More

Senate Panel OKs Plan To Revamp Health Care System

RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR and BEN FELLER   07/16/09 12:04 AM ET   AP

Senate Health Committee

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama achieved a milestone Wednesday when a Senate committee approved a plan to revamp the U.S. health care system.

The Senate panel's action, which attracted no Republican votes, came as the president's campaign organization rolled out television ads to build support for his top domestic priority.

Obama met with Republicans at the White House in search of an elusive bipartisan compromise on his call to expand coverage to the nearly 50 million uninsured Americans as well as restrain spending increases in health care.

But the 13-10 party-line vote in the Senate health committee signaled a deepening rift in Congress. While Democrats respond to Obama's call for action with renewed determination, Republicans are using harsher words to voice their misgivings.

In the House, Democrats began pushing legislation through the first of three committees, although moderate and conservative members of the rank and file were demanding changes. In the Senate, lawmakers were considering fees on health insurance companies as a new source of potential financing for a $1 trillion package that's short on funds.

"We have delivered on the promise of real change," Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., said as he presided over the Senate health committee vote, alluding not only to his bill but also to Obama's campaign promise.

The president was in the Rose Garden for the latest in a daily series of public appeals to Congress to "step up and meet our responsibilities" and move legislation this summer. Obama also pushed his message in network television interviews, telling employers that his plan would require them to offer benefits or face a fine.

"If you can afford it, either give your employees health insurance or pay into the pot so that we're not subsidizing you," Obama told CBS News.

He also reversed a campaign stance against requiring everyone to buy health care coverage.

"I'm now in favor of some sort of individual mandate as long as there's a hardship exemption," he said. "If somebody truly just can't afford health insurance even with the subsidies that the government is now providing, we don't want to double penalize them."

Wednesday's Senate health committee vote "should make us hopeful – but it can't make us complacent," Obama said. "It should instead provide the urgency for both the House and the Senate to finish their critical work on health reform before the August recess."

The health panel's $615 billion measure would require individuals to get health insurance and employers to contribute to the cost. The bill calls for the government to provide financial assistance with premiums for individuals and families making up to four times the federal poverty level, or about $88,000 for a family of four, a broad cross-section of the middle class.

Obama wants the House and Senate to act on health care this summer so lawmakers can reconcile differences in their respective bills after Labor Day and put final legislation on his desk this fall.

Obama's all-out effort since he returned from his overseas trip last week has "galvanized things," Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said.

Obama met at the White House with Republican Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, Bob Corker of Tennessee and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska.

"I urged him not to rush consideration of the bill," Collins told reporters later. "This bill is going to affect virtually every American. If the president tries to rush this through in the next two weeks ... I fear the process will be very divisive."

Another senior Republican, whom Obama courted only a few months ago to become his commerce secretary, also sounded alarm bells.

"This supposed health care fix is a health care failure and a disaster for the American people," Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., said. "We still have time to turn this process around instead of steamrolling our country into a sub-par government-run plan, but it will require serious action from Democrats and Republicans and a pledge to put politics aside."

The debate is taking on a campaign-like edge. In the cross-hairs are moderate senators, Democrats and Republicans, whose votes could make the difference in a closely divided Senate.

Obama's political organization launched a series of 30-second television ads on health care, which were to begin airing Wednesday in Washington and on cable TV nationally. A version will run for two weeks on local stations in Arkansas, Indiana, Florida, Louisiana, Maine, North Dakota, Nebraska and Ohio to prod senators to back the health care effort.

In the ads, private citizens describe problems they've had with the medical system and say it's time for action. The sponsor is Organizing for America, Obama's campaign organization, which has become part of the national Democratic Party. The group would not reveal the cost.

Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., one of the lawmakers targeted, said the ads would not affect his decision. He has concerns that the evolving Democratic plans would give government too big a role.

Obama planned White House meetings Thursday with Nelson and Republican Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine, another potential swing vote.

Obama supports a government-run insurance plan to compete with private insurers, but he says he doesn't want to overturn the system of employer-sponsored health benefits that has served middle-class families for better than half a century. He wants the legislation to be fully paid for and the total cost kept around $1 trillion over 10 years.

"The American people have to recognize that there's no such thing as a free lunch, right?" Obama told NBC News. "So we can't just provide care to everybody that has no costs whatsoever."

Wednesday's vote in the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee took the Senate only part of the way toward passage of an overhaul bill. Another panel, the Finance Committee, still has to unveil its approach. The plan is to combine the two bills for a floor vote.

Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., met Wednesday with committee Democrats to try to settle how to pay for the bill and other issues, and later met with moderate Democrats who don't sit on his panel.

Obama has pushed Baucus to have a bill ready by week's end, but Baucus declined to say whether he'd made a timetable commitment to the president or whether he'd be able to deliver by Friday. "We're just not quite there," Baucus said.

Baucus is aiming for a bipartisan bill. He praised the health committee's work but said of their legislation: "That's a partisan bill."

"I think it's virtually impossible to get 60 votes on a partisan bill," Baucus said, referring to the number needed to advance legislation in the 100-member Senate.

Finance Committee members are considering a proposal from Schumer that would raise $100 billion over 10 years by imposing new fees on health insurance companies.

___

Associated Press writers Erica Werner and Alan Fram contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama achieved a milestone Wednesday when a Senate committee approved a plan to revamp the U.S. health care system. The Senate panel's action, which attracted no R...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama achieved a milestone Wednesday when a Senate committee approved a plan to revamp the U.S. health care system. The Senate panel's action, which attracted no R...
Filed by Marcus Baram  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 417
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
10:13 AM on 07/17/2009
I am very much opposed to the concept of a "hardship" exemption to coverage. This nonsense is something that came out the Massachusetts state plan. Does this same exemption provide the effected person with exemption from illness or injury requiring medical care as well? If paying a modest subsidized health insurance premium is a hardship, what would $25, $50, or $100K in medical be? Who would pay for this care? Those with insurance, the same as today. That's is one of the many things that are broken about the present system, if you even call it a system. We don't give exemptions to taxes bases on hardship, why should we exempt people from this responsibility?

President Obama wants to build a new healthcare system using the old as a foundation. That's the problem. Like a faulty foundation that is riddled with cracks and causing the existing structure it supports to fail, the existing system is simply too flawed to support a new one. The foundation which the President seeks to preserve IS the problem.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ncmom54
05:04 PM on 07/16/2009
Congress member Dennis Kucinich of Ohio will be introducing an important single-payer amendment today, Thursday - the House healthcare reform bill.

The Kucinich amendment which gives states the right to pass and implement state-based single payer plans and will ensure the federal rules waivers required to allow that innovation. It will benefit millions of Americans - from California to Pennsylvania to Illinois to New York and beyond.

While not stepping away from our shared fight for HR676 and national single-payer reform, this is a chance for nurses and patients to help Rep. Kucinich to press the single payer fight forward during this legislative session.

Please support (TODAY) the amendment by Rep. Kucinich that allows states to enact a single payer system without federal barriers and with financial assistance from the federal government.

http://www.1payer.net/
11:21 AM on 07/16/2009
everyone should read blueonblue's comments
10:01 AM on 07/16/2009
To all: Right, Left, Liberal, Conservative, Independant

Read the Bill...we are all going to suffer under it. Americans have to stop with the US vs Them.

While we are all fighting, our governing body has managed to drive up our cost of living (housing, education, health care, food and enerfy) and whittle away at all of our liberties.

The bill will have us all report our premium status and require us to buy insurance. It looks like very few will be able to 'choose' the public option, and, if they are going to offer subsidies up to 88K income a year, that means they are going to be very expensive...and I doubt the subsidy will be 100%.

BTW: they have not defined 'affordable'....but you will be fined 2.5% of your AGI if you don't play! I see that leading to people just paying the 1 or 2 grand instead of the 12 -14K for insurance...and that DOES work out to a tax.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nick1936
08:22 AM on 07/16/2009
If we want a good Health care bill there is only one way to get it and that is for congress to give up their government paid health care for the bill they pass
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
llovejim
Truth, Justice and the Milky Way
07:14 AM on 07/16/2009
alright, who said that Clarence Thomas is a scholar? that is hilarious!! thanks for the laugh.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:29 AM on 07/16/2009
Clarence "Coke Can" Thomas.
01:40 PM on 07/17/2009
High tech l.ynching of a b.lack man...Stop the h.ate
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:27 AM on 07/16/2009
I know there is always going to be differences in income for people because of educational level, the type of job they work, etc. But this really threw me:

The bill calls for the government to provide financial assistance with premiums for individuals and families making up to four times the federal poverty level, or about $88,000 for a family of four, a broad cross-section of the middle class.

Financial assistance for families with an $88K income? IDivide it up, and that's $22K per person, the total family income for many. Around here, people making that kind of money live in McMansions on the lake, drive luxury cars, etc. Why should they be helped when they're squandering their paychecks on material consumption? The average family income is less than $50K per year, many below that level, and pay is decreasing, not increasing. Making health insurance mandatory is going to be a difficult proposition for those who have trouble even putting food on the table.
07:38 AM on 07/16/2009
Because we the people have settled for voting for our respective candidates, and then sitting at home on the couch and watching the hoopla on cable news like some sort of a soap opera, while the insurance lobby, "idea-less" GOP rhetoriticians, scared Dem moderates are all positioning for the best outcomes for themselves either financially or politically.

We are making no demands, besides that the POTUS himself, and by himself force feed this change through with his charm alone, we know intuitively that this will help our longterm stability, but we are not pushing back against the GOP who thinks that we are so stupid that we would consider doing nothing and letting those whose profit models created the problem hold the country's health for ransom due to the fact that under new condition they may not be able to make billions in profit annually.

We are even letting moderate Democrats position themselves for GOP swing voters by pretending that the GOP's fears are based on anything besides politics and strategy, if the profit margins of big insurance means more thant he health of Americans, our passivity and failure to speak out is the perfect way to keep things on the same trajectory into the pits.

the 88,000 figure is mean't to appease the fears of those who have bought into the fearmongering.
09:38 AM on 07/16/2009
what that should tell you is:

the premiums are going to be very, very EXPENSIVE
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LORISNJ
Retired, AFL-CIO
06:22 AM on 07/16/2009
Can't find any story on Sotomayor - I guess she has dropped off the radar.
06:19 AM on 07/16/2009
where is the video?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fodel
digital mischief
06:15 AM on 07/16/2009
what does this have to do with Al Franken?
Peabodies
We are the Many. They are the Few.
02:47 AM on 07/16/2009
So now it's a "revamp". How sexy. Before it was an "overhaul". President Obama said we couldn't start from scratch. Mr. President, not starting from scratch, we just institute Medicare for All, right now. The procedures, mechanisms are in place. Just do it! Declare Medicare for all, starting NOW. Show your leadership by turning on a dime. And don't eviscerate Medicare before the public option is in place.

We have competition in every other sphere of our economy, why is health care exempt?

I heard today about the notion of "loss ratio" among the health vested interests. What loss ratio means is that for every health care dollar denied by the Big Medico (Pharma, hospitals, HMos, devices, nursing homes) it translates into $ wins in the stock market! How immoral is that? Your sister or grandpa being denied urgent, needed care, translates as a plus for these companies. They don't care about your grandpa or sister, they just want their Wall Street stock to rise. It's the ugly truth, and that's why they are spending $1.4 million,daily, in advertisements (on our supposedly free air waves) to peddle their immoral unsustainable commercial model. When do we scream ENOUGH!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Samalabear
08:37 AM on 07/16/2009
I was listening to Dodd and Hatch on NPR this morning, and through the whole interview I thought these people have to know the problem. The problem is making money for Wall Street starting with insurance companies. Doctors and hospitals don't like the reimbursement from insurance companies and they pad the bills. Dental rates are off the chart and I'm sure that has to do with insurance, too. I have yet to find a dentist that would give me a break, though. They want me, the uninsured, to pay the full rate, not the Medicare rate, not the insurance company reimbursement rate. Which is why I can't get work done.

It all comes down to the middleman -- private insurers being the big one. They should be non-profit. Get them off of Wall Street. I just write from what I hear and see. What I see is insurance companies and pharma and pro-profit hospitals being coddled, while businesses and individuals get hammered. And I really do disagree with continuing employer-provided health insurance.

It all comes down to single payer being sane, streamlined and smart. Health insurance companies offer supplemental or full policies to those who want to deal with them, but make them non-profit as they once were.
02:42 AM on 07/16/2009
Not one single Republican vote - WOW

How much are these creeps being paid by the insurance companies????
03:06 AM on 07/16/2009
It is a massive tax.....trillions of dollars, You are so ill informed.
03:13 AM on 07/16/2009
Who 'informed' you?

We pay double what other developed countries pay per-person for health care. And that's without all Americans being covered!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim303
03:15 AM on 07/16/2009
Good. You are describing something ethical and good. Of course, you should try living on an island with all your tax hating friends, without roads and schools for a while, in order to see what I mean.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Opti
02:24 AM on 07/16/2009
Huh. Headline: "WATCH: Franken Questions Sotomayor, Cracks A Few Jokes"
Links to AP article about the debate in the Senate over healthcare...
Um...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:14 AM on 07/16/2009
Yeah, I noticed that too? Where's Al ?????
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Solja
05:05 AM on 07/16/2009
That's why I clicked on it.
01:44 AM on 07/16/2009
Is anyone else enjoying watching this wise Latina woman make these pasty white GOP bigots make poopie in their pants as much as I am????
03:09 AM on 07/16/2009
Well, if it is ok to watch someone completely distort their record the it must be fun. She put up decisions to SC ten times and was overturned on eight of them. Not a particularly stellar record. At least Clarence Thomas is a scholar.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim303
03:16 AM on 07/16/2009
So what? You can still be a good judge even if you get overturned.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
atcrossroads
03:32 AM on 07/16/2009
Interesting. I did not know that. Now does that tell us something about Judge Sotomayor, or does that tell us something about the supreme court? Justice is not just about the letter of the law, it is also about the spirit of the law, and seemingly some of those judges have a very limited vocabulary when it comes to the latter.
03:23 AM on 07/16/2009
Republicans are aware that Obama intends to change their whole game -- removing all the advantages for the rich that have been dialed into the system over the last decade. Their lovely elitist world is being dashed to pieces. Their response is to damage anything and everything they can. Lie, cheat and steal with every breath -- with hopes of making a dent of some sort. Hoping to find that thing that somehow makes the American people go stupid again.

Today the target is the most unassailable of jurists -- but they don't care. She's Obama's choice, so she's the enemy. And this is all out war.
01:13 AM on 07/16/2009
Sessions was heard by several colleagues commenting that he 'used to think they [the Klan] were OK' until he found out some of them were 'pot smokers.'"
01:17 AM on 07/16/2009
LMFAO!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:26 AM on 07/16/2009
Yeah, those pot smokers are far worse than muderers. This is clearly in line with the way republicans view things in America. They legalize weapons, so the right wing extremist can continue to kill those who do not agree with them, and they make a God given natural herb, that's been time tested and proven to make friends of the worst of enemies. After using pot, enemies of all colors and ethnic groups come together and eat, and eat and eat this unnatural, chemically induced substance called food. Republicans believe in God, but not the peace herb that God provided, damn hypocrites!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
harobamason
its a new day
07:12 AM on 07/16/2009
YES that is true.

The irony is astounding.