iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Small Pacific Islands Plead For Carbon Cuts Before They Are Swallowed By The Sea

MAKERETI KOMAI   08/ 5/09 06:45 AM ET   AP

In this image provided by Greenpeace, protestors scale a 50-meter (164-foot) high coal loader at a coal terminal in Mackay, Australia, Wednesday, Aug. 5, 2009, to stop its operation. The protesters demanded that Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, who is attending the Pacific Forum, back calls to drastically cut greenhouse gas emissions. (AP Photo/Greenpeace, Hamiton)

CAIRNS, Australia — A group of tiny Pacific Island countries appealed to the world Wednesday to slash greenhouse gas emissions by 45 percent to help save them from rising seas.

The seven nations, whose coral atolls rise just a few yards (meters) above sea level, urged rich nations to make the cut in their polluting emissions by 2020.

"As you drive along the roads along the coast, you will see coconut trees in the water – that's an indication of the sea level rise" in Tuvalu, Prime Minister Edward Natapei told reporters Wednesday at the annual summit of South Pacific leaders. At least one village has been abandoned, he said.

The seven countries, part of the 16-member Pacific Islands Forum, said in a statement they are worried about the "serious and growing threat posed by climate change to the economic, social, cultural and environmental well-being and security" of their populations.

Wednesday's appeal was the latest made by Pacific Island countries at international forums, and comes ahead of negotiations in Copenhagen in December on a new global pact on reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

U.N. climate change negotiator Yvo de Boer said industrialized countries need to adopt ambitious targets in Copenhagen and "engagement" from major developing countries was needed if a new agreement is to succeed.

"A number of these low-lying islands are clearly under threat already," de Boer told Sky News television on the sidelines of the South Pacific summit, which he is attending as an observer.

Many scientists agree that carbon dioxide and other harmful gases are warming the planet and melting ice caps, gradually raising sea levels.

Pacific countries including Kiribati, the Marshall Islands and Tuvalu have coral atolls no more than 10 feet (3 meters) above sea level, and rising oceans are threatening to eat away coastlines, pollute freshwater sources and kill off fruit-bearing trees and other crops.

South Pacific countries' small populations and impoverished states leave them with little diplomatic or economic clout at big international meetings.

They won some rhetorical support Wednesday from summit host Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, who called climate change "the greatest challenge of our time." He promised to become an advocate of the islanders' plight in Denmark.

"Half the populations of these island countries are lying in the pathway of coastal inundation," said Rudd. "Australia's responsibility (is) to argue as clearly and cogently as we can the interests of our friends and neighbors in the councils of the world."

South Pacific countries "are among the least responsible for the causes of climate change. But they will bear the brunt of its impact the most," Rudd said.

Rudd has set a target of cutting greenhouse gas emissions by up to 15 percent below 2000 levels by 2020, but says he might go deeper if a new pact is reached in Copenhagen.

The group of seven small countries – the Cook Islands, Kiribati, the Marshall Islands, Nauru, Niue, Palau and Tuvalu – adopted the position of the global Association of Small Islands States that asks developed nations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 45 percent by 2020 and 85 percent by 2050.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

Filed by Alex Leo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:52 PM on 08/05/2009
Has any of these man made climate change dudes considered the fact that volcanic atols and islands are products of a volcanic plume below the techtonic crust and they create a bulging effect due to the pressure and heat thereby raising the landmass similar to a pimple on your face. It is possible that these islands volcanic hot spot has cooled and reduced underlying pressure causing them to subside rather than the sea rising? Just a thought.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
doriath22
Born-again Jacobin. Robespierre had the right idea
07:56 AM on 08/06/2009
Most of these atolls lie along the subduction zone between pacific and asian plates (the "ring of fire"), as opposed to "hot spots", like the Hawaiian islands. Nice try, though
11:00 AM on 08/06/2009
Yes and as the plate slides it has a tendancy to be depressed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Overtone
See bio on the Aesop Institute website
08:45 PM on 08/05/2009
Why wait for governments!

Future cars will need no fuel and can become power plants when parked.

Breakthroughs include the MagGen. These magnetic generators will initially make it possible to cut the cord on a plug-in hybrid so it no longer needs to plug-in. Later, they can replace the batteries in an electric car. Then, the MagGen can run when the car is parked and sell power to the utility. Prototypes are under development.

Next is a Self Powered Internal Combustion Engine - SPICE, which can power a hybrid. It will need no fuel and is another path to ending the need to plug-in. The engine can run when parked. Both systems can wirelessly transmit and sell power to the local utility.

The SPICE will be powered by Fractional Hydrogen - which lets a barrel of water equal hundreds of barrels of oil.

Scientists and engineers will doubt these technologies are possible until they have been validated by independent laboratories - an important step on the agenda.

Until now, car ownership has been an expense. Payments to those driving a hybrid with a SPICE, or powered by MagGen, are likely to be substantial.

The cost of many vehicles might be paid for by utilities, as they purchase power.

Parked cars each become decentralized power plants - a rapid, cost-effective path to winding down fossil fuels - and a rebirth of both the automobile industry and the world economy.

To learn more, see: www.chavaenergy.com Look under the heading HOW?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
doriath22
Born-again Jacobin. Robespierre had the right idea
07:52 AM on 08/06/2009
Sure, and I've got a perpetual motion machine I'd like to sell you
Ever heard of the first law of thermodynamics?
photo
Dredd
Our government is a wartocracy.
07:31 PM on 08/05/2009
I would say they have good reason to be concerned and to be activists.

http://blogdredd.blogspot.com/2009/08/climate-change-deniers-take-hit.html
07:51 PM on 08/05/2009
Not for the people of Tuvalu. The erosion pattern at Tuvalu indicates a sea level drop in the past 20 years. One has to account for plate tectonics.

Besides, the link does not show that the skeptics took a hit. The meeting in New Mexico relates to
the area in the Pacific with plastic debris. The alarmists are grasping at straws. The skeptics believe the role of co2 is over-estimated. Even the Chief Alarmist, Hansen, is changing his tune as far as non-co2 causes of climate change go.

Dr. Jim Hansen of GISS wrote a guest weblog on climatesci.org on April 11 2009:
"our research and that of others demonstrates that atmospheric circulations are significantly
altered on the hemispheric and global scale due to human land management practices."

As an aside, relating to the co2 hysteria: Science, vol 324 (April 17, 2009), Peter G Brewer et al.
show that Ocean "dead zones" devoid of aerobic life are likely to grow as co2 concentration rise.

Back to sea level rise:
Since the end of last ice age (about 15,000 years ago), the sea level rose 120 meters, the
rise rate decreasing to what it is now about 4,000 years ago.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Current_sea_level_rise
05:32 PM on 08/06/2009
classic fanatic headline. We see them all the time, Dredd, and the headlines rarely mean anything. "BABY BORN NAKED: COULD IT BE CAUSED BY GLOBAL WARMING?" Members of the Church of AGW are resorting to National Enquirer tactics, clinging to their Chinese lightbulbs and religion as the hoax is exposed.
05:46 PM on 08/05/2009
Let's see, these islands have "coral" atolls that are 10 feet above sea level and coral only grows under water. This should lead one to believe that at some time in the past, the sea level was 10 feet higher than now....and that was long before there was any possible man-made impact on the climate. Could it possibly be that mother nature and not man is the cause of the changing sea levels??
07:33 PM on 08/05/2009
May I add:

In 1837, Charles Darwin proposed a simple theory to explain atoll formation – atolls begin as a fringing reef growing around a volcanic island. If this island sinks beneath the ocean, but the reef continues to grow upwards an atoll forms. (From: Darwin, C. (1837). On certain areas of elevation and subsidence in the Pacific and Indian oceans, as deduced from the study of coral formations. Proceedings of the Geological Society of London 2: 552-554)

This theory was pretty well accepted until the late 1870’s when geologist Alexander Agassiz and others proposed a different idea – that atolls grew up from shallow sand banks on the bottom of the ocean.

Darwin wrote to Agassiz in 1881 suggesting that the answer could be gained by boring 500- 600 ft (150-180 m) beneath an atoll. If there was volcanic rock below the atoll Darwin would be right, but if sand was found then Agassiz would be right.

In 1896, a Royal Society of London expedition went to the South Pacific to drill beneath Funafuti Atoll in Tuvalu. This expedition was unsuccessful because they were only able to drill down 100 feet (30 m).

In the summer of 1951, a French group drilled to a depth of 4154 ft (1260 m), and at the depth of almost a mile the drill struck volcanic rock – Darwin was right.
05:40 PM on 08/05/2009
The saddest thing about all this liberal handwringing is that we have at our disposal the means to immediately, IMMEDIATELY cut our CO2 emissions by 20%, more than Waxman will bring for a decade, by converting transportation en masse to natural gas. We have so much natural gas we are running out of storage. http://ds1.downloadtech.net/cn1072/landnews/Possible_Winter_Gas_Shut-ins_and_Ramifications.pdf

we could become energy independent. We could create jobs at home converting the vehicles to NG. The technology is in use now. Virtually every home has NG running to it, and addition of a home refueling station is ridiculously easy.

So tell your liberal congressperson that instead of doing something meaningful to save these islands, they are enriching Goldman Sachs and Al Gore, destroyinig more american jobs, and eliminating any meaningful reduction in emissions. Aren't you proud of your Democratic Party?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
doriath22
Born-again Jacobin. Robespierre had the right idea
07:50 AM on 08/06/2009
How is Al Gore "profiting" from all this (apart from his movie, which I haven't seen, or his books, which I haven't read)? Please enlighten us.
09:00 AM on 08/06/2009
By owning a brokerage that trades in Government issued carbon credits. That doesn't make any real money unless Waxman-Markey or some similar government coercion program is in place.

Presently Gore's business sells 'carbon offsets', a form of ecological 'indulgences', to wealthy people with guilty consciences over their lifestyles. I think he is making a small profit from this activity.
03:53 PM on 08/05/2009
Dont they also prey to the Volcano Gods?
04:23 PM on 08/05/2009
pardon, I meant *Pray
01:44 PM on 08/05/2009
The sea level is not rising any faster than in the last century. Currently, the rate is less than 1-foot per century. It is not accelerating as can be seen from the University of Colorado website which uses satellite altimetry to determine global sea level twice a week over the last 16 years. Over the last 16 years CO2 has increased 7%. The 1-foot per century rate has not increased, in fact it appears to be slowing down.
http://sealevel.colorado.edu/current/sl_ib_global.pdf
Look at the graph yourself. Judge for yourself. Do not take my word for it.
There has been atmospheric cooling the last 8 years, and no new high global annual temperatures in the last 11 years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Progress08
I've come to regard you as people I've met
09:05 AM on 08/06/2009
Your chart says 20 cm since 1880. Thats about 8" all of which occurred in the last 100 years. It can be approximated as linear over the last 100 years suggesting that we will see around 8" more over the next century if all factors remain similar.