Gibbs Won't Say What White House Gave Drugmakers To Gain Their Support

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Gibbs Won't Say What White House Gave Drugmakers To Gain Their Support stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 08-13-09 05:10 PM   |   Updated: 09-13-09 05:12 AM

What's Your Reaction?
Gibbs

What did the White House offer drugmakers to get their support for health care legislation?

NBC's Chuck Todd put the question directly to Robert Gibbs after the White House spokesman denied that a deal outlined in a memo obtained by the Huffington Post was accurate.

"Stepping back a minute on the PhRMA deal, are we to believe that PhRMA didn't get anything for their agreement on the $80 billion; that they did not get anything in return from the White House, any pledges, promises, winks, nods, whatever? Are we to believe nothing was promised to them?" he asked.

"Well, again, I'm simply -- was responding to what the question was about a memo that I think both sides..." Gibbs responded, before Todd cut him off.

"Forget the memo a minute," Todd said. "Can you answer that -- can you answer that question? Were they -- can you say for sure they were promised nothing in return?"

Gibbs ducked the question. "I can assure you that we've come to an agreement to seek some savings from the pharmaceutical industry as part of comprehensive health care," he said, declining to say what PhRMA was offered in return.

"And at what point are you going to release, then, the facts of the deal with them and with the hospitals and with a couple of these stakeholders that have come here and made these pledges and you guys have..." Todd followed up.

"I think some of this is going to be written into legislation that we'll hopefully see going through Congress relatively soon," said Gibbs.

Story continues below

"Should we -- you know, why not release it now? Why not say what it is?" Todd asked.

"Again, as I said yesterday, some of that agreement -- some of those agreements are up on the Finance Committee Web site," said Gibbs.

But there is, in fact, nothing on the Senate Finance Committee website about what the committee or what the White House offered PhRMA in exchange for its commitment to support reform and shave $80 billion in costs.

The memo:

Todd's question stands unanswered: "Are we to believe that PhRMA didn't get anything for their agreement on the $80 billion?"

WATCH:

Gibbs was asked about the PhRMA deal several other times in Thursday's press conference. From the transcript prepared by the White House:

Q The PhRMA deal. There's been some confusion I think about what exactly the White House has agreed to with Big Pharma, what they've not agreed to. Could you clarify what it is exactly that the White House signed off on, whether or not you feel that the Senate Finance Committee and Senator Baucus were up front with you guys about what he agreed to? And also, do you think that this was done, whatever deal this was, was this done in keeping with the transparency that then-candidate Obama promised?


MR. GIBBS: Yes, well, we had a little -- let me take the last part of that. I think the question a few days ago, something similar to this, which is we discussed bringing people to the table. We discussed making sure that stakeholders that are involved in health care are part of an agreement. Look, you can't -- you're not going to get health care legislation without involving the hospitals, without involving those that provide medications, without talking to groups that represent doctors or patients or seniors, nurses, what have you.

And we've talked a little bit about the PhRMA deal. You know, the Finance Committee and PhRMA agreed to $80 billion in cost savings, part of which goes to fill the doughnut hole for seniors as part of Medicare Part D, which I think we all know is at a certain point coverage for the purchase of those drugs stops until you basically reach a catastrophic level and the coverage kicks back in. Then some of the -- some of that additional savings would be used for health care.

Q But the question is what the White House agreed to, bypassing most members of Congress? Did you agree to oppose importation of drugs? Did you agree to oppose rebates in Medicare Part D? Did you oppose a repeal of noninterference and oppose the opening of Medicare Part B? That is what some lobbyists are saying the White House has agreed to.

MR. GIBBS: Yes, and I think the same article that denotes that has denials from both PhRMA and us on that.

Q But PhRMA said -- PhRMA said that the deal was $80 billion, that's it, no more, they can't give any more. Yet in Portsmouth, the President said that maybe you could get more.

MR. GIBBS: Well, maybe you could get more savings as a result of health care reform. I do not believe that the President meant we could take an $80 billion agreement and make it $95 billion. I've been fairly clear on that from here. I think as a result of the change in health care, you can see health care costs and drug costs driven down. That's not to say we were reopening it.


Q So just to be clear, you're denying that the --

MR. GIBBS: I'm denying the --

Q -- administration agreed to any of those things that I just listed?

MR. GIBBS: I am denying that the -- I'm reissuing the denial that I think is in the story that you're referring to, on our behalf and on PhRMA's behalf.

Yes, sir.

[snip]

Q Robert, you mentioned that some of -- back to PhRMA -- you mentioned that some of it would be written into the Senate Finance legislation.

MR. GIBBS: Well, that's --

Q Did I understand that correctly?

MR. GIBBS: Well, again, the -- that's the panel; if you're talking about getting different cost savings into the bill on the Senate side, that's the committee of jurisdiction.

Q Pieces of the $80 billion agreement?

MR. GIBBS: Right.

Q Okay. But that agreement, the $80 billion, is not binding on Congress in any way, is it?

MR. GIBBS: Is it not binding on?

Q Congress.

MR. GIBBS: All of Congress?

Q All of Congress.

MR. GIBBS: Well, I guess that depends to some degree on what ultimately comes out of the Senate and what's agreed to in a conference committee, but I think that's getting -- that's projecting a tad ahead of ourselves.

Q Well, is it binding on the Senate Finance Committee?

MR. GIBBS: It's the agreement that they entered into. Yes, sir.


What did the White House offer drugmakers to get their support for health care legislation? NBC's Chuck Todd put the question directly to Robert Gibbs after the White House spokesman denied that a de...
What did the White House offer drugmakers to get their support for health care legislation? NBC's Chuck Todd put the question directly to Robert Gibbs after the White House spokesman denied that a de...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
79
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
photo

BOHICA -- Look it up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 08/14/2009
- DIAGER I'm a Fan of DIAGER 10 fans permalink

Clearly some deal was struck. That's what COMPROMISE is all about.

But nothing in Obama's history leans credence to his not doing what's best for the country.

Unlike Bush & Cheney, Obama's history is one where the PEOPLE's interests appear to have genuinely come first.

So this American will wait for the finished product.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:35 AM on 08/14/2009
- andy5555 I'm a Fan of andy5555 2 fans permalink

Wow your just as blind as Bush supporters.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 PM on 08/14/2009
- Giselle25 I'm a Fan of Giselle25 2 fans permalink

Here's a thought. Eat healthy (that means no frankenfoods with polypronexylisdgggFDC12), ditch soda/unnatural beverages, and foods with excessive sugar and perhaps, try organic foods.

Next thought, maybe identify what's really in you soap, shampoo, deodorant and "beauty" supplies because odds are they are toxic, making you age faster and cancerous. Same for toxic cleaning supplies.

Once you reevaluate the latter two, you may realize that you spend way too much $ on stuff that really doesn't work. You may find things that actually do work (clays, jojoba oil, essential oils and baking soda, lemon juice, vinegar ).

After changing your diet and getting rid of toxic crap in your environment you may realize you're richer and a hell of a lot healthier. You may start getting rid of carpet, getting an air filter or running more. You may realize that hot pepper, garlic, onions, chamomile and other herbs taken daily can boost your immune system and make you not have to buy any meds down the road.

When you combine all these measures you may actually become something close to resembling a natural human being, you know the kind that existed before obese, toxin filled, brainwashed Americans came along.

Many of us don't really need health care. We'd save more money saving our money for the rare accidents (like breaking a leg) and spending everything else on good food and products that aren't laden with health diminishing toxins.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:13 AM on 08/14/2009
photo

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong. This "DEAL" was set up between phrma and the senate finance committee, hasn't gone through the senate, it is not binding but somehow the President is the one who made the "deal"?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 AM on 08/14/2009

The American people need to elect someone who can negotiate a better deal for the taxpayers. First, the loophole in the TARP and second giving away our rights to import drugs from Canada, UK, etc.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 AM on 08/14/2009
- attyrose3 I'm a Fan of attyrose3 6 fans permalink

This story demonstrates twhy Mr. Obama will be a one term president. Airhead Chuck Todd should be no match for Robert Gibbs but was able to best him because Gibbs had nothing to work with. Obama is proving he is just someone who can give a good speech. Obama has been talking out of both sides of his mouth on so many subjects, including health care. Before the election people assured me that Obama would push through a universal coverage plan. I assured them it would not happen during his administration. Today I got a notice from my insurance company that my premiums are going up 20% beginning in October. I already pay $795 a month for one person with a $3500.00 deductible, 20% of the next several thousand dollars of costs, and then I have to fight to get anything about the amounts I must paid actually paid by my carrier, Aetna. At least the Republicans want to change the tax code so my premiums are either deductible or I get a tax credit, Obama voted against that idea when in the Senate. A cheap fix to more coverage would be to amend ERISA laws so that my same sex partner's employer would have to offer partners benefits equal to what spouses are able to particpate in at a total cost that is less per month than just the increase being made to my premium but that would involve changing DOMA and that isn't going to happen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 AM on 08/14/2009
photo

Wouldn't it be nice to have access to a non-profit insurance program that's accepted everywhere? You could switch up and not be excluded for pre-existing conditions. Enough folks like yourself opt in, and it would be more than fully self supporting. Zero impact on the deficit. DOMA isn't going to change? You might be right, but is that the reason for your prognostication? Resentment regarding the financial impact of that law? If it were me, I'd take it very personally indeed. My opinion Gibbs is a bright guy in an embarrassing situation. His hands were tied and he's just doing his job. Getting Rockefeller to lighten up on opposition to Reform is pure magic, unless reform itself is the price. I guess we'll find out soon enough. Of course, I'm not a lawyer, OR Nostrafriggindamus.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:31 AM on 08/14/2009
- attyrose3 I'm a Fan of attyrose3 6 fans permalink

I do not believe that Obama will be re-elected because despite his amazing ability to give an inspiring speech, neither he or his staff understand that those that listen and believe what he says actually pay attention to what they do. A pattern is developing. Obama ran on transparency yet his office is run like Bush ran his. Obama ran as against war yet he is gearing up in Afganiztan in a war that has less end than is possible in Iraq. Obama ran on being for equal rights for all yet his Dept. of Justice opposes challenges to DOMA and he has traded his health care and economic plans for end to don't ask, don't tell. HIs economic team is owned by Wall Street. The list goes on and on. I voted for Obama but had low expectations of actual performance. Most people I know supported and believed him. THey are growing more and more disenchanted. He needs to pay more attention to his base and not assume that they will be there the next time around.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 PM on 08/14/2009
- deebles I'm a Fan of deebles 3 fans permalink

Just one little example. A drug like Wellbutrin costs about 10 bucks a day with no insurance. Teva which makes the generic charges way less but to produce off such a good patent they did what all generic do. Reform the chemical molecular structure to be sorta the same but different. The generic dumps out hours before its half life because it is purse, whereas Wellbutrin is a Coach handbag. What Obama did is to allow all the purses which cost nothing to be sold to you as if they were a Coach bag. Yeah.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:48 AM on 08/14/2009
- BertaLib I'm a Fan of BertaLib 2 fans permalink
photo

Supposedly the Pharmaceutical Researchers and Manufacturers Association (PhRMA) agreed to cut $80 billion in projected costs to taxpayers and senior citizens over ten years. But, the memo says: "Commitment of up to $80 billion, but not more than $80 billion." UP TO $80 billion means that this agreement would actually allow them to cut as little as as they want in projected costs just as long as they do not cut over that amount. How could anyone be so stupid as to leave that in there? Take out the "up to" and make them at least cut a specified amount. They are just going to screw us again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 AM on 08/14/2009
- retromega I'm a Fan of retromega 17 fans permalink

Just what support is it that big Pharma is showing???? Is Gibbs delusional? or do the Mr Slicks in DC think that they can pull this out after they FIU this year and then get more support from those of us who want to see our country move ahead even if our leadership proves its incompetance? Were did these people come from who think that truth and justice makes any difference without power? When did showing fear in the face of committed liars lead to ANYTHING positive? When does this "oh, its OK, I know what right and true" Save Andrew Goodman, James Chaney, and Michael Schwerner from the hero police in Neshoba Co Mississippi?

Get a clue! The effort to civilize ourselves and our fellow countrymen and women continues. No One's mother would ever say they should lie but it happens every single day and someplaces and some people do it every single chance they get!

Wake up! or when you snooze - YOU LOSE!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 PM on 08/13/2009
- Zuzette I'm a Fan of Zuzette 2 fans permalink

I'm not throwing up my hands on Obama any time soon. He's doing that chess game that pols do, & I trust him to do it FAR more skillfully, & with the American people's interests at heart FAR more sincerely, than any other recent president. It's unrealistic to expect more.
And too, where's the "transpareny" about the source of this memo? It looks fishy to me. Who found the old timey typewriter it was apparently typed on?
We need to chill before we start to sound like the wacky "birther/deathers".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 PM on 08/13/2009

What happened to the man I voted for, who obtained his campaign contributions from the people and promised to work for them? He is a wuss, the overwhelming majority wants single payor and a fair pharmaceutical bill, but what he is delivering is worse than what we have. The insurance industry needs to be put to pasture not pandered to.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 PM on 08/13/2009
- mrh3 I'm a Fan of mrh3 45 fans permalink

This has gone far enough. From a sworn Democrat this is not good enough. If we know what we bought, I want to know what it cost. Then I’ll decide if it's a good deal which I can support. As it stands how do I defend this? The president is putting us in an untenable situation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 PM on 08/13/2009
- Chazet2 I'm a Fan of Chazet2 6 fans permalink

I've lost my trust in this administration. Most frustrating of all is that it seems to be out of touch, and out of reach. None of what I see people saying here is heard, acknowledged, and responded to. Decisions are made behind closed doors and we are told that Obama is working in our interest and should just fall in line with our support, while what we think is best is shoved to the side. I don't care for this paternalism.
While Obama gives a good speach, he has yet to sell any of his ideas or actions. He does nothing to bring the public along, and refuses to listen to those who want to help. And I am very tired of him being center stage all the time. By taking that approach he is setting himself up to be the loser, the target. None of this is being handled very well, and that criticism doesn't seem to be sinking in at all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 AM on 08/14/2009
- lilalove I'm a Fan of lilalove 19 fans permalink
photo

What Gibbs is saying (while not saying it) is that Obama has not agreed while not disagreeing with many things involving the Big Pharma deal. Obama is holding his cards close. Big Pharma is set to get millions upon millions of more customers under Obama's preventive care focused health care bill. There are a huge number of preventive care drugs on the market. Even at a leveraged lower price they are set to make a ton of money. What deal did Obama make.... oh, lets say that on his care plan, that anyone with high blood pressure or high cholesterol is assured preventive drugs that lower each. Who profits? The American people and Big Pharma. What might happen? With more preventive care fewer people will have strokes and heart attacks. Who profits? The American people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 PM on 08/13/2009
- mrh3 I'm a Fan of mrh3 45 fans permalink

Eplain that to my co-workers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 PM on 08/13/2009
photo

the king has no clothes.
plain and simple.
hope he's enjoying the beach.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 PM on 08/13/2009
- mrh3 I'm a Fan of mrh3 45 fans permalink

Go h te something.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 PM on 08/13/2009
photo

Okay. Anyone who thinks this document is real is a complete and utter idiot. The federal government is not going to use the terminology 'donut hole' to refer to the Medicare Part D prescription drug program. There's so much more wrong with this entire setup.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:41 PM on 08/13/2009
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect