More

CIT Gets $3 Billion Rescue Loan To Prevent Bankruptcy

STEVENSON JACOBS and DANIEL WAGNER   07/20/09 09:45 PM ET   AP

Cit

NEW YORK — Commercial lender CIT Group Inc. confirmed late Monday that it has secured a $3 billion bailout from its bondholders, averting an immediate bankruptcy filing and giving the company some breathing room to restructure its debt.

It's a new twist in the financial crisis: A major bank on the verge of a last-minute rescue – only this time the bailout isn't coming from the government. The deal marks the first time since the banking crisis erupted that private investors are stepping in to save a big financial firm without federal help or oversight.

The lifeline for CIT, whose clients include Dunkin' Donuts franchises and clothing maker Eddie Bauer, aims to sustain the company long enough for it to rework its heavy debt load, which includes $7.4 billion due in the first quarter of next year. It does not guarantee CIT will avoid bankruptcy.

CIT said the rescue includes a $3 billion secured term loan with a 2.5-year maturity, which will ensure that its small and midsized business customers continue to have access to credit. Term loan proceeds of $2 billion are committed and available immediately, with an additional $1 billion expected to be committed and available within 10 days.

The short-term financing comes at a high price – an interest rate of about 10.5 percent, said a person close to the negotiations who was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.

CIT also said it has launched a cash tender offer for its $1 billion worth of outstanding floating rate senior notes due Aug. 17, offering $825 for each $1,000 worth of notes tendered on or before July 31, and $800 for notes tendered between Aug. 1 and Aug. 17. Lenders involved in the bailout deal have agreed to tender all of their Aug. 17 notes, CIT said. The company and the steering committee of bondholders now will work on drawing up a number of debt swap offers designed to alleviate CIT's debt burden and further shore up the company's cash position.

"With today's announcement, our board of directors, management team, advisors, and a steering committee of bondholders, who are lenders under the term loan financing, are now actively focused on a restructuring plan that will better position our company for the long term," said Jeffrey M. Peek, CIT chairman and CEO, in a statement.

New York-based CIT was negotiating with six key bondholders, including bond manager Pimco. Peek was actively involved in the talks, according to a person briefed on the matter.

The deal suggests the appetite for risk in the private sector is increasing, analysts said. It also could provide a framework for other financial rescues if Washington turns off the bailout spigot.

The negotiations' success, along with robust earnings reports last week by several big banks, may raise hopes that private capital can start flowing again into the beaten-down banking industry, analysts said. That was all but unthinkable just a few months ago.

"You've got private money coming in and essentially giving a vote of confidence" in banks' future profitability, said Vincent Reinhart, former director of the Federal Reserve's monetary affairs division. "It's encouraging."

"It tells me that the appetite for risk is increasing, and people are betting that a recovery is coming," said William Larkin, fixed-income portfolio manager at Cabot Money Management in Salem, Mass.

CIT lends money to nearly a million small and midsize U.S. companies. It was forced to turn to bondholders for help after the government refused to save the company last week, a sign the administration is pulling back on costly and unpopular bank rescues.

Had CIT been allowed to collapse, some experts feared it would have dealt a crippling blow to an economy still bleeding hundreds of thousands of jobs a month despite a nearly $800 billion federal stimulus program.

The retail sector would have been hit especially hard. CIT serves as short-term financier to about 2,000 vendors that supply merchandise to 300,000 stores, according to the National Retail Federation. Analysts say 60 percent of the apparel industry depends on CIT for financing.

"If CIT had gone under, that would have left a huge hole in the supply chain," said Craig Shearman, a spokesman for the National Retail Federation, one of the trade groups that had urged the government to prevent CIT's collapse.

By not getting involved, the administration gambled that CIT was not so enmeshed with the financial system as companies like Citigroup, Bank of America and others banks that accepted federal bailout money, analysts said.

"The government's sitting there saying, 'If this doesn't set off a meltdown of the financial system, there's no rationale to bailing out creditors,'" said Daniel Alpert, managing director of the investment bank Westwood Capital LLC.

CIT, squeezed as its debt has come due and borrowers have drawn down their credit lines, has been scrambling to raise $2 billion to $4 billion. It received $2.3 billion from the government's Troubled Asset Relief Program last fall – money that could be lost if CIT files for bankruptcy.

The Federal Reserve put the company through its "stress test" last week and found it faced a $4 billion capital shortfall. It has more than $7 billion in debt due in the first quarter of next year.

CIT had been in round-the-clock talks with regulators to reach a deal for emergency funding before talks broke down last week. The company had warned that depriving it of more federal aid could imperil about a million corporate borrowers.

Once talks with government officials fell apart, CIT turned to some of its major bondholders for financial help. They struck a deal late Sunday.

Ahead of the deal's confirmation investors sent shares of CIT jumping 55 cents, or 78 percent, to $1.25 in trading Monday.

Federal officials were not involved in the negotiations that led to Sunday's deal, a Treasury official said Monday. He spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to discuss the matter.

The government's hands-off approach marks a major shift in the crisis. In the past 16 months, the government has poured billions into stumbling mega-banks like Citigroup and Bank of America. It's also provided guarantees or guidance on the sales of Bear Stearns, Washington Mutual and Merrill Lynch.

But the nation's biggest banks still enjoy federal support through borrowing or debt guarantees. So how far the government is willing to go with its hands-off policy is unclear.

"The question is, does it only apply to the small- and medium-sized guys, or does it apply to everyone?" said Simon Johnson, a former chief economist with the International Monetary Fund, now a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Sloan School of Management.

Scott Talbott, top lobbyist with the Financial Services Roundtable, which represents CIT and other big financial firms, said the government's seeming pullback from the banking sector was a welcome sign.

"When the government steps in, you disrupt the market," he said. "That was necessary to restore liquidity but distorted the free-market system. Now the exit strategy is becoming clear."

Evercore Partners and Morgan Stanley are CIT's financial advisers and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP and Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz are legal counsel in connection with the financing and restructuring plan. Barclays Capital is arranger and administrative agent for the term loan financing.

Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and BofA Merrill Lynch are the dealer managers for the debt swap offer.

CIT has cancelled its earnings release and conference call previously scheduled for Thursday. It will report results for the quarter ended June 30 when it files its 10-Q quarterly report with regulators.

___

Wagner reported from Washington. AP Business Writers Stephen Bernard, Anne D'Innocenzio and Alan Zibel contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

Filed by Nicholas Sabloff  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 65
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
11:33 PM on 07/20/2009
DEFINE THIS MOMENT AS THE END OF BAILOUTS OF WALL STREET BANKS BY GOVERNMENT IN OUR HISTORY!

CEASE AND DESIST!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
11:30 PM on 07/20/2009
A Federal Agency in our Government, the 0ffice of the Comptroller of the Currency, 0CC, issues a quarterly Report that has the following info:

1 JPM0RGAN $81TRILLION in Toxic Derivatives
2 B 0F AM $78TRILLION
3 G0LDMAN $48TRILLION
4 M0RGAN $39TRILLION
5 C1T1GROUP $32TRILLION

http://www.occ.gov/ftp/release/2009-72a.pdf
It is on page 23!

CITIGROUP wants MORE TARP! NO! Amazing they find money from investors!

Glass-Steigel them!

Divide them up and get rid of the JUNK at the expense of the Stakeholders!

Bye Bye TOO-BIG-TO-FAIL!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
11:33 PM on 07/20/2009
DEFINE THIS AS THE LAST BAILOUT OF A WALL STREET BANK BY GOVERNMENT IN OUR HISTORY!

CEASE AND DESIST!
03:02 PM on 07/20/2009
it seems that financial institutions survive or fail depending on whether or not this is to Goldman's advantage
Tinsdale
"Character is Destiny."- Heraclitus
08:19 PM on 07/20/2009
Indeed.
10:12 AM on 07/20/2009
This I believe is just postponing the inevitable. Obama should have treated all banks this way. You dug your hole now lie in it. Wouldn't it be great if all Americans who have fallen prey to this economy could have their slates wiped clean, and be given a fresh influx of cash to start over, instead we have fed the monsters that created the mess in the first place. SHAMEFUL!
10:19 AM on 07/20/2009
PS...I am a small business owner trying to survive the bloodletting that has been occuring in Florida for the last 2 years in our indudtry. There is not a bank here that will lift a finger for any small business owner. That Is a Fact
10:24 AM on 07/20/2009
If the banks that are overleveraged with bad debts were allowed to fail, the credit market would be wiped clean and you would have more opportunities for borrowing.
11:32 AM on 07/20/2009
Not all small businesses are in trouble. If yours is... maybe its because of fundamentals and not because of the economy?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Clearing-Brush
Badges? We don't need no stinkin badges.
10:34 AM on 07/20/2009
The fact is that the prior and current administrations and the congress were all too quick to bail out and make whole banks, investment giants and billionaires with our hard earned tax dollars so that these ppl could continue to receive their million dollar bonuses and live lavishly on our dime. The same ppl that have been ripping us off and feeding on the blood of the hard working middle class to its distruction. And "we" the small fish, continue to loose our jobs, our homes and our nest eggs. And the plundering continues..... When will this stop?
09:42 AM on 07/20/2009
Ret.hugs are just not intellectually honest. They slam Obama for bailing out companies earlier this year. Now they are railing on him for not bailing out a company with very tenuous prospects of paying back any loans. Their argument is that he has something against small business.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
1088
08:17 AM on 07/20/2009
You cannot have it both ways, one minute Hoff Post writing about why Obama is not helping the little man which is CIT, for they help Small Business. Now they are getting help. So what is the problem?
09:19 AM on 07/20/2009
Only Obama didn't help CIT. He told them to get bent. CIT cut a deal with bondholders to stay in business.
09:38 AM on 07/20/2009
It also would have wiped out $2.3 billion in federal bailout money injected into the company in December.

Uhm, they got $2.3 billion in FEDERAL bailout money in December. It's easier to spew nonsense when you have no idea what you're talking about.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danusgram
supporter of Mitt robbed me for President
08:00 AM on 07/20/2009
CIT and Citigroup one in the same only seperate on paperwork.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
breakingpoint
War is a Racket - Smedley Butler
06:56 AM on 07/20/2009
And the American People being tossed out of their houses get the bill

They're all Financial Terrorists
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSwWy4E6I04
06:48 AM on 07/20/2009
""""New York-based CIT had been negotiating with key bondholders – including bond manager Pimco"""

fact is PIMCO is CIT 's largest bond holder .---CIT has no money to re-pay them
02:43 AM on 07/20/2009
A few billion here, a few billion there, it's adding up to real money.

After all it's not like the money given to them is "someone's money", it's "someone-else's money"!
06:09 AM on 07/20/2009
Unreal!
Another scab that has to heal.
It will be generation before the scars clear if ever.
02:08 AM on 07/20/2009
More theft...
09:20 AM on 07/20/2009
How so? CIT is not recieving one dime from the tax payers.
09:36 AM on 07/20/2009
They already did previously. Needing another loan after the bailout money they initially received doesn't bode well for getting that money back, especially if they have to pay 10% interest on a $3 billion loan.
01:51 AM on 07/20/2009
see...the matter resolved itself out without the aid of the govt. bailout.

The govt. now needs to follow through and stop bailing out other companies too. CIT is not going to fail, bondholders gave another loan (emergency loan that is).

the govt now needs to stick to plan.
09:35 AM on 07/20/2009
We had previously given them $2 billion in bailout money.
01:29 AM on 07/20/2009
I love how the government says it cares about small businesses and yet they refuse to bailout a company which helps keep small businesses afloat.
01:52 AM on 07/20/2009
the matter has been resolved. CIT is getting emergency loan (2 billion and change at 10%)...good thing the govt refused to bailout.

these things have a habit of resolving themselves when govt stays out of the picture.
06:59 AM on 07/20/2009
you are absolutely right! CIT in fact, is the largest small business lender and yet the government was willing to allow them to fail. Exactly what is BO's policy on helping small businesses?
07:24 AM on 07/20/2009
do you know the largest account at CIT?

How many AMericans are meployed at that largest account?

GO get the facts
10:29 PM on 07/19/2009
I think Obama's trying to throw us Small Business owners under the bus
10:46 PM on 07/19/2009
Because treasury declined to send more $ their way? CIT received $2.33 B in bailout in December. It's not clear if that money will ever be repaid. Do you think another 10- or 11-figure sum is in order?
10:35 AM on 07/20/2009
I could ask the same questions about GM. Of course there will be no questions about ever more money for General Motors. It's nice to have unlimited funds. 'course, none of us will eveer know the feeling.......
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
masher
software engineer
01:58 AM on 07/20/2009
I know he is throwing working people under the bus. He is still importing foreigners into the US to replace Americans....in America. At Microsoft were are groups that can only hire H-2B visa workers (because those are the only resumes we get to see ). Everyone knows H-1B is full of corruption like this but Obama won't do a damn thing even as unemployment soars.

There are more unemployed US programmers now than there are H-1B visa holders.

So yes, Obama is trying to throw small business under the bus. Obama wants a nation of two tiers, the super rich and a permanent peasant class. Obama is following the same statist capitalist policy of Reagan and all in between.
07:06 AM on 07/20/2009
"""statist capitalist policy of Reagan""-------- that's a hoot
09:06 PM on 07/19/2009
Wait a minute. Didn't they just post some huge profit ?? Eyes to brain...does not compute.
09:18 PM on 07/19/2009
Maybe you're thinking of Citi. It and BOA just posted large profits.