Pentagon Won't Ban Tobacco Products In War Zones

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Pentagon Won't Ban Tobacco Products In War Zones stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

PAULINE JELINEK | July 16, 2009 12:19 AM EST | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — Smoke 'em if you got 'em. The Pentagon reassured troops Wednesday that it won't ban tobacco products in war zones. Defense officials hadn't actually planned to eliminate smoking – at least for now. But fear of a ban arose among some troops after the Defense Department received a study recommending the military move toward becoming tobacco-free – perhaps in about 20 years.

Press secretary Geoff Morrell pointedly told a Pentagon news conference that Defense Secretary Robert Gates is not planning to prohibit the use of cigarettes, chewing tobacco or other tobacco products by troops in combat.

"He knows that the situation they are confronting is stressful enough as it is," Morrell said, noting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. "I don't think he is interested in adding to the stress levels by taking away one of the few outlets they may have to relieve stress."

Gates will review the new study to see if there are some things than can be done to work toward the goal of having a smoke-free force some day, Morrell said.

"Obviously, it's not our preference to have a force that is using tobacco products," he said, noting health concerns and the high cost of caring for health-related problems.

The study, commissioned by the Pentagon and the Veterans Affairs Department, recommended that the military start making incremental moves toward becoming smoke-free. The report by the Institute of Medicine suggested the services could start by banning smoking at military academies, then among recruits. It said the VA and Pentagon should eliminate use of tobacco on its facilities and the military should stop selling tobacco products at its commissaries.

The military and VA have been working for years to reduce smoking among soldiers and vets through a number of programs. The Pentagon laid out a plan in 1999 to reduce smoking rates by 5 percent a year and reduce chewing tobacco use to 15 percent by 2001 – and still wasn't able to achieve the goals.

"Tobacco use declined overall from 1980 to 2005, but there has recently been an increase in consumption, possibly because of increased tobacco use by deployed troops," the study said.

Story continues below
advertisement

The military hasn't placed a high enough priority on reducing tobacco use, according to the study, and that while smoking has declined in the U.S., it remains higher in the military than in the civilian world.

In 2005, a third of members of the active-duty military smoked compared to a fifth of the adult U.S. population, the study said, adding that it "has been implicated in" higher dropout rates during and after basic training, higher absenteeism in the military and other problems.

Criticism of the proposals spread across the Internet and among troops.

"Our troops make enough sacrifices to serve our nation," said Brian Wise, executive director of the advocacy group Military Families United. "They give up many of the freedoms civilians enjoy already without being told they cannot partake in yet another otherwise legal activity."

Spc. Charles Rodriguez, 23, said he started smoking long before he joined the Army and that his pack-a-day habit doesn't affect his physical fitness. His Army instructors during basic training made him quit, but he quickly started up again, Rodriguez said in an interview outside of Fort Campbell, Ky.

During his last deployment to Iraq, Rodriguez found a lot of time to smoke while troops were patrolling or just hanging around the base. He said one of his friends who doesn't normally smoke would join him for a cigarette during the deployment, just out of boredom

Said Rodriguez, "There's nothing else to do and they're cheap over there."

___

Associated Press writers Kristin M. Hall in Oak Grove, Ky., and Lolita C. Baldor in Washington contributed to this report.

(This version CORRECTS the spelling of Rodriguez.)

WASHINGTON — Smoke 'em if you got 'em. The Pentagon reassured troops Wednesday that it won't ban tobacco products in war zones. Defense officials hadn't actually planned to eliminate smoking &nd...
WASHINGTON — Smoke 'em if you got 'em. The Pentagon reassured troops Wednesday that it won't ban tobacco products in war zones. Defense officials hadn't actually planned to eliminate smoking &nd...
Filed by Lila Shapiro  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
315
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
- mergina I'm a Fan of mergina 82 fans permalink
photo

Smart move.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 PM on 07/19/2009
- OKSunny I'm a Fan of OKSunny 12 fans permalink

take away the cigarettes and give them prostitutes instead

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:09 AM on 07/17/2009
- OKSunny I'm a Fan of OKSunny 12 fans permalink

I hate cigarettes and wish they would just be illegal
give them joints instead (to both sides) then maybe they wouldn't have to fight at all

But, if they are putting their lives at risk why not let them smoke....I mean, it is their lives after all....gosh what a concept!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 AM on 07/17/2009
- greenwlu I'm a Fan of greenwlu 11 fans permalink

I'm amazed at some of the ignorance here. Smoking - especially at night - shows the enemy where you are. It isn't all about lung cancer, letting the soldiers relax, or health care as the article would suggest. It is about a smoker giving away the position of himself and fellow troops, which puts all of their lives imminent danger on the battlefield. My dad, a Lt. Col. in the Marines, banned smoking among his patrol a long time ago, and it saved the lives of his soldiers. The enemy, however, didn't always cover their cigarette at night, and that resulted in head shots.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 AM on 07/17/2009
- ChinaC I'm a Fan of ChinaC 16 fans permalink

If Obama sets the drapes on fire in the White House the smoking issue will be forgotten.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 AM on 07/17/2009
- Montgriz I'm a Fan of Montgriz 36 fans permalink

So that I understand: We send our troops to Afghanistan to kill the Taliban and also to keep the poppy crop from being destroyed...and the Taliban is our enemy because they aid people who killed Americans....among others....Then, we subsidize tobacco growers, and let the tobacco companies write a new bill protecting themselves, and then allow soldiers to smoke, which, we already know for certain, that cigaratte smoking will kill you slowly, after considerable pain. So, we kill the Taliban but reward the tobacco growers and manufacturers of cigs......and I am supposed to hate the Taliban...­..hmmmmmmm­mmmm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 AM on 07/17/2009
- Oldtt I'm a Fan of Oldtt 34 fans permalink
photo

Since when are we fighting in Afghanistan to protect the poppy crop? Even Cheney didn't think of that one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:38 AM on 07/17/2009
- Montgriz I'm a Fan of Montgriz 36 fans permalink

Keep up....last week the military was told to back off any effort to destroy the poppy fields...a­pparently, money in the right hands is all that counts.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:47 AM on 07/17/2009
- Oldtt I'm a Fan of Oldtt 34 fans permalink
photo

I'm suprised that this study didn't recommend that all front line troops be barred from producing any lethal second-hand smoke which might waft over to the enemy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 AM on 07/17/2009
- Wallysmom I'm a Fan of Wallysmom 73 fans permalink
photo

While bullets are whizzing by your head, it isn't time to slap a NicoDerm patch on.
I never understood why Maximum Security Prisons prohibit smoking, especially for those on Death Row. Kinda silly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 AM on 07/17/2009
- Oldtt I'm a Fan of Oldtt 34 fans permalink
photo

Rules are rules, even if they're stupid.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 AM on 07/17/2009
photo

second hand smoke? just because the prisoners are on death row, doesn't mean the guards should have to breathe in the smoke too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:12 PM on 07/17/2009
photo

Maybe cigarette smoking enhances battle readiness -- assuming that testosterone levels are related to aggressiveness.

The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism (January 2007) reported on a study that found a "substantial" drop in U.S. men's testosterone levels since the 1980s. The study at the New England Research Institutes reported the average levels of the male hormone dropped by 1 percent a year.

The causes of the drop in testosterone were not clear, but it was hypothesized that the sharp decline in cigarette smoking in the past 20 years might help explain the findings. This is because smoking increases testosterone levels.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 PM on 07/16/2009

" it was hypothesized that the sharp decline in cigarette smoking in the past 20 years might help explain the findings. This is because smoking increases testosterone levels."

Huh??

That study's abstract reads:

"Results: We observe a substantial age-independent decline in T that does not appear to be attributable to observed changes in explanatory factors, including health and lifestyle characteristics such as smoking and obesity. "

http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/92/1/196

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:10 AM on 07/17/2009
- dhinds I'm a Fan of dhinds 25 fans permalink

Smoking does not increase T levels, it reduces them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:06 PM on 07/18/2009
photo

Yes get rid of the cigarettes. I wouldn't want my mother and sisters shot dead by some cancer riddled soldier.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 PM on 07/16/2009
- FZliveson I'm a Fan of FZliveson 78 fans permalink
photo

Vascopyjama: Exactly wtf is that supposed to mean?
You've compounded about three insinuations.
Come clean.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 PM on 07/16/2009
- Marklar I'm a Fan of Marklar 13 fans permalink
photo

You'd prefer to have them killed by someone going through withdrawl?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 AM on 07/17/2009
- Oldtt I'm a Fan of Oldtt 34 fans permalink
photo

In your position, I would want the cancer to get the soldier before the soldier got my sister.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:17 AM on 07/17/2009
- chriss0114 I'm a Fan of chriss0114 24 fans permalink
photo

My God! They're facing possible death--let them smoke if they want!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 PM on 07/16/2009
- Marklar I'm a Fan of Marklar 13 fans permalink
photo

Let anyone smoke if they want. We are all going to die of something. Whenever I am smoking and someone says, those things are gonna kill you, I respond, If not them something else will.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 AM on 07/17/2009
- Montgriz I'm a Fan of Montgriz 36 fans permalink

Maybe, because they know that cancers associated with tobacco are the most devastating, and slow acting, and that smoking is the leading cause of death that can be prevented...so smoke if you want, but not around me....I smoked for 44 years and quitting was easier than I was told it would be.....now, my doctors know what to look for....so far, I am lucky.....good luck to you....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:29 AM on 07/17/2009
- Oldtt I'm a Fan of Oldtt 34 fans permalink
photo

In a nearby county in Upstate NY, the legislature recently raised the age for purchasing cigarettes from 18 to 21, but made an exception for people serving on active duty in the military. I thought that was very nice of them. When the County Executive vetoed the bill, she was over-ridden, which was the first time for any veto. Smokers are still smoking, but lots of people feel better now. Personally I think the bill should also have exempted volunteer firemen, police and sheriffs, football heroes, and eagle scouts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:24 AM on 07/17/2009
- Ergon I'm a Fan of Ergon 70 fans permalink
photo

Telling a soldier not to smoke tobacco in the midst of the largest poppy producing country in the world reminds of that famous oxymoron, 'military intelligence'
As the Russians found out when all their recruits came back from Afghanistan with drug problems..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 PM on 07/16/2009
- Oldtt I'm a Fan of Oldtt 34 fans permalink
photo

They went there with drinking problems anyway.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:35 AM on 07/17/2009
- Montgriz I'm a Fan of Montgriz 36 fans permalink

unlike many of our troops who go there with drug problems...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:48 AM on 07/17/2009

Pentagon: "We won't ask and you won't tell us if you are a smoker. That's fair right? See, that way we can marginalize you forever."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:22 PM on 07/16/2009
photo

If you're worried about their health.....THEN QUIT SENDING THEM TO WAR!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:19 PM on 07/16/2009
- JohnIII I'm a Fan of JohnIII 7 fans permalink

Good point! If they're going to risk their necks, they can have a smoke. Ridiculous.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 PM on 07/16/2009

That about sums it up!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 PM on 07/16/2009
- Dr Scott I'm a Fan of Dr Scott 22 fans permalink
photo

The Army pushed "smoking cessation" pretty hard, even in OEF (2002) and OIF (2004). I went to Afghanistan with a foot locker full of cigars. Same for Iraq, plus I took up the hookah. I found it laughable that the medics were constantly trying to help us quit. As if the possibility of lung or lip cancer 30 years from now was our biggest problem. I helped plenty of people START smoking. Troops already don't get access to enough stress relievers in country. Give the poor guys a break. BTW, Army bases in USA are much more smoke-free.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 PM on 07/16/2009

" I helped plenty of people START smoking."

Well aren't you cute? I'm sure that when the ravages of emphysema, cancer and heart disease begin to kick in, they will thank you profusely. As will their bereft families.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:16 AM on 07/17/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect