iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

House Health Plan Released, Will Boost Taxes On Rich

RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR and ERICA WERNER   07/14/09 10:39 PM ET   AP

House

WASHINGTON — House Democrats on Tuesday rolled out a far-reaching $1.5 trillion plan that for the first time would make health care a right and a responsibility for all Americans, with medical providers, employers and the wealthiest picking up most of the tab.

The federal government would be responsible for ensuring that every person, regardless of income or the state of their health, has access to an affordable insurance plan. Individuals and employers would have new obligations to get coverage, or face hefty penalties.

Health care overhaul is President Barack Obama's top domestic priority, and his goal is to slow rising costs and provide coverage to nearly 50 million uninsured Americans.

Democratic leaders said they would push the measure through committee and toward a vote in the full House by month's end, while the pace of activity quickened on the other side of the Capitol.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said he wanted floor debate to begin a week from Monday. Other officials said that timetable was likely to slip. Even so, it underscored a renewed sense of urgency.

The House legislation unveiled by Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democrats would slow the growth of Medicare and Medicaid payments to medical providers. From big hospitals to solo physician practices, providers also would be held to account for quality care, not just ordering up tests and procedures. Insurance companies would be prohibited from denying coverage to the sick. The industry also would face stiff competition from a new government plan designed along the lines of Medicare.

The liberal-leaning plan lacked figures on total costs, but a House Democratic aide said the total bill would add up to about $1.5 trillion over 10 years. The aide spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the private calculations. Most of the bill's costs come in the last five years after the 2012 presidential election.

The legislation calls for a 5.4 percent tax increase on individuals making more than $1 million a year, with a gradual tax beginning at $280,000 for individuals. Employers who don't provide coverage would be hit with a penalty equal to 8 percent of workers' wages with an exemption for small businesses. Individuals who decline an offer of affordable coverage would pay 2.5 percent of their incomes as a penalty, up to the average cost of a health insurance plan.

With Obama pressing Congress to act on health care this summer, House leaders want to move their bill quickly through three committees and to a floor vote before the August congressional recess. But a group of moderate and conservative Democrats has withheld support, and no Republican votes are expected.

The House bill seemed unlikely to win broad backing in the Senate, where the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee was expected to finish its version of the legislation Wednesday in what was looking to be a party-line vote. Another panel, the Senate Finance Committee, was striving to unveil a bill by the end of the week.

Standing before a banner that read "Quality Affordable Care for the Middle Class," Pelosi, D-Calif., called the moment "historic and transformative." The bill would provide "stability and peace of mind" by braking costs and guaranteeing coverage, she said.

"We are going to accomplish what many people felt wouldn't happen in our lifetime," said House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif., one of the main sponsors. Obama, who issued a statement hailing the measure, plans to keep up the pressure on Congress by delivering remarks in the Rose Garden on Wednesday.

Speaking in Warren, Mich., where he was promoting new spending for community colleges, Obama anticipated a congressional confrontation over health care.

"There's going to be a major debate over the next three weeks," he said, deviating from his prepared text. "And don't be fooled by folks trying to scare you saying we can't change the health care system.We have no choice but to change the health care system because right now it's broken for too many Americans."

Separately, Obama spoke by telephone with Sen. Charles Grassley, the Iowa Republican viewed as critical to the fate of bipartisan negotiations in the Senate.

House Democrats said the income tax increase in their bill would apply only to the top 1.2 percent of households, those who earn about one-quarter of all income. The wealthiest 4 percent of small business owners would be among them. The tax would start at 1 percent for couples making $350,000 and individuals earning $280,000, ramp up to 1.5 percent above $500,000 of income, and jump to 5.4 percent for those earning above $1 million.

The tax would raise an estimated $544 billion over 10 years.

Business groups and the insurance industry immediately assailed the legislation. In a letter to lawmakers, major business organizations branded the 1,000-page bill a job-killer. Its coverage mandate would automatically raise the cost of hiring a new worker, they said.

"Exempting some micro-businesses will not prevent this provision from killing many jobs," the letter said. "Congress should allow market forces and employer autonomy to determine what benefits employers provide, rather than deciding by fiat."

The business groups also warned that the U.S. health care system could be damaged by adding a government-run insurance plan and a federal council that would make some decisions on benefits, as called for in the legislation. Thirty-one organizations signed the letter, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Business Roundtable representing top corporate CEOs and the National Retail Federation.

The House bill would change the way individuals and many employers get health insurance. It would set up a new national purchasing pool, called an exchange. The exchange would offer a menu of plans, with different levels of coverage. A government plan would be among the options, and the exchange would eventually be open to most employers. Insurers say that combination would drive many of them out of business since the public plan would be able to offer lower premiums to virtually all Americans.

But backers of a public plan – including Obama – say it would provide healthy competition for the insurance industry.

Under the House bill, the government would provide subsidies to make coverage more affordable for households with incomes up to four times the federal poverty level, or $88,000 for a family of four and $43,000 for an individual. Medicaid – the federal-state health program for the poor – would be expanded to individuals and families up to 133 percent of the poverty line. About 17 million people would remain uninsured – about 6 percent of the population – and half of them would be illegal immigrants.

The legislation also would improve the Medicare prescription drug benefit by gradually reducing a coverage gap known as the 'doughnut hole.'

The individual and employer coverage requirements would raise about $192 billion over 10 years, the Congressional Budget Office said.

Even before the bill was unveiled, the House Ways and Means Committee announced it would vote on the proposal beginning on Thursday. The panel is one of three that must act before the bill can go to the full House, probably later in the month.

Some House Democrats privately have expressed concern that they will be required to vote on higher taxes, only to learn later that the Senate does not intend to follow through with legislation of its own. That would leave rank-and-file House Democrats up for re-election next year in the uncomfortable position of having to explain their vote on a costly bill that never reached Obama's desk or became law.

___

Associated Press writers David Espo, Alan Fram and Andrew Taylor contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

WASHINGTON — House Democrats on Tuesday rolled out a far-reaching $1.5 trillion plan that for the first time would make health care a right and a responsibility for all Americans, with medical p...
WASHINGTON — House Democrats on Tuesday rolled out a far-reaching $1.5 trillion plan that for the first time would make health care a right and a responsibility for all Americans, with medical p...
Filed by Susan Crile  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 290
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
03:53 PM on 07/15/2009
So basically, we get a small penalty for not accepting something that's good for our health. lol sounds ok to me. ^_^
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Coinyer101
King of Doobiestan
01:27 PM on 07/15/2009
I am going to urge my Senators ( Lincoln and Pryor) ,of Arkansas, who are both Bluedogg dems, NOT to pass this bill. As much as I would like serious healthcare reform ,( like a single-payer system), i cannot and will not support this bill, because of the 'exchange', and because of the mandate and penalties on those who don't want to buy 'coverage', instead of actual healthcare. I'm as liberal as they come, but, to invade my privacy rights and force me to buy insurance instead of healthcare is enough to make me spitting mad. If this bill passes and is signed into law by this President, those responsible will not get my vote in 2010 and 2012.
Ivar
Ivar
11:22 AM on 07/15/2009
We should boost taxes on the rich. The poor can't afford it. Who was it that, when asked why he robbed banks, said, cuz that's where the money is?
09:28 AM on 07/15/2009
http://bit.ly/9QLV8
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tangelan
You will not cast aspersions on my asparagus.
07:51 AM on 07/15/2009
Uh, oh. The Republican plan is being introduced on Morning Joe. We get to watch and manage our own health. Every American is covered by a refundable tax credit and the plan will not be government run. They have no cost from the CBO. I'm going to take a leap by saying this bill isn't going to fly. I don't think Shadegg has even written any of this down. He's making it up as he goes along.
photo
mcmutter
A Groover has to expect a few setbacks .....
08:48 AM on 07/15/2009
the insurance companies keep getting richer and fatter from all the dollars

they rob 30% of all health care dollars for their profit and overhead
09:06 AM on 07/15/2009
Even more
AETNA Headquarters: Hartford, Connecticut 2007 Profits: $1.831 billion 2007 CEO Total Compensation: Ronald A. Williams, $23,045,834 Aetna has a long history in the business of insurance. Founded to sell life insurance in 1850, it became the first insurance company owned by stockholders to go into the health coverage business. Infamous For: “Underwriting Discipline” In 2007, Aetna applauded itself for its low “medical loss ratio”--the percentage of revenue it “loses” to paying for health care. (Sensitive to public relations, the industry now calls this a “medical benefit ratio.”) “Our commercial medical benefit ratio of 79.2% for the fourth quarter and 79.5% for the full year reflected solid underwriting discipline and our focused efforts in the area of medical management,” CEO Ronald Williams told investors in February, 2008. Translation: We are proud to spend less than 80 percent of premiums on health care by avoiding unhealthy enrollees and keeping a lid on services.
08:50 AM on 07/15/2009
Tax junk foods ---2 cents

Tax- soda 2 cents

Tax gas 1 cent

Then stuff your tax for business and others. If you need to tax the wealthy it will be very very small to balance it out and no one will say a word.

My father died because of eating these junk foods because his arteries were clogged . Other people become very overweight and add big problems to there health. This is fair let people eat what they want and enjoy but this small tax will help in a big way /
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:15 AM on 07/15/2009
Tax corporate campaign contributions 25%. Healthcare would be paid for until the end of time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Samalabear
07:26 AM on 07/15/2009
This is a further sellout of the American people to their corporate masters. This isn't health care for all. There is no equality. This is health insurance. We don't need health insurance -- we need health care -- health care for all regardless of employment status. Not Medicaid, not watered-down Medicare. From looking over this last night a bit and reading other comments from people who were reading even more of this bill, this is going to ensure that nightmare paper chase in doctors' offices continues. Confusing, muddled crap. And, yes, as others have said, an insult to taxpayers.
06:22 AM on 07/15/2009
This is Medicare Advantage Plan the Sequel! George Bush and his cronies are still running America, they're called Democrats. My mother is covered by one of these plans. She is healthy and rarely goes to the doctor, but the government (taxpayers) pays these private insurance companies a fixed premium each month to provide my mother Medicare coverage whether she uses it or not.

These government "insurance" plans are nothing but contracts that guarantee taxpayer payouts to private for-profit insurance companies whether or not health care has been provided or not. These insurance companies are nothing but legalized Mafia!
02:40 AM on 07/15/2009
More drama words anything but truth.
06:15 AM on 07/15/2009
This plan is a sickening insult to every American. It is as if they actually believe EVERY American is a dimwit that will accept any piece of overblown expensive crap they dish out. Oh, 2010 elections CANNOT GET HERE SOON ENOUGH. Payback time.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:17 AM on 07/15/2009
Shame on you.
03:44 PM on 07/15/2009
How is it an insult to every American if they're trying to make healthcare affordable?
01:25 AM on 07/15/2009
They are rushing this thing and it's a huge mistake. Reform means taking a long hard look at healthcare, not just health insurance. Let's differentiate here. For-profit is the main problem.. The greedy will always take and so making people have coverage will NOT guarantee good care. It will only allow the insurance companies and HC corporations to take more $$$, increase profits and reduce their expenses by taking more shortcuts in care. This is the next biggest sham after the 9/11 coverup.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
treetracker
12:44 AM on 07/15/2009
I just read an article that I recommend everyone here read. http://tiny.cc/J9YlI

It spells out that 1.6 trillion over the next 10 years is equal to 1% of the GDP over the next 10 years. 1%!!!!

And all the complaints about the cost are completely bogus. All the money spent for health care will go right back into the GDP, it will no evaporate into thin air like Congress is making it out to be.

Small price to pay for health care for everyone.
12:53 AM on 07/15/2009
good article

thank you
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CR46
spay/neuter and adopt
01:58 AM on 07/15/2009
Thanks and as a person who will be taxed at a higher rate, I don't care. I would much rather see tax $$$ go for bettering access to healthcare for all.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:19 AM on 07/15/2009
Thank you for your support. I say tax corporate campaign contributions. That could wipe out the national debt in no time.
03:48 PM on 07/15/2009
People like you are amazing! You're willing to help out the little guy. Now that's what I call Progressive!
12:40 AM on 07/15/2009
has anyone figured how much a policy would cost to buy?

that's my bottom line - how much do i pay for coverage
12:16 AM on 07/15/2009
This is going to have enough loop holes to drive a truck full of campaign donations through. States can opt out of the public plan. Commissioners can decide who can participate in the public plan and the exchange. Insurance companies don't have to comply till 2018. Employers don't have immediate access. Access can be delayed or withheld indefinitely.
06:18 AM on 07/15/2009
It is useless. It will do nothing more than PROVE that money is meaningless in Washington. It comes from some magical clouds and we can spend as much as we want when we want on any crap we design, as long as those that own us get their cuts.
12:10 AM on 07/15/2009
lets eat the rich until were all poor.
what ever happened to self reliance and independent spirit. 50 years ago they would not have played this class warfare. what a sad and selfish country we have become.
12:17 AM on 07/15/2009
They started it.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CR46
spay/neuter and adopt
02:00 AM on 07/15/2009
The insurance companies have created this mess, by over charging, eliminating coverage for people etc, but you will probably never understand this and I'm sure you will be turning down SS and medicare coverage when you are older, to uphold your beliefs.
07:40 AM on 07/15/2009
i wont need to because my children will not have enough hyperinflated money to pay my way, as both programs are to be bankrupt.
dont you get it? there is not enough money in our economy to support these programs.
why do you look to government to solve your problems. i agree that insurance companies and certain providers create problematic areas in the industry but i can assure you that a government run plan of any sort will look like fema in new orleans.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MossyOak
12:06 AM on 07/15/2009
Why can't we just have "health care" instead of "health insurance"?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Marcospinelli
an old liberal Democrat, a 'New Deal'-Democrat
11:15 PM on 07/14/2009
I think that people mistakenly believe that Obama&Democrats want public health care.

If TheBushYears taught us nothing else, it's that anyone can sell anything to Americans, if you're stolid & relentless in your sales pitch & tactics. It's not that Bush&Rove were geniuses & knew something that nobody else knew; Bush&Rove were just more ruthless (clumsy & careless many political graybeards would say) in doing what politicians & the parties had gone to great lengths to hide from Americans.

Obama didn't get to be the first black president, vanquish the Clinton machine & the oldest, most experienced politicians in our nation's history (including the Rove machine) by not having mastered these skills. Nor do Democratic politicians (more incumbents than ever, in office longer) not know how to do it. How do you think Democrats managed to keep impeaching Bush&Cheney off the table & have us still reelecting them, not marching on Washington with torches&pitchforks?

Obama&Democrats know how to do it -- They don't want to do it.

The trick for them has been to keep the many different populist groups believing that they really do support our issues, but that they're merely inept. And to get us to keep voting for them in spite of their failure to deliver on any of our alleged shared objectives.
12:05 AM on 07/15/2009
The sky is falling.
02:05 AM on 07/15/2009
Well written, unfortunately the Government is not of the people, for the ...: rather the purpose is to keep distributing wealth to the "special" interests or clients (be it Pentagon, Law Enforcement, Health & Welfare or the Government itself). If one follows the money re: 9/11, Oklahoma City bombing or our latest "the wall st./economy" melt down our gov. gets more power over it's citizens. One wonders who Washington is really afraid of it certainly could not be us the people, how could that be.

When was the last time the army was in DC to protect the government. What will happen when unemployment exceeds 20% Dangerous times ahead for all.