More

Baitullah Mehsud, Taliban Chief, Reportedly Killed In US Missile Strike

ZARAR KHAN and ISHTIAQ MAHSUD   08/ 7/09 12:57 AM ET   AP

Pakistan

ISLAMABAD — U.S. and Pakistani authorities were investigating whether Pakistani Taliban chief Baitullah Mehsud, who has led a violent campaign of suicide attacks and assassinations against Pakistan's government, was killed in a CIA missile strike.

A Pakistani official said Friday that reports of the militant leader's death were based on communication intercepts. A senior U.S. intelligence official said there were strong indications that Mehsud was among those killed in the attack, but he would not elaborate.

If confirmed, Mehsud's demise would be a major boost to Pakistani and U.S. efforts to eradicate the Taliban and al-Qaida.

Mehsud has al-Qaida connections and has been suspected in the killing of former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. Pakistan views him as its top internal threat and has been preparing an offensive against him. The U.S. sees him as a danger to the war effort in Afghanistan, largely because of the threat he is believed to pose to nuclear-armed Pakistan.

The missile strike hit the home of Mehsud's father-in-law in Pakistan's South Waziristan tribal region early Wednesday. Intelligence officials say Mehsud's second wife was among at least two people killed, and Mehsud associates have claimed he was not among the dead.

Pakistan army spokesman Maj. Gen. Athar Abbas cautioned the reports of Mehsud's death were still unconfirmed. "We are receiving reports and probing," he said.

A senior Pakistani intelligence official said phone and other communications intercepts – he would not be more specific – have led authorities to suspect Mehsud was dead, but he also stressed there's no definitive evidence yet. He spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak on the matter publicly.

The U.S. government was also looking into the reports, according to a U.S. counterterrorism official. The official indicated the United States did not yet have physical evidence – remains – that would prove who died. But he said there are other ways of determining who was killed in the strike. He declined to describe them.

The two U.S. officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.

The U.S. and Pakistan will conduct DNA testing on the body to try to confirm it is Mehsud, The Wall Street Journal reported, citing an unnamed U.S. defense official. The tests will use DNA samples taken from Mehsud's family members, and results could take anywhere from days to weeks, the newspaper reported.

For years, the U.S. has considered Mehsud a lesser threat to its interests than some of the other Pakistani Taliban, their Afghan counterparts and al-Qaida, because most of his attacks were focused inside Pakistan, not against U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan.

That view appeared to change in recent months as Mehsud's power grew and concerns mounted that increasing violence in Pakistan could destabilize the U.S. ally and threaten the entire region.

In March, the State Department authorized a reward of up to $5 million for the militant chief. And increasingly, American missiles fired by unmanned drones have focused on Mehsud-related targets.

While Mehsud's death would be a big blow to the Taliban in Pakistan, he has deputies who could take his place. Whether a new leader could wreak as much havoc in Pakistan as Mehsud could depends largely on how much pressure the Pakistani military continues to put on the Taliban network, especially in South Waziristan.

Pakistan's record is spotty on that front. It has used both military action and truces to try to contain Mehsud over the years, but neither tactic seemed to work, despite billions in U.S. aid aimed at helping the Pakistanis tame the tribal areas.

Mehsud was not that prominent a militant when the U.S. invaded Afghanistan in 2001 after the Sept. 11 attacks, according to Mahmood Shah, a former security chief for the tribal regions. In fact, Mehsud has struggled against such rivals as Abdullah Mehsud, an Afghan war veteran who had spent time in U.S. custody in Guantanamo Bay.

A February 2005 peace deal with Mehsud appeared to give him room to consolidate and boost his troop strength tremendously, and within months dozens of pro-government tribal elders in the region were gunned down on his command.

In December 2007, Mehsud became the head of a new coalition called the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan, or Pakistan's Taliban movement. Under Mehsud's guidance, the group has killed hundreds of Pakistanis in suicide and other attacks. He is believed to have as many as 20,000 fighters at his beck and call, among them a steady supply of suicide bombers.

Analysts say the reason for Mehsud's rise in the militant ranks is his alliances with al-Qaida and other violent extremist groups. U.S. intelligence has said al-Qaida has set up its operational headquarters in Mehsud's South Waziristan stronghold and the neighboring North Waziristan tribal area.

Mehsud has no record of attacking targets in the West, although he has threatened to attack Washington.

However, he is suspected of being behind a 10-man cell arrested in Barcelona in January 2008 for plotting suicide attacks in Spain. Pakistan's former government and the CIA have named him as the prime suspect behind the December 2007 killing of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. He has denied a role.

He also has withstood threats from within Taliban ranks. A few weeks ago, Qari Zainuddin, the leader of a renegade Pakistani Taliban faction who had criticized Mehsud's tactics, was shot to death – allegedly on Mehsud's orders.

In June of this year, Pakistan said it would launch an offensive against Mehsud in South Waziristan.

In the weeks that have followed, the army has relied heavily on airstrikes to target areas under Mehsud's control, but it has never quite gone full-scale with the offensive. Meantime, the missile strikes continued, raising speculation that the U.S. might get him first.

Pakistan publicly opposes the missile strikes, saying they anger local tribes and make it harder for the army to operate. Still, many analysts suspect the two countries have a secret deal allowing the strikes.

___

Associated Press writers Nahal Toosi in Islamabad and Pamela Hess in Washington, D.C. contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

Filed by Marcus Baram  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 156
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
01:37 AM on 08/08/2009
Now that's a job well done!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ira7
03:58 PM on 08/07/2009
Don't we have just one bomb, to quote Ralph Kramdem's pal Ed Norton, "That'll do the woirk of all ah dese?"
photo
Whinger
I'm Just Me!
12:38 PM on 08/07/2009
His death is based on an assumption, where is the supportive physical evidence?

Can this be an attempt to paint over the death of his wife?
01:06 PM on 08/07/2009
Can this be that you're a Talib supporter unwilling to face any negative news about your heroes?
12:16 PM on 08/07/2009
This is what happens when you combine American tech and Pakistani intel.
Taliban better start thinking about negotiating a surrender.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
punk
There is no 'beyond left & right'
12:30 PM on 08/07/2009
What happens when you spend too much money on policing the world??
01:01 PM on 08/07/2009
Afghanistan is a just war conducted with unanimous support of U.N.Security Council and most of the world community. Get used to it.
12:16 PM on 08/07/2009
U.S.Intel just confirmed it was indeed Mehsud that was taken out. BRAVO.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090807/ap_on_re_as/as_pakistan;_ylt=AriMb0sEMoX3cdETmvJ9l950fNdF
photo
TheSpider
Half a truth is often a great lie.
12:05 PM on 08/07/2009
Obama strikes again.....It's was his ok that lead to the strike.

Way to go Obama, keep proving the haters WRONG.
12:37 PM on 08/07/2009
Give me a break. If you think Obama gives the OK for these strikes, you are sadly mistaken. I'm glad they are still being done, and yes, he has the power to stop them, but certain people seem to have forgotten a certain former President was our leader when this stuff was happening. It seems to me he got a much harsher critique from the homefront than Obama.
02:34 PM on 08/07/2009
don't forget the recent spectacular US Navy rescue off the coast of somalia.
02:41 PM on 08/07/2009
just a little more than seven months into his presidency.

he's doing a fine job.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:24 AM on 08/07/2009
One Taliban chief down and only 500 million more replacements to go!

Oh yes! This is a brilliant plan!
12:09 PM on 08/07/2009
Your statement absolutely ridiculous, and quite ignorant.
11:19 AM on 08/07/2009
Won't he be surprised when he meets Allah! Ticket to hell for him. Not that I believe any of it.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
punk
There is no 'beyond left & right'
11:03 AM on 08/07/2009
Taliban is not al-Qaeda.
11:12 AM on 08/07/2009
They're not the same organization. But according to all reputable accounts they closely cooperate with each other. This is beyond debate.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
punk
There is no 'beyond left & right'
12:26 PM on 08/07/2009
9/11 Commission: “The Taliban's chief, Mullah Omar, opposed attacking the United States” Indeed, the Taliban had NOTHING to do with 9/11.

http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report_Exec.htm
11:54 AM on 08/07/2009
Either way, its a good kill.
10:56 AM on 08/07/2009
I don't understand the Media fascination with killing a "top commander" of Al-Queda/Taliban/etc.
This isn't a f'n football game! What kind of immature idiots write these pieces?
If you "knock out" the "other team's quarterback" that doesn't mean you automatically WIN.
If one of our top military commanders was killed, we would just promote someone else and continue on with the mission.
Why do you think these people are any different? (if anything, single commanders mean even LESS to them than to us due to their de-centralized command structure.)
11:10 AM on 08/07/2009
Most of your argument is valid. One point you failed to take into account.
Decentralized forces are good at guerilla warfare.Yes. But without disrupted centralized command and control Taliban loses the ability ( however temp) to field a force able to challenge Pakistani army or control Waziristan. Hope P-stani army is able to take advantage.
10:55 AM on 08/07/2009
The pompous warlord and his entire council taken out by some pimply teen with A Sony PlayStation joystick. Precious.
This fact should be more advertised accross ME and
Westerners don't understand how much losing face means to them.
A poster along these lines will cut into recruitment more than all the interfaith conferences combined.
10:39 AM on 08/07/2009
And the "war" drags on interminably. No end in sight. No rational purpose to it. Our very presence creates the "enemies" that we need to dispatch, and thousands of civilians are slaughtered and maimed in the wake of this mindless destruction. We call it "collateral damage."

One country, Iraq, already lies in ruins. Fortunately, Afghanistan was pretty primitive to begin with. We can't bomb them back into the Stone Age.
10:32 AM on 08/07/2009
Well done Bush, oh I mean Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsgaetano
Semper Fidelis Tyrannosaurus!
10:40 AM on 08/07/2009
So... I guess we got another Al Queso #2.
10:48 AM on 08/07/2009
Sob...sob....
10:15 AM on 08/07/2009
I'm glad he's dead, but we're sure spending a lot of money to kill these clowns. There'll be more coming along to replace him so we and our allies will have to kill them too. That's fine with me.

It's good to know that enough people in Pakistan are now finally as fed up with these people as we are. It wasn't until the Taliban/al Qaeda dog came home to bite its Pakistani master that they realized they'd have been better off wiping them out a decade ago.

There ought to be an easier, cheaper way to kill more of them, though, because they can't be deterred and won't surrender. Job well done, CIA and military, keep the hits coming.
10:13 AM on 08/07/2009
Its just a matter of time before one of those missiles lands on Bin Laden. Lets hope sooner then later.