More

Shuttle Endeavour Launch VIDEO: Blast Off Successful But NASA Concerned About Debris That Hit Shuttle

First Posted: 02/08/10 08:08 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 02:40 PM ET

***SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO***
UPDATED 2/8/2010: Looking for information about the February 2010 Endeavour shuttle launch? See photos, video, and details on the most recent Endeavour blast off on the Huffington Post here.

By MARCIA DUNN, AP Aerospace Writer

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. - After more than a month's delay, space shuttle Endeavour and seven astronauts thundered into orbit Wednesday on a flight to the international space station, hauling up a veranda for Japan's enormous lab and looking to set a crowd record.

Success came on launch try No. 6, on the eve of the 40th anniversary of the liftoff of man's first moon landing.

But the mood was dampened somewhat when NASA managers watched the launch video.

Several pieces of foam insulation came off the external fuel tank during liftoff, and the shuttle was hit two or three times, said Bill Gerstenmaier, NASA's space operations chief. Some scuff marks were spotted on the belly, but that probably is coating loss and considered minor, he said.

Engineers immediately began reviewing all the launch video, standard procedure ever since flights resumed following the Columbia disaster. Gerstenmaier said zoom-in photos will be taken of the entire shuttle right before it docks with the space station Friday, to ascertain whether the shuttle suffered any serious damage.

"The bottom line is we saw some stuff," said Mike Moses, chairman of the mission management team. "Some of it doesn't concern us. Some of it you just can't really speculate on right now. But we have the tools in front of us and the processes in front of us to go clear this vehicle for entry" in 16 days.

Columbia was destroyed during re-entry in 2003 because of a hole in its wing, left there by flyaway foam at liftoff.

Endeavour blasted off a little after 6 p.m. from its seaside pad -- the same one used to launch Apollo 11 on July 16, 1969 -- a welcome sight for shuttle workers who had to overcome hydrogen gas leaks last month and, since the weekend, thunderstorms.

The skies finally cleared, allowing commander Mark Polansky and his crew to embark on their 16-day adventure. One more holdup and they would have tied a record for the most shuttle launch delays.

"The weather is finally cooperating, so it is now time to fly," launch director Pete Nickolenko called out to the crew. "Persistence pays off."

Replied Polansky: "Endeavour's patiently waited for this. We're ready to go, and we're going to take all of you with us on a great mission."

Endeavour soared through thin clouds and was visible, gleaming in the sunlight, for three minutes. The exhaust plume and its shadow linked together to resemble a high arc in the sky.

The astronauts will catch up Friday afternoon with the space station, which was soaring more than 220 miles above the Pacific at launch time. When they do, it will be the first time 13 people are together in space. Ten is the previous record. The doubling of the space station crew a few months ago, to six, makes the new record possible.

The shuttle will remain docked at the space station for nearly two weeks. During that time, the shuttle astronauts will help install the third and final piece of the Japanese space station lab, a porch for outdoor experiments. The first two parts went up on shuttle flights last year.

Japan's $1 billion laboratory is the largest and fanciest of the three up there. It even has its own robot arm which will be used for the first time, during the coming days, to move research payloads.

Shuttle managers say robot arm operations will be especially intricate on this flight, involving all three of the available mechanical devices.

Five spacewalks are planned to help attach the new porch to the Japanese lab, give the space station some new batteries and perform other maintenance.

Endeavour also is carrying up hundreds of pounds of food for the station crew and a fresh station resident, an American who will take the place of the lone Japanese on board.

All of the major space station partners will be represented once Endeavour arrives. The combined crews will have seven Americans, two Canadians, two Russians, one Japanese and one Belgian. All but one are men.

NASA was anxious to get Endeavour flying, given time is running out on the shuttle program.

Only eight shuttle flights remain, including this one, before NASA retires the fleet. The White House wants those missions completed by the end of next year if at all possible. Each one is dedicated to finishing the space station -- now 81 percent complete -- and hauling up supplies and big spare parts that are too big to fly on any other rocketship. Some of those large parts, including a pump and antenna, are flying up on Endeavour.

The lengthy delay means Endeavour will be in orbit on the 40th anniversary of man's first steps on the moon, on Monday.

The Endeavour crew, meanwhile, claimed its own record with Wednesday's launch. Rookie astronaut Christopher Cassidy became the 500th person in space.

And Polansky, the skipper, is set to become only the second person to use Twitter in space.

One technical issue during the final stage of the countdown involved a shuttle fuel cell. Engineers worried that the fuel cell -- one of three identical electrical powerplants -- might not be able to operate at low power during the flight, which could cut short the mission. Mission managers cleared the issue shortly before liftoff.

___

Associated Press writer Mike Schneider contributed to this report.

___

On the Net:

NASA: http://www.nasa.gov/mission(underscore)pages/shuttle/main/index.html

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

***SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO*** UPDATED 2/8/2010: Looking for information about the February 2010 Endeavour shuttle launch? See photos, video, and details on the most recent Endeavour blast off on the Hu...
***SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO*** UPDATED 2/8/2010: Looking for information about the February 2010 Endeavour shuttle launch? See photos, video, and details on the most recent Endeavour blast off on the Hu...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 215
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:38 AM on 07/23/2009
DEBRIS = UFO'S .... CRAZY BUT TRUE...
04:52 PM on 07/16/2009
Amazing lauch of the shuttle last night - awe inspiring. Would love to see it live one day. Rgds Vince
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kevin Robles
comp sci major
10:01 AM on 07/16/2009
Too cloudy to watch the launch from the backyard... was looking forward to it all day
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bccmeteorites
Don't believe everything NASA says.
09:53 AM on 07/16/2009
These posts are rather spirited and enlightening. I think some have given NASA way too much credit for its infusion of public money into space exploration, the development of hardware and software leading to new discoveries. In many respects the agency is the follower not the leader. Here on my desk is a copy of ASTRONOMY written by Forest Ray Moulton, published by The McMillan Company in 1931, in the works more than 30 years before NASA was "invented". This book is very detailed contains numerous photographs and descriptions of celestial objects from ground based instruments long before NASA came on to the scene. Chapter 15 is devoted to stars and Nebulae which again is highly detailed with photographs as to their physical characteristics. In 2002 a Berkeley scientist (NASA funded) was making outrageous claims in his research of Chondrules. "Implying that he discovered them". Over the years NASA has funded lots of research on these objects. The minute crystalline objects are thought to be the primordial seeds expelled during the beginning of the Universe. Page 302 of this same book by Moulton contains a vivid description and highly detailed photomicrograph of a Chondrule. While NASA may lay claim to much scientific advancement and provide beautiful photographs of celestial objects like Supernovae obtained from Hubble, they cannot lay claim to actually having studied the solid physical remnants of these objects in the lab, like I can here on this page.

http://www.bccmeteorites.com/page3.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bude
My Brain Hurts!
09:44 AM on 07/16/2009
Frying the shuttle is like driving a Ford Pinto.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tonewheel
Vote early...and often.
09:45 AM on 07/16/2009
You mean you want to cook the shuttle by frying it? Or are you speaking English-Japanese?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bude
My Brain Hurts!
09:46 AM on 07/16/2009
What?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bude
My Brain Hurts!
09:46 AM on 07/16/2009
It's time to trade in that clunker.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Proxy11
Aspiring to Something
09:03 AM on 07/16/2009
It's really sad to read some of the comments on here. I can't believe people would actually want to shut down NASA.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bude
My Brain Hurts!
09:45 AM on 07/16/2009
They have no imagination.
09:50 AM on 07/16/2009
Most parts of NASA are fantastic, but there are a few bad apples that unfortunately keep getting more and more of the NASA budget even though everything they touch turns to crap.

The Ames, Goddard, Johnson, Kennedy, Langley, and Michoud facilities turn out great work consistently. The major offender is the Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama. They're responsible for NASA's repeated and spectacularly unsuccessful efforts to develop a launch system to replace Shuttle. They haven't developed an upper stage since Saturn V, and it shows. They're DECADES behind Lockheed Martin and Boeing, and instead of accepting their proposals, they make outrageous claims that they violate the laws of physics.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
temenos
Honi soit qui mal y pense
11:01 AM on 07/16/2009
The longevity of Spirit and Opportunity are an example of good design and execution. Sometimes NASA does excel.
08:21 AM on 07/16/2009
The debris impacts following SRB separation caused less damage than Atlantis suffered on STS-125, and that posed no concern for reentry from a significantly higher orbit. There were more debris events during heads-up roll later in second stage ascent, but at that point there's no atmosphere to slow the debris, and so they impact the vehicle at low relative velocity.

As I type, the crew of Shuttle Endeavor is waking up for flight day 2 activities, which are dominated by an extensive regimen of thermal protection system inspections. I'll be the first to admit that the Shuttle design concept is flawed, but the safety measures that NASA has put in place since the Columbia disaster are impressive, and while Shuttle will never be a particularly safe vehicle, NASA is doing everything they can to fly out the remainder of the launch manifest as safely as possible.

I'm looking forward to a spectacular space construction project. Three robotic arms (Shuttle, Station, and Kibo) operating in concert with five spacewalks to maneuver some gigantic pieces of hardware in very tight places. The launches and landings are always a sight to see, but in my book, the on-orbit activities are just as impressive to watch. It's just amazingly beautiful up there, and the sophisticated work that human beings can accomplish in such a harsh and unfamiliar environment is simply remarkable.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:12 AM on 07/16/2009
When will the national nightmare of NASA end?
08:12 AM on 07/16/2009
Awesome, space exploration must be a priority.
08:08 AM on 07/16/2009
HEY NASA! Lowe's is having a 2-for-1 on rolls of duct tape.
08:04 AM on 07/16/2009
Why do so many want to give the same politicians responsible for the system which produced the exploding space shuttle complete control over every single life or death medical treatment of every single US citizen?
08:24 AM on 07/16/2009
I wouldn't want Marshall Space Flight Center making decisions about my health, but then again, I don't know who you believe is suggesting this.
08:42 AM on 07/16/2009
Do they offer remedial reading comprehension at your community college?
08:03 AM on 07/16/2009
Obama would be better off keeping missile defense and shutting down NASA.
08:26 AM on 07/16/2009
Yes, let's transfer funding from a program that fails every once in a while to a program that succeeds every once in a while...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jbrantow
08:47 AM on 07/16/2009
I didn't think star wars ever had a success....unless they cheated.
08:00 AM on 07/16/2009
How is it that virtually every launch is accompanied by some kind of debris maybe damaging some part of the shuttle? Can they just make these things so "debris" doesn't just fly off at takeoff?? This isn't rocket science people...

Well, alright...but this part should be pretty damn fundamental.
08:44 AM on 07/16/2009
All cryogenic liquid rockets have liberate ice during launch, and most are designed to shed foam for ablative insulation. Watch some of the old Saturn V launches. Massive amounts of ice and debris come streaming off the vehicle as it clears the tower.

The only reason why debris liberation is a problem for Shuttle is because the orbiter is mounted on the side of the propellant tank. Most rockets mount the payload on the top where it isn't in the way of any debris. The Shuttle orbiter is positioned right in the line of fire. It's a major design flaw to be sure.
07:36 AM on 07/16/2009
"THEY MOVE IN ANY DIRECTION AND SOMETIMES JUST DISAPPEAR" Sounds like my employees.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
SanTang
Your micro-bio is empty is my micro-bio
07:59 AM on 07/16/2009
"And my employers" many could claim right now.
photo
blico
65 A Kinder Gentler Soul
06:16 AM on 07/16/2009
Thursday, July 28, 2005 9:27 a.m. EDT
Shuttle Foam Loss Linked to EPA RegsAs recently as last month, NASA had been warned that foam insulation on the space shuttle's external fuel tank could sheer off as it did in the 2003 Columbia disaster - a problem that has plagued space shuttle flights since NASA switched to a non-Freon-based type of foam insulation to comply with Clinton administration Environmental Protection Agency regulations.
"Despite exhaustive work and considerable progress over the past 2-1/2 years, NASA has been unable to eliminate the possibility of dangerous pieces of foam and ice from breaking off the external fuel tank and striking the shuttle at liftoff," the agency's Return-to-Flight Task Force said just last month, according to The Associated Press.
But instead of returning the much safer, politically incorrect, Freon-based foam for Discovery's launch, the space agency tinkered with the application process, changing "the way the foam was applied to reduce the size and number of air pockets," according to Newsday.
"NASA chose to stick with non-Freon-based foam insulation on the booster rockets, despite evidence that this type of foam causes up to 11 times as much damage to thermal tiles as the older, Freon-based foam," warned space expert Robert Garmong just nine months ago. Rest of story here.
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/7/28/93055.shtml