'Potter' Crushes Box Office Competition, Breaks Records

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - 'Potter' Crushes Box Office Competition, Breaks Records stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

DAVID GERMAIN | 07/19/09 01:22 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?

LOS ANGELES — Harry Potter continues to work box-office alchemy, turning his latest movie adventure into an overnight blockbuster.

The sixth installment, "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince," took in $79.5 million domestically over opening weekend and $159.7 million since debuting last Wednesday, according to estimates from distributor Warner Bros. on Sunday.

The movie also took in $237 million overseas since Wednesday in 54 countries, bringing its worldwide total to $396.7 million.

With some of the best reviews of any "Harry Potter" movie, "Half-Blood Prince" was off to the fastest overall start in franchise history.

The sixth movie about the young wizard came in $20 million ahead of the last movie, "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix," which grossed $139.7 million domestically in its first five days two years ago.

The new film had the second-highest start ever for a movie premiering on Wednesday, trailing the $200 million five-day opening for last month's "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen."

"Half-Blood Prince" already has surpassed the $157.3 million "Order of the Phoenix" pulled in during its entire first week. By the end of its seventh day Tuesday, "Half-Blood Prince" will be in the $180 million range on its way to becoming the franchise's first $300 million domestic smash since the original movie, 2001's "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone," said Dan Fellman, Warner head of distribution.

The audience was a bit older for the new movie, with more elder teens turning out to see Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) and pals Hermione (Emma Watson) and Ron (Rupert Grint) as they deal with adult concerns such as heartache, jealousy and romantic triangles.

Story continues below
advertisement

Fans have grown up with the franchise, from young readers whose parents had to debate whether the early movies might be too intense for their children to see.

"When the first movie came out, they fought to go. The mother was like, well, should I take them, should I not take them?" Fellman said. "Now they're driving themselves to this and going to the midnight show."

Sacha Baron Cohen's mock documentary "Bruno" plummeted after its No. 1 debut the previous weekend. The Universal Pictures comedy fell to fourth-place with $8.4 million, down a whopping 73 percent from its $30.6 million opening.

Crowd-pleasing movies typically dip 50 percent or less in their second weekends. But "Bruno" has had mixed reviews and failed to earn the audience buzz that made a $128 million hit out of Baron Cohen's 2006 comedy "Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan."

After 10 days in release, "Bruno" has climbed to $49.6 million and will finish far below $100 million domestically.

While "Harry Potter" had a healthy start, the overall box office plunged compared to the same weekend last year, when the Batman juggernaut "The Dark Knight" had its record opening weekend of $158.4 million.

The top-12 movies this weekend combined for less than that, taking in $153.9 million, down 39 percent from a year ago.

"We got kind of slaughtered even with the 'Potter' movie, but we knew that was going to happen," said Paul Dergarabedian, box-office analyst for Hollywood.com. "When one movie last year makes more than what the top-12 movies did this year, you're going to have a down weekend."

Fox Searchlight's romantic comedy "500 Days of Summer," starring Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Zooey Deschanel, got off to a big start in limited release with $837,588 in 27 theaters. That amounted to an average of $31,022 a cinema, compared to $18,376 in 4,325 theaters for "Half-Blood Prince."

A hit with critics, "500 Days of Summer" expands gradually into wide release over the next few weekends.

Estimated ticket sales for Friday through Sunday at U.S. and Canadian theaters, according to Hollywood.com. Final figures will be released Monday.

1. "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince," $79.5 million.

2. "Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs," $17.7 million.

3. "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen," $13.8 million.

4. "Bruno," $8.4 million.

5. "The Hangover," $8.32 million.

6. "The Proposal," $8.3 million.

7. "Public Enemies," $7.6 million.

8. "Up," $3.1 million.

9. "My Sister's Keeper," $2.8 million.

10. "I Love You, Beth Cooper," $2.7 million.

___

On the Net:

http://www.hollywood.com/boxoffice

___

Universal Pictures and Focus Features are owned by NBC Universal, a unit of General Electric Co.; Sony Pictures, Sony Screen Gems and Sony Pictures Classics are units of Sony Corp.; Paramount and Paramount Vantage are divisions of Viacom Inc.; Disney's parent is The Walt Disney Co.; Miramax is a division of The Walt Disney Co.; 20th Century Fox, Fox Searchlight Pictures and Fox Atomic are owned by News Corp.; Warner Bros. and New Line are units of Time Warner Inc.; MGM is owned by a consortium of Providence Equity Partners, Texas Pacific Group, Sony Corp., Comcast Corp., DLJ Merchant Banking Partners and Quadrangle Group; Lionsgate is owned by Lions Gate Entertainment Corp.; IFC Films is owned by Rainbow Media Holdings, a subsidiary of Cablevision Systems Corp.; Rogue Pictures is owned by Relativity Media LLC; Overture Films is a subsidiary of Liberty Media Corp.

LOS ANGELES — Harry Potter continues to work box-office alchemy, turning his latest movie adventure into an overnight blockbuster. The sixth installment, "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince...
LOS ANGELES — Harry Potter continues to work box-office alchemy, turning his latest movie adventure into an overnight blockbuster. The sixth installment, "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
166
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)

I'm glad it did well. I thought it evoked all my emotions. My boyfriend thought it was the best Harry Potter movie. He doesn't read the books, so that suggests non-readers may find it more enjoyable. Yes, the movie adaptation did leave out some parts; however, it was a lot of "fat" that was cut out. Did it make the movie better or worse? Depends on if you like fat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:36 PM on 07/20/2009

I've really enjoyed all the Potter movies except this one. I yawned several times, almost dozed off a couple of times and almost walked out (I haven't done that since Dead Poets Society). This is the craziest movie adaptation of a book that I have ever seen. It's about 2 1/2 hours long and whole chunks of the book are nowhere to be found. For example, Harry's Aunt Petunia has a more prominent role than usual in the book but is not in the movie at all. I wish I could get my $8.25 back.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:55 PM on 07/20/2009
photo

It is easier to be critical than correct.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:42 PM on 07/20/2009
photo

The movie was great...it was entertainment which last time I checked is what a movie is supposed to be.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:11 PM on 07/20/2009
photo

The only thing sadder than adults obsessed with childrens books are adults that are obsessed with the amount of money made by movies made about said books

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:02 PM on 07/20/2009
photo

And sadder still are people such as yourself who obviously find no joy in anything.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:13 PM on 07/20/2009
photo

BING-O

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:43 PM on 07/20/2009
photo

Have you even read the books? Good literature is good literature, no matter the label 'children' 'young adult', whatever.

It's a great story. What the heck is wrong with anyone's enjoyment of that?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:24 PM on 07/20/2009
- plzchuteme I'm a Fan of plzchuteme 34 fans permalink
photo

I had no doubt that this movie would be, and is incredibly attractive, however, why don't they count attendance instead of gross receipts. It is a much truer view of popularity and much fairer if one is comparing success from different eras. It is not very accurate to compare success of a production when the population is 175 million and ticket price is $2.00 with success at a population of 300 million and ticket prices of $12.00 if gross receipts are the criteria.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 PM on 07/20/2009
photo

400 million in 5 days. That has to be a record.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:52 PM on 07/20/2009
photo

One preview I saw at the theatre, (before waiting for Harry P to start) was the one for Sherlock Holmes... (w/Robert Downey Jr. and Jude Law.)

THAT movie looks like winner.. take it to the bank.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:32 AM on 07/20/2009
- PaxMundis I'm a Fan of PaxMundis 13 fans permalink

I don't know if you're being sarcastic, but what I saw was Guy Ritchie trashing everything interesting and good about the Conan Doyle character.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 07/20/2009
photo

Guy Ritchie, (as he writes in, "The Sun") seems to be on a mission to see the movie fail for some reason...

.. but then again, "The Sun" is another Murdoch paper, where negative press rules the day...

From what I've seen and heard however, this movie looks good...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 AM on 07/20/2009

This is just the proof we need... the average intelligence has absolutely no taste!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 AM on 07/20/2009
- joewalters I'm a Fan of joewalters 5 fans permalink

Hey, but its far more in-depth than Twilight.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 AM on 07/20/2009

Elitist.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 AM on 07/20/2009
- pjgm I'm a Fan of pjgm 7 fans permalink

talk about a right aweful git!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 AM on 07/20/2009
- AbeMartin I'm a Fan of AbeMartin 10 fans permalink
photo

Coming to theaters near you in 2011: "Harry Potter and the Half-baked princess of Wassila"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 AM on 07/20/2009

LOL
Now, that's cold

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:56 PM on 07/20/2009
photo

Book 6 was my favorite in the series and this is my favorite movie in the series. Sirius's death in the book was extremely well done; on film it was too gentle. I wondered how they'd handle D's death in this one and I have to say, even knowing what was coming and why, it was shocking and horrifying. After all these years, to get to that point was just spectacular.

I really enjoyed the movie. Yes, the books are better -- they're fuller and richer and motivation is more clearly drawn. But to get to spend 2+ hours in a dark room with the characters come to 2-dimensional life was a pleasure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 AM on 07/20/2009
- jsijason I'm a Fan of jsijason 31 fans permalink
photo

This latest edition was as snoozefest, IMO.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 AM on 07/20/2009

For more on Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, check out http://www.precioustimeny.com/blog/?p=2544.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 AM on 07/20/2009
photo

The new movie is called " Harry Potter and the Wizards of Dumbledorf Make 19 and 20 Year Olds Look Like Teenagers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 AM on 07/20/2009
- dmac I'm a Fan of dmac 7 fans permalink

Cool. The viewer can suspend disbelief for the whole magic thing, but the actors' ages are an impediment to enjoyment.

'Kay.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 AM on 07/20/2009

If you are 19, your a teenager? I think we are splitting hairs here, as the cast is closer to the actual age they are playing. Does anyone remember how old the cast of 901210 were when they were playing high schoolers? If recollection serves me right, they were in their mid to late 20's.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 07/20/2009
- MJinCanada I'm a Fan of MJinCanada 116 fans permalink

How old was Judy Garland when she played Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz? She was 17, playing a child.

But the thing about teenagers is that that some look younger than their age and some look older. There are 13 year olds in my son's class who could pass for 15, 16 or even 17. While he, poor kid, looks 10, except for his height.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:44 PM on 07/20/2009
photo

That Hangover just won't go away. Not usually a good thing, but it's great in this case. Too bad Star Trek is off the top 10, though. It was such a better movie than Ice Age or Transformers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:36 AM on 07/20/2009
- becky16 I'm a Fan of becky16 2 fans permalink
photo

Im glad. None of tem are better the books though.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:32 AM on 07/20/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect