EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Kanjorski Brings In Big Bucks From Wall Street, Declines To Reveal Guests At Fundraiser

First Posted: 8/23/09 Updated: 5/25/11

Kanjorski

Rep. Paul Kanjorski (D-Pa.), a senior member of the House Financial Services Committee, raised $164,500 from finance, insurance, and real estate interests during the second quarter of 2009, according to an analysis of Federal Election Commission filings by the nonpartisan Public Campaign Action Fund.

"Anytime you take $164,000 from just one sector of the economy," PCAF Campaigns Director David Donnelly told the Huffington Post, "clearly those that are giving to him hope he helps him out."

Donnelly's group reported earlier this month that the 71 members of the committee had raised $62.9 million from the industry in lifetime campaign contributions. The top recipient was Rep. Spencer Bachus (R-Ala.), who has raised $3.62 million, followed by Kanjorski, who has raked in $3.12 million.

On Monday, the committee did a favor for Wall Street, punting on proposed legislation to create a Consumer Financial Protection Agency in response to industry pressure. The committee will wait until after the August recess to take up the bill.

In an effort to see Kanjorski shake the money tree in real time, the Huffington Post visited a fundraiser Wednesday night at a home in Northwest Washington. Upon setting foot in the house, the Huffington Post was immediately asked to leave.

Price of admission to Kanjorski's dinner party was a $1,000 campaign contribution for individual guests, $2,500 for political action committee reps, and $5,000 for "co-hosts." The Sunlight Foundation posted an invitation to the event on its website, www.politicalpartytime.org. The house belonged to big-time lobbyist Tony Podesta, who co-hosted the event with wife Heather Podesta and Gwen Mellor, whose clients include the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and the National Installment Lenders Association.

There's no telling who attended Wednesday's fundraiser. Event organizers and Kanjorski's office declined to provide details about the guest list for the run-of-the-mill event, and arriving guests politely declined to speak with a reporter.

It was just one fundraiser of at least at least a dozen happening that day. Fellow committee members Joe Baca (D-Calif.), Suzanne Kosmas (D-Fla.), and Lynn Jenkins (R-Kan.) also found time to raise money, according to the Sunlight Foundation.

Freshman members like Kosmas and Jenkins have received some attention for the ease with which they raise money from Wall Street after winning their seats.

Last week Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) complained about the fundraising, saying she was "shaken" buy "the huge amount of money that the bankers and financial services community representatives are going to spend to lobby members of Congress."

Donnelly said finance, insurance, and real estate industry PACs have been bringing smaller checks to fundraisers lately. He sees fewer $5,000 donations and more contributions in the $1,000-to-$2,500 range.

"They're withholding some donations until after the votes," he said. "I think they are waiting to see who their friends really are...They'll top them off when they see how they vote."

Donnelly hates the game, not the players. He laments the fact that members of Congress who don't devote time to fundraising risk losing their jobs to better-funded opponents. But he said that the Fair Elections Now Act, which would allow candidates to fund campaigns with a mix of small contributions and public money, is nearing 70 cosponsors and may get a hearing next week.

Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Rep. Paul Kanjorski (D-Pa.), a senior member of the House Financial Services Committee, raised $164,500 from finance, insurance, and real estate interests during the second quarter of 2009, according ...
Rep. Paul Kanjorski (D-Pa.), a senior member of the House Financial Services Committee, raised $164,500 from finance, insurance, and real estate interests during the second quarter of 2009, according ...
 
  • Comments
  • 27
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
TheBaffler
a long the riverrun
09:55 PM on 07/23/2009
Kanjorski is, sadly, my representa­tive. He's been a milquetoas­t do-nothing for years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
babyboomerorig
We the People
07:36 PM on 07/23/2009
Better send it all back or give it to charity...­..it'll bite you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:15 PM on 07/23/2009
Reminds me of Emper0r Palpatine (aka Darth Sidious, of the Sith) without his cloak.
05:01 PM on 07/23/2009
“When I go to hell, I mean to carry a bribe: for look you, good gifts evermore make way for the worst persons.”

John Webster.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
expired
03:27 PM on 07/23/2009
Money talks, period.
03:09 PM on 07/23/2009
Actually, in Buckley vs. Valeo the Supreme Court ruled that while political donations are an extension of freedom of speech, they can also lead to corruption or the appearance thereof. The Court's decision stated that the government has an important interest in preventing corruption­, an interest critical enough to set some limits on the "money equals speech" argument. That's why contributi­on limits were upheld.

Voluntary public funding systems have also been upheld by the Supreme Court in every challenge since it was first considered in 1976. And it's important to note that public funding programs (versus some other reforms) greatly EXPAND, rather than limit free political speech by allowing more qualified leaders to run for office and more citizens to be involved in electing these leaders.

Matt Stempeck
Americans for Campaign Reform

P.S. Love the "hate the game, not the player" line. Love 'em or hate 'em, all of our national politician­s are stuck in a system that requires them to spend vast amounts of time calling strangers for money. If you don't think they hate it, watch this video: http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=8b3pkXr83­Do
04:20 PM on 07/23/2009
This is exactly why the system needs redesignin­g. Congress spends billions on less important issue why not set up a fund for any candidate to have equal time equal advertisem­ent with no party involvemen­t no lobbyist needed.
Or we could think outside the box: In my opinion, that would help improve consumer confidence more than anything.
Here’s an idea let’s vote Congress men/women in by utilizing modernize technology­. I think all campaigns and votes should be held similar to reality shows. Every season we are presented with a new set of candidates­, they are given challenges­, have a chance to discuss their platforms, equal coverage and digging into their history occurs, their past achievemen­ts clearly represente­d and every new season we vote candidates into Congress by popular vote. For those without tv or phone have voting centers at libraries.

This would solve three major problems: 1) the cost of campaignin­g 2) the non bi-partans­hip currently in Congress and 3) problems with taking campaign funds from special interest groups. Different, definitely­; but, here’s the Catch 22, guess who would have to make it law. That’s right, our non-functi­oning government­.
04:29 PM on 07/23/2009
Out of curiosity, What other reforms would be worse?

1976 was also a different time, less corruption­. Corporate America did not have the hold that they do now. You state every challenge has lost since 1976 then lousy lawyers were involved. Evidence can not be more clear, take a look at today's Huffpost only, how many articles is about this specific subject. Lobbyist are buying votes, that must be illegal.


Contributi­on limits should not only have been upheld but curtailed completely­. The problem is the Supreme Court may also be very political.
photo
WASanford
I think, therefore I am mad as hell!
03:06 PM on 07/23/2009
I've been disappoint­ed that public financing wasn't even on Obama's to do list much less on the top of it where I would have placed it. When money speaks the corporatio­ns can scream while the rest of have to whisper. Publicly financed campaigns will give control of our government back into the hands of the American people, where it belongs.
photo
huffyISaHottie
Nothing about me is micro;).
03:06 PM on 07/23/2009
congress is bought and paid for...lets not be shocked...­lets get this lifers out of congress
02:46 PM on 07/23/2009
no wonder he did nothing with my informatio­n

i sent him a letter

and dennis kucinich
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:37 PM on 07/23/2009
For all the whining about corruption among GOP when they were in power....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chriss0114
the meanderings of a madman
02:30 PM on 07/23/2009
we need public financing NOW

a friend of mine said he did not want to pay taxes to do that

I explained to him that he is paying WAY more in pork as payback for the campaign bribes system we have now

MONEY does not EQUAL free speech

otherwise it would not cost so much

the current system shuts evryone out except leading boardrooms and a few executives unless there is a MAJOR groundswel­l of support which is what happened with the O and will be hard to repeat unless people wake up
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:15 PM on 07/23/2009
Second that.
08:15 PM on 07/23/2009
you can tell your friend the bushies spent 5 trillion more than they raised in taxes----a­sk you friend what he or the country has to show for that expenditur­e
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinns17
TEAMSTER
02:26 PM on 07/23/2009
http://www­.votesmart­.org/index­.htm see how they vote
02:17 PM on 07/23/2009
the folks in his district are clinging to guns, religion and disposable cash for their representa­tive, I guess.
01:49 PM on 07/23/2009
Democratic or Republican if their vote is being bought than they are corrupt. The Supreme court needs to change their decision. These are not campaign contributi­ons the actions of lately (from Financial world and from healthcare­) proves that they are buying votes.

This has to be Unconstitu­tional to be able to buy votes. Lawyers what can we do?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TJCole
02:17 PM on 07/23/2009
Corporate "Personhoo­d"..!

Tom Hartman on it, and what's coming in September at SCOTUS...

http://www­.commondre­ams.org/vi­ew/2009/07­/06-0
02:19 PM on 07/23/2009
The supreme court favors republican­s --so they don't like limiting money contributi­ons. republican­s can never win the popular vote unless they spread their lies far and wide and John Robert, Alito and Scalia understand that very well. they HAVE to have corrupt access to rich people's money in order to do this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TJCole
01:38 PM on 07/23/2009
"We have a system of legalized bribery...­!"

Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski­...