WSJ Reporters Mock Obama For Attention To Detail

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - WSJ Reporters Mock Obama For Attention To Detail stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 08-12-09 09:01 AM   |   Updated: 08-12-09 01:16 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

In a Wall Street Journal article and accompanying video published Wednesday, Jonathan Weisman and Neil King Jr. accuse President Obama of micromanaging and mock him for his attention to what they consider minutiae.


Says Weisman:

You know, every president has to make a decision, you know, are you going to fly way up high and look down on policy at 30,000 feet, sort of like George W. Bush did, or are you going to get down into the weeds and sometimes run into the risk of micromanagement, like Jimmy Carter did. Barack Obama has kind of tended toward the weeds....


President Obama, not only does he want to hear about the unemployment rates -- he wants to hear about the U6, the underemployment rate! A few weeks ago, they were talking about child obesity rates, and what to do about childhood nutrition. These things go into the weeds.

For the record, the U6 includes not just those traditionally labeled unemployed, but those who have given up looking for jobs and those who are employed part-time for economic reasons. That makes it arguably the most accurate measure of the impact the recession is having on American workers. And childhood hunger and obesity have a long, important and complicated interrelationship.

In the article, Weisman and King even go so far as to blame Obama's declining approval ratings not on, say, a massive lobbying and astroturf campaign by industries opposed to his policies, or on an angry nativism movement, but on the president's desire to understand things:

Whatever the merits or flaws of Mr. Obama's style, it sometimes has trouble translating with opponents, and the country at large. Following a smooth first few months in office, he has seen his agenda stall amid rising opposition, even from some members of his own party. His approval rating with the public in the latest Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll late last month was barely over 50%, down from 61% in April.

There are all sorts of legitimate reasons to be concerned about Obama's approach to governing.

But particularly after the presidency of George W. Bush, who so often seemed detached both from details and reality, Obama's intellectual curiosity is one thing journalists in particular should celebrate, not sneer at. It's the know-nothings we should be exposing, not the know-somethings.


Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

In a Wall Street Journal article and accompanying video published Wednesday, Jonathan Weisman and Neil King Jr. accuse President Obama of micromanaging and mock him for his attention to what they cons...
In a Wall Street Journal article and accompanying video published Wednesday, Jonathan Weisman and Neil King Jr. accuse President Obama of micromanaging and mock him for his attention to what they cons...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
1253
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (37 pages total)

Barack, is smart. He never makes a mistake, has never lied or mislead the American populous when he's spoken. He knows and understands all.

I think I'll go meditate now. Barack Obamaaaaaa­aaaaaaaaaa­aaahhhhhhh­. Barack Obamaaaaaa­aaaaaaaaaa­aaaaaaahhh­hhhh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:50 PM on 08/16/2009

Wear a smock when you mock and maybe people will sing about you http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kuNnnW-7Ws

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:47 PM on 08/13/2009
photo

The photo of these two candyheads - especially the one on the right - makes me laugh.
That Obama - he needs to know EVERYTHING!"
"Yeah - and the part that gets ME is - he UNDERSTANDS it all!"
"Boy, that really sticks in my CRAW!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 PM on 08/13/2009

They really must have loved Reagon. Talk about detached.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 PM on 08/13/2009
- RGKahn I'm a Fan of RGKahn 5 fans permalink

The WSJ has always been somewhat Schizophrenic in its reporting. This goes back long before Murdock took over. The reportage was, for the most part, straight forward. It addressed that classic who, why, when why, and how of a story. The Editorial side of the house was something that Lious the 13 would have found right wing. Two polar opposites. Not today, We will be seeing more and more editorial content leaking into the news side of the house.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 08/13/2009
photo

Of course the WSJ is opposed to any president that gives the American people details, they prefer a dunce in the white house that simply rubber stamps what big business tells him to do.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:58 AM on 08/13/2009
- mick7191 I'm a Fan of mick7191 34 fans permalink
photo

A fine journal destroyed by political ideology. It's sad.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 AM on 08/13/2009
- jennylynn I'm a Fan of jennylynn 49 fans permalink

Maybe he should pay attention to cake questions at Townhall meetings.The Boston Globe exposed the little girl who was planted in the townhall meeting to ask BO about healthcare? Seems her mother is a member of the Mass. Women for Obama. Shameful.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 AM on 08/13/2009

@Jenny. Yeah almost as shameful as taking $millions from private healthcare and then voting in their favor. Is it really surprising to find an Obama supporter at his town hall? I'm shocked..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:04 AM on 08/13/2009
- 1dogs2 I'm a Fan of 1dogs2 121 fans permalink

Yeah. They should have barred that little girl and her mother from attending the town hall. They should have done a background check of everyone the computer randomly selected for tickets and withheld tickets from those who voted for Obama. THEN we would have seen a REAL town hall -- like the one's Bush used to have.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:28 AM on 08/13/2009
- nodonjuan I'm a Fan of nodonjuan 9 fans permalink
photo

The WSJ reads more like page six in the NYP. I can't believe what News Corp. has done to a once great newspaper. The WSJ has always been pro business, now they are pro business, pro radical right and do not care about journalistic integrity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:50 AM on 08/13/2009

Australians warned us not to allow Rupert Murdoch to infiltrate our free press standards

England warned us not to allow Rupert Murdoch to infiltrate our free press standards

Sir Richard Branson said something like "if we let him, Murdock will destroy democracy".

We ignored Australia and England- look at the dumb down we got!

WSJ- Dumb it Down President!

BE PROUD!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:20 AM on 08/13/2009
photo

See, Murdoch is an eagle who shares an apartment with a hyena. Lou Dobbs is also a hyena but not the same one. Wait... there's probably a lion...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 PM on 08/13/2009
photo

So let me see if I understand this correctly - they are making fun of President Obama because he wants to be informed about issues, some of which do not carry as much importance as others? What is wrong with this picture? The morons who reported this piece need to reflect on their stupidity. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that a leader who takes the time to learn as much as he can about an issue is going to make better, more informed decisions. These guys need to take a good long look at themselves in the mirror and ask themselves what it means to be a highly regarded journalist who can be taken seriously, versus a whiney commentator that rambles on about total nothingness. What a waste!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 AM on 08/13/2009
- nana4g I'm a Fan of nana4g 98 fans permalink

Of course. The WSJ is accustomed to the Village Idiot.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 AM on 08/13/2009

How many times was bu.sh mocked, it comes with the job, get o.ver it

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 PM on 08/12/2009
- HST I'm a Fan of HST 48 fans permalink
photo

Yeah if you are president and actually pay attention to details
you are just asking to be mocked (rolls eyes).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 AM on 08/13/2009
- fuelie I'm a Fan of fuelie 8 fans permalink
photo

Most of the once prestigious national newspapers and aren't much better than the gossip tabloids anymore, reporting sensationalism for profits sake instead of collaborated, verified, and meaningful news stories. Where is Uncle Walter when you need him?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 PM on 08/12/2009
- mharg11 I'm a Fan of mharg11 18 fans permalink

WSJ is now a part of the Fox News Family,,,,,,,Merdox

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:46 AM on 08/13/2009
- rascalish I'm a Fan of rascalish 36 fans permalink
photo

HRC got it right.

If he could walk on water they'd say he couldn't swim.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:23 PM on 08/12/2009
- Sundialsvc4 I'm a Fan of Sundialsvc4 140 fans permalink

I guess that's why they're not The President of the United States.

"Armchair quarterbacks" are a dime a dozen. Every buffo with a beer-can in his hand is always so cock-sure that he could just waddle right out there and throw that winning pass.

But there is exactly one President of the United States, and exactly one Veep, and neither one of them works for the Wall Street Journal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:19 PM on 08/12/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (37 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect