Mark Cuban's SEC Case Dismissed By Judge

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Mark Cuban's SEC Case Dismissed By Judge stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

SCHUYLER DIXON | July 17, 2009 05:08 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
FILE - In this May 26, 2009 file photo, Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban, center, walks out of his federal hearing accompanied by members of his legal team at the Earle Cabell Federal Courthouse in Dallas. A federal judge on Friday, July 17, 2009 dismissed an insider trading lawsuit against Cuban. (AP Photo/Tony Gutierrez, file)

DALLAS — A federal judge dismissed a civil insider-trading lawsuit against Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban on Friday, dealing the Securities and Exchange Commission a rare high-profile setback.

U.S. District Judge Sidney A. Fitzwater ruled that the SEC could not hold Cuban liable for insider trading because the agency didn't allege the billionaire NBA team owner had agreed not to trade based on confidential information he received about an Internet search engine company, Mamma.com Inc.

The judge wrote in his 35-page ruling that the SEC could file an amended complaint within 30 days if it can allege that Cuban agreed not to sell stock when he told the company's chief executive that he wouldn't divulge secret information he was about to receive in 2004.

The SEC said Cuban avoided a loss of $750,000 by selling his 600,000 shares, which represented a 6.3 percent stake in the company.

Fitzwater, however, rejected most of Cuban's claims over how his fiduciary relationship with Mamma.com should be applied to the law.

Scott Friestad, associate director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement, said in a statement that the commission was reviewing the ruling and weighing its options.

Ralph Ferrara, one of Cuban's attorneys, said he needed time to digest the ruling but was initially impressed with what he called Fitzwater's "appellate court level" analysis.

"It sounds like unlike many trial courts on motions to dismiss, he really tried to come to grips with the fundamental legal policy questions that we raised," Ferrara said.

Story continues below
advertisement

Cuban's attorneys at the New York law firm of Dewey & LeBoeuf said in a statement they were "grateful" for the ruling.

"The court employed a reasoned and thoughtful approach ... and chose not to be bound by labels and monikers or resort to 'technicalities,'" the statement said.

Cuban didn't respond to an e-mail seeking comment.

In a vague Twitter posting that seemed to address the ruling, Cuban wrote that Friday had been "a great day so far." In a later posting, he thanked supporters and said he wouldn't comment to reporters.

Five years ago, Mamma.com Chief Executive Guy Faure told Cuban by phone that the company was planning to raise capital in a so-called private placement in a public equity offering known as a PIPE, the SEC lawsuit said.

Faure began the conversation by saying he was about to give confidential information and Cuban agreed to keep it to himself, the SEC said. According to the lawsuit, Cuban became angry because he said PIPEs dilute stock value for existing shareholders, and he ended the call by saying, "Well now I'm screwed. I can't sell."

The SEC alleges that Cuban sold his shares hours after the phone call from Faure, before the announcement of the private offering.

Fitzwater ruled that Cuban's statement can't "reasonably be understood" as an agreement not to sell based on the information.

"Thus while the SEC adequately pleads that Cuban entered into a confidentiality agreement, it does not allege that he agreed, expressly or implicitly, to refrain from trading on or otherwise using for his own benefit the information the CEO was about to share," Fitzwater wrote.

Phillip Stern, a former SEC staffer now in private practice, said the agency could pursue an appeal rather than try to amend the Cuban complaint. He said the decision would come down to whether the agency thought it could successfully attack Fitzwater's ruling, which he said was surprising.

But another analyst said the SEC generally must prove what Fitzwater's ruling required: that defendants agreed to keep information confidential and promised not to trade on it.

"This was a frontier case for the SEC," said J.W. Verret, a law professor at George Mason University who also practiced securities enforcement law in Washington. "The SEC was straining insider trading law beyond its proper scope to catch a big fish, and it lost. It's time for the SEC to go home and lick its wounds."

The 50-year-old Cuban is a tech entrepreneur who sold his Broadcast.com to Yahoo Inc. in 1999 at the height of the dot-com boom. He bought the Mavericks in 2000.

Cuban runs a Web site called Sharesleuth.com, which bills itself as providing "independent Web-based reporting aimed at exposing securities fraud and corporate chicanery." A companion site, BailoutSleuth.com, tracks the government's $700 billion financial rescue plan.

___

Associated Press writer David Koenig and AP Sports Writer Jaime Aron contributed to this report.

DALLAS — A federal judge dismissed a civil insider-trading lawsuit against Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban on Friday, dealing the Securities and Exchange Commission a rare high-profile setback...
DALLAS — A federal judge dismissed a civil insider-trading lawsuit against Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban on Friday, dealing the Securities and Exchange Commission a rare high-profile setback...
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
17
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- jeffp26 I'm a Fan of jeffp26 25 fans permalink
photo

Faure began the conversation by saying he was about to give confidential information and Cuban agreed to keep it to himself, the SEC said. According to the lawsuit, Cuban became angry because he said PIPEs dilute stock value for existing shareholders, and he ended the call by saying, "Well now I'm screwed. I can't sell."

The SEC alleges that Cuban sold his shares hours after the phone call from Faure, before the announcement of the private offering.

Fitzwater ruled that Cuban's statement can't "reasonably be understood" as an agreement not to sell based on the information.

Cuban admitted he knew he had inside information, and that he could not sell.

This judge is a fool. Or someone paid him off.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 07/18/2009
- jeffp26 I'm a Fan of jeffp26 25 fans permalink
photo

I would like to smack the judge who made this stupid ruling.

Anyone who has ever worked on wall street knows Cuban received inside information. He then traded on it.

He is guilty. Guilty. A criminal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 AM on 07/18/2009
- maxfax I'm a Fan of maxfax 17 fans permalink

Good deal. Poor Billo.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:29 PM on 07/17/2009
- Balzac I'm a Fan of Balzac 110 fans permalink
photo

Mark Cuban says "Hi haters".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:14 PM on 07/17/2009
- vgirl1 I'm a Fan of vgirl1 48 fans permalink

Wonderful. This was a setup anyway because the NBA could not stand the fact that people like Cuban continue to expose their money driven refereeing and advertising schemes.

Anyone who looked at any of the playoffs saw the numerous calls made by NBA referees that determined the outcome of games in support of the NBA's desires. The only way they were not totally successful is that certain teams just proved too good for them to overtly move off the stage inspite of their desires.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:06 PM on 07/17/2009
- wrender I'm a Fan of wrender 22 fans permalink
photo

This is why so many folks with a bit of power, money, and influence keep quiet about 911. The mechanisms in place to discredit those who publicly question the myth is relentless. But I'm glad he's been exonerated.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:34 PM on 07/17/2009
- jalowe1957 I'm a Fan of jalowe1957 34 fans permalink
photo

The GOP was gunning for Mark Cuban for daring to make public embarrassing revelation in his planned documentary "Loose Change."

Now why do you think he was targeted for selective prosecution? Does anyone smell a stink far, far worse than rancid?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:08 PM on 07/17/2009

"""""in his 35-page ruling, Fitzwater wrote that the SEC didn't accuse Cuban of promising not to trade based on the confidential information he received. Thus, the commission could not hold him liable for illegal insider trading, the judge wrote.""""""

what on earth does that mean ????/

""""""didnt accuse him of promising not......."""""

doesn't anyone speak english anymore..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 PM on 07/17/2009
- larry278 I'm a Fan of larry278 44 fans permalink

Si, hablo Ingles. Yes, I speak, write & understand English, northstar11. BTW, English is a proper noun. The 1st letter of a proper noun is written in an upper case, capitol letter. It might be a good idea if you learned how to use the elipsis; it's 3 dots, .... You neglected to capitolize the 1st letter of the 1st word you used in your 2d paragraph (or 3d sentence). That word is what.
It pains us users of Spanish in addition to English to see experienced users of English to constantly fail to use caps correctly when they write in English; do they not love English well enough to learn to write English properly? Americans could be like the English which prompted a line in "My Fair Lady". The lines, spoken by Prof Higgins, was, "Why can't the English (establishment) [teach the common folk] to [use] speak English...?". What is wrong with you Yanquis? Don't you love English enough to learn to use English properly?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:19 PM on 07/19/2009
- DustinTime I'm a Fan of DustinTime 41 fans permalink

The SEC, who couldn't be bothered to go after Madoff--despite people armed with incriminating facts and data directly begging them--went after Cuban for political reasons.

A high-profile billionaire supporting the release of the film "Loose Change," chock-full of dangerous, disturbing­ly-overloo­ked information, was a direct threat to the Bush administration, and they were not going to take it laying down.

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/localnews/columnists/jragland/stories/DN-ragland_28met.ART0.State.Edition2.447e560.html

And they succeeded. Despite that Dallas News story, Cuban ultimately backed off.

Meanwhile, a much better film anyway is the Italian documentary "Zero."

http://zero911movie.com/site/

"Featuring presentations from intellectual heavy weights; Gore Vidal, and Noble Prize winner Dario Fo, the film challenges assumptions surrounding the attacks. In the words of the Italian daily newspaper, Il Corriere de da Sera, "What results is a sequence of contradictions, gaps, and omissions of stunning gravity."

You can find and watch the full version on youtube.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:30 PM on 07/17/2009
- ntmessage I'm a Fan of ntmessage 35 fans permalink

The SEC thought they could go after a high profile case to cover up the fact they have been asleep at the wheel for years. Tell those SEC guys to go after actual criminals. There are scores in the financial industry itself, their back yard in case they have not looked yet. What a monumental waste of time and Cuban is not a financial industry guy no less.

Memo to SEC: The crooks are manipulating the oil markets RIGHT NOW!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 PM on 07/17/2009

Hey, they did put Martha Stewart away! How dare you question the strategy of the SEC to prosecute high profile small offenders just because they can't get at the professionals who know the law better than they do! After all... it worked... at least once!

:-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:49 PM on 07/17/2009
- zenmonkman I'm a Fan of zenmonkman 6 fans permalink
photo

SEC ... Marc Cuban ... Bernie Madoff ... nah! They’re all victims!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 PM on 07/17/2009
photo

Well, George W. Bush was cleared of insider trading as well. Welcome to the U.S. Injustice System, where the millionaires fraudulently become multi-millionaires and everyone else goes to jail for years on relatively minor offenses.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 PM on 07/17/2009
- thaneb I'm a Fan of thaneb 11 fans permalink
photo

A violation requires promising not to trade on the insider information? That makes no sense to me. There must be more to the facts in the case and the ruling.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 PM on 07/17/2009

See... this is why it is important to pay top $$$ to attract top talent. The SEC is a very good example of what happens when you don't...

:-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 PM on 07/17/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect