly ethnic rioting.

It was the first time the Chinese government has acknowledged that its security forces opened fire since communal violence hit Urumqi, the capital of the restive Xinjiang region, on July 5. At least 184 people have been reported killed and another 1,680 wounded.

The midafternoon shooting sent frightened residents scurrying into homes and shops for cover and bystanders hitting the ground. The incident underscored how far authorities are from imposing order between the Muslim Uighurs and the Han Chinese, the majority ethnic group.

Despite the tens of thousands of security forces sent into Urumqi, they have yet to end the violence.

State Department spokesman Ian Kelly said the United States had officials in the region but was still gathering information about what was happening.

"We are urging China to handle the situation as they go forward in a transparent manner," Kelly said. "As they work to restore order, we believe that it's important that they respect the legal rights of all Chinese citizens."

He called on China not to put restrictions on Uighurs' religious activity.

An official with the Urumqi city government, who gave his surname as Fan, said police on patrol about 2:55 p.m. had seen three Uighur men attacking a fourth Uighur with long knives and batons. When they tried to break up the fight, the three turned against the officers, he said.

Story continues below
advertisement

"The police fired into the air for warning, but it's not effective. Therefore, the police shot them, according to law," Fan said. Two of them died on the spot while the wounded man was taken to the nearby People's Hospital, where his condition was unknown.

The gunfire near one of the city's main Uighur neighborhoods shattered the relative calm of the afternoon. Witness accounts corroborated some of the police report but also differed in details.

Zhang Ming, a construction worker at a building site near the incident, said he saw three men with knives come out of a nearby mosque and attack a group of paramilitary police standing in a cluster along the road. Riot police then chased them, beat them and fired shots, he said.

An Associated Press reporter at the scene saw police in bulletproof vests wielding pistols, shotguns and batons chasing down a man who appeared to be a Uighur. They surrounded him and began kicking him and beating him with batons. Gunfire was heard before and during the brief incident, though it was unclear if the man had been shot.

Photos show one policeman raising his rifle to strike a man. Lying at their feet, the man, who was wearing a blue shirt, had blood on his right leg. Police quickly formed a ring around him and raised their guns skyward toward surrounding buildings as if worried about retaliation.

An armored personnel carrier and paramilitary police arrived, and police waved their guns and shouted for people to get off the streets.

A few hours later, a splotch of blood was still on the street, the stain faded from apparent scrubbing.

A Uighur man, who was visiting his mother in the neighborhood, said he heard the gunfire but did not see the incident. He said he had no doubt that there will be more violence.

"This is obviously not something that will end in just one, two or three days," he said, not wanting to give his name for fear of government retaliation. "There are no human rights in China. They catch Uighurs and beat them and take them away and nobody knows."

China's leaders have sought to play down tensions between ethnic groups, dispatching Politburo member Zhou Yongkang to spread the message that stability in Xinjiang was the "most important and pressing task that has overwhelming priority," the official Xinhua News Agency reported.

The Uighurs, who number 9 million in Xinjiang, have complained about an influx of Han Chinese and government restrictions on their Muslim religion. They accuse the Han of discrimination and the Communist Party of trying to erase their language and culture.

Han Chinese, many of whom were encouraged to emigrate here by the government, believe the Uighurs should be grateful for Xinjiang's rapid economic development, which has brought new schools, highways, airports, railways, natural gas fields and oil wells to the sprawling, rugged region the size of Texas.

The distrust remains a crucial barrier.

Gardner Bovingdon, a Uighur expert at Indiana University, said he doubts the Uighur community will mount a major protest in the next few days, given the government's current clampdown.

"I suspect there's going to be quiet resentment. I think really what we're going to see for the next bit is kind of lockdown _ they go into martial law," he said.

Since last week, tens of thousands of Chinese troops have poured into Urumqi and other parts of Xinjiang to impose order. Checkpoints have been set up and police searched buses for any suspects.

The July 5 violence began when Uighurs who were protesting last month's deaths of fellow factory workers in a brawl in southern China clashed with police. Crowds scattered throughout the city, attacking ethnic Han Chinese and burning cars.

Of the 184 reported killed July 5, the government has said 137 were Han Chinese and 46 were Uighurs, along with one minority Hui Muslim. Uighurs say they believe many more from their ethnic group died in the government crackdown.

Some of the tension had just begun to lift in Urumqi on Monday, but the afternoon gunfire changed that, said Ehsanjiang, a 37-year-old Uighur.

"In the past few days, everything seemed peaceful and safe, and then this afternoon something had to happen again," he said, holding his 2-year-old son. "I wonder when it will be safe again."

URUMQI, China — Police fatally shot two Uighur men Monday and wounded a third in western China, where violence has persisted despite the massive numbers of troops sent to restore calm more than ...
URUMQI, China — Police fatally shot two Uighur men Monday and wounded a third in western China, where violence has persisted despite the massive numbers of troops sent to restore calm more than ...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
7
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- SFA I'm a Fan of SFA 15 fans permalink

http://jamesfallows.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/07/a_uighur_speaks_about_pork.php

A Uighur speaks about pork :- A great article from Atlantic giving a different perspective on what is happening in China.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 PM on 07/13/2009

Of course Uyghurs are so afraid of Chinese because they have been terrorizing them for a 5 decades. If Uyghurs express their opinion or say what they have witnesses, they will be arrested by Chinese communist and tortured in prison. Uyghurs have already witness so many of these kinds of arbitrary detention and torture.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:14 PM on 07/13/2009
photo

Is the Chinese government terrorizing the Uighurs? Why are they so afraid of them?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 PM on 07/13/2009
- loki I'm a Fan of loki 128 fans permalink
photo

Not saying they are, but could it be possible the US is goingt o use the Uighurs as a propaganda wedge against china?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:06 PM on 07/13/2009
- Billy Hell I'm a Fan of Billy Hell 43 fans permalink
photo

After the tragic events of July 5 in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region in China, it would be useful to look more closely into the actual role of the US Government’s ”independent“ NGO, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). All indications are that the US Government, once more acting through its “private” Non-Governmental Organization, the NED, is massively intervening into the internal politics of China.

The reasons for Washington’s intervention into Xinjiang affairs seems to have little to do with concerns over alleged human rights abuses by Beijing authorities against Uyghur people. It seems rather to have very much to do with the strategic geopolitical location of Xinjiang on the Eurasian landmass and its strategic importance for China’s future economic and energy cooperation with Russia, Kazakhastan and other Central Asia states of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.

The major organization internationally calling for protests in front of Chinese embassies around the world is the Washington, D.C.-based World Uyghur Congress (WUC).

The WUC manages to finance a staff, a very fancy website in English, and has a very close relation to the US Congress-funded NED. According to published reports by the NED itself, the World Uyghur Congress receives $215,000.0­0 annually from the National Endowment for Democracy for “human rights research and advocacy projects.”

More to follow...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 PM on 07/13/2009
- Billy Hell I'm a Fan of Billy Hell 43 fans permalink
photo

The president of the WUC is an exile Uyghur who describes herself as a “laundress turned millionaire,” Rebiya Kadeer, who also serves as president of the Washington D.C.-based Uyghur American Association, another Uyghur human rights organization which receives significant funding from the US Government via the National Endowment for Democracy.

The president of the WUC is an exile Uyghur who describes herself as a “laundress turned millionaire,” Rebiya Kadeer, who also serves as president of the Washington D.C.-based Uyghur American Association, another Uyghur human rights organization which receives significant funding from the US Government via the National Endowment for Democracy.

The NED was intimately involved in financial support to various organizations behind the Lhasa ”Crimson Revolution“ in March 2008, as well as the Saffron Revolution in Burma/Myanmar and virtually every regime change destabilization in eastern Europe over the past years from Serbia to Georgia to Ukraine to Kyrgystan to Teheran in the aftermath of the recent elections.

Allen Weinstein, who helped draft the legislation establishing NED, was quite candid when he said in a published interview in 1991: "A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA."

More to follow...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 PM on 07/13/2009
- Billy Hell I'm a Fan of Billy Hell 43 fans permalink
photo

The NED is supposedly a private, non-government, non-profit foundation, but it receives a yearly appropriation for its international work from the US Congress. The NED money is channelled through four “core foundations”. These are the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, linked to Obama’s Democratic Party; the International Republican Institute tied to the Republican Party; the American Center for International Labor Solidarity linked to the AFL-CIO US labor federation as well as the US State Department; and the Center for International Private Enterprise linked to the US Chamber of Commerce.

The salient question is what has the NED been actively doing that might have encouraged the unrest in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, and what is the Obama Administration policy in terms of supporting or denouncing such NED-financed intervention into sovereign politics of states which Washington deems a target for pressure? The answers must be found soon, but one major step to help clarify Washington policy under the new Obama Administration would be for a full disclosure by the NED, the US State Department and NGO’s linked to the US Government, of their involvement, if at all, in encouraging Uyghur separatism or unrest. Is it mere coincidence that the Uyghur riots take place only days following the historic meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

More at: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14327

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:08 PM on 07/13/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect