iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Release Of Abdel Baset al-Megrahi, Lockerbie Bomber, A "Mistake": Says Obama (SLIDESHOW)

First Posted: 09/20/09 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 02:50 PM ET

EDINBURGH, Scotland (AP) — Scotland freed the terminally ill Lockerbie bomber on compassionate grounds Thursday, letting the Libyan go home to die despite American pleas to show no mercy for the man responsible for the 1988 attack that killed 270 people.

U.S. President Barack Obama declared the decision to release Abdel Baset al-Megrahi "a mistake," and said he should be placed under house arrest on his return to Libya, rather the feted with a hero's welcome.

Al-Megrahi, 57, left Scotland's Greenock Prison and flew to Libya on an Airbus sent to Glasgow Airport, still insisting he was innocent.

"We have been in contact with the Scottish government indicating that we objected to this," Obama said in an interview from the White House with Philadelphia-based radio talk show host Michael Smerconish. "And we thought it was a mistake."

Obama said his administration had called on Libya to ensure that al-Megrahi is "not welcomed back in some way, but instead should be under house arrest."

Announcing the release, Scotland's justice secretary insisted freeing the Pan Am Flight 103 bomber was an expression of the Scottish people's humanity -- a decision rejected by many in the U.S.

"I think it's appalling, disgusting and so sickening I can hardly find words to describe it," said Susan Cohen, of Cape May Court House, New Jersey, whose 20-year-old daughter Theodora died in the attack. "This isn't about compassionate release. This is part of give-Gadhafi-what-he-wants-so-we-can-have-the-oil."

Some men outside the prison made obscene gestures as al-Megrahi's prison van drove by toward the airport.

Al-Megrahi, who had served only eight years of his life sentence, was recently given only months to live after being diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer.

Scottish Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill said although al-Megrahi had not shown compassion to his victims -- many of whom were American college students flying home to New York for Christmas -- MacAskill was motivated by Scottish values to show mercy.

"Some hurts can never heal, some scars can never fade," MacAskill said. "Those who have been bereaved cannot be expected to forget, let alone forgive ... However, Mr. al-Megrahi now faces a sentence imposed by a higher power."

Al-Megrahi was convicted in 2001 of taking part in the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 on Dec. 21, 1988. He was sentenced to life in prison. The airliner exploded over Scotland and all 259 people aboard and 11 on the ground died when it crashed into the town of Lockerbie.

The former Libyan intelligence officer was sentenced to serve a minimum of 27 years in a Scottish prison for Britain's deadliest terrorist attack. But a 2007 review of his case found grounds for an appeal of his conviction, and many in Britain believe he is innocent.

In a statement following his release, al-Megrahi protested his innocence. "I say in the clearest possible terms, which I hope every person in every land will hear -- all of this I have had to endure for something that I did not do," he said.

Al-Megrahi's conviction was largely based on the testimony of a shopkeeper who identified him as having bought a man's shirt in his store in Malta. Scraps of the garment were later found wrapped around a timing device discovered in the wreckage of the airliner. Critics of al-Megrahi's conviction question the reliability of the store owner's evidence.

In his statement, al-Megrahi said he believed the truth behind the Lockerbie bombing may now never be known.

"I had most to gain and nothing to lose about the whole truth coming out -- until my diagnosis of cancer," he said, referring to an appeal against his conviction that he dropped in order to be freed. "To those victims' relatives who can bear to hear me say this, they continue to have my sincere sympathy for the unimaginable loss that they have suffered."

MacAskill said he stood by al-Megrahi's conviction for "the worst terrorist atrocity ever committed on U.K. soil."

He said he had ruled out sending the bomber back to Libya under a prisoner-transfer agreement, saying the U.S. victims had been given assurances that al-Megrahi would serve out his sentence in Scotland. But he said that as a prisoner given less than three months to live by doctors, al-Megrahi was eligible for compassionate release.

Compassionate release is an established feature of the British and Scottish judicial systems when a prisoner is near death. According to officials, there have been 30 requests for release on compassionate grounds in Scotland over the last decade, 23 of which were approved. Scotland, which is part of Britain, has a separate legal system.

"I don't understand how the Scots can show compassion. It's an utter insult and utterly disgusting," said Kara Weipz, of Mount Laurel, New Jersey, whose 20-year-old brother Richard Monetti was on board Flight 103. "It's horrible. I don't show compassion for someone who showed no remorse."

Al-Megrahi's return will be a landmark event in Libya. His countrymen see him as an innocent victim scapegoated by the West in a campaign to turn their country into an international pariah. Many will also view his release as a moral victory for their country.

He will arrive Thursday night at Meetiga military airport on the outskirts of Tripoli, the Libyan capital. A few hundred Libyan youths prepared to greet him, with Libyan songs blaring in the background. Some were dressed in T-shirts bearing al-Megrahi's picture and carried placards with his image. Others carried rolled up Libyan flags or miniature blue-and-white Scottish flags.

"I'm happy" about his release, said Mohammed, one of the youth group members who would only give his first name.

It was not immediately clear whether al-Megrahi would be taken to meet Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi or go directly to a hospital for medical care.

Gadhafi engineered a rapprochement with his former critics following the Sept. 11 attacks. He renounced terrorism, dismantled Libya's secret nuclear program, accepted his government's responsibility for the Lockerbie bombing and paid compensation to the victims' families.

Western energy companies -- including Britain's BP PLC -- have moved into Libya in an effort to tap the country's vast oil and gas wealth.

Gadhafi lobbied hard for the return of al-Megrahi, an issue which took on an added sense of urgency when al-Megrahi was diagnosed with cancer last year.

Al-Megrahi was a well-known figure in the Scottish community near his prison, receiving regular treatment at the hospital and visited often by his wife and children, who lived in Scotland for several years.

Briton Jim Swire, whose daughter Flora died on Flight 103, welcomed the Libyan's release, saying many questions remained about what led to the bomb that exploded in the cargo hold.

"I think he should be able to go straight home to his family and spend his last days there," Swire told the BBC. "I don't believe for a moment this man was involved in the way he was found to be involved."

Among the Lockerbie victims was John Mulroy, the AP's director of international communication, who died along with five members of his family.

____

Associated Press Writers Tarek El-Tablawy in Tripoli, Libya, Geoff Mulvihill in Mount Laurel, New Jersey, Shawn Marsh in Trenton, New Jersey, Meera Selva in London, Matthew Lee in Washington, Jessica M. Pasko in Albany, New York, Jim Hannah in Dayton, Ohio, and Robert Burns, in Washington, contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

EDINBURGH, Scotland (AP) — Scotland freed the terminally ill Lockerbie bomber on compassionate grounds Thursday, letting the Libyan go home to die despite American pleas to show no mercy for the...
EDINBURGH, Scotland (AP) — Scotland freed the terminally ill Lockerbie bomber on compassionate grounds Thursday, letting the Libyan go home to die despite American pleas to show no mercy for the...
Filed by Hanna Ingber Win  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,418
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (26 total)
04:12 PM on 08/27/2009
Why do Americans beleive their point of view is the only valid one,you are such sheep ,some empty suit tells you how to think and you queue up for it,get real investigate the damn thing.The truth is out there,but it is not a pleasant truth,having to swallow that US/UK and other inteligence services are up to their necks in the lockerbie bombing.

A good place to start would be to google the maltese double cross,I have no doubt it will not change the minds of those baying for blood but it may give some with a mind of their own some food for thought.
08:33 AM on 08/22/2009
The whingers in the White House should pause for a moment and reflect on the very strong possibility that if the US hadn’t shot down Iranian Flight 655 in 1988 killing all 290 on board, an action that was rewarded with medals rather than punishment, there may not have been a Lockerbie tragedy six months later.

Reprieve’s director Clive Stafford-Smith overturned the flawed convictions of more than 100 prisoners wrongly sentenced to death for supposed capital offences on US’ Death Rows: nearly half of those Mr Megrahi is supposed to have killed but wrongly sentenced to death by fellow US citizens and only reprieved by the work of one concerned British lawyer.

What the US public only cares about is retributive justice: i.e. revenge. They had a man behind bars, regardless of the facts, and that was good enough for them.

Professor Dr. Stanley Collymore.
11:24 PM on 08/27/2009
Interesting.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
henrywolff
01:40 PM on 08/21/2009
Likely what happened here is that UK/BP manipulated nutty SNP into doing this, likely without the MacAskill/SNP even being fully awares. SNP is so twisted around by inferiority complex, anti-UK/Americanism and politically motivated anti-Iraq war leftovers that they don't know which way is up. Fertile group for the boys from BP/MI-6 to have their way with them.
06:27 AM on 08/22/2009
I'm presuming you are an American, because you're so totally ignorant of the facts in this case.

It became evident to Scottish prosecutors and others there that the evidence against this man was flimsy at best. I have seen on TV (BBC of course) relatives of Scots killed in the bombing and crash state that they believe he is innocent.

Somehow our press has neglected to inform us, or the relatives of the American victims, of these facts. Facts which suggest that the real criminals are safe and laughing somewhere.

Do we care? What, are we sissies?

Many of my fellow citizens, I'd expect, might not even be swayed by these facts -- there's some kind of irrational chamber in the American personality that requires that someone get whacked in retribution -- even if he or she is not the right party.

That was evident in the run-up to the Iraq war, when many Americans ignored the very clear evidence that Saddam had nothing to do with 911. No matter, someone identifiably Muslim had to pay the price.

So we shouldn't be surprised that much of the world sees us as a heavily armed, bellowing bully likely to hit anyone for some reason apparent only to ourselves.

See Mencken Boobus Americanus.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
henrywolff
09:47 AM on 08/22/2009
I bet the answer to every question for you is "Americans are idiots."

He was convicted. Evidence was circumstantial, which you need to be in the courtroom to properly evaluate. The jury did and they convicted him.

All the 'experts' saying he was innocent, well, nearly all of them weren't there. But people get convicted on the basis of circumstantial evidence all the time.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Damaven
11:43 AM on 08/21/2009
Read this from thesmokinggun:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2009/0820093lockerbie1.html

I tell you, some Clinicians were from Libya. What the @#$%
12:12 PM on 08/21/2009
What's the problem with that? He is a Libyan national involved in a high profile case.

It is perfectly reasonable for Libyan physicians to examine him and give their opinion on his medical condition.

And I'll point out that all the doctors, Libyan or Scottish, were in agreement.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ergon
Man From Atlan
10:41 AM on 08/21/2009
President Obama ought to realize he isn't the president of Scotland, and thank goodness for that!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
eden4barack08
Yes WE can!!!
11:13 AM on 08/21/2009
President Obama is only giving his OPINION, which is based on representing HIS constituents, more specifically the families of those who lost their loved ones and feel that a guilty man is being given the compassion their sons and daughters were not given.

ALL he said is that he feels this is a mistake, he has a right to express an opinion without being the president of Scotland, does he not?
Had it been the Bush administration, Scotland would be boycotted and listed in the "axis of e.vil", would you have preferred that?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
eden4barack08
Yes WE can!!!
12:19 PM on 08/21/2009
President Obama is only giving his OPINION, which is based on representing HIS constituents, more specifically the families of those who lost their loved ones and feel that a guilty man is being given the compassion their sons and daughters were not given.

ALL he said is that he feels this is a mistake, he has a right to express an opinion without being the president of Scotland, does he not?
Had it been the Bush administration, Scotland would be boycotted and listed in the "ax.is of e.vil", would you have preferred that?
10:28 AM on 08/21/2009
THE SCOTTISH GOVT.have turned this Terrorist now to a some-kind of- a HERO to his people .
REWARDING BAD -VERY BAD BEHAVIOR SENDS A WRONG MESAGE TO [VERY BAD PEOPLE ][GROUPS]=TERRORIST ???
10:23 AM on 08/21/2009
The ability to feel compassion for those who have harmed us is what distinguishes us from terr'rsts.
12:21 PM on 08/25/2009
Did Scottish prisons release other canncer patients? Come on Scotland, show some compassion, release them all.
12:27 PM on 08/25/2009
correcttion: cancer
08:40 AM on 08/21/2009
Here is a Guardian story which sums up the most important parts of the SCCRC's findings: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2007/jun/17/politics.lockerbie1
08:39 AM on 08/21/2009
Lastly, there are serious, serious doubts over Megrahi's conviction.

In 2007, the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission gave Megrahi leave to pursue another appeal, as they had several serious concerns about his conviction.

You can read their full decision here: http://www.sccrc.org.uk/ViewFile.aspx?id=293
08:35 AM on 08/21/2009
We lost people on the ground; Lockerbie was utterly devastated. We are a small country and this tragedy affected us hugely. Our countryside was burning. The most offensive thing about all of this is the attitude that somehow we didn't feel it as much as the US. Many families of the victims believe Megrahi is innocent, as do many people in Lockerbie.

You do not have a monopoly on grief and pain. This isn't a case of a country which has no idea and no right to do this releasing him; this is a case of the country where the plane landed, a country which lost entire families in the blink of an eye, a country where the people of the town that was devastated assisted the police in searching for bodies and evidence, showing compassion. And I will never, ever be ashamed of that.
08:35 AM on 08/21/2009
5) Kenny McAskill is the Justice Secretary of Scotland; he is NOT a judge.

6) Megrahi has been examined by several Scottish doctors and they have also consulted cancer experts on their findings. His cancer has metastasised to his spine; he has only a few months left to live.

7) Scotland has our own sizeable oil reserves in the North Sea. We are a small country (with a population smaller than New York) and we do not need anywhere near as much oil as somewhere like the US, or even just ONE of your states. The UK government had no influence on this decision. To suggest that his release had anything to do with getting Libyan oil is ludicrous.

8) And I can't believe this needs to be pointed out, but this crime was committed in our airspace and on our soil. He was tried under Scots law, and any question of his release was our business and our business ALONE. The US had no right to interefere, and there is nothing more your government could have or should have done. Just because you are a superpower does not mean you get to overrule the accepted laws of another smaller country.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
henrywolff
10:07 AM on 08/21/2009
Believe me, when the world thinks of the Scots, 'compassion' is not a word that jumps to mind.

To think that this was due to 'compassion' and not 'quid pro quo' is simply mindboggling.

Pressure was brought to bear and god-knows-what deals were made on behalf of BP/UK to make this happen.
10:26 AM on 08/21/2009
Dining table.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daniel Wilkes
12:09 PM on 08/21/2009
Do you seriously think that the Scottish Nationalist Government in Edinburgh, which wants an independent Scotland and views the UK government at Westminster with thinly disguised hatred, would do anything to further the cause of the United Kingdom?
08:34 AM on 08/21/2009
I feel need to point out a few facts to temper some of the ignorance being shown here.

1) Scotland has it's own legal system, and has had ever since the act of union in 1707. Part of the act of union settlement was that we would get to keep our own legal system and our own education system. Just as a bit of trivia, a three year degree is standard in England, whereas a four year degree is the standard in Scotland.

2) Release on compassionate grounds is a standard part of the Scottish justice system, and would always have been carried out through the same process as this. It is just that this particular prisoner was high profile. Which leads me to...

3) Megrahi was NOT released under the prisoner transfer agreement that Westminster negotiated with Libya. Under that agreement, a transfer cannot take place when there are ongoing legal proceedings. While Megrahi had dropped his appeal, the Crown Office had an ongoing appeal against his sentence, and therefore a prisoner transfer would have been illegal. If you watch Kenny McAskill's full speech, he outlines this quite clearly.

4) Under devolution, the UK government has absolutely no right to influence or interfere in this decision. Kenny McAskill though, in an unnecessary but considerate move, asked if Westminster would like to make representations about any possible release. The UK government refused to do so.
06:43 AM on 08/21/2009
I'm always struck and the ignorance -- encouraged by our "infotainment" industry that substitutes for news -- that keeps my country's people so ignorant.

Many Scottish victims' relatives have learned that the evidence against this man was suspect, and that he might not have killed their relatives.

Americans remain uninformed and clueless.

And there's a darker side to our typically knee-jerk reactions. We have a deep, deep streak of dumbness that our politicians can rely on, unfortunately.

I heard many people, before the Iraq invasion, say that they didn't care if Saddam was involved in 911 -- someone Muslim needed to pay the price so we could extract revenge on someone. They remind me of people who want "convicted" people executed or jailed even after DNA tests have proved them innocent.
06:36 AM on 08/21/2009
"despite American pleas to show no mercy". NO MERCY? Are we monsters now?
"U.S. President Barack Obama declared the decision to release Abdel Baset al-Megrahi a mistake". Well, pal, sorry to disagree.
06:00 AM on 08/21/2009
Now you know what it's like to be perceived as COLLATERAL DAMAGE.

Professor Dr. Stanley Collymore.