CIT Denied Bailout, Bankruptcy Likely

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - CIT Denied Bailout, Bankruptcy Likely stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
A pedestrian past the the CIT Group Inc. building in New York, Wednesday July 15, 2009. The Obama administration drew a line in the sand on financial bailouts Wednesday by denying emergency aid to CIT Group Inc., a struggling commercial lender on the brink of bankruptcy. (AP Photo/Bebeto Matthews)

NEW YORK — Denied a federal bailout, CIT Group Inc. said late Thursday its board and management continue to seek alternatives to shore up the company's cash position and remain in talks with potential lenders to secure financing and stave off a bankruptcy protection filing.

CIT saw its shares plunge 75 percent Thursday as bondholders scrambled to find an 11th-hour solution that would keep the commercial lender out of Chapter 11. But there is no guarantee they will be able to save the ailing company, which teeters on the brink after failing to get emergency government funding.

CIT said late Wednesday that talks with regulators about a possible rescue had broken off after days of round-the-clock negotations. The move marked a defining moment for the Obama administration and showed it's drawing a line in the sand on federal rescues for troubled financial firms.

In a last-ditch effort to avoid bankruptcy, CIT is trying to line up $2 billion to $4 billion in rescue financing from its debtholders within the next 24 hours, two sources familiar with the talks told The Associated Press. They requested anonymity because they weren't authorized to speak publicly.

CIT bondholders discussed their options Thursday in a conference call that involved restructuring firm Houlihan Lokey, according to the sources. Another conference call with the largest bondholders was to be organized by bond manager Pimco later in the day, the sources said. Houlihan Lokey and Pimco didn't return calls seeking comment.

If CIT can improve its liquidity, either through debt restructuring or by getting an injection of private equity, that could give it better leverage to reopen talks with regulators. The most likely avenue for survial would be getting permission to transfer assets to the company's bank. The bank could then borrow against that money at a discount if the Fed allows it.

Such transfers require approval from the Fed and the FDIC because regulators don't want banks – whose deposits are insured – to risk insolvency by bailing out their parent companies.

Regulators resisted CIT's earlier plea for permission to make a transfer because they didn't think the company was strong enough, and worried it would default on any loans from the Fed. With a stronger balance sheet, CIT may make a better case.

Story continues below
advertisement

But investors were acting as if bankruptcy were unavoidable, sending CIT shares skidding $1.23, or 75 percent, to close at 41 cents after sinking as low as 31 cents earlier in the session.

Both Fitch Ratings and Moody's further downgraded CIT's debt Thursday following the company's announcement that it expects no further federal support.

"I think it makes a bankruptcy filing a near certainty," banking analyst Bert Ely said of the refusal to bail out CIT.

Meanwhile, shares in the broader market traded higher. According to preliminary calculations at the market's close, the Dow Jones industrial average rose 95.61, or 1.1 percent, to 8,711.82. The Standard & Poor's 500 index rose 8.06, or 0.9 percent, to 940.74.

The muted response by the overall market to CIT's woes suggests investors are more focused on signs that the economic slump may be easing, said Paul Baiocchi, senior market strategist at Delta Global Advisors in San Francisco.

CIT's small size relative to other big commercial banks may also ease worries of a ripple effect. Though a major lender to small and midsize U.S. business with about a million clients, CIT is one-eighth of the size of Lehman Brothers when massive credit losses forced the investment bank into bankruptcy last fall.

CIT had also begun cutting back on lending in recent months, diminishing the risk a possible bankruptcy could cause significant damage to the broader economy. The lender had $5.3 billion in credit lines to customers as of March, down from $6.1 billion at the end of 2008.

"That shows they were pulling back and should lessen the immediate blow of this," said Kathleen Shanley, an analyst at corporate bond research firm Gimme Credit. "I don't see a real contagion effect here."

CIT, which got $2.3 billion of bailout money in December, had warned that depriving it of more federal aid could imperil about a million corporate borrowers – from Dunkin' Donuts franchisees to retailer Dillards Inc.

The Bush administration paid a price for its decision not to save Lehman Brothers, whose collapse helped spark the financial crisis last fall.

Asked about CIT, a Treasury Department spokeswoman said in an e-mail that "even during periods of financial stress, we believe that there is a very high threshold for exceptional government assistance to individual companies."

A bankruptcy filing would wipe out CIT's shareholders and the government's $2.3 billion stake. But CIT's clients would not automatically lose their lines of credit, longtime banking analyst Bert Ely said.

Still, with other lenders to retailers already under financial strain, many CIT clients may lose their financing options.

"The industry just won't be able to absorb the amount of volume," said Michael Cipriani, executive vice president of Rosenthal & Rosenthal Inc., a competitor of CIT that's considered healthy.

The company in April posted a larger first-quarter loss than expected and has seen funding options disappear as investors shy away from purchasing all but the safest forms of debt. The lender has $7.4 billion in debt coming due in the first quarter of 2010, plus other obligations.

Though a fraction of the size of big commercial banks, CIT's holdings are substantial. The company had $75.7 billion in assets as of March 31, according to a corporate filing.

Lehman Brothers, which collapsed after former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson declined to save it, listed $639 billion in assets when it filed for bankruptcy Sept. 15.

___

Wagner reported from Washington. AP Economics Writers Jeannine Aversa and Martin Crutsinger in Washington, and AP Retail Writer Anne D'Innocenzio in New York contributed to this report.

NEW YORK — Denied a federal bailout, CIT Group Inc. said late Thursday its board and management continue to seek alternatives to shore up the company's cash position and remain in talks with pot...
NEW YORK — Denied a federal bailout, CIT Group Inc. said late Thursday its board and management continue to seek alternatives to shore up the company's cash position and remain in talks with pot...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
31
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- writeon1 I'm a Fan of writeon1 9 fans permalink
photo

They shouldn't worry. Goldman has so much extra money now that they can buy it and become even bigger. Then Goldman can screw up again through their greed and blame it on everyone they stepped on to begin with. Geez, I wish tar and feathers was still allowed. http://newsy1.wordpress.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:42 PM on 07/16/2009

Small potatoes. Let it go. It's mostly a lender, isn't it? So how much is at risk in deposits? Anything?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:27 PM on 07/16/2009

Good. Let AIG go next!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:23 PM on 07/16/2009

"Nero fiddled while Rome burned. I imagine our Congressman, Senators, and President have a symphony to attend tonight. If the FDIC is not going to risk losses and support CIT, then the FDIC needs to tell the banks that were so anxious to repay the TARP like Goldman Sachs and J.P. Morgan that they can no longer issue bonds guaranteed by the FDIC. Please, let’s support Main Street for once."

http://www.escapethenewgreatdepression.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:58 PM on 07/16/2009
- jeun28 I'm a Fan of jeun28 19 fans permalink

Why is it that all we have in this country is just giant corporations? What happened to the little guys? I am sorry this is not a republican or democratic issue but it just seems sickening. What happened to the people. are the corporations people now

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:18 PM on 07/16/2009

"Why is it that all we have in this country is just giant corporations?"

You don't. It's just that you don't know the smaller players because they are either not in the news most of the time or they are not even on the radar because they are privately owned and they don't answer to anyone but the IRS with their quarterly tax statement, none of which is on the public record.

"What happened to the little guys? "

They are all around you. I work for one of them. But then, we are financially so healthy, you wouldn't believe it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:30 PM on 07/16/2009
- Sundialsvc4 I'm a Fan of Sundialsvc4 138 fans permalink

"I don't believe a word that you say."

The world of finance is so besotted with crime, and high crime, that its version of what is "real" is entirely a decision of convenience. One moment they are "bankrupt," with not a dime to their name, and the next they are bulging with cash.

How can this be?

Simple: because it ISN'T. Because it never was.

"Worthless paper" is "toxic asset." "Ponzi scheme" is "derivative security." The crime goes on. And on. And on.

Perhaps there are more-than-a-few hapless Senators, Congressmen, SEC members and other government officers who by now realize just how swiftly "bribery" turns into "blackmail."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:19 PM on 07/16/2009
- TylerRose I'm a Fan of TylerRose 6 fans permalink

Make sure the taxpayer's 2.3 billion bailout money is recoup from the bankruptcy. If CIT was already cutting back on money to small businesses, then the small businesses weren't getting needed help anyway. Dunkin Donuts, Dillards, and all the other businesses just need to switch banks. So what is the problem?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 07/16/2009

Yes! In fact I think it should be possible for the government to take the recouped 2.3 billion and lend it to their clients while they transition to new banks, since its not like CIT was lending it out anyway. Dillards, I know, has been in dire straights of late. Getting rid of the zombie banks is the best thing that can happen. But I'm just a crazy liberal....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:17 PM on 07/16/2009
- jsarets I'm a Fan of jsarets 148 fans permalink

Don't worry. The TBTF commercial banks that got bailouts will buy the small business and community banks that didn't for pennies on the dollar...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 PM on 07/16/2009
- Not Blind I'm a Fan of Not Blind 22 fans permalink
photo

Lehman Bros. deserved to fail, just as did Golman-Sachs, Merryl Lynch, AIG and the rest. Those managers took inappropriate, excessive risks, bribed ratings agencies to over-value their funds, and then "guaranteed" them with CDS's while knowing they lacked capital to cover losses. They encouraged mortgage and real estate brokers to over-value homes, give predatory loans to people they knew were incapable of paying them for their commissions and short-term profits, knowing all along the meltdown would one day come. It was a Ponzi scheme even bigger than Madoff's.
Instead of letting these sharks fail, we bailed them out with no preconditions, oversight, or any accountability for our money. The TARP funds were supposed to buy the toxic assets so banks could balance their books, provide on-going credit, restore solvency and liquidity, and save jobs. Instead, our money was used for posh junkets, bonuses, mergers-acquistions making "too-big-to-fail" institutions even larger, and to thwart regulations, reform in their industries, as well as to kill any viable health care reform legislation. They took our money interest-free, and are buying treasury bonds, charging the government­-taxpayers interest to lend our money back to us, to continue financing their recovery. Paulson, Geithner, Summers, and the rest who are protecting the privileged Goldman Sachs and AIG are the principle benefactors of the firm's rescue, which is why they have no incentive to reform the system they profit from.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 PM on 07/16/2009
- spinns17 I'm a Fan of spinns17 34 fans permalink

about time .f these crooks

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 PM on 07/16/2009
- KCFreedom I'm a Fan of KCFreedom 16 fans permalink

Just for the record, some people seem to confuse CIT (Commercial Investment Trust) with Citibank. There is NO connection.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIT_Group

That doesn't bring any more sympathy from me; they were bought out by Tyco in 1999, of which the scandalous CEO's golden shower curtain became a culturally derided item in American lore. Even though Tyco divested them in 2002 after their scandals, the stank of Tyco probably still permeates them.

I once worked for a company that was bought by Tyco in the 1990s and they just chewed them up and destroyed them. As far as I know, that company no longer exists in any form. All those jobs lost.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 AM on 07/16/2009
- JoeBlough I'm a Fan of JoeBlough 57 fans permalink
photo

A curtain specifically for "golden showers"? Who would have guessed it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 AM on 07/16/2009
- KCFreedom I'm a Fan of KCFreedom 16 fans permalink

lol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 PM on 07/16/2009
- Diana I'm a Fan of Diana 12 fans permalink

Good riddance!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 AM on 07/16/2009
- mcantwell I'm a Fan of mcantwell 320 fans permalink
photo

Quote: "But the decision could come back to haunt the administration if CIT's failure proves devastating to the firm's many small business borrowers. Small businesses are considered crucial to economic recovery, employing about half of the private-sector work force."

Let Citi file Bankruptcy, then the Gov. should lend directly to Small Business'. No more bailouts for 'too big to fail' entities.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 AM on 07/16/2009

I guess CTI didn't "contribute" enough...now GS or CITI or Bof A will be able to pick up the pieces for pennies on the dollar....how Darwinian.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:41 AM on 07/16/2009
- JoeBlough I'm a Fan of JoeBlough 57 fans permalink
photo

And they will use their bail-out money to buy CITI. Now that's funny.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:56 AM on 07/16/2009
- aj88 I'm a Fan of aj88 3 fans permalink

You mean they will use OUR money. Now that's really funny.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:07 AM on 07/16/2009
- mjtaylor22 I'm a Fan of mjtaylor22 39 fans permalink
photo

by bye citi, i think we still should get ur funds bk a primary debitor,.
adn yes should have given funds to mortgage holders to keep thier homes

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 AM on 07/16/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect