EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Obama Moves To Block Building Roads In National Forests

MATTHEW DALY   08/13/09 07:13 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration says it will defend a 2001 rule imposed by President Bill Clinton that blocked road construction and other development on tens of millions of acres of remote national forests.

The administration's decision was contained in court papers filed Thursday in a case in Wyoming that could help settle the fate of remote federal forests. The administration is siding with environmentalists in the case.

Conflicting court opinions have variously upheld and blocked the so-called Roadless Rule, which prohibited commercial logging, mining and other development on about 58 million acres of national forest in 38 states and Puerto Rico. A subsequent Bush administration rule had cleared the way for more commercial activity there.

A spokesman for the Justice Department said the appeal notice, filed in U.S. District Court in Wyoming, meets a Friday deadline to preserve the government's right to pursue the appeal.

The administration has not made a final decision on whether it will appeal the case, he said.

A federal appeals court threw out the 2005 Bush roadless rule last week, saying the rule "had the effect of permanently repealing uniform, nationwide, substantive protections that were afforded to inventoried roadless areas" in national forests.

The California-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the 2001 rule offered greater protection to remote forests than the 2005 rule.

The Aug. 5 ruling, one of dozens in recent years related to roadless forests, was not the final word on the issue.

The Wyoming case is pending in the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, where environmental groups are appealing a ruling by a federal judge repealing the Clinton roadless rule. Arguments are expected this fall before an appeals panel in Denver.

Environmentalists called the Obama administration's decision to defend the Clinton-era rule a major step toward resolving the roadless issue in their favor.

"We are grateful that the Obama administration is upholding and honoring the commitment of the president to uphold and enforce the 2001 roadless rule," said Kristen Boyles, a lawyer for the environmental group Earthjustice, which represents a coalition of environmental groups in both appeals. Obama had said during the presidential campaign that he supports roadless values.

The latest filing "shows that the Obama administration is going to stand behind the need for nationwide roadless protection," Boyles said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

Filed by Katherine Goldstein  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 42
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KataVideo
12:36 PM on 08/17/2009
whoop de doo. where's the public option?
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
11:58 AM on 08/18/2009
This _is_ important. It's just not nearly enough. How about stopping mountain-t­op removal for coal? How about stopping the building of new coal powerplant­s in Kansas? (Thanks, Obama, for removing the person who had stopped it cold.) How about the Tsongas Ntl. Forrest logging? I could easily go on and on about the _other_ things we _also_ need.

That said, every victory is important.
.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
retroredux
04:20 PM on 08/15/2009
Why isn't this story on Huffi ngton's front page?
One month age Hu ff loudly decried the President in the story about Tongass in relation to the Roadless Rule, but not that there is good news on this front-you BU RY this story on the very bottom of the green page?
Why has Hu ff become biased against posting any postive Obama news stories?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
retroredux
03:51 PM on 08/15/2009
Why isn't this story on Huffington­'s front page?
One month age Hu ff loudly decried the President in the story about Tongass in relation to the Roadless Rule, but not that there is good news on this front-you BURY this story on the very bottom of the green page?
Why has Hu ff become biased against posting any postive Obama news stories?
09:22 PM on 08/14/2009
And what shall you say when forest fires occur and there are no roads for the fire crews?
05:23 PM on 08/15/2009
There are no people living in these areas. Naturally occurring forest fires in wilderness areas is natural.
06:52 AM on 08/16/2009
So you advocate not putting out forest fires?
01:46 PM on 08/14/2009
Once our wilderness lands are gone they're gone.

Republican­s are so unAmerican when it comes to our wilderness legacy.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HLL
A smile is the beginning of peace ☮
12:19 PM on 08/14/2009
Thank you, Mr. President. You are making good on your promise to help the environmen­t!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Merrimack
11:26 AM on 08/14/2009
One of the primary purposes of the National Forests is for their lumber. As lumber is a necessary resource for our civilized society, they were protected so they could be managed to guarantee an unending supply. They were not primarily protected to make environmen­talist feel good or to give folks a place to have picnics. National parks on the other hand were designated to protect the eco-system­.

Building logging roads through them is necessary to use the forests as intended.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
11:56 AM on 08/14/2009
When's the last time you've been thought a National Forest after a cut? The lumber companies cut roads on steep grades, resulting in a lot of erosion. Then they clear cut, so the land doesn't produce timber quality trees for decades.

You don't find them treating the land like that on their own property.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Merrimack
02:15 PM on 08/14/2009
I was just in the Olympic National Forest above Port Angelas in June. I agree its very disturbing to see the clear cut areas. As I just recently was made aware of the original purpose of these forests I thought I would pass along my new found knowledge.

Would it be great if we never touched these forests; absolutely­, However, our need for wood will likely never go away and it has to come from somewhere. I am just as bad as the next person as I love real wood furniture and floors.
11:56 AM on 08/14/2009
Priorities change - we now value forests for much more than building materials. They protect water, cool the planet, and provide the ecosystems necessary for wildlife.

Speaking as someone who attended the NY State College of Forestry at Syracuse University & knows a few things about the field, I'm very happy to see economic profit finally yielding to other values in the national administra­tion of our forests.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:43 AM on 08/14/2009
Everybody is so concerned with carbon offsetting­. Our National Forests are like a savings account in addition to being nice places to visit. Rather than send money to the amazon rain forest for reforestat­ion send it to the National Garden Club which has been running "Penny Pines" since 1941. For a $68 contributi­on you 350 trees are planted by volunteers in the National Forest of your choice by volunteers and then taken care of for 5 years by the Forest Service until they are establishe­d. A bargain.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
RazeTemple
10:02 AM on 08/14/2009
I love you, Mr. President.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:50 AM on 08/14/2009
This just about had to happen, didn't it?
05:44 AM on 08/14/2009
The Guns, Timber, Beer and Top Fuel lobby can't be happy this.
photo
mlaiuppa
Pres. Sarcasm Society. Like we need your approval.
02:12 AM on 08/14/2009
So they're saving Wyoming...­but allowing roads in Alaska.

Take that, Sarah.
11:25 PM on 08/13/2009
hooray common sense from the white house, at last
04:04 PM on 08/14/2009
where's the common sense? I have'nt seen any yet from this administra­tion
09:55 PM on 08/13/2009
Now we need to insist that our largest National Forest, the Tongass, be included.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SilviaMaria
09:14 PM on 08/13/2009
Great news!