Pentagon Won't Ban Tobacco Products In War Zones

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Pentagon Won't Ban Tobacco Products In War Zones stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

PAULINE JELINEK | July 16, 2009 12:19 AM EST | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — Smoke 'em if you got 'em. The Pentagon reassured troops Wednesday that it won't ban tobacco products in war zones. Defense officials hadn't actually planned to eliminate smoking – at least for now. But fear of a ban arose among some troops after the Defense Department received a study recommending the military move toward becoming tobacco-free – perhaps in about 20 years.

Press secretary Geoff Morrell pointedly told a Pentagon news conference that Defense Secretary Robert Gates is not planning to prohibit the use of cigarettes, chewing tobacco or other tobacco products by troops in combat.

"He knows that the situation they are confronting is stressful enough as it is," Morrell said, noting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. "I don't think he is interested in adding to the stress levels by taking away one of the few outlets they may have to relieve stress."

Gates will review the new study to see if there are some things than can be done to work toward the goal of having a smoke-free force some day, Morrell said.

"Obviously, it's not our preference to have a force that is using tobacco products," he said, noting health concerns and the high cost of caring for health-related problems.

The study, commissioned by the Pentagon and the Veterans Affairs Department, recommended that the military start making incremental moves toward becoming smoke-free. The report by the Institute of Medicine suggested the services could start by banning smoking at military academies, then among recruits. It said the VA and Pentagon should eliminate use of tobacco on its facilities and the military should stop selling tobacco products at its commissaries.

The military and VA have been working for years to reduce smoking among soldiers and vets through a number of programs. The Pentagon laid out a plan in 1999 to reduce smoking rates by 5 percent a year and reduce chewing tobacco use to 15 percent by 2001 – and still wasn't able to achieve the goals.

"Tobacco use declined overall from 1980 to 2005, but there has recently been an increase in consumption, possibly because of increased tobacco use by deployed troops," the study said.

Story continues below

The military hasn't placed a high enough priority on reducing tobacco use, according to the study, and that while smoking has declined in the U.S., it remains higher in the military than in the civilian world.

In 2005, a third of members of the active-duty military smoked compared to a fifth of the adult U.S. population, the study said, adding that it "has been implicated in" higher dropout rates during and after basic training, higher absenteeism in the military and other problems.

Criticism of the proposals spread across the Internet and among troops.

"Our troops make enough sacrifices to serve our nation," said Brian Wise, executive director of the advocacy group Military Families United. "They give up many of the freedoms civilians enjoy already without being told they cannot partake in yet another otherwise legal activity."

Spc. Charles Rodriguez, 23, said he started smoking long before he joined the Army and that his pack-a-day habit doesn't affect his physical fitness. His Army instructors during basic training made him quit, but he quickly started up again, Rodriguez said in an interview outside of Fort Campbell, Ky.

During his last deployment to Iraq, Rodriguez found a lot of time to smoke while troops were patrolling or just hanging around the base. He said one of his friends who doesn't normally smoke would join him for a cigarette during the deployment, just out of boredom

Said Rodriguez, "There's nothing else to do and they're cheap over there."

___

Associated Press writers Kristin M. Hall in Oak Grove, Ky., and Lolita C. Baldor in Washington contributed to this report.

(This version CORRECTS the spelling of Rodriguez.)

WASHINGTON — Smoke 'em if you got 'em. The Pentagon reassured troops Wednesday that it won't ban tobacco products in war zones. Defense officials hadn't actually planned to eliminate smoking &nd...
WASHINGTON — Smoke 'em if you got 'em. The Pentagon reassured troops Wednesday that it won't ban tobacco products in war zones. Defense officials hadn't actually planned to eliminate smoking &nd...
Filed by Lila Shapiro  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
315
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 (7 pages total)
- rabrophy I'm a Fan of rabrophy 22 fans permalink

The Pentagon can't get decent body armor to the Troops and we Vets have to wait months to see an intern at a VA Hospital, but they are wasting time and money on yet another study! I wounder how much they pissed away on this circle jerk!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:00 PM on 07/16/2009

Well said!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:37 PM on 07/16/2009
- JShankel I'm a Fan of JShankel 118 fans permalink
photo

So, what, cigarettes are bad for you but war isn't? Let 'em smoke.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:58 PM on 07/16/2009
- wm1066 I'm a Fan of wm1066 35 fans permalink
photo

Smoking helps calm your nerves, of course when the tobacco wears off you need another smoke, but it does work in the short term. These soldiers need everything they can get to make it through their tour of duty. Outlawing a smoke would be cruel. Trying to make these people quit when they are facing death is nuts!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:57 PM on 07/16/2009

These guys are in extremely stressful situations. If they want to smoke, let them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:57 PM on 07/16/2009

Is it true that tobacco calms a person down and helps them think at the same time?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:34 PM on 07/16/2009
- JShankel I'm a Fan of JShankel 118 fans permalink
photo

Yes, that's why it's addictive. It releases dopamine, among other things, which calms you and helps you concentrate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:40 PM on 07/16/2009
- TexasDem0 I'm a Fan of TexasDem0 36 fans permalink

That depends on whether you believe the entire medical community, or the marketing executives who profit from tobacco sales.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:12 PM on 07/16/2009
- battlinbob I'm a Fan of battlinbob 10 fans permalink

Too bad this even has to be an issue... Why dont people get a life and understand that other adults, including those in uniform have the ability to choose for themselves what they do and dont do.. This is such a waste of govt resources...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:55 PM on 07/16/2009

It's a waste of taxpayers dollars when we have to start paying for their healthcare costs from smoking.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:12 PM on 07/16/2009

The extra taxes on cigs should more than cover the health costs. And if they banned pesticides and additives the health costs would go down.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:32 PM on 07/16/2009
- JShankel I'm a Fan of JShankel 118 fans permalink
photo

Actually, cigarettes save us money. People who don't smoke end up living longer and dying of more complicated, longer-term diseases.

Smokers work their whole life and then die rather quickly shortly after retirement. Yes, we have to pay for their cancer treatments, but we'll have to pay to treat whatever they end up dying of.

Yes, sir, that'll be the new Republican health care plan: Smoke 'em if you got 'em.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:00 PM on 07/16/2009
- Gmoney1 I'm a Fan of Gmoney1 24 fans permalink

we have to pay our taxes for fat people who are a plague on the healthcare system -

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 PM on 07/16/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 (7 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect