Illinois Abortion Notification Law Revived By Court

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Illinois Abortion Notification Law Revived By Court stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 07-14-09 03:30 PM   |   Updated: 07-14-09 08:46 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Abortion

CHICAGO (AP) -- A federal appeals court breathed new life on Tuesday into a long-dormant Illinois law that requires teen girls to notify their parents before having abortions.

Attorneys on both sides of the emotionally charged issue said the law would take effect within weeks unless its critics ask for a stay and the appeals judges agree to put their order on hold pending a possible rehearing.

Anti-abortion activists applauded the appeals court's decision as a long-overdue victory, while opponents of the law, which went unenforced during years of legal wrangling, said the measure was guaranteed to usher in dangerous problems.

"It's about time the law was approved," said Thomas Brejcha, president and chief counsel of the Thomas More Society, which fought to have the measure enforced. "It's ridiculous that it took this long to get a decision."

Lorie A. Chaiten of the American Civil Liberties Union, which battled to keep the law from going into effect, said the law "creates unnecessary, dangerous hurdles to accessing essential health care for young women facing an unintended pregnancy in the state of Illinois."

The appeals court described the measure as "a permissible attempt to help a young woman make an informed choice about whether to have an abortion." It does not require teens to get their parents' consent, only to notify them beforehand.

A provision of the law allows girls to bypass that by notifying a judge instead, a procedure that the ACLU argued would not be workable in practice.

The appeals court's three-judge panel brushed aside that claim.

Story continues below
advertisement

"We acknowledge that there might be practical problems with the procedure at issue here - it may be intimidating for a minor to navigate the process of presenting her case to a judge, for instance," said the 35-page opinion written by Judge Richard D. Cudahy for the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

"But we fail to see a better alternative," it said. "Abortion, no matter how it is confronted, may present intimidating choices to the minor woman who faces it."

Robyn Ziegler, a spokeswoman for the Illinois attorney general's office, which sought to have the enforcement ban dissolved, had no immediate comment.

The original parental notification law was passed in 1984 and an updated version followed in 1995.

U.S. District Judge David H. Coar issued the ban on enforcement in February 2007 - an order that was dissolved by the appeals court's decision.

Brejcha described the law as a compromise that didn't make anti-abortion forces particularly happy because it didn't require parental consent.

"They think mom and dad should be notified before their daughter has invasive surgery," Brejcha said. He said it was possible that the decision the case could eventually be taken to the U.S. Supreme Court, but expressed doubt that the high court would agree to hear the case.

ACLU spokesman Ed Yohnka said it was unclear what the next step would be but that it was possible that the appeals court would be asked for a rehearing.

Meanwhile, Chaiten said it was time to "turn our attention to counseling teens and medical providers to minimize the harms of the notice and bypass requirements."

-ASSOCIATED PRESS

CHICAGO (AP) -- A federal appeals court breathed new life on Tuesday into a long-dormant Illinois law that requires teen girls to notify their parents before having abortions. Attorneys on both sides...
CHICAGO (AP) -- A federal appeals court breathed new life on Tuesday into a long-dormant Illinois law that requires teen girls to notify their parents before having abortions. Attorneys on both sides...
Filed by Ben Goldberger  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
7
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

With population being out of control, abortion is simply a form of natual selection. So all forms of abortion should be encouraged to limit the future population increases that are not sustainable agriculturally or civicly.

The beauty of abortion, as a fiscally responsible macro-economic practice, is that it eliminates those who are "unwanted" before they are even born. Think of it as preemptive law enforcement, or preemptive unemployment, compensation, and welfare benefits reduction. And especially those born to parents under the age of 18 are at a distinct disadvantage in life.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:29 PM on 07/15/2009
- yearlin I'm a Fan of yearlin 4 fans permalink

wtf? how heartless

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:25 AM on 07/17/2009
photo

A girl in that situation needs accurate health information and kind, thoughtful counseling. If she is afraid or unwilling to get those things from her parents IN THE FIRST PLACE- there is most likely a serious reason. Should a victim of incest be forced to go to her parents for permission for an abortion? That seems needlessly cruel to me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 PM on 07/14/2009

absolutely agree, and from a pro life Catholic..­...so when the girl goes to the clinic to get the abortion , the clinic can get the court order... As a matter of fact abortion clinics are required to report incidences of incest and rape... But , especially in regards to statutory rape, they don't...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:12 PM on 07/14/2009
- benji85 I'm a Fan of benji85 8 fans permalink
photo

That's why they put in using the court to get permission.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:33 PM on 07/14/2009
- Alarmist I'm a Fan of Alarmist 13 fans permalink
photo

good point. Also, many teen victims of rape or incest may not be ready to reveal that information at the time they want or need the abortion. THey should be allowed to proceed at their own pace.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:47 PM on 07/14/2009
- sunnybunny I'm a Fan of sunnybunny 16 fans permalink
photo

That extreme example is unnecessary. A victim of incest or rape has other problems that need to be addressed. How about an example of a young girl who just wants to protect her boyfriend from her fathers wrath and/or doesn't want to be locked up until she's 18? Or maybe she doesn't want to have a baby, but her parents are pro-lifers-maybe she intends to never tell them? She needs to have her rights recognized.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 AM on 07/15/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect