More

House Health Bill Clears Last Committee Before Floor Vote, Recess

First Posted: 08/31/09 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 02:45 PM ET

Health Care Vote

After nearly two weeks of delays, a health care bill passed the House Energy and Commerce Committee late Friday night, setting the stage for a full floor vote in the lower chamber -- but not for more than a month, as the House will be on vacation until Sept. 8.

The committee passed its reform bill 31 to 28, with five Democrats joining every Republican in voting no. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic leaders said at a press conference earlier Friday that they will spend much of their August recess working to reconcile the Energy and Commerce bill with the stronger bills passed by the Ways and Means and Education and Labor committees on July 17.

Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) had been furiously negotiating with warring Democratic factions since negotiations broke down early last week.

"Today is a historic moment for the House of Representatives and a defining moment for our country," Waxman said in a statement. "It is a significant victory that all three committees in the House have worked together to pass comprehensive health reform legislation for all Americans. This bill will deliver the results the nation's health care system so desperately needs: lower costs, better quality, and broader coverage. I hope that when we return from recess, the House will act expeditiously to enact this bill into law."

The seven conservative Blue Dog Democrats on Waxman's committee stood as the primary obstacles to the bill throughout the past two weeks. The five Democrats who ultimately voted against the bill included three of those seven -- Reps. Jim Matheson of Utah, Charlie Melancon of Louisiana and John Barrow of Georgia -- plus Reps. Bart Stupak of Michigan and Rick Boucher of Virginia.

The four Blue Dogs who voted to support the bill were Reps. Bart Gordon of Tennessee, Baron Hill of Indiana, Zack Space of Ohio and frontman Mike Ross of Arkansas.

With the aid of Obama administration officials, Waxman and those four struck a deal Wednesday that delayed the full House vote past August, weakened the bill's public health care option and cut $100 billion over 10 years, much of it in subsidies for uninsured members of the middle class who would be ineligible for the public plan.

Those concessions prompted an outcry from House progressives, 57 of whom signed a letter to House leadership and the three committee chairmen protesting the Blue Dog deal. Waxman struck a deal between the progressives and Blue Dogs early Friday morning that left the public option delinked from Medicare and forced to negotiate its own rates, but restored the middle-income subsidies by shifting funds from existing federal health care programs. The deal also slightly reduced the cost of premiums for the uninsured, from 12 percent of a household's annual income to 11 percent.

Alongside that agreement, Pelosi promised a floor vote on a single-payer health care system that would be fully government-run, Waxman told the committee Friday night. After Waxman's announcement, Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) agreed to withdraw his single-payer amendment from consideration in the Energy and Commerce bill. Weiner then high-fived Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), who with Reps. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.), Mike Doyle (D-Penn.), Bobby Rush (D-Ill.), Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) and Peter Welch (D-Vt.) helped cut the deal with Pelosi.

Though Republicans were sidelined throughout the private negotiations among Democrats, they managed to briefly delay the incorporation of the intraparty Democratic deals as the committee debate stretched into Friday night. Finally Waxman overrode the procedural complaints of ranking member Joe Barton (R-Texas) and forced a vote on the Blue Dog agreement. First, however, Republicans expressed disappointment that the Blue Dogs were unable to water the bill down more or cut the public option entirely. "You allowed them to pick the color of the lipstick that's going on this pig," Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) grumbled to Waxman shortly before the amendments were added to the bill.

The final Energy and Commerce vote was even closer than the votes in the two other two House committees. Education and Labor passed its bill by a vote of 26 to 22, opposed by all committee Republicans and three Democrats -- Reps. Jason Altmire (D-Penn.), Jared Polis (D-Col.) and Dina Titus (D-Nev.). The Ways and Means markup, which includes tax increases, passed 23 to 18. There, too, three Democrats joined the united Republican opposition: Reps. Ron Kind (D-Wis.), Earl Pomeroy (D-N.D.) and John Tanner (D-Tenn.).

While the House has now cleared its last remaining obstacle to a full floor vote, things are moving more slowly in the Senate. Ted Kennedy's Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee passed its bill two weeks ago under the stewardship of Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), but Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.), who chairs the Senate Finance Committee, told reporters Thursday that he would not have a final version of the Finance bill before the Senate leaves for vacation at the end of next week.

Both parties are already sharpening their knives in preparation for each member's monthlong battle for public opinion back home. Republican talking points leaked Friday argue that reform will simultaneously hurt both the insurers and the insured. "During a recession that has seen the loss of 6.5 million jobs, Democrats propose a government takeover of health care that will lead to increased costs, fewer jobs, higher taxes and less health coverage," the Republican memo reads.

"Democrats appear ready to leave town for the August recess with a so-called deal in hand. I think it's safe to say that, over the August recess, as more Americans learn more about their plan, they're likely to have a very, very hot summer," House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) said Thursday.

For their part, Pelosi and other House Democratic leaders sought this week to unite their party against the insurance companies Pelosi deemed the real "villains."

"The glory days are coming to an end to the health insurance industry in our country," Pelosi said at a press conference Friday afternoon, calling the industry's profits "obscene." In a conference call with reporters immediately before the press conference, Pelosi lieutenant Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) condemned the Republican "campaign of lies."

The White House is reaching out to help its allies in Congress frame the debate. Senior Obama adviser David Axelrod and Office of Health Reform head Nancy Ann DeParle held a closed-door messaging strategy meeting with House Democrats Friday morning, and Pelosi said Friday afternoon that the president will continue to stump for the forthcoming reform bills during the recess.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

After nearly two weeks of delays, a health care bill passed the House Energy and Commerce Committee late Friday night, setting the stage for a full floor vote in the lower chamber -- but not for more ...
After nearly two weeks of delays, a health care bill passed the House Energy and Commerce Committee late Friday night, setting the stage for a full floor vote in the lower chamber -- but not for more ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,995
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (39 total)
04:13 PM on 08/02/2009
From ThomasDoubting: "The Democratic Congress and President also have a plan, and although, we have heard bits and pieces of the government plan, most people have no idea what they are proposing."

*******************************************

I believe the information is not shared because many of our elected officials have not had time to read the monolithic proposal. Open, honest communication is difficult when the material is inaccessible by sheer volume.

When my son was a teenager, I learned that, something "was up" and deserved greater scrutiny on two re-occurring occasions; when he delivered little information, or when he went into an information overload. The latter amounted to "too much too fast." I found that when there was a huge, almost frenzied push for something, it was time to step back a moment and re-evaluate.

It is always wise to take the time to fully read a bill before any voting occurs.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThomasDoubting
12:27 PM on 08/02/2009
Part 1 The Health Care Industry as represented by the Insurance Companies have a plan for how they want this issue resolved. The Democratic Congress and President also have a plan, and although, we have heard bits and pieces of the government plan, most people have no idea what they are proposing. The fact that the proposed bill has more than 1000 pages is a bad sign. If the sponsors thought that the American voters would approve, they would be telling us all about it, with pride. Why are these "progressive" Senators, and Congressmen telling us about the need to go slow, and getting it past the right wingers. The first class, in Negotiation 101, teaches that you ask for more than you want, not less, and do it, with the confidence that you will win. They should be telling us, that we now have a Democratic President and a Democratic Congress and we are going to use this opportunity to something that the American people want. Not only give the people what they want, but do it cheaper. Recent polls show 70% of the Americans polled, said they want a Free, Universal, Single payer, not for profit, health care system. We don't need no stinkin, Insurance Companies, and people know it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThomasDoubting
12:26 PM on 08/02/2009
Part 2 In the 1950s and 1960s, when medical technology began to keep people alive, longer than the Insurance Industry had planned, they refused to insure those over age 65, which was a common retirement age, at that time. If you left your job, that was the end of your health care insurance. That's why the government created Medicare. Medicare has covered seniors who are relatively high risk, while they left younger healthier people to the private companies. Now it looks like they want the federal government to insure the millions considered 'uninsurable'. Of course they don't want to lose their healthy young people, many of whom never even see a doctor, while their employer, pays a large percentage, of the employees' salary, to this insurance company. Only when the hospital says 'Paid In Full' will they be sure if they were really covered. I suspect that most of those 1000 pages tell us, what we are not going to get. When the right wingers have some input, of course they will make it even worse. "Medicare for All"
06:54 AM on 08/02/2009
UNPRECEDENTED
just for that.. I am making my first contribution to SARAHPAC.
sending the receipt to the DNC, using their pre-paid envelop!
09:28 PM on 08/01/2009
Thank God Congress isn't a cocktail lounge as I'd probably get the most watered-down, expensive drink in town.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:43 PM on 08/01/2009
Colorado 2nd District Dems: Jared Polis was one of a few dems who voted against the bill. In a letter explaining his position, he mentions cost but says nothing about the public option. Please write to Polis and ask him if he supports the public option and get a better explanation of where his priorities lie. From his letter:

"I made my decision knowing that the bill still had the votes to make it out of my committee. It passed by a vote of 26 to 22. My actions were to modify the House bill to better reflect the President’s plan to contain costs so that we have exhausted every possible alternative before resorting to tax increases."
07:57 PM on 08/01/2009
Voters need to pay close attention to how their Representatives are voting on this. If a Democrat votes to weaken this bill or votes against health care for all, the voters in those states need to nominate somebody to run against them in the primary. It's time to make sure the blue dogs listen to the people.
06:42 PM on 08/01/2009
They cut 10 billion a year for 10 years,,,just annual bonuses for the Goldman-Sachs boys. Democrats are so spineless. Stick to it Teddy!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kburlz
05:59 PM on 08/01/2009
They couldn't come in for a couple hours today to vote on the freaking bill?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PaxEterna
05:35 PM on 08/01/2009
Obama, who campaigned against everything that is happening, is to blame, and he will be blamed because he did not have the integrity or courage to stand up for the American people.

The next election cycle will prove disastrous for the Democrats.

I will not be voting for Change You Can believe In, again.

Which is worse, America: the insult or the injury? We have gotten both with this President.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Dustee
R-U Caught Up in all of those Republican LIES?
06:11 PM on 08/01/2009
You've been against the President Obama and most other dems since at least February that I can see. So you're saying that you will not vote against Change you can believe in again.

buh-bye!

Don't let the door knob hit hit'cha where the good lawd split'cha.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:16 PM on 08/01/2009
1. We do not (as Bush/Cheney claimed) have an Imperial Presidency. The Legislative process must take place.

2. Throughout his campaign the health care reform program he spoke to was one that allowed those who had existing employer insurance plans to keep their insurance, and those who had no insurance would have a "Menu Pick Type Plan" or "Health Exchange" to chose coverage from with a "Public Option" included in the Plan to provide competition to the private sector.
photo
barkrudedog69
Im Kinda Republican and Kinda Liberal
06:22 PM on 08/01/2009
I love reading about the Bush/Cheney Presidency.......it is like we do not have any other history and Bush was our first president. Even though the progressive movement and democrats of the 30's were taken to court and many of FDR's programs were found to be UNconstitutional......but wait there is more.....The good old Truman doctrine that helped start us down the road Korea and that other little SE Asia thing......

Bush/Cheney.....yes.....Bush/Cheney......with so many floundering war seeking and power pushing Dems in the 40's, 50's and 60's to talk about lets always point out Bush/Cheney.
07:17 PM on 08/01/2009
Precisely correct, lj9283! To all who now hate Obama -as if you have a choice out there - if you want to do away with the Imperial Presidency, then your work as a citizen and resident of this nation is to fight Congress for caving in to both these repulsive Blue Dogs and the insurance industry lobbyists they placate. Votes overwhelm money always - but if you've not screamed, yelled, and done whatever it takes to make them change, then YOU are the problem. WE organized BIG TIME in MIke Thompson's district - not hugely Dem in registration - made a perfect stink, and he pulled OUT of the Blue Dogs and voted for the first, much, much stronger public option version. If you sat on your hands and just whined, then YOU did nothing to help. Guess what - democracy is not just having "your guy" in power - it's having YOU in power. Obama said and meant - he cannot change these things alone. This capitulation is dreadful, but if we do not RAISE HELL, they will stay in place. The RW does this - what the hell is wrong with us progressives? We did it in CA 1 - now it's up to the rest of you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PaxEterna
05:04 PM on 08/01/2009
Kudos to Moyers. He is the only journalist who has tried to air the issue from the people's side. This program - the Potter interview - was actually a re-run, and I am glad that more people have had a chance to see it.

No one in MSM, the WH, the Congress, or on the lobbyists' payroll dares mention the interview, the consequences of the current bills, the costs, the corruption etc. They are all on the take, starting with our President who has taken the only viable solution OFF the table - SINGLE PAYER - and de facto endorsed a bill that is a bonanza for the medical industrial complex. By the way, according to opensecrets.org, Obama took 19 million dollars from the lobbyists/health care sector in 2008, all the while campaigning against them.

Moyers is the man of the hour, and has displayed incredible courage in the face of the media masters taking us all to slaughter.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:52 PM on 08/01/2009
"... taking us all to slaughter?"

Exaggerating a bit maybe?
04:59 PM on 08/01/2009
I am going to another fundraiser tomorrow.. for a woman who is raising money to pay for her chemotherapy for breast cancer. I have been to four fundraisers this year (including one for MS which my daughter has). We must do better in this country. The amount of money wasted on junk is obscene. People are suffering and dying...
03:22 PM on 08/01/2009
Good for the blue dogs! While they are on vacation it is up to us to talk our representatives into slowing this thing down so it actually works. A slow progression that does not ruin the system that makes our medical specializations the most progressive in the world should work. Perhaps these guys will read the bill over recess?

(Of course, I use the original denotation and connotation of the word "progressive.")
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:43 PM on 08/01/2009
If the American Health Care System is the most progressive in the world why did an estimated 750,000 Americans traveled abroad for medical care in 2007.

Why is this number estimated to increase to six million by 2010.

http://www.deloitte.com/dtt/cda/doc/content/us_chs_MedicalTourismStudy(1).pdf

And why is it that in "a system that makes our medical specializations the most progressive in the world" we have 98,000 preventable deaths from medical errors annually in America ?
(Patient Safety in American Hospitals, Health Grades 2004)

And why do you not support your statements on Health Care with any verifiable resource?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
springsm
04:27 PM on 08/01/2009
Being the most progressive or the best means nothing when only the elite and privileged can get health care. Yes, we are good here..but not all of us get it...makes it less than "the best".
04:40 PM on 08/01/2009
So 0.2% go abroad for health care? Pretty miniscule. That is great! Was it mostly for cheap plastic surgury or just serious issues? Do you even know?

Why do we have preventable deaths and errors? Because we have human doctors. Because we have problems that need addressing. The case has yet to be made that government will improve care. I think we need time to have that case presented. However, that is an impressive statistic also. (Not in the way you intended, I am guessing.)

Oh, yes, you can do your statistical research on the World Health Organization. I hope that help you verify.
03:57 PM on 08/01/2009
• Page 16: Private insurance will become ILLEGAL - Can't write NEW policies, and lose existing policies if you change jobs, coverage or prices!
• Page 22: Mandates audits of all employers that self-insure!
• Page 29: Admission: your health care will be rationed!
• Page 30: A government committee will decide what treatments and benefits you get (and, unlike an insurer, there will be no appeals process).
• Page 42: The “Health Choices Commissioner†will decide health benefits for you. You will have no choice. None.
• Page 50: All non-US citizens, illegal or not, will be provided with free healthcare services.
• Page 58: Every person will be issued a National ID Healthcard.
• Page 59: The federal government will have direct, real-time access to all individual bank accounts for electronic funds transfer.
• Page 65: Taxpayers will subsidize all union retiree and community organizer health plans (read: SEIU, UAW and ACORN).
• Page 72: All private healthcare plans must conform to government rules to participate in a Healthcare Exchange.
• Page 84: All private healthcare plans must participate in the Healthcare Exchange (i.e., total government control of private plans).
• Page 91: Government mandates linguistic infrastructure for services; translation: illegal aliens.
• Page 95: The Government will pay ACORN and Americorps to sign up individuals for Government-run Health Care plan.
• Page 102: Those eligible for Medicaid will be automatically enrolled: you have no choice in the matter.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:01 PM on 08/01/2009
When the Right Wing cannot discuss the issue the just post lies.

Each of the statements in this post is a lie.
07:21 PM on 08/01/2009
I have the bill - NONE of that is in it. You're pretty spectacular if you can find this stuff where it is NOT. And when you do have a point (linguistic access) it is for ANY person for whom English is not comfortable which includes CITIZENS for whom the technical language of medicine is tricky. You are lying and distorting this - I've READ the bill, and these things are totally not true.
03:03 PM on 08/01/2009
Now's the time for Obama to start meeting with seniors at the White House and saying "Grandma, we promise not to take away your Social Security and Medicare like the Republicans want to do. We all know that the Republicans are greedy and evil and only care about the rich, but Democrats aren't like them. We started Social Security and Medicare, and it was the Republicans who always opposed them."

We promise not to throw Grandma out into the street with no money or medical care.
07:53 PM on 08/01/2009
• Page 127: The AMA sold doctors out: the government will set wages.
• Page 145: An employer MUST auto-enroll employees into the government-run public plan. No alternatives.
• Page 126: Employers MUST pay healthcare bills for part-time employees AND their families.
• Page 149: Any employer with a payroll of $400K or more, who does not offer the public option, pays an 8% tax on payroll.
• Page 150: Any employer with a payroll of $250K-400K or more, who does not offer the public option, pays a 2 to 6% tax on payroll.
• Page 167: Any individual who doesn’t’ have acceptable healthcare (according to the government) will be taxed 2.5% of income.
• Page 170: Any NON-RESIDENT alien is exempt from individual taxes (Americans will pay for them).
• Page 195: Officers and employees of Government Healthcare Bureaucracy will have access to ALL American financial and personal records.
• Page 203: “The tax imposed under this section shall not be treated as tax.†Yes, it really says that.
• Page 239: Bill will reduce physician services for Medicaid. Seniors and the poor most affected.â€
• Page 241: Doctors: no matter what specialty you have, you’ll all be paid the same (thanks, AMA!)
• Page 253: Government sets value of doctors’ time, their professional judgment, etc.
• Page 265: Government mandates and controls productivity for private healthcare industries.
• Page 268: Government regulates rental and purchase of power-driven wheelchairs.
•
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MaryanneAZ
Raven enjoys the Halloween candy!
08:40 PM on 08/01/2009
Spam. Please do not cyberlitter. Thank you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:59 PM on 08/01/2009
Which bill?
02:58 PM on 08/01/2009
http://standwithdrdean.com/posts

go to this site,,there is so much info here , it will take time to go through it all