Shuttle Endeavour Launch VIDEO: Blast Off Successful But NASA Concerned About Debris That Hit Shuttle


First Posted: 07-15-09 08:45 PM   |   Updated: 07-15-09 08:55 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

***SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO***

By MARCIA DUNN, AP Aerospace Writer

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. - After more than a month's delay, space shuttle Endeavour and seven astronauts thundered into orbit Wednesday on a flight to the international space station, hauling up a veranda for Japan's enormous lab and looking to set a crowd record.

Success came on launch try No. 6, on the eve of the 40th anniversary of the liftoff of man's first moon landing.

But the mood was dampened somewhat when NASA managers watched the launch video.

Several pieces of foam insulation came off the external fuel tank during liftoff, and the shuttle was hit two or three times, said Bill Gerstenmaier, NASA's space operations chief. Some scuff marks were spotted on the belly, but that probably is coating loss and considered minor, he said.

Engineers immediately began reviewing all the launch video, standard procedure ever since flights resumed following the Columbia disaster. Gerstenmaier said zoom-in photos will be taken of the entire shuttle right before it docks with the space station Friday, to ascertain whether the shuttle suffered any serious damage.

"The bottom line is we saw some stuff," said Mike Moses, chairman of the mission management team. "Some of it doesn't concern us. Some of it you just can't really speculate on right now. But we have the tools in front of us and the processes in front of us to go clear this vehicle for entry" in 16 days.

Story continues below
advertisement

Columbia was destroyed during re-entry in 2003 because of a hole in its wing, left there by flyaway foam at liftoff.

Endeavour blasted off a little after 6 p.m. from its seaside pad -- the same one used to launch Apollo 11 on July 16, 1969 -- a welcome sight for shuttle workers who had to overcome hydrogen gas leaks last month and, since the weekend, thunderstorms.

The skies finally cleared, allowing commander Mark Polansky and his crew to embark on their 16-day adventure. One more holdup and they would have tied a record for the most shuttle launch delays.

"The weather is finally cooperating, so it is now time to fly," launch director Pete Nickolenko called out to the crew. "Persistence pays off."

Replied Polansky: "Endeavour's patiently waited for this. We're ready to go, and we're going to take all of you with us on a great mission."

Endeavour soared through thin clouds and was visible, gleaming in the sunlight, for three minutes. The exhaust plume and its shadow linked together to resemble a high arc in the sky.

The astronauts will catch up Friday afternoon with the space station, which was soaring more than 220 miles above the Pacific at launch time. When they do, it will be the first time 13 people are together in space. Ten is the previous record. The doubling of the space station crew a few months ago, to six, makes the new record possible.

The shuttle will remain docked at the space station for nearly two weeks. During that time, the shuttle astronauts will help install the third and final piece of the Japanese space station lab, a porch for outdoor experiments. The first two parts went up on shuttle flights last year.

Japan's $1 billion laboratory is the largest and fanciest of the three up there. It even has its own robot arm which will be used for the first time, during the coming days, to move research payloads.

Shuttle managers say robot arm operations will be especially intricate on this flight, involving all three of the available mechanical devices.

Five spacewalks are planned to help attach the new porch to the Japanese lab, give the space station some new batteries and perform other maintenance.

Endeavour also is carrying up hundreds of pounds of food for the station crew and a fresh station resident, an American who will take the place of the lone Japanese on board.

All of the major space station partners will be represented once Endeavour arrives. The combined crews will have seven Americans, two Canadians, two Russians, one Japanese and one Belgian. All but one are men.

NASA was anxious to get Endeavour flying, given time is running out on the shuttle program.

Only eight shuttle flights remain, including this one, before NASA retires the fleet. The White House wants those missions completed by the end of next year if at all possible. Each one is dedicated to finishing the space station -- now 81 percent complete -- and hauling up supplies and big spare parts that are too big to fly on any other rocketship. Some of those large parts, including a pump and antenna, are flying up on Endeavour.

The lengthy delay means Endeavour will be in orbit on the 40th anniversary of man's first steps on the moon, on Monday.

The Endeavour crew, meanwhile, claimed its own record with Wednesday's launch. Rookie astronaut Christopher Cassidy became the 500th person in space.

And Polansky, the skipper, is set to become only the second person to use Twitter in space.

One technical issue during the final stage of the countdown involved a shuttle fuel cell. Engineers worried that the fuel cell -- one of three identical electrical powerplants -- might not be able to operate at low power during the flight, which could cut short the mission. Mission managers cleared the issue shortly before liftoff.

___

Associated Press writer Mike Schneider contributed to this report.

___

On the Net:

NASA: http://www.nasa.gov/mission(underscore)pages/shuttle/main/index.html

***SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO*** By MARCIA DUNN, AP Aerospace Writer CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. - After more than a month's delay, space shuttle Endeavour and seven astronauts thundered into orbit Wednesday on...
***SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO*** By MARCIA DUNN, AP Aerospace Writer CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. - After more than a month's delay, space shuttle Endeavour and seven astronauts thundered into orbit Wednesday on...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
215
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
photo

DEBRIS = UFO'S .... CRAZY BUT TRUE...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:38 AM on 07/23/2009
photo

Amazing lauch of the shuttle last night - awe inspiring. Would love to see it live one day. Rgds Vince

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:52 PM on 07/16/2009
photo

Too cloudy to watch the launch from the backyard... was looking forward to it all day

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 AM on 07/16/2009
photo

These posts are rather spirited and enlightening. I think some have given NASA way too much credit for its infusion of public money into space exploration, the development of hardware and software leading to new discoveries. In many respects the agency is the follower not the leader. Here on my desk is a copy of ASTRONOMY written by Forest Ray Moulton, published by The McMillan Company in 1931, in the works more than 30 years before NASA was "invented". This book is very detailed contains numerous photographs and descriptions of celestial objects from ground based instruments long before NASA came on to the scene. Chapter 15 is devoted to stars and Nebulae which again is highly detailed with photographs as to their physical characteristics. In 2002 a Berkeley scientist (NASA funded) was making outrageous claims in his research of Chondrules. "Implying that he discovered them". Over the years NASA has funded lots of research on these objects. The minute crystalline objects are thought to be the primordial seeds expelled during the beginning of the Universe. Page 302 of this same book by Moulton contains a vivid description and highly detailed photomicrograph of a Chondrule. While NASA may lay claim to much scientific advancement and provide beautiful photographs of celestial objects like Supernovae obtained from Hubble, they cannot lay claim to actually having studied the solid physical remnants of these objects in the lab, like I can here on this page.

http://www.bccmeteorites.com/page3.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 AM on 07/16/2009
- Bude I'm a Fan of Bude 165 fans permalink
photo

Frying the shuttle is like driving a Ford Pinto.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 AM on 07/16/2009
- tonewheel I'm a Fan of tonewheel 32 fans permalink
photo

You mean you want to cook the shuttle by frying it? Or are you speaking English-Japanese?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 AM on 07/16/2009
- Bude I'm a Fan of Bude 165 fans permalink
photo

It's time to trade in that clunker.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 AM on 07/16/2009
- Proxy11 I'm a Fan of Proxy11 8 fans permalink
photo

It's really sad to read some of the comments on here. I can't believe people would actually want to shut down NASA.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:03 AM on 07/16/2009
- Bude I'm a Fan of Bude 165 fans permalink
photo

They have no imagination.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 AM on 07/16/2009
- jsarets I'm a Fan of jsarets 148 fans permalink

Most parts of NASA are fantastic, but there are a few bad apples that unfortunately keep getting more and more of the NASA budget even though everything they touch turns to crap.

The Ames, Goddard, Johnson, Kennedy, Langley, and Michoud facilities turn out great work consistently. The major offender is the Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama. They're responsible for NASA's repeated and spectacularly unsuccessful efforts to develop a launch system to replace Shuttle. They haven't developed an upper stage since Saturn V, and it shows. They're DECADES behind Lockheed Martin and Boeing, and instead of accepting their proposals, they make outrageous claims that they violate the laws of physics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:50 AM on 07/16/2009
- temenos I'm a Fan of temenos 23 fans permalink
photo

The longevity of Spirit and Opportunity are an example of good design and execution. Sometimes NASA does excel.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:01 AM on 07/16/2009
- jsarets I'm a Fan of jsarets 148 fans permalink

Forgot to put Jet Propulsion Laboratory on the good list.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 AM on 07/16/2009
- MaxPowerXP I'm a Fan of MaxPowerXP 7 fans permalink

People who want to shut down NASA have no soul and take no joy whatsoever from life or the concept of exploration. While others reach for the stars, they're perfectly happy to plant their face in the mud.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 AM on 07/16/2009
- jsarets I'm a Fan of jsarets 148 fans permalink

The debris impacts following SRB separation caused less damage than Atlantis suffered on STS-125, and that posed no concern for reentry from a significantly higher orbit. There were more debris events during heads-up roll later in second stage ascent, but at that point there's no atmosphere to slow the debris, and so they impact the vehicle at low relative velocity.

As I type, the crew of Shuttle Endeavor is waking up for flight day 2 activities, which are dominated by an extensive regimen of thermal protection system inspections. I'll be the first to admit that the Shuttle design concept is flawed, but the safety measures that NASA has put in place since the Columbia disaster are impressive, and while Shuttle will never be a particularly safe vehicle, NASA is doing everything they can to fly out the remainder of the launch manifest as safely as possible.

I'm looking forward to a spectacular space construction project. Three robotic arms (Shuttle, Station, and Kibo) operating in concert with five spacewalks to maneuver some gigantic pieces of hardware in very tight places. The launches and landings are always a sight to see, but in my book, the on-orbit activities are just as impressive to watch. It's just amazingly beautiful up there, and the sophisticated work that human beings can accomplish in such a harsh and unfamiliar environment is simply remarkable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 AM on 07/16/2009

Awesome, space exploration must be a priority.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:12 AM on 07/16/2009
- katooom I'm a Fan of katooom 15 fans permalink
photo

When will the national nightmare of NASA end?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:12 AM on 07/16/2009
photo

HEY NASA! Lowe's is having a 2-for-1 on rolls of duct tape.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 AM on 07/16/2009

Why do so many want to give the same politicians responsible for the system which produced the exploding space shuttle complete control over every single life or death medical treatment of every single US citizen?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:04 AM on 07/16/2009
- jsarets I'm a Fan of jsarets 148 fans permalink

I wouldn't want Marshall Space Flight Center making decisions about my health, but then again, I don't know who you believe is suggesting this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:24 AM on 07/16/2009

Do they offer remedial reading comprehension at your community college?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:42 AM on 07/16/2009

Obama would be better off keeping missile defense and shutting down NASA.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:03 AM on 07/16/2009
- jsarets I'm a Fan of jsarets 148 fans permalink

Yes, let's transfer funding from a program that fails every once in a while to a program that succeeds every once in a while...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:26 AM on 07/16/2009
- jbrantow I'm a Fan of jbrantow 38 fans permalink

I didn't think star wars ever had a success....unless they cheated.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:47 AM on 07/16/2009

How is it that virtually every launch is accompanied by some kind of debris maybe damaging some part of the shuttle? Can they just make these things so "debris" doesn't just fly off at takeoff?? This isn't rocket science people...

Well, alright...but this part should be pretty damn fundamental.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:00 AM on 07/16/2009
- jsarets I'm a Fan of jsarets 148 fans permalink

All cryogenic liquid rockets have liberate ice during launch, and most are designed to shed foam for ablative insulation. Watch some of the old Saturn V launches. Massive amounts of ice and debris come streaming off the vehicle as it clears the tower.

The only reason why debris liberation is a problem for Shuttle is because the orbiter is mounted on the side of the propellant tank. Most rockets mount the payload on the top where it isn't in the way of any debris. The Shuttle orbiter is positioned right in the line of fire. It's a major design flaw to be sure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 AM on 07/16/2009
- NanDarien I'm a Fan of NanDarien 2 fans permalink

"THEY MOVE IN ANY DIRECTION AND SOMETIMES JUST DISAPPEAR" Sounds like my employees.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:36 AM on 07/16/2009
- SanTang I'm a Fan of SanTang 4 fans permalink

"And my employers" many could claim right now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 AM on 07/16/2009
- blico I'm a Fan of blico 46 fans permalink
photo

Thursday, July 28, 2005 9:27 a.m. EDT
Shuttle Foam Loss Linked to EPA RegsAs recently as last month, NASA had been warned that foam insulation on the space shuttle's external fuel tank could sheer off as it did in the 2003 Columbia disaster - a problem that has plagued space shuttle flights since NASA switched to a non-Freon-based type of foam insulation to comply with Clinton administration Environmental Protection Agency regulations.
"Despite exhaustive work and considerable progress over the past 2-1/2 years, NASA has been unable to eliminate the possibility of dangerous pieces of foam and ice from breaking off the external fuel tank and striking the shuttle at liftoff," the agency's Return-to-Flight Task Force said just last month, according to The Associated Press.
But instead of returning the much safer, politically incorrect, Freon-based foam for Discovery's launch, the space agency tinkered with the application process, changing "the way the foam was applied to reduce the size and number of air pockets," according to Newsday.
"NASA chose to stick with non-Freon-based foam insulation on the booster rockets, despite evidence that this type of foam causes up to 11 times as much damage to thermal tiles as the older, Freon-based foam," warned space expert Robert Garmong just nine months ago. Rest of story here.
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/7/28/93055.shtml

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:16 AM on 07/16/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect