• Home
  • Politics
  • Media
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  •  Comedy
  • Business
  • Living
  • Style
  • Green

Grand Canyon Uranium Mining Halted

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Grand Canyon Uranium Mining Halted stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JOAN LOWY and FELICIA FONSECA | 07/20/09 07:45 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Grand Canyon

FLAGSTAFF, Ariz. — Thousands of mining claims dot 1 million acres near the Grand Canyon, and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar says his department has a responsibility to ensure those resources are developed in a way that protects communities, treasured landscapes and watersheds.

The Interior Department announced Monday that it is barring the filing of new mining claims, including for uranium, on the acreage for two years. Meanwhile, his department will study whether the land should be permanently withdrawn from mining activity.

"Over the next two years, we will gather the best science and input from the public, members of Congress, tribes and stakeholders, and we will thoughtfully evaluate whether these lands should be withdrawn from new mining claims for a longer period of time," Salazar said in a statement.

Environmentalists applauded the decision, while some members of Congress and the mining industry said it would cost jobs and further harm the economy.

The land being set aside covers 633,547 acres under the control of the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and 360,002 acres in Kaibab National Forest.

The protections offered by the Interior Department won't affect uranium mining claims already filed. It's not possible to prevent existing claims from being developed under the General Mining Act of 1872 unless Congress appropriates money for the department to buy them.

The announcement comes ahead of Tuesday's congressional hearing on a bill to set aside more than 1 million acres of federal lands north and south of the canyon. The bill's sponsor, Democratic U.S. Rep. Raul Grijalva of Arizona, and environmental groups had been looking to Salazar for temporary protections at the Grand Canyon while the legislation is pending.

The announcement drew an immediate objection from the mining industry. National Mining Association Vice President Luke Popovich said current laws and regulations are effective for protecting the environment from mining activity.

Story continues below

"So this decision appears on its face to be wholly unjustified and even dumbfounding in view of the near 10 percent jobless rate," Popovich said.

Environmentalists, who contend mining leaves the Grand Canyon vulnerable to environmental damage, praised the decision but said that permanent protection is the goal.

"This decisive action to protect the Grand Canyon sends an important signal that President (Barack) Obama is committed to prioritizing the public interest when it comes to managing America's natural resources," said Jane Danowitz, U.S. public lands program director at the Pew Environment Group.

There are as many as 10,000 existing mining claims on BLM and U.S. Forest Service lands near the Grand Canyon for all types of hard-rock exploration. Some 1,100 uranium mining claims are within five miles of the Grand Canyon National Park.

Most of the claims for uranium are staked in the Arizona Strip, a sparsely populated area immediately north of the Grand Canyon National Park known for its high-grade uranium ore.

Operations in the area ceased some 20 years ago, when the price plummeted for uranium used for nuclear energy, weapons and medicine. With prices now around $55 a pound because of renewed interest in nuclear energy, the industry is eyeing restarting operations.

Toronto-based Denison Mines Corp. is about a year away from mining at a site about 20 miles from the canyon's northern border if it secures an air permit with Arizona state officials. A public hearing is being held this week.

The Interior Department under President George W. Bush was unresponsive to efforts to ban new uranium mining claims. The House Natural Resources Committee invoked a little-used rule to stop any new claims for up to three years, but Interior officials refused to recognize the action and continued to authorize additional mining claims.

A coalition of environmental groups sued, and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management later rescinded Congress' right to withdraw lands from mining and other activities in emergencies.

Since then, environmentalists and Grijalva have been hanging their hopes on Salazar for temporary protections.

Any companion bill to Grijalva's in the Senate is unlikely to come from Arizona's two U.S. senators. Republicans John McCain and Jon Kyl told Grijalva in a letter last month that adequate protections already exist.

___

Associated Press Writer Joan Lowy reported from Washington.

__

On the Net:

http://www.federalregister.gov/OFRUpload/OFRData/2009-17293(underscore)PI.pdf

FLAGSTAFF, Ariz. — Thousands of mining claims dot 1 million acres near the Grand Canyon, and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar says his department has a responsibility to ensure those resources are...
FLAGSTAFF, Ariz. — Thousands of mining claims dot 1 million acres near the Grand Canyon, and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar says his department has a responsibility to ensure those resources are...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
301
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 pages total)
- n5ifi I'm a Fan of n5ifi 9 fans permalink
photo

WHERE ARE THE JOBS?

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 03:06 PM on 7/21/2009
- JSaeger I'm a Fan of JSaeger permalink
photo

Please refer to Dr. Helen Caldicott's web page for a wealth of information on the dangers of uranium mining. IF YOU LOVE THIS PLANET stop all uranium mining now.

HelenCaldicott.com

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 PM on 7/21/2009
- urweatherman I'm a Fan of urweatherman 20 fans permalink

How about no more construction anywhere? Building of any kind ruins the landscape and has possible environmental impact. No new houses or roadways unless others are cleaned up! For those advocating solar power, all it takes is one bad year for volcanoes and we are all screwed!

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 AM on 7/21/2009
- research I'm a Fan of research 319 fans permalink

BioFuels can supply our energy needs till the sun comes back. rooftop solar does no environmental damage. rooftop solar is the cheapest electricity you can buy at 3 cents per kwh. see my profile.

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 AM on 7/21/2009
- BradSmith I'm a Fan of BradSmith 246 fans permalink
photo

So how do you produce all these solar panels without haveing an impact on the environment?

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 PM on 7/21/2009
- rshrink I'm a Fan of rshrink 65 fans permalink
photo

Why can't everyone make their own energy with solar and wind and algae fueled generators? Why can't we have net metering everywhere so people can share energy so that there is an endless supply? Then we don't need coal or uranium. Now, if the government has to subsidize other energy producers, why not subsidize individuals who convert their homes into generators of power to share with others? We can call it US infrastructure and it helps to keep this country going for everyone. Take out the middle man. We don't need him. And it is clean and it will provide American jobs, as long as we don't put illegal immigrants to work on this, so it has to be regulated to prevent that and that would be okay too

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 AM on 7/21/2009
- BradSmith I'm a Fan of BradSmith 246 fans permalink
photo

"why not subsidize individuals who convert their homes into generators of power to share with others"? Actually they already do. And the reason it's a bad idea is that the government is subsidizing with money they have stolen from someone who may or may not be involved. Sharing or bartering with your neighbors is great but please keep the government out they will only steal as much as they can and then where are you? Right back where you started right?

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 03:31 AM on 7/21/2009
- research I'm a Fan of research 319 fans permalink

tax pollution 1$ per carbon ton equivalent. Polluters of the commons, SHOULD pay, right?

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 AM on 7/21/2009
- rshrink I'm a Fan of rshrink 65 fans permalink
photo

See, I don't have this knee jerk thing about the government. If the people get involved in the governing more, which they have since the Bush catastrophe, then things go much better. The government is the only way to get this going. Corporations are largely far less worthy of trust and they are not good at stuff like this. Churches are controversial. Even if an organization like Habitat for the Humanities was used, it would still have to have government backing.

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 12:10 PM on 7/21/2009
- rshrink I'm a Fan of rshrink 65 fans permalink
photo

One other thing, we are all involved. This is a problem for everyone and everyone needs to help solve it.

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 PM on 7/21/2009
- Organic-Guy I'm a Fan of Organic-Guy 42 fans permalink
photo

The General Mining Act of 1872? Maybe we need a new one.

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 PM on 7/20/2009
- Zyzzygowski I'm a Fan of Zyzzygowski 10 fans permalink

Any new mining permit should require that an old mine be cleaned up.

Yep, if you want to mine anything, you have to find a closed, or abandoned, mine to clean up (restore, make safe, etc.)

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 05:57 PM on 7/20/2009
- rshrink I'm a Fan of rshrink 65 fans permalink
photo

I vote for ending the mining. It is far too destructive, especially mountaintop removal. But then using what is mined ends up a problem as well. There is no way presently to clean it up.

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 PM on 7/20/2009
- patianneb I'm a Fan of patianneb 18 fans permalink
photo

Thank you.

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 05:22 PM on 7/20/2009
- sfwolf I'm a Fan of sfwolf permalink

No one lives in the Grand Canyon? The Havasupai have lived there for centuries.

And there is one additional feature that millions of people depend on - the Colorado River which drains the entire Grand Canyon and the surrounding plateau. Downstream, the water goes to Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Phoenix, Tucson and Mexico.

Uranium mining could have a great effect throughout the desert SW.

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 PM on 7/20/2009
- rongbeech I'm a Fan of rongbeech permalink

YAAAAAAY!!!!

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 03:12 PM on 7/20/2009
- research I'm a Fan of research 319 fans permalink

Good!, Nukes are Insane. ANY reactor work promotes proliferation.

Nukes can't even pay their own insurance, the Taxpayers yet again insure the catastrophic events that WILL happen if we continue nuke power.

Solar is ready NOW!
3 cents per KWH
1.85 per peak watt! retail!
http://www.atensolar.com/14.html
http://www.ecobusinesslinks.com/solar_panels.htm
see my profile for more links and details.

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 02:58 PM on 7/20/2009
- LITU I'm a Fan of LITU 115 fans permalink
photo

France, arguably the most advanced user of nuclear power, can't even solve the spent fuel problem. As a matter of fact, the reprocessed fuel is even more insidious than the original. I don't quite get what all the clamor is about. Until the problem of spent fuel is resolved, it remains just another unresolved problem.

Jump right in here, neocons, and tell us why I've got it all wrong.

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 PM on 7/20/2009
- AmandaBC I'm a Fan of AmandaBC 698 fans permalink
photo

As long as the French have an African dictator willing to take a bribe, they know where to dump their radioactive waste and there is no problem at all, ask Sarko... ;)

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 05:47 PM on 7/20/2009
- guinganbresil I'm a Fan of guinganbresil 7 fans permalink
photo

Not a neocon...

Sweden is addressing the problem...

http://www.thelocal.se/19824/20090602/

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 07:51 PM on 7/20/2009
- research I'm a Fan of research 319 fans permalink

"The Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company (SKB), an independent company owned by nuclear power plant operators, is due to select a site sometime in June for its final repository for high-level spent nuclear fuel from Sweden's 10 reactors."

Hey I love the swedes, but they make mistakes too, this sounds like the nuke power industry saying "trust us".

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 PM on 7/20/2009
- BradSmith I'm a Fan of BradSmith 246 fans permalink
photo

Name one time that we have had an accident in the US that caused deaths regarding spent fuel storage. The fact is that has not happened not once ever! 70,000 deaths a year can be attributed to the coal indistry in the US alone. Thats 1,200 Chernobyls per year!!! Reprocessed fuel is no bigger problem to take care of in fact the opposite is true just the fact that it's close to 100 times smaller makes it easy in comparison. furthermore if you add up all of the nuclear waste that this country has ever produced it would still fit in a football field and only fill it up four feet deep. Do you have any idea of the waste products from coal do. Even the uranium that is expelled exeeds all of this nuclear wast.

The fact is that you Greenies and the neocons have a lot in common. You use fear to shove your adgenda down our throats rather than facts!!

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 08:53 PM on 7/20/2009
- guinganbresil I'm a Fan of guinganbresil 7 fans permalink
photo

The insurance claim is a canard.

A newspaper - The Age - published a short letter saying "Insurance companies, I believe, won't touch nuclear power stations. Could there be a more eloquent statement of doubt from a capitalist institution?"
To which the reply: your correspondent (25/11/06) "is wrong in believing that insurers will not touch nuclear power stations. In fact, wherever they are available to private sector insurers, Western-designed nuclear installations are sought-after business because of their high engineering and risk management standards. This has been the case for fifty years."

Much more...

http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf67.html

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 08:14 PM on 7/20/2009
- BradSmith I'm a Fan of BradSmith 246 fans permalink
photo

ANY reactor work promotes proliferation. How is that? Everyone already has or can get this tech. Pandoras box is already open and you will not put this back in. Sorry but I have researched solar over and over and it just is not cost effective yet. I'll check out your links because I'm always looking but so far it's all been a joke. The only way it even comes close is with using a tax credit. But I suppose your for that type of credit right? Thats just too funny, solar power fans complaning about tax credits!

Peace!

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 08:58 PM on 7/20/2009
- rshrink I'm a Fan of rshrink 65 fans permalink
photo

TO make a change to using new forms of energy requires building infrastructure. That is a necessary expense, but a wise one certainly in the long run as it can help clean things up and make us more efficient. So, it is tax money well spent, instead of wasting it on needless and hopeless wars and other useless pork.

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 09:04 PM on 7/20/2009
- research I'm a Fan of research 319 fans permalink

Pleas research rooftop solar again!

It just became the cheapest electricity you can buy!

1.85 per peak watt! retail! about 3 cents per KWH!!!!!!!!
http://www.atensolar.com/14.html
http://www.ecobusinesslinks.com/solar_panels.htm
see my profile for more links

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 PM on 7/20/2009
- StuartGalley I'm a Fan of StuartGalley 4 fans permalink
photo

The government intervening yet again to stifle enterprise. Good thing they are cancelling at least 2 years of drilling....meaning that is x amount of more jobs lost under the Obama administration. Way to go greenies. Green is socialism....one big faleshood of an agenda.

News for you people....no one lives in the Grand Canyon.

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 PM on 7/20/2009
- LITU I'm a Fan of LITU 115 fans permalink
photo

News for you - no one live on Mars.

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 7/20/2009
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 167 fans permalink

But the Havasupi do live in the Grand Canyon

And why not ask the Hualapai while you are at it.

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 04:42 PM on 7/20/2009
- LITU I'm a Fan of LITU 115 fans permalink
photo

...lives...

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 7/20/2009
- AmandaBC I'm a Fan of AmandaBC 698 fans permalink
photo

The top ten countries in the UN Human Development Index are all Social Democracies. They are also the countries with the highest respect for environmental issues and the most extensive green technology. If ignorance is bliss, why are you right-wingers always so angry?

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 02:54 PM on 7/20/2009
- LITU I'm a Fan of LITU 115 fans permalink
photo

Do it to 'em, Amanda! :-)

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 PM on 7/20/2009
- StuartGalley I'm a Fan of StuartGalley 4 fans permalink
photo

Yeah Amanda....and guess what. The US is number 15 out of the 179 countries in your reference point. So don't act like the US is that far from the top in "respect for environmental issues". And do we have to be the top at everything? No. But we are pretty darn close in most things.

And where do China and India rank? 94 and 132 respectively. So our cutting out mining for Uranium is going to mean anything when you have close to 3 billion people destroying much more of the world than our 300 mil

Wait a second here Amanda....who exactly funds the UN Human Development Index? The UN? (actually the US and China) And you are going to put your eggs and say that than anything the UN says is credible? I've got an issue with that. All the UN is is a punching bag disguised as the United States. All anyone wants at the UN is money from the US. All they want in return is stifle anything the US does to promote enterprise.

Trust me...it's not just right wingers who get angry with Socialistic Greenies. It is a lot of lefties and independents as well. It is like arguing with PETA (People who Eternaly Think with their A.......)

Nice try though.

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 03:18 PM on 7/20/2009
- Cambridge9 I'm a Fan of Cambridge9 110 fans permalink
photo

There are living accomodations in the Grand Canyon. There are camps and researchers who spend long periods of time in various parts of the canyon. No, I agree, there are no towns, supermarkets and malls; but that does not mean that people don't live there on a temporary basis. And I can be corrected but I do believe that there is at least one person (an artist/researcher I believe) who has permission to live there fairly permanently.

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 03:30 PM on 7/20/2009
- StuartGalley I'm a Fan of StuartGalley 4 fans permalink
photo

OK....the GC is a very very large area.....much larger than 1mil acres. What the HP article leaves out (as they typically do) is....does anyone live by this area?

Think about what you just typed....I believe there is at least one person who lives there fairly permanently. So what? He/she can move somewhere else. And as far as the tribe is concerned....OK. Do they live around this particular 1mil acres? Does any of that tribe work drilling for this company? If so, how is that going to affect their ability make a living?

Maybe I should rephrase this for the literal....not too many people live in the GC? Better? Easier to understand?

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 PM on 7/20/2009
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 167 fans permalink

I suggest yo go talk to the Havasupi tribe and inform them that they don't live in the Grand Canyon.

That would really interest them.

And while you are at it tell them their water supply would be safe with uranium mining in their watershed.

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 03:31 PM on 7/20/2009
- SelenicMagick I'm a Fan of SelenicMagick 18 fans permalink
photo

The Lakota AND the Navajo aren't and weren't "safe" with it being done... what the H*LL makes anyone in their right mind think that any OTHER tribe would be safe?

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 08:17 PM on 7/20/2009
- rshrink I'm a Fan of rshrink 65 fans permalink
photo

More jobs are possible with Green jobs than with mountaintop removal and uranium mining. So, Stuart, are you the promoter of this prop a gand a or just a suc ker who bought into it.

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 07:53 PM on 7/20/2009
- rshrink I'm a Fan of rshrink 65 fans permalink
photo

Green is intelligentism and not green is dumbism, as plain as that.

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 08:29 PM on 7/20/2009
- rshrink I'm a Fan of rshrink 65 fans permalink
photo

Mining should never have been allowed in that tourist dense area. It is a health hazard to say the least. Probably people didn't know that and were not told, which demonstrates more of the secrecy of the Bush/Cheney admin. It points out once again, that under republican rule, mining interests, along with the associated energy industry and weapons industry, banks, insurance and pharmaceuticals were determining the policies of our country. They had free reign and just went crazy with power, forgoing all other concerns.

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 02:27 PM on 7/20/2009
- Samcat604 I'm a Fan of Samcat604 25 fans permalink

If you read it, 90% of the mining sites are over 5 miles from the canyon. How far away do they have to be? 10 miles? 50 miles?

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 03:36 PM on 7/20/2009
- rshrink I'm a Fan of rshrink 65 fans permalink
photo

Once the tailings get in the water, it will do a lot of damage and as far as particulate matter getting up in the wind, it can carry quite a distance, certainly enough to impact the tourists and apparently, people do live in that area as well. I'm sure Bush ignored the studies. That land like other National Parks was set aside for the enjoyment of tourists, not for mining. Of course, that is of little concern to Bush and Cheney and the other people who are just in it for greed appeasement.

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 04:07 PM on 7/20/2009
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 167 fans permalink

Outside of the watershed.

Jeez.

Ever been in the Grand Canyon? Do you have a clue just how valuable the springs and streams are.

Or how rare.

Or how far the water travels before it emerges from solid rock in the coolest waterfalls anywhere on earth?

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 04:44 PM on 7/20/2009
- Bitsko I'm a Fan of Bitsko 670 fans permalink
photo

Rep. Raul Grijalva is an American hero.

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 02:17 PM on 7/20/2009
- Jaybot I'm a Fan of Jaybot 13 fans permalink

True, I wonder where Franks stand on this one - wait he's a Republican, it doesn't matter.

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 02:22 PM on 7/20/2009
- LindasLookout I'm a Fan of LindasLookout 3 fans permalink
photo

I'm with kburlz, see above. There are ways to be cool yet clean, we just have to try harder.

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 PM on 7/20/2009
- Forest I'm a Fan of Forest 7 fans permalink

Thank you to the Obama administration.

    Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 02:01 PM on 7/20/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with