New Documents Show Rove's Role In Political Firings: Help Us Read Through Them

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - New Documents Show Rove's Role In Political Firings: Help Us Read Through Them stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 08-11-09 02:17 PM   |   Updated: 09-11-09 05:12 AM

What's Your Reaction?
Rove Bush

The House Judiciary Committee Web-published thousands of pages of documents on Tuesday, including over 700 pages of transcripts of on-the-record interviews with Karl Rove and Harriet Miers regarding the Bush-era U.S. Attorney firings and the politicization of the Department of Justice.

Chairman John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich.) said he is forwarding the documents to federal prosecutors.

According to the committee, the materials -- including over 5,400 pages of Bush White House and Republican National Committee emails -- show that Bush White House officials were deeply involved in the US Attorney firings and that the administration then attempted to cover up that fact.

"After all the delay and despite all the obfuscation, lies, and spin," Conyers said, "this basic truth can no longer be denied: Karl Rove and his cohorts at the Bush White House were the driving force behind several of these firings, which were done for improper reasons. Under the Bush regime, honest and well-performing US Attorneys were fired for petty patronage, political horsetrading and, in the most egregious case of political abuse of the US Attorney corps - that of US Attorney Iglesias - because he refused to use his office to help Republicans win elections. When Mr. Iglesias said his firing was a 'political fragging,' he was right."

Conyers said he has "provided a copy of the materials released today to special U.S. Attorney Nora Dannehy to assist in her effort to determine whether federal criminal charges are appropriate and to pursue any such charges."

Help us read through the documents and send the most interesting things you find to ryan@huffingtonpost.com -- or post them below as comments. .

The following summary comes from the committee:

• 2005 White House "Decision" to fire David Iglesias - It has previously been known that New Mexico Republicans pressed for Iglesias to be removed because they did not like his decisions on vote fraud cases. New White House documents show that Rove and his office were involved in this effort no later than May 2005 (months earlier than previously known) - for example, in May and June 2005, Rove aide Scott Jennings sent emails to Tim Griffin (also in Rove's office) asking "what else I can do to move this process forward" and stressing that "I would really like to move forward with getting rid of NM US ATTY." In June 2005, Harriet Miers emailed that a "decision" had been made to replace Iglesias. At this time, DOJ gave Iglesias top rankings, so this decision was clearly not just the result of the White House following the Department's lead as Rove and Miers have maintained.


• Iglesias criticized by Rove aide for not "doing his job on" Democratic Congressional Candidate Patricia Madrid - An October 2006 email chain begun by Representative Heather Wilson criticized David Iglesias for not bringing politically useful public corruption prosecutions in the run up to the 2006 elections. Scott Jennings forwarded Wilson's email to Karl Rove and complained that Iglesias had been "shy about doing his job on Madrid," Wilson's opponent in the 2006 Congressional race. Just weeks after this email, Iglesias' name was placed on the final firing list.

Story continues below
advertisement

• An "agitated" Rove pressed Harriet Miers to do something about Iglesias just weeks before Iglesias was placed on the removal list - Karl Rove phoned Harriet Miers during a visit to New Mexico in September 2006 - according to Miers' testimony, Rove was "agitated" and told her that Iglesias was "a serious problem and he wanted something done about it."

• Senator Domenici personally asked Bush's Chief of Staff Josh Bolten to have Iglesias replaced - In October 2006, Senator Domenici stepped up his campaign to have Iglesias replaced. According to White House phone logs and emails, as well as Rove's own testimony, Domenici spoke with President Bush's Chief of Staff Josh Bolten about Iglesias on October 5, 2006, and during October 2006, Domenici or his staff spoke with Karl Rove at least 4 times.

• Todd Graves removed in Rove-approved deal with Republican Senator - Kansas City US Attorney Todd Graves was removed as part of a White House-brokered deal with US Senator Kit Bond. In exchange for the Administration firing Graves, Senator Bond agreed to lift his hold on an Arkansas judge nominated to the Eighth Circuit federal appeals court. A White House email stated that "Karl is fine" with the proposal.

• Miers obtained favorable statement on Rick Renzi in violation of DOJ policy - When rumors of the FBI investigation of Rep. Rick Renzi surfaced in October, 2006, one of Rove's subordinates contacted Harriet Miers, who called Deputy Attorney General McNulty seeking a possible statement that would have "vindicated" Renzi. Even though this was contrary to standard DOJ policy, such a statement was issued several days later.

UPDATE: Media Matters has a fun find. In one instance, Bush aide Scott Jennings claimed he simply "followed orders," prompting fellow staffer Jane Cherry to ask, "Isn't that what the Nazis claimed?" Jennings replied, "shut up. these things always roll down hill ... i'm guessing you are going down."

And Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who interrogated Rove, offers his take.

UPDATE 2: A reader finds a suspicious e-mail from Karl Rove to White House aide Scott Jennings in the document dump that demonstrates the level of Rove's oversight of the firings.

Rove's subject line of a November 25th e-mail: "Give me a report on what US Attorney slots are vacant"

And then in the e-mail: "Or to be open soon"

Jennings replies, two and a half hours later: "Yes sir. It will be lengthy- there are several."

The e-mails are on page 39 and part of exhibits ten and eleven in part one of the committee's "Rove Exhibits."

On Nov. 30, 2006, Bush aide William Kelley reminds Jennings of the public outcry that could come and asks, "Scott, can I take your sign-off as Karl's, or should I raise this separately with him?"

On Friday, December first, he wrote again, nudging: "Scott--Did you get this? DOJ very much wants to pull this trigger, and they are waiting on us. Many thanks."

Jennings writes back on Monday. "Yes - I·th[i]nk we are fine to move ahead."

Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

The House Judiciary Committee Web-published thousands of pages of documents on Tuesday, including over 700 pages of transcripts of on-the-record interviews with Karl Rove and Harriet Miers regarding t...
The House Judiciary Committee Web-published thousands of pages of documents on Tuesday, including over 700 pages of transcripts of on-the-record interviews with Karl Rove and Harriet Miers regarding t...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
592
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (16 pages total)
- ReedYoung I'm a Fan of ReedYoung 131 fans permalink
photo

Just funny
Rove July 7 Interview, pages 19-20

Q (Adam Schiff): But you were mindful of how local elected officials, and particularly local Republican officials, felt about particular candidates, right?
A (Karl Rove): Their quality and their ability to do the job.
Q: And that was part of your responsibility as supervising OPA to -- please let me finish the question.
A: Yeah, I am just breathing, if that is okay.
Q: No, that is fine. You have a habit of jumping in at the end of my questions. But as the head of OPA or supervising hte head of OPA, it was part of your responsibility to know how the local delegation would view the choices you ultimately made on U.S. Attorney hiring, right?
A: By local delegation you mean the congressional delegation?
Q: Local senators, House members, Republican Party leaders. You would want to know how they would view your selections, wouldn't you?

Obviously not best friends.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 AM on 08/16/2009
- 8milereb I'm a Fan of 8milereb 2 fans permalink

Clinton fired ALL 93 federal prosecutors in his first term, not a word from the left. Amazing....SPOT ON! HE FIRED EVERYONE!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:37 PM on 08/12/2009
- Telemachus I'm a Fan of Telemachus 108 fans permalink

So you're saying Clinton ordered them all to commit unprofessional conduct for political reasons and they all refused, and he fired them in retaliation? Because if he didn't, you're comparing apples to oranges.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:54 PM on 08/12/2009
- aaronaa3 I'm a Fan of aaronaa3 2 fans permalink
photo

yeah this topic is discussed in the Miers interview, 8milereb.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:04 PM on 08/12/2009
- 8milereb I'm a Fan of 8milereb 2 fans permalink

Is the all the left can do?...distractions? Rove is gone and so is Bush..lets focus on the real issues and not continue to blame folks who are no longer in power. When you folks see you grip on America slipping like Obama is dropping like a rock in the polls and health care reform now at 53 % who DISAPPROVE, all you can do is go back and pick up crap that is meaningless!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:36 PM on 08/12/2009
- ReedYoung I'm a Fan of ReedYoung 131 fans permalink
photo

If he didn't do anything wrong he has nothing to hide and nothing to fear from a very, VERY thorough investigation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 AM on 08/16/2009
- Collielady I'm a Fan of Collielady 82 fans permalink
photo

Why is that p/g not in the pen?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 PM on 08/12/2009

We are building a BIGGER one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:02 PM on 08/12/2009
- blaharumph I'm a Fan of blaharumph 14 fans permalink
photo

chubby cheeks!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 AM on 08/12/2009

Yes. Two sets on the same two feet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 PM on 08/12/2009

Byron York?

Another neocon liar.

Might as well have quoted Rove himself.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 PM on 08/12/2009
- den1953 I'm a Fan of den1953 50 fans permalink
photo

Why don't you Republicans tell the people of 9/11 to move on forget it it's history,how about telling the American people just move on so what if you lost your homes or your savings,how about telling the American people to move on forget about how you were spied on,or maybe move on for losing your loved ones and the innocent Iraqi people for a war our adminstration started for revenge and oil. Your vision of the past 8 years are totally clouded sir!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 AM on 08/12/2009
- robjh1 I'm a Fan of robjh1 16 fans permalink
photo

I am the only hope for the Republican GOP.

"and we are not saved..."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 AM on 08/12/2009
- John Beach I'm a Fan of John Beach 5 fans permalink
photo

Clinton fired all 93 federal prosecutors in his first term, not a word from the left. Amazing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 AM on 08/12/2009
- Marcus-UK I'm a Fan of Marcus-UK 9 fans permalink

The question here is whether there was a cover-up. Rove has stated many times (most recently on O'really's Faux News) that has involvement was minimal and that he played NO part.

This evidence would suggest otherwise.

If you have evidence of a cover-up regarding the firing of 93 federal prosecutors then present it. I'm quite sure that it would be denounced as corrupt just as this appears to be.

Po oh or get off the pot!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 AM on 08/12/2009
- John Beach I'm a Fan of John Beach 5 fans permalink
photo

rove's role was minimal, because he had no authority over the AGs office. He didnt have the power to fire these people, so therefore could not have broken any law. Wanting them to be fired or even suggesting they be fired is not breaking any law. this is a waste of time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 AM on 08/12/2009
- GLT21 I'm a Fan of GLT21 3 fans permalink
photo

Yea, all R's from daddy bush.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 AM on 08/12/2009
- larce1948 I'm a Fan of larce1948 10 fans permalink

It is quite customary for newly elected presidents to fire everyone and start with a clean slate.
What is not customary is to fire their own appointees for failing to do their political dirty work.
Clearly. This is way to complicated for you to understand.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 08/12/2009
- bronceye I'm a Fan of bronceye 29 fans permalink

Clearing the deck on your maiden voyage is much different than selectively throwing people overboard halfway through that voyage.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 AM on 08/12/2009

clueless!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:35 PM on 08/12/2009
photo

Karl Rove was involved in that? Gee, I never knew that White House chiefs of staff ever had anything to do with decisions aorund the White House! Certainly Rahm Emanuel has nothing to do with anything at the White House, does he? If you find that he does, why not make a big headline here...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:58 AM on 08/12/2009
- John Beach I'm a Fan of John Beach 5 fans permalink
photo

He didnt have the authority to fire anyone. Rove had no real power of the AG office. So he couldnt break any law since the order couldnt have come from him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:58 AM on 08/12/2009

Kyle Sampson on How to deal with Congress: Source:http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/pdf/WHDocsPT2.pdf Page 28

-----Original Message"----
From: sampson, Kyle [mailto:Ky­le.Sampson­@usdoj.gov­]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19,' 2006 6:27 PM
TO: Oprison, Christopher G. .
Subject: RE: Another Gritfin article
My thoughts:
1. I think we should gum this to death: ask the Senators to give Tim a chance, meet with
him, give him some time .in office to see hOw he performs, .etc. If they ultimatelY say,
"no never" (and the longer we· can forestall th,t, the better), then, we can tell them we'll
look for 'other candidates, "ask them for recommendations, evaluate the ,recomniendations,
interview their candidates, and otherwise run out the clock. All of this should be done
in "go,od faith," of course .
2.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 AM on 08/12/2009
- sc300nc I'm a Fan of sc300nc 52 fans permalink

Move on people, Bush and Cheney are history. Let's concentrate on the problems we currently face. Remember, what the Dems do to the Republicans, they will get back in return. Do you want Obama's administration, when it is over, to undergo the same scrutiny? Will you be yelling for Obama or Biden's head?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:31 AM on 08/12/2009
- Wilbur I'm a Fan of Wilbur 22 fans permalink

Move on? Ignore crimes? Geez, you GOP'ers are something ELSE!

Wilbur

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:35 AM on 08/12/2009
- Joeinloth I'm a Fan of Joeinloth 2 fans permalink

SOFT ON CRIME!!!!!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 AM on 08/12/2009
- Marcus-UK I'm a Fan of Marcus-UK 9 fans permalink

How can you seek to move on when the Republicans and the GOP continue to use these people as credible spokesman. If they have broken the law and committed criminal acts they should be held to account.

And yes, if it turns out after an Obama administration that there had been corruption, criminal acts or constitutional by-passes then I would expect and demand the same level of scrutiny.

I think too often we allow people to circumvent their responsibilities by adding the caveat 'move on'

Let's move forward whilst looking back to see if they had broken the law.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 AM on 08/12/2009
- John Beach I'm a Fan of John Beach 5 fans permalink
photo

there is no law that was broken. 6 months have gone by and nothing new has emerged on this other than the fact Rove wanted them fired. big shocker there!!! stop the presses!!! bush was an honest man trying to do his best, wether you liked him or disliked him, it's time to move on, youre not going to find any evidence on him. and anything you could question will be meet with the "executive privilege" defense. case over.

just because obama's poll number are droppping, it's time to bash bush again? this is getting old.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 AM on 08/12/2009

The fact that these crimes haven't been dealt with may be cause for the near lawlessness of hate/fear/­race-baiti­ng speech that is going on now.

There is simply no responsibility or accountablity and it's gone AMUCK.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:45 AM on 08/12/2009
- jennylynn I'm a Fan of jennylynn 49 fans permalink

They will be called Ra ci st if they do that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 AM on 08/12/2009
- bronceye I'm a Fan of bronceye 29 fans permalink

That's right. The repubes could be upset and impeach a Democratic President for infidelity or something if we continue to root out political tampering. We must remember that Clinton let Raygun and Bush1 off the hook and Ollie North(who was covicted of lying to Congress) got a job with a fair and balanced tv network. See how well it works if we let repubes off the hook? Nixon, raygun, Bush I&II, all did the same things and we didn't pursue it. If we don't pursue, we will know what the next repube pres. is up to. Isn't knowledge enough?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 AM on 08/12/2009

(referring to picture) Hi Miss Piggy Isn't your puppet supposed to be sitting in your lap?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:09 AM on 08/12/2009

the picture has been doctored ...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 PM on 08/12/2009
- Telemachus I'm a Fan of Telemachus 108 fans permalink

It's there, but it's made of meat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 PM on 08/12/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (16 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect