Obama Deviates From Remarks, Urges Lawmakers To "Buck Up" On Health Care

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama Deviates From Remarks, Urges Lawmakers To "Buck Up" On Health Care stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 07-15-09 01:35 PM   |   Updated: 08-15-09 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Obama

President Obama deviated from prepared remarks on Wednesday, urging members of Congress, his administration, and the federal government as a whole to "buck up" and finalize health care reform as the process approaches its most critical juncture.

Speaking at the White House just hours after the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions committee passed its version of a health care bill via a party-line vote, Obama applauded the progress made to date. But he also cautioned against complacency. The passage of that one version of health care legislation, he said, should provide the "urgency for the House and Senate to finish their critical work on health care reform before the August recess."

The House is marking up its version of health care legislation this week. The Senate Finance Committee has yet to introduce its version.

"We are going to get this done," Obama proclaimed at one point. "We need to buck up people here... It is now up to us. We can do what we've done for so long and defer tough decisions for another day -- or we can step up and meet our responsibility. In other words, we can lead."

The "buck-up" line was not in the president's prepared remarks. Nor was the slight dig he took at Republican lawmakers earlier in his short address. Noting the 50 hours of debate that it took to get the HELP bill passed, Obama highlighted the 160 Republican amendments added to the measure, calling it "a hopeful sign of bipartisan support for the final product."

But no Republican senators ended up voting for the bill's passage. And that didn't seem to escape the president's notice. "If people are serious about bi-partisanship," he added to his prepared statement.

Here are Obama's full remarks:

I'm pleased to be joined today by representatives from the American Nurses Association on behalf of the 2.9 million registered nurses in America -- men and women who know as well as anyone the urgent need for health reform.


I should disclose right off the bat that I have a long-standing bias towards nurses. When Sasha, our younger daughter, contracted a dangerous case of meningitis when she was just three months old, we were terrified. But it was the nurses who were there with us, explaining what was going on, telling us it would all be okay.

Story continues below
advertisement

So I know how important nurses are, and the nation does too. Nurses aren't in health care to get rich; they're in it to care for us from the time they bring new life into this world to the moment they ease the pain of those who pass from it. If it weren't for nurses, many Americans in underserved and rural areas would have no access to health care at all.

That's why it's safe to say few understand why we have to pass reform as intimately as our nation's nurses. They see firsthand the heartbreaking cost of our health care crisis. They hear the same stories I've heard across this country -- of treatment deferred or coverage denied by insurance companies; of insurance premiums and prescriptions that are so expensive they consume a family's entire budget; of Americans forced to use the emergency room for something as simple as a sore throat just because they can't afford to see a doctor.

This is a problem we can no longer wait to fix. Deferring reform is nothing more than defending the status quo -- and those who would oppose our efforts should take a hard look at just what it is they're defending. Over the last decade, health insurance premiums have risen three times faster than wages. Deductibles and out-of-pocket costs are skyrocketing. And every single day we wait to act, thousands of Americans lose their insurance, some turning to nurses in the emergency room as their only recourse.

So make no mistake: The status quo on health care is not an option for the United States of America. It is threatening the financial stability of our families, our businesses, and government itself. It is unsustainable.

I know a lot of Americans who are satisfied with their health care right now are wondering what reform would mean for them. Let me be clear: If you like your doctor or health care provider, you can keep them. If you like your health care plan, you can keep that too.

But here's what else reform will mean for you: you'll save money. If you lose your job, change your job, or start a new business, you'll still be able to find quality health insurance you can afford. If you have a pre-existing medical condition, no insurance company will be able to deny you coverage. You won't have to worry about being priced out of the market. You won't have to worry about one illness leading your family into financial ruin. That's what reform means.

The naysayers and the cynics still doubt we can do this. But it wasn't too long ago that those same naysayers doubted that we'd be able to make real progress on health care reform. And thanks to the work of key committees in Congress, we are now closer to the goal of health reform than we have ever been.

Yesterday, the House introduced its health reform proposal. And today, thanks to the unyielding passion and inspiration provided by Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, and the bold leadership of Sen. Chris Dodd, the Senate HELP Committee reached a major milestone by passing a similarly strong proposal for health reform. It's a plan that was debated for more than 50 hours and includes more than 160 Republican amendments -- a hopeful sign of bipartisan support for the final product.

Both proposals will take what's best about our system today and make it the basis of our system tomorrow -- reducing costs, raising quality, and ensuring fair treatment of consumers by the insurance industry. Both include a health insurance exchange, a marketplace that will allow families and small businesses to compare prices, services and quality so they can choose the plan that best suits their needs; and among the choices available would be a public health insurance option that would make health care more affordable by increasing competition, providing more choices, and keeping insurance companies honest. Both proposals will offer stability and security to Americans who have coverage today, and affordable options for Americans who don't.

This progress should make us hopeful -- but it shouldn't make us complacent. It should instead provide the urgency for both the House and the Senate to finish their critical work on health reform before the August recess.

America's nurses need us to succeed, and not just on behalf of all the patients they sometimes have to speak up for. If we invest in prevention, nurses won't have to treat diseases or complications that could've been avoided. If we modernize health records, we'll streamline the paperwork that can take up more than one third of a nurse's day, freeing them to spend more time with their patients. If we make their jobs just a little bit easier, we can attract and train the young nurses we need to make up a nursing shortage that's only getting worse. Nurses do their part every time they check another healthy patient out of the hospital. It's time for us to do ours.

We're going to get this done. These nurses are on board. The American people are on board. It's up to us now. We can do what we've done for so long and defer tough decisions for another day - or we can step up and meet our responsibility as leaders. We can look beyond the next news cycle and the next election to the next generation, and come together to build a system that works not just for these nurses, but for the patients they care for; for doctors and hospitals; for families and businesses - and for our very future as a nation.

Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

President Obama deviated from prepared remarks on Wednesday, urging members of Congress, his administration, and the federal government as a whole to "buck up" and finalize health care reform as the p...
President Obama deviated from prepared remarks on Wednesday, urging members of Congress, his administration, and the federal government as a whole to "buck up" and finalize health care reform as the p...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
561
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
- eshalom I'm a Fan of eshalom 14 fans permalink

President Obama broke White House precedent yesterday by childishly attempting to upstage Hillary Clinton's major foreign policy speech with his little event hastily arranged in the Rose Garden.

According to the Daily News, “In other administrations when the President was speaking no one else in the administration was allowed to speak. Alternatively, if another administration official was already scheduled to speak at an event, the White House press office made sure the President spoke either before or after and not during.”

Another source puts the blame mostly on the White House. “At the very least it’s complete non-coordination between the White House communications and press operation and Cabinet agencies — in this case a high profile department and Cabinet secretary giving a major address outlining the President’s agenda,” the source said. “It does not make sense for the President to drown out his secretary of state when she is trying to line up influential and public support for his foreign policy. Scheduling matters.”

My take stands: Obama was feeling annoyed that Hillary's job approval in the 70s far exceeds his own, which has recently taken a dive into the 50s.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 AM on 07/16/2009
- pfrogger I'm a Fan of pfrogger 60 fans permalink

how does this relate to healthcare?
couldn't you do Obama bashing at Fox News?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:33 PM on 07/16/2009

With the House version, the top combined federal and state income-tax rate in 39 states would exceed 50 percent. And there will be an exodus from NYC.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:01 AM on 07/16/2009

Now Obama is all for cutting Medicare funding, individual mandates or a law to "force" people into spending money on health care and taxing health care benefits.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 AM on 07/16/2009

During the campaign Obama was adamantly against cutting funding for Medicare, taxing health care benefits and any kind of individual mandates.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:36 AM on 07/16/2009
- RightsGuy I'm a Fan of RightsGuy 20 fans permalink

SENATORS WHO SIGNED LETTER OPPOSING PUBLIC HEALTH PLAN TOOK $17.7 MILLION IN CAMPAIGN CASH FROM HEALTH CARE/INSURANCE INDUSTRIES
http://www.campaignmoney.org/pressroom/2009/06/08/senators-who-signed-letter-opposing-public-health-plan-took-17-7-million-in-campaign-cash-from-health-care-

Quoted from the article:

"The Senators have collectively taken $17.7 million from insurance and health care interests, according to data analyzed at the Center for Responsive Politics website, opensecrets.org. That amounts to nearly $2 million per Senator over their careers.

“Americans want a government that is responsive to our needs, not a Congress that listens to its donors from the insurance and health care industry,” commented David Donnelly, national campaigns director of Public Campaign Action Fund. “These Senators appear to be carrying water for their donors at the expense of advancing health care reform.”

All nine Senators sit on the Senate Finance Committee, which is actively engaged in debating health care reform. The nine signers include

Senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa),

Orrin Hatch (R-Utah),

Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.),

Jim Bunning (R-Ky.),

Mike Crapo (R-Idaho),

Pat Roberts (R-Kan.),

John Ensign (R-Nev.),

Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.), and

John Cornyn (R-Texas).

Senator Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) was the committee’s only Republican Senator not to sign. Sen. Snowe has taken $1.1 million from the same interests, less than all but two of the signers."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 AM on 07/16/2009
- TomH7259 I'm a Fan of TomH7259 2 fans permalink

I have a simple way to get Congress to come up with the very best, outstanding, easy to administer and beneficial to the public health care system on earth. The answer is so simple, I don't know how it escaped me up to this point. Want to hear it?

Simple: Cancel the current Government paid, all inclusive, completely free Health care System that Congressmen and Congresswomen themselves currently enjoys, and make it mandatory for all of Congress to use whatever public health care system they come up with for the rest of us.

I'll bet that plan will then be great, eh?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 AM on 07/16/2009
- RightsGuy I'm a Fan of RightsGuy 20 fans permalink

Great idea!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:21 AM on 07/16/2009
- Solja I'm a Fan of Solja 99 fans permalink
photo

The part about canceling the current health care system that Congressmen and Congresswomen use won't work. Why? Because Congress would have to make that change, and what fool would cut off their own health insurance? So that won't happen.

But I like the part that makes them have to use the same insurance as the plan they come up with. That would be great!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:31 AM on 07/16/2009

Insurance providers are middlemen. Healthy people are on one side of their teeter toter, unhealthy people are on the other side and insurers are in the middle. This represent the zero profit point for middlemen.

Now say this middleman wants to make a 10% profit. How does he do it. Simple ... he goes down on the unhealthy side, boots 10% of the unhealthiest off and slides in behind the rest. If he wants 20% he boots another 10% off and so on.

In the best of all worlds for the middleman(insurer) he alone is sitting on one end and the healthy people are on the other end paying premiums.

So why are insurers(middlemen) fighting a public option for health care if those uninsured are unhealthy and insurers don't want to cover them. Again simple ... they are afraid the healthy people would opt rightly for the public option leaving them to make a living insuring the potentially unhealthy.

Understand insuring is supposed to be a risk business. An insurer is betting an unhealthy person is not going to be sick before he has put in enough money to cover his illness. Healthy people were never really supposed to be part of the mix.

As soon as insurers figured out massive profits could be made insuring the healthy it ceased being a business and became a scam.

The money to pay for health care is coming right out of these leeches hide. I look at that as a good thing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:02 AM on 07/16/2009
- dxz I'm a Fan of dxz 4 fans permalink

If the bill will only be borne by the Democrats, we might as well go back to the drawing board and settle for a SINGLE PAYER SYSTEM. The whole Public Option concept is itself a compromise, not neccesarily comprehensive enough for most Democrats. We might as well be BOLD and GO for GOLD, if the Republicans want to GO for NO!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:32 PM on 07/15/2009

I'm no democrat, but if there has to be health care for all, then the government has to go all out and give universal access and not the Crap that is in this bill.

Mandated health Insurance???, not health care??. Fines to businesses and individuals???, this is just rubbish.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 PM on 07/15/2009
- Chaimirija I'm a Fan of Chaimirija 56 fans permalink
photo

I give up trying to slog through the monstrosity...I am just going to work three jobs instead

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 PM on 07/15/2009
- Mikeeee I'm a Fan of Mikeeee 62 fans permalink

There has to be a "strong" public option or all of this is a waste of time. One million people with no health care? Which city of one million people should be picked to have no health care.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 PM on 07/15/2009
- Chaimirija I'm a Fan of Chaimirija 56 fans permalink
photo

I am not sure there is one...and if there is, it is set to begin 2013?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 PM on 07/15/2009
- ohmetoo I'm a Fan of ohmetoo 23 fans permalink
photo

I think the number is more like 47 million which is the population of Europe the EU roughly, that is my understanding. How about all of Europe without healthcare?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:55 PM on 07/15/2009
- TwinX I'm a Fan of TwinX 6 fans permalink

The population of the European Union is roughly 495 million, (France alone has about 66 million), and for the whole of Europe it's more like 830 million.

That said, 47 million without health care is still terrible for a highly developed western nation. I'm speaking from a European perspective though; it's tricky for some of us us to get our heads round the ideological objections to universal coverage.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:32 AM on 07/16/2009
- Chaimirija I'm a Fan of Chaimirija 56 fans permalink
photo

‘‘(6) NOT TREATED AS TAX IMPOSED BY THIS CHAPTER FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES.—
The tax im posed under this section
shall not be treated as tax imposed by this chapter
for purposes of determining the amount of any credit under this chapter or for purposes of section 55.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 PM on 07/15/2009
- Chaimirija I'm a Fan of Chaimirija 56 fans permalink
photo

‘‘Subpart A—Tax on Individuals Without Acceptable Health Care Coverage
‘‘Sec. 59B. Tax on individuals without acceptable health care coverage.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:56 PM on 07/15/2009
- Chaimirija I'm a Fan of Chaimirija 56 fans permalink
photo

Short title: the dingellberry act

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 PM on 07/15/2009
- Chaimirija I'm a Fan of Chaimirija 56 fans permalink
photo

TAX IMPOSED.—In the case of any individual
who does not meet the requirements of subsection (d) at
any time during the taxable year, there is hereby imposed
a tax equal to 2.5 percent of the excess of—

‘‘(1) the taxpayer’s modified adjusted gross in come for the taxable year, over the amount of gross income specified in section 6012(a)(1) with respect to the taxpayer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 PM on 07/15/2009
- Chaimirija I'm a Fan of Chaimirija 56 fans permalink
photo

‘‘(5) RELIGIOUS CONSCIENCE EXEMPTION.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) shall
not apply to any individual (and any qualifying
child residing with such individual) for any pe23
riod if such individual has in effect an exemp24
tion which certifies that such individual is a
member of a recognized religious sect or divi-
sion thereof described in section 1402(g)(1) and
an adherent of established tenets or teachings
of such sect or division as described in such sec4
tion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 PM on 07/15/2009
- porsche996 I'm a Fan of porsche996 65 fans permalink
photo

wow and you got that posted? You da man!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:29 PM on 07/15/2009
- HeWhoReads I'm a Fan of HeWhoReads 8 fans permalink
photo

Without context that is impossible to understand. Incredibly suspicious yes, but what does it mean? What is Subsection (a)? What is described in section 1402(g)(1)? Section 4?

And no, I'm not looking through the 1018 pages of bill to find out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:38 PM on 07/15/2009
- Chaimirija I'm a Fan of Chaimirija 56 fans permalink
photo

give me a break---reading it is making my eyes hurt--

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 PM on 07/15/2009
- Chaimirija I'm a Fan of Chaimirija 56 fans permalink
photo

it means there is a loophole

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 PM on 07/15/2009
- Chaimirija I'm a Fan of Chaimirija 56 fans permalink
photo

‘‘(B) EXEMPTION.—An application for the
exemption described in subparagraph (A) shall
be filed with the Secretary at such time and in
such form and manner as the Secretary may
prescribe. Any such exemption granted by the
Secretary shall be effective for such period as
the Secretary determines appropriate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:47 PM on 07/15/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect