EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Faced With Bad Health Care News, Obama Turns To Orszag And His Blog

First Posted: 8/27/09 Updated: 5/25/11

Orszag

Slightly after noon on an otherwise slow-news Saturday, journalists began turning their attention to a Congressional Budget Office analysis released earlier that morning detailing how an independent panel could affect Medicare spending.

The consensus was negative. "CBO deals new blow to health plan," blared a headline article from Politico, noting that the White House's proposal to create an Independent Medicare Advisory Council would not have major savings over the decade.

In the White House, the coverage was viewed as unexpectedly harsh and, to some, off base -- major savings, they noted, could be achieved, just in subsequent decades. Within an hour, the pushback had been planned and launched. Office of Management and Budget Director Peter Orszag fired off a testy blog post in which he wrote that the proposed new council was "a game changer not a scoreable offset." He concluded: "In providing a quantitative estimate of long-term effects without any analytical basis for doing so, CBO seems to have overstepped."

Once it was live on whitehouse.gov, the White House's media team alerted reporters to Orszag's blog. And by Monday, a new narrative had been set, one focused on the dispute over the analysis rather than its conclusion. "Office of Management and Budget Director Peter Orszag accused Congressional Budget Office Director Doug Elmendorf of 'overstepping' in a Web post Saturday," read MSNBC's First Read, "escalating the battle between the Obama administration and Republicans over the White House's conduct toward the CBO."

While just a small battle in the larger health care debate, the White House's pushback against Saturday's CBO report illustrates a key feature of this administration's approach to the reform process. While Orszag is well known as a telegenic, genuine health care obsessive who once headed the CBO himself, little attention has been paid to his eager use of new media to get across his message.

More than any other department within the White House, OMB has worked to spread its message through venues other than the traditional press. Orszag in particular has been a pioneer in this effort. One White House aide called him the president's "secret weapon." Others say he has found his niche and passion in trying to convey complex topics through personalized forums.

"Peter sees OMBlog as an effective way to explain to people what OMB is doing and why," said Kenneth Baer, OMB communications director. "It also gives him a chance to dive much deeper into a topic, the type of analysis that is often lost in the mainstream media."

Saturday was a case study in how Orszag is trying to change the landscape -- or, perhaps, adjust to it. The Politico story on the CBO report was published at 2:47 p.m. After coordinating with other members of the White House's communications team and hammering out the message, Orszag was up with his rebuttal by 3:19 p.m. That he would take to the blog was hardly surprising.

Orszag has openly touted his affinity for blogging, declaring it a great venue to distill complex issues into an accessible form for the public. And, over the course of several months, his posts have become essential reading for members of the press corps.

When the administration was outlining its budget, Orszag personally called a host of reporters, including those from non-traditional outlets, to pitch them on specific aspects of the president's approach. And OMB, among other administration offices, most often uses the president's new media team to fine-tune and disseminate its message, aides say.

Those close to Orszag say he has a strong appetite to know what is going on in the world of politics and a keen sense of how stories can go from zero-to-sixty in the fast-paced 24-hour news cycle. The OMB Director follows roughly 20 blogs with his Google reader. And he often will take somewhat obscure but intellectually interesting topics and turn them into short analysis pieces. In April 2009, for instance, he analyzed the correlation between suicide rates and the economic recession.

But what makes Orszag an effective new media mouthpiece for this administration -- especially within the context of the health care debate -- is his knack for delivering a message in ways that resonate with the press and public. To this point, aides say, he has already coined several phrases that have become staples of the current health care debate lexicon. The administration's approach to making health care reform more approachable for Congress is known as the "belt and suspenders approach." And the notion of finding long-term cost savings in the system now goes by the term "bending the curve."

"He has thought about health care for a long time and worked on it a long time. And I think when you are really familiar with the topic you have the ability to pull back and expand upon it in a way that is accessible for people," said an administration aide.

Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Slightly after noon on an otherwise slow-news Saturday, journalists began turning their attention to a Congressional Budget Office analysis released earlier that morning detailing how an independent p...
Slightly after noon on an otherwise slow-news Saturday, journalists began turning their attention to a Congressional Budget Office analysis released earlier that morning detailing how an independent p...
 
  • Comments
  • 258
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
01:47 PM on 08/07/2009
If You Really Think President Obama wants A Strong Public Option,
I have a bridge I’d like to sell you.

President Obama is a Corporatis­t in Populist Clothing.

The greed of the Health Insurance Companies
is not only destroying our economy, it's killing
people. The Public Option is actually a clever
scam to give these blood sucking companies
even more of our tax money.
06:47 PM on 07/28/2009
For all you folks who lust for links:

http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=izpU4YJ0Z­AA
04:32 PM on 07/28/2009
Good health is a right not a privilege. It is a public good that needs to stay in the public sphere (like the fire department or police). The Market is not very efficient when it comes to the environmen­t or health. People will pay any price when afflicted with a disease. It sets up a situation that can be taken advantage of.
Health care cannot be a profit making oligopoly. There is too much at stake. The more people get sick and need medicine, the higher profit margins for health providers will be.
No doubt there is a place for private companies to compete with a government plan and prove that they can do it better and cheaper, but let’s not pretend that what is happening in the insurance business is free market. It will become free when the govt. option exists as a moderating force.
Markets need government to maintain their freedom. Regulation is what makes markets free. President Obama's health care plan isn’t socialist, it is purely capitalist­. It allows capitalism to work properly.
06:07 PM on 07/28/2009
If we had a government that was good and just, that would be possible, but sadly we do not. They will use health care to force all sorts of social change and take adventage of the people. There is not a power that the government has been given or taken upon itself thet it hasn't abused.
07:32 PM on 07/29/2009
I completely disagree. The president even admitted last week in his prime-time news address that the government­-run Medicare program is the reason why we have such a huge deficit. We are paying for this. If an insurance company or a doctor doesn't make a profit (as Medicare doesn't) it would simply go out of business. With a government plan, it is funded through increased taxes which we pay for. Why on earth would we let the government control 1/6 of our economy? That's just crazy. medical insurance will come down in price as soon as everyone is mandated to be covered. Those companies that charge too much will go out of business as their insured find coverage elsewhere.
02:41 PM on 07/31/2009
i liked what you had to say till you got to the word "mandate"
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Artemis34
Mommy says the rich men need our food stamps.
01:37 AM on 08/04/2009
Obama Renews Vow of No Middle-Cla­ss Tax Increase
http://www­.nytimes.c­om/2009/08­/04/us/pol­itics/04ob­ama.html
03:38 PM on 07/28/2009
Does anyone know who is writing up this bill and deciding what's in it? It's not Obama - he is just the spokes model, the pitch man, the snake oil salesman, if you will, who doesn't know what's in his product but is will ing to sell it to unsuspecti­ng people.
photo
str8fwd
Realistic Idealism for an Ideal Reality
02:53 PM on 07/28/2009
LOL! Good try Repugnant-­can, but not quite good enough.

The actual "details" of the Health Care Reform Bill have not been made public "yet" because it's STILL in negotiatio­ns while being constantly amended. If it had been, then EVERYone would have EASY access to it by now either on the internet or through the Media. So unless you are a member of Congress, you wouldn't have ANY specific informatio­n to post here. And if you ARE a member of Congress, you are in violation of Constituti­onal Law for posting those "details" PAGE by PAGE without Executive (PRESIDENT Obama"s) approval.

2nd, every point you listed are frequently used and well known Republican talking points. There is nor has there ever been ANYthing in the Health Care Reform Bill that is "forced" upon businesses or individual­s--- for that would be automatica­lly counter-pr­oductive to get it approved and for the vast majority of American people to "accept" ANY measure of Health Care Reform, much less be part of the majority of Americans who APPROVE of "some" measure of Health Care Reform.

3rd, the Health Care Reform Bill is over 1,000 pages long--- yet you only seemed to focus on certain fragments of it they encompasse­d only 14 pages of it AND inserted your subjective opinions wherever appropriat­e.

And 4th, you're a liar, a slandering plagiarist with a political agenda who is just another mindless, care-less drone of the GOP out to destroy President Obama by ANY unethical means available.
03:58 PM on 07/28/2009
Are you replying to Angel who put a better sp'in on Obamacare then it deserves?

1. if the details of the government take'over of health care haven't been announced and are in a constant state of flux, why are you and so many others backing it? Will everyone be afforded a bank of law'yers to translate it for us? Where in the Constituti­on does it say the congress can't say anything without presidenti­al approval?

2. What is wrong with talking points if they are true and accurate? If we are not being forc''ed, why the penalties and fin'es?

3. If the frag'ments are so odoro'us, so is the whole. It's a sum of the parts.

4. Obama is the li'ar. He has proven that over and over again. You, with your ha'teful name'calli­ng have ex'posed yourself for what YOU are.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Dustee
For God sake Y don't U give more power to the ppl
05:42 PM on 07/28/2009
Do you speak and read in English or just Palinease?
01:21 PM on 07/28/2009
Just a few interestin­g things from the health care bill.

Page 22: Mandates audits of all employers that self-insur­e!
. Page 29: Admission: your health care will be rationed!
. Page 30: A government committee will decide what treatments and benefits you get (and, unlike an insurer, there will be no appeals process)
. Page 42: The "Health Choices Commission­er" will decide health benefits for you. You will have no choice. None.
. Page 50: All non-US citizens, illegal or not, will be provided with free healthcare services.
. Page 58: Every person will be issued a National ID Healthcard­.
. Page 59: The federal government will have direct, real-time access to all individual bank accounts for electronic funds transfer.
. Page 65: Taxpayers will subsidize all union retiree and community organizer health plans (read: SEIU, UAW and ACORN)
. Page 72: All private healthcare plans must conform to government rules to participat­e in a Healthcare Exchange.
. Page 84: All private healthcare plans must participat­e in the Healthcare Exchange (i.e., total government control of private plans)
. Page 91: Government mandates linguistic infrastruc­ture for services; translatio­n: illegal aliens
. Page 95: The Government will pay ACORN and Americorps to sign up individual­s for Government­-run Health Care plan.
. Page 102: Those eligible for Medicaid will be automatica­lly enrolled: you have no choice in the matter.
. Page 124: No company can sue the government for price-fixi­ng. No "judicial review" is permitted against the government monopoly. Put simply, private insurers
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wesinohio
Can't never did anything.
02:11 PM on 07/28/2009
Which of the six versions are you referring to? Given your obvious opposition to the "bill", your summaries likey omit, exaggerate and mislead. I'm not trusting you to evaluate the health care bill.
03:59 PM on 07/28/2009
Who DOo you trust to evaluate it? Or them?
photo
str8fwd
Realistic Idealism for an Ideal Reality
02:52 PM on 07/28/2009
LOL! Good try Repugnant-­can, but not quite good enough.

The actual “details” of the Health Care Reform Bill have not been made public “yet” because it's STILL in negotiatio­ns while being constantly amended. If it had been, then EVERYone would have EASY access to it by now either on the internet or through the Media. So unless you are a member of Congress, you wouldn't have ANY specific informatio­n to post here. And if you ARE a member of Congress, you are in violation of Constituti­onal Law for posting those "details" PAGE by PAGE without Executive (PRESIDENT Obama’s) approval.

2nd, every point you listed are frequently used and well known Republican talking points. There is nor has there ever been ANYthing in the Health Care Reform Bill that is "forced" upon businesses or individual­s--- for that would be automatica­lly counter-pr­oductive to get it approved and for the vast majority of American people to "accept" ANY measure of Health Care Reform, much less be part of the majority of Americans who APPROVE of "some" measure of Health Care Reform.

3rd, the Health Care Reform Bill is over 1,000 pages long--- yet you only seemed to focus on certain fragments of it they encompasse­d only 14 pages of it AND inserted your subjective opinions wherever appropriat­e.

And 4th, you're a liar, a slandering plagiarist with a political agenda who is just another mindless, care-less drone of the GOP out to destroy President Obama by ANY unethical means available.
04:00 PM on 07/28/2009
I'm getting a feeling of Deja Vu here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wesinohio
Can't never did anything.
12:31 PM on 07/28/2009
Promoting the general health is in the constituti­on. Having a healthy population is a matter of national security.
12:48 PM on 07/28/2009
Promoting yes, but total control over a person is not what the constituti­on is all about.
01:27 PM on 07/28/2009
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquilit­y, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constituti­on for the United States of America.

Where does it say "promoting general health"? Above it says "Promote general welfare" but it doesn't say demand it, or force it on us. How far can the government go in demanding health? Forced diets and exercise? Prohibitio­n of anything they claim drives up health care costs? Forced participat­ion in their plan? Penalties? Fines?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wesinohio
Can't never did anything.
03:43 PM on 07/28/2009
Promoting the "general welfare" is where the constituti­on says it. The details don't have to include your imaginary "forced diets and exercise" or the "prohibiti­ons" that you dream up in your imaginatio­n. And "total control over a person", to answer that other poster above you, is just an imaginary complaint that no one endorses. It's just an ignorant, fearful fantasy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
lthuedk 1
Artist, Political Imagery
11:16 AM on 07/28/2009
CBO, the Corporatis­t Budget Office, has spoken. So have 75% super majority.

Betray the People and beg for revolution­. That's precisely where this is headed should our government no longer represent us. Do not be afraid of Corporate. They are no longer our equal, but far, far less, and need to be harshly regulated and stripped of their Constituti­onal individual status. Corporatis­ts are not Americans but usurpers of the Republic.

http://www­.light-to-­dark.com/o­bama_confr­onts_the_c­orporation­.html
12:09 PM on 07/28/2009
I have read this post three times and it doesn't make any more sense. Sorry, I tried.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wesinohio
Can't never did anything.
04:16 PM on 07/28/2009
Your commentary­, as always, is condescend­ing, mean spirited and irrelevant­. Many progressiv­es aim to take the country back from the corporatis­ts. I think it's clear what side you're on.
10:57 AM on 07/28/2009
The Blue Dogs are the real Waterloo for the Democrats. Who needs Republican­s when you have Democrats like that. Besides I think the president is not ready to fight for real reform. His press conference did not show any passion for it. He will be ready to sign anything as long as there is maybe one Republican on board, for that he will sell out all the people who worked so hard and hoped for so much when they helped making him president. I voted for him too and believed he had the potential to become a great president now my doubts keep growing. I keep thinking he and the Democrats are like the Republican­s, just another style they are the blues of the same cloth as the reds. He could let them know, he will veto any bill that does not include at the minimum a public option and health care for all.
11:05 AM on 07/28/2009
Patience, Grasshoppe­r. POTUS is waiting for the dust to settle before weighing in. No sense in wasting ammo on issues that may resolve themselves­.
11:17 AM on 07/28/2009
This is not the first time we are dancing the dance, it is a decades old struggle. Always a little BAND AID and the status quo. Profit is all that counts. The corporate sector always wins.
12:23 PM on 07/28/2009
Obama knows that if he keeps it in the forefront that someone might actually read it and find out whats in it. It's not what you think. READ IT YOURSELF! Find out what you are giving away.
11:08 AM on 07/28/2009
Vote them out! Send money to their opponents.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Samalabear
10:56 AM on 07/28/2009
"While Orszag is well known as a telegenic, genuine health care obsessive who once headed the CBO himself, little attention has been paid to his eager use of new media to get across his message."

Yes, a health care obsessive as long as it's not single payer, apparently­.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PaxEterna
10:48 AM on 07/28/2009
Until someone steps up to the real issue and advocates SINGLE PAYER, all the talk is just that: spin and more spin, lies and mendacity, it's the American way.
10:55 AM on 07/28/2009
All or nothing?

Perfect is not the enemy of the good
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Samalabear
11:05 AM on 07/28/2009
Oh, please. Nobody said that single payer is perfect in every way. It is, though, the good. It should be the public option. Single-pay­er public options work alongside private insurers in other countries just fine.
12:23 PM on 07/28/2009
I am not againse single payer as long as that single payer is not the Federal Government­. They are the real enemy of the people.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:47 PM on 07/28/2009
You are wrong about this. It is the for-profit corporatio­ns that have robbed the people because they seek profit above all else. they don't care about the laborers or the ordinary citizens. They only care for profits. and hey have purchased our elected officials.­. And why has this particualr topic attracted all these health insurance profiteers­. They must feel threatened­. Tthe government IS the people.
10:40 AM on 07/28/2009
This is all about ending medicare for seniors and the soon to be seniors, the baby boomers.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PaxEterna
10:49 AM on 07/28/2009
Agreed . . . slowing costs is akin to slowing enrollment which is what they have done in MA because they cannot pay for everyone who qualifies for the mandated health insurance reform.

Sound familiar?

Just like insurance companies who say no to sick people.

Pretty soon it will be death to the seniors by denying them drugs they need, surgeries they need, etc.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PocketWatch
10:52 AM on 07/28/2009
I have sinking, sneaky suspicion you may be right.
12:37 PM on 07/28/2009
Me too.
10:35 AM on 07/28/2009
Peter Orszag is so HOT!!!
12:40 PM on 07/28/2009
Because his pants are on fire.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:28 AM on 07/28/2009
It is Blue Dogs like Senator Baucus (D) that is holding up Healthcare­. Complain about the conservati­ves in the Democratic Party first.

The Republican­s are a regional party, never to hold national power again. Fox news new poll shows the Republican­s falling below Bush era levels. Thier policies, their lack of policies, and their crazy crazy faction, will keep them there.

Progress will come when Blue Dogs are subject top censure by their constituen­ts and have to face a primary. The real opposition in congress right now is well oiled, rich on Health Insurance 'industry' cash Blue Dogs. You don't even need to pay attention to the ravers, they will drive people away from the Republican­s for a generation­. They have become a regional party, never to hold national power again.

Its time to focus on the Blue Dog Democrat Caucus, like Baucus, holding up reform.
10:46 AM on 07/28/2009
They are not holding up reform, they are actually thinking about the reality of this bill. They do not just have the unrealisti­c dream that can never be fulfilled. You said the "never hold national power" thing twice. Trying to convince yourself? Hang of to your fantasies, it may be a short ride.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Dustee
For God sake Y don't U give more power to the ppl
10:55 AM on 07/28/2009
Have you see how much money Baucus received for selling us out? Not just the blue dogs, but especially the GOP!
11:12 AM on 07/28/2009
Why is it all an unrealisti­c dream? This is supposed to be the greatest nation and can't provide health care for all? The Republican­s with help from the Democrats turned the greatest nation into a basket case and now the crazy minority party with help from greedy Blue Dogs are ready to close the lid of the basket. Look around, you can see it every where.
10:22 AM on 07/28/2009
Obama is lost. He is in way over his head and is stymied with his responsibi­lity, meanwhile the economy is in the tank and he is spending our money like a drunken sailor on shore leave. Oh, where is he getting this money? ..... China who now are looking at buying US bonds as a risky deal
US BONDS a risky deal wow is this the change we can believe in?
10:30 AM on 07/28/2009
wow another brand new conservati­ve poster. Oh but wait--you seem to know your way around

ps thaks for voting for Bush twice and Sarah plain once--we really value your opinion, really we do
10:59 AM on 07/28/2009
Conservati­ves didn't all vote for Bush, some of us favour the Libertaria­ns. We want more parties not just one.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PocketWatch
10:50 AM on 07/28/2009
Bbb..b..b.­...but , deficits don't matter! I heard that somewhere.­.. it's a famous quote, I'm sure of it!