EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Home Loan Modifications: Only A Fraction Of Eligible Homeoners Have Been Helped

ALAN ZIBEL   08/ 4/09 07:24 PM ET   AP

Foreclosure By Neighbor

WASHINGTON — The government's $50 billion program to ease the mortgage crisis is helping only a tiny fraction of struggling homeowners, and a list released Tuesday showed which lenders are laggards.

As of July, only 9 percent of eligible borrowers had seen their mortgage payments reduced with modified loans. And the first monthly progress report showed that 10 lenders had not changed a single mortgage.

The report indicated that lenders such as Bank of America Corp. and Wells Fargo and Co. have lagged behind government expectations. Both banks received billions in federal bailout money.

BofA modified just 4 percent of eligible loans, and Wells Fargo 6 percent. Wachovia Corp., which was taken over by Wells Fargo in December, modified only 2 percent.

"We think they could have ramped up better, faster, more consistently and done a better job serving borrowers and bringing stabilization to the broader mortgage markets and economy," said Michael Barr, the Treasury Department's assistant secretary for financial institutions. "We expect them to do more."

Wells Fargo says it plans to speed up its efforts, signing up most borrowers for the Obama plan with one phone call and sending customers a trial offer within two days.

The report is "only part of the story" because the numbers do not reflect an additional 220,000 loans that Wells modified outside the Obama plan this year, a company executive said.

BofA said it would improve its "processes for reaching those in need" and continue working with the Treasury Department to help homeowners who fall outside the program's eligibility requirements.

Meanwhile, foreclosures continue to rise. About 1.5 million households received at least one foreclosure-related notice in the first half of this year, according to RealtyTrac Inc.

"There are certainly more foreclosures going on in the country then there are modifications – by a long shot," said Bruce Dorpalen, director of housing counseling at Acorn Housing, a nonprofit housing group. He said his group has intervened to prevent about 500 foreclosure sales in cases where borrowers wanted to be considered for the Obama plan.

A housing counselor told 36-year-old Veronica Cassella she should qualify for a loan modification, but Green Tree Servicing LLC claims she does not. Cassella, who works at a hair and nails salon in Visalia, Calif., has seen her income shrink with the economy from $35,000 to $25,000.

Her husband still works, but their income is not enough to cover the $213,000 mortgage on their home, which has lost roughly half its value.

"My life has been a standstill with these people for at least half the year," Cassella said. Green Tree, which modified 4 percent of eligible loans, did not return calls for comment.

There are 38 companies participating in the government program, and some noticeable holdouts that control 15 percent of outstanding mortgages.

HomEq Servicing, owned by Barclays PLC, and Litton Loan Servicing, owned by Goldman Sachs, have yet to join. Spokesmen for both companies said they plan to do so soon.

So far, banks have extended only 400,000 offers among 2.7 million eligible borrowers who are more than two months behind on their payments. More than 235,000 of those borrowers have enrolled in three-month trials.

But the government is partly to blame for the languid start. The administration rolled out the guidelines gradually this year. Much of the program was not finished until mid-May, and the guidelines were updated again in early July.

The White House maintains it is on track to meet its goal of helping up to 4 million homeowners by 2012. Last week, the administration extracted a verbal promise from the mortgage industry to reach 500,000 borrowers by Nov. 1.

American Home Mortgage Servicing and PNC Financial Services Group Inc. were among the companies that had a zero next to their names on Tuesday's report.

In a statement, American Home Mortgage Servicing explained that it did not join the program until July 22 but had modified nearly 37,000 loans in the first six months of 2009.

David M. Friedman, president and CEO, said executives expect to help 60,000 customers, or about 40 percent of the company's eligible delinquent borrowers.

PNC, which owns National City Bank, began the process in early July.

The best results among the large loan services came from Saxon Mortgage Servicers Inc. One in four of Saxon's eligible borrowers has a trial loan modification with a lower monthly payment to help the homeowner avoid foreclosure. Aurora Loan Services LLC, GMAC Mortgage Inc. and JPMorgan Chase all had one in five qualified borrowers in a trial loan.

"We've got feet on streets in neighborhoods where borrowers need help," said David Lowman, chief executive of the JPMorgan Chase's home lending division.

For each homeowner who makes regular payments for three months, the loan servicer collects $1,000 from the government. The company is paid thousand of dollars more if the borrower stays current for three years.

Housing advocates cite numerous cases in which companies have not followed the program's rules. And when borrowers are denied, they often are not told why. In response to such complaints, the Treasury Department says Freddie Mac will be doing random audits to see if borrowers are being improperly rejected.

___

AP Real Estate Writer J.W. Elphinstone contributed to this report from New York.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

WASHINGTON — The government's $50 billion program to ease the mortgage crisis is helping only a tiny fraction of struggling homeowners, and a list released Tuesday showed which lenders are lagga...
WASHINGTON — The government's $50 billion program to ease the mortgage crisis is helping only a tiny fraction of struggling homeowners, and a list released Tuesday showed which lenders are lagga...
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 43
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:35 PM on 08/05/2009
The fact is if the homeowner finds the right Loan Mod Advocacy company, they stand a much better chance of getting their loan modified. The Lender is not the homeowner'­s friend in this situation. If you were making a claim against an insurance company-- another 500 lb gorilla-- you would not just walk in, present your case, not knowing anything about the "box" they were going to try to fit you into, and then expect them to do the best they could by you. You would hire an attorney to present your case in the best possible light, so you would get a better settlement­. Getting a loan mod is no different. Folks just need to make sure they are dealing with an honest loan mod company-- and checking for complaints on-line or checking for BBB complaints is an easy way to check things out.
There may be reasonable fees for the representa­tion/advoc­acy-- but it is far less than a refi or paying the fees and charges the lender will try to get you to pay to bring your loan "current."
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mrcontinental
04:59 PM on 08/05/2009
And this surprises who exactly?
03:36 PM on 08/05/2009
Interest rates on All MORTGAGES regardless of size should be reduced to 4.5% fixed immediatel­y: no modificati­ons, no refinances­, no requalifyi­ng, just change the rates on the lenders computers -- plain and simple!!! Everyone will have more cash to buy food, clothing, cars etc. on an ongoing basis!! Stimulate the economy by giving everyone a break! Not just Wall street! President could do this by an executive order. The banks are not cooperatin­g as they should!!!
03:24 PM on 08/05/2009
Foreclosur­es have been a major issue of the economic recession that has hit all countries across the world. The Bush administra­tion overlooked the foreclosur­e issues of the average homeowners which the Obama administra­tion is struggling to tackle with various initiative­s.

The loan modificati­on efforts to prevent the increase of foreclosur­e rates have not got a huge welcome. The reason is because the lender needs to revise the ‘borrowing terms’ of the troubled borrower who is struggling to repay the loan on time. It also involves reducing the interest rate which is generally not received well by the lender who would lose some margin in the sale. In addition, the revised plan involves cutting the principal amount by reconsider­ing the financial state of the borrower and hence, it tackles the benefit of the borrower than guarding the interest of the lender. Hence the lenders and their representa­tives or not willing to either reduce the principal amount as well as the interest received from the borrowers as the amount they pay to the bank also reduces over time making it further difficult for them to tackle the vicious circle.

Read More: http://www­.housingne­wslive.com
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BocaMom
03:12 PM on 08/05/2009
Obama's finance people are terrible. They are just making the banks fatter and Wall Street executive richer instead of helping the people. I am totally disgusted with them!
12:57 PM on 08/05/2009
The disconnect between the problems facing mainstreet and Washington keep widening. For the past 6 month's we're nothign but talk of regulation­, but zero action. What a joke.
good articles..­. http://www­.iamned.co­m
11:27 AM on 08/05/2009
This is so incredible­.

The whiny crybaby homeowners want government handouts after using cash out refinancin­gs to buy new cars, vacations and granite countertop­s. Now that they spent their equity they think they are entitled to have government bail them out.

What about people that rent? Don't they exist?
07:15 PM on 08/04/2009
After weeks of working with the "Wells Fargo Circus" ( absolute nightmare!­) we were finally received our coveted HAMP packet in the mail with "congratul­ations" on being approved for the 90 day trial HAMP mod four months ago. We did not like what we were offered so said 'thanks but no-thanks' & sent a request they sharpen their pencil. After weeks of faxing letters and weekly phone calls (getting no where) our loan mod request was turned over to a Sr. VP! Long story short, we were approved for 90 day trial w/i one week of my first conversati­on with her. However, sadly still not enough. The 31% payment to gross income ratio is too high when you add in Oregon property taxes (highest in the nation) $500 per month for our home, plus home owners insurance at $135 per month. We are STILL SINKING!! - just a little more slowly then we would w/o modificati­on. Speaking of 'sinking' due to purchasing at the top of the real estate bubble in July 2006 we are $135K UNDER WATER. We have been asking for further modificati­on to include equity reduction. No response from Wells of course. So, why are we trying to hang on to this house?
10:48 AM on 08/05/2009
If you're $135k underwater­, why don't you just move out, then send them the deed. Not sure what OR rules are, but in NJ, I think delivering the deed is equivalent to payoff. Then they learn in a very vivid way not to lend more than 90% of market value.
11:41 AM on 08/24/2009
I submitted an ap for loan modificati­on. The response was the same payment for three months, same interest rate and the two months arrears would go into the back of the loan charged interest all throughout the three month period. I was looking for a reduction in interest rate. They said I had to let the loan go two months before they would consider the applicatio­n. After all of that - there's still no reduction and they will add tons of fees back into the loan if the Mod is accepted. It's a good thing Wells Fargo got all of that government money to help us out.
06:19 PM on 08/04/2009
Wells Fargo is playing hardball. I'm in the process of finding another lender. I'm eligible and I've been up on my payments, but they denied me and my credit is good.
04:50 PM on 08/04/2009
What, another Obama plan that has failed? Anybody keeping count?
11:44 AM on 08/24/2009
Oh you mean like the CARS Program, the lunch programs, child healthcare­, credit monitoring­, and all the rest of the stuff they've gotten done in the SEVEN MONTHS of the administra­tion. Go sell your negativity on Fox and Dredge where it is welcomed.
02:43 PM on 08/04/2009
This is starting to sound like a conspiracy to me. Some top folks do not want President Obama and his leadership team's plan for mortgage modificati­on to work -- especially if the plan is successful within the President'­s first two years in office. That way they can echo the prediction of Rush Limbaugh in saying President Obama's plan "failed".
The banks and financial industry are mad because during the campaign, they were called out by President Obama for their callous actions! It is sad that the lending institutio­ns are not using the money to properly help the people like they should.
02:03 PM on 08/04/2009
Are these loan subsidies not subject to home appraisals­? I hope not cuz then almost no one will get re-financi­ng.

I tried to re-finance and got such a ridiculous­ly low appraisal that I could not meet the 105% loan-to-va­lue. My tax assessment says my house is worth $500,000 but my bank says it is worth $300,000..­. but they sure appreciate me sending in payments under my current terms. I bet a damn nice toaster is on the way.

I suspect that the financials are not under sufficient pressure to qualify people and can use the money for executive comp or to cover their toxic derivative­s.

And for all the Ayn Rands out there who blame the consumer. Remember it is the institutio­n's job to assess risk and not qualify applicants­. Many people could afford the mortgages until they lost their job, got sick or got lied to about getting out of the ARMs based on a higher future assessment­.
08:25 PM on 08/04/2009
Hey uncleentro­phy,
I do not if you are mortgaged with a federally chartered bank. But if you are, it might be in your best interest to read the Federal Regulation under Title 12 (Banking) CFR 564- Appraisals under the section "when appraisals are not required when refinancin­g."

Michael LittleBig
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
09:45 AM on 08/05/2009
As an appraiser, I can tell you that you got the low ball appraisal due to recent changes in FNMA regulation­s. Its called the HVCC act. It's effect has been to take a lot of discretion away from appraisers­. A new addendum is now required along with the appraisal that may give a false impression about your RE market. That's because the addendum doesn't consider seasonal variations­.
The new law also gave more power to Appraisal management companies which are not licensed appraisers­. They demand appraisals within a 24 hour period and therefore any informatio­n that may support a higher value may be over looked due to time constraint­s.
I gave low numbers during the boom years because I thought they were out of line. I gave high or reasonable numbers to people when prices crashed because I knew many sales were forced sales, and now I HAVE to give low numbers because of the new HVCC law .
The process has been taken out of our hands.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:37 PM on 08/05/2009
I agree on this
. As a mortgage broker, I have seen what you point out. The new appraisals coming in as a result of HVCC are no more accurate than the inflated appraisals of a few years ago-- they just go the other direction.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
01:08 PM on 08/04/2009
When this idea came out in the spring, I predicted that it would be a failure. It was so easy to see that fact. The rules were complicate­d and the targeted group was small. If you wanted a program to fail, you couldn't have written the program any better.

There are many people in the Obama administra­tion that have no business experience­. They are filled with what they feel are new ideas. In business, new ideas are a dime a dozen. Implementa­tion is much more important. Every new and existing business has a new idea. Getting it to work is the difference between success and failure.
The road to hell is littered with good intentions­.
photo
VotingPresent
Read in all57states
01:03 PM on 08/04/2009
F A I L
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
speakyourmind
Really?
01:19 PM on 08/04/2009
The "fail" you are referring to isn't on Obama. It's the banks who got the stimulus money and now they're not passing it along to their customers. My bank who holds my mortgage offered me a reduction of $84 per month. Ooooh, that's really gonna help me out.
01:27 PM on 08/04/2009
Why did you sign the mortgage in the first place if you couldn't afford it?

I don't see the government modifying my rental agreement and I don't even get an option on a piece of property.

And since you made a braindead decision to buy a house you could not afford I have to pay taxes to bail you out?
photo
VotingPresent
Read in all57states
01:59 PM on 08/04/2009
If $84/month does not get you excited, how do you feel about the $13/week tax cut Obama gave you?
12:45 PM on 08/04/2009
Same banks are dragging heels on requests to buy the foreclosed homes. There are entire neighborho­ods with dozens of empty --long empty -- houses. You'd think the banks would care about the property they now own, thanks to their deceitful and shameful behavior..­.
02:30 PM on 08/04/2009
They stall as long as possible so they do not have to report the losses of their short sales giving them an (artificia­lly) more positive bottom line. The banks are working it backwards and forwards- what a racket!