More

Lockerbie Bomber Release Threatens Scottish Relations With U.S.

BEN McCONVILLE   08/24/09 10:27 PM ET   AP

Lockerbie

EDINBURGH, Scotland — Scotland's justice minister on Monday defended his much-criticized decision to free the Lockerbie bomber, as the U.S. State Department said that though it disagreed "passionately" the move would not affect relations between America and Britain.

The Scottish administration has faced unrelenting criticism from the both the U.S. government and the families of American victims of the 1988 airline bombing since it announced last week it was freeing Abdel Baset al-Megrahi on compassionate grounds. The terminally ill al-Megrahi, who has prostate cancer, returned to his native Libya on Thursday, where he was greeted by crowds waving Libyan and Scottish flags.

The United States will stand by Britain, even though it believes the decision was a mistake, State Department spokesman Ian Kelly told reporters.

"We made it quite clear that we disagreed passionately with this decision, because we thought it sent the wrong signal to, not only the families, but also to terrorists, But I really discourage you from thinking that we necessarily have to have some kind of tit-for-tat retaliation because of it. I just don't see it – not with Britain. Not with Scotland either," Kelly said.

Kelly's words follow days of criticism from top U.S. officials.

Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill doggedly defended the decision Monday, but said Libya had broken a promise by giving the convicted terrorist a hero's welcome. Scottish lawmakers came back from summer vacation a week early for an emotional debate on the issue.

Britain, meanwhile, scrapped a trade visit to Libya by Prince Andrew amid controversy over the release.

MacAskill said the warm homecoming for al-Megrahi breached assurances from Libyan authorities that "any return would be dealt with in a low-key and sensitive fashion."

"It is a matter of great regret that Mr. (al-) Megrahi was received in such an inappropriate manner," MacAskill told the Scottish parliament. "It showed no compassion or sensitivity to the families of the 270 victims of Lockerbie."

A member of the Libyan government's negotiating team who took part in the talks about al-Megrahi's release told The Associated Press that the Libyan government had not organized al-Megrahi's reception and had not broken any agreement with Scotland. The official did not want to be identified due to the sensitivity of the issue.

He said no government official met al-Megrahi at the airport and pointed out that Gadhafi's son, Seif al-Islam Gadhafi, who traveled with al-Megrahi on the plane, is not a government official.

The official said the crowd that threw rose petals and cheered al-Megrahi at the airport heard of his return through the media and spontaneously chose to greet him, he said.

By Libyan standards, al-Megrahi's welcome was relatively muted. Hundreds of people waiting in the crowd for his plane were rushed away by authorities at the last minute, and the arrival was not aired live on state TV.

Back in Scotland, MacAskill said his decision to free al Megrahi "was not based on political, economic or diplomatic considerations."

"This was my decision and my decision alone," he said. "I stand by it and I live with the consequences."

The decision has prompted calls for a trade boycott of Scotland and widespread criticism of the nationalist government in Edinburgh.

Scottish people were ashamed "to see our flag flying to welcome a convicted bomber home," Labour legislator Iain Gray told the parliament.

In a strongly worded letter to the Scottish government, FBI director Robert Mueller said al-Megrahi's release gave comfort to terrorists, while Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, said releasing the bomber was "obviously a political decision."

The explosion of a bomb hidden in the cargo hold of Pan Am Flight 103 over the Scottish town of Lockerbie killed all 259 people on the plane – most of them American – and 11 people on the ground. Al-Megrahi, a former Libyan intelligence agent, is the only person convicted of the bombing.

Compassionate release is a regular feature of the Scottish system when a prisoner is near death. Of the 31 applications over the last decade, 24 prisoners have been freed on compassionate grounds in Scotland, including al-Megrahi. Another seven applications were turned down because the medical evidence did not support the claim.

Top British cancer specialists say al-Megrahi has less than three months to live.

Scotland is part of Britain but has its own parliament – established in 1999 – with power over large areas of policy, including justice, health and education. The British Parliament in London retains primacy on all matters relating to Britain as a whole, such as defense, energy and foreign relations.

Scotland's nationalist administration has vowed to hold a referendum on full independence from Britain. Some lawmakers have called for MacAskill to resign over his decision. No vote was taken during Monday's 75-minute session, but some Scottish politicians say they will seek a confidence vote when the parliament begins its fall session next week – one that could potentially bring down the minority government.

The British government has fiercely refuted claims that al-Megrahi's release was intended to boost business ties between Britain and Libya, which has vast oil reserves. Such suspicions were heightened after Libyan President Moammar Gadhafi thanked Brown and Queen Elizabeth II by name for "encouraging" the Scottish government to free al-Megrahi.

Business Secretary Peter Mandelson said the suggestion there had been a deal was "completely implausible and actually quite offensive."

Kelly said the U.S. was not aware that any commercial interests between Britain and Libya played a role in the decision to release al-Megrahi.

"You have multiple senior British officials who have denied this. And I will take what they said on face value," Kelly said.

He warned that the U.S. relationship with Libya now depended in part on how Libya handles the situation.

"We had made it quite clear to the Libyan government, both publicly and privately, that we're going to be watching very closely how they receive this man," he said. "And if they continue to lionize him in a public fashion, that these kinds of public demonstrations can only have a profoundly negative effect on our relationship."

Prince Andrew has visited Libya several times in his role as a British trade ambassador and his office said last week that a trip for next month was in the planning stages. But Buckingham Palace said Monday there were no plans now for the prince to visit Libya.

A spokesman for Brown said al-Megrahi's release was "a uniquely sensitive and difficult decision" – and one for Scottish officials.

_____

Associated Press Writers Jill Lawless in London and Khaled El-Deeb in Tripoli contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

EDINBURGH, Scotland — Scotland's justice minister on Monday defended his much-criticized decision to free the Lockerbie bomber, as the U.S. State Department said that though it disagreed "passio...
EDINBURGH, Scotland — Scotland's justice minister on Monday defended his much-criticized decision to free the Lockerbie bomber, as the U.S. State Department said that though it disagreed "passio...
Filed by Hanna Ingber Win  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 128
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
03:58 PM on 09/03/2009
US leaders should really re-think their stance on whether relations with Britain should remain the same in light of the fact that recently disclosed communications between GB and Scotland indicate that oil was a part of GB's stance to not oppose Megrahi's release. Additionally, the White House should, in keeping with Obama's campaign promise to lead an open government, stop blocking the release of communications that US leaders had with Scotland prior to Megrahi's release. The current WH position does of not releasing the statements and having no plans to alter relations does nothing but raise suspicions over what the US's position truly was. If the US strongly opposed his release the actual release of communications showing this might bring some comfort to the families of the victims who were so clearly denied justice.

For more stories and information on this story please visit the American Principles Project blog at: http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/tags/lockerbie-bomber/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ergon
Man From Atlan
02:57 PM on 08/25/2009
When the US shot down the Iranian Airbus, the victims families received $300,000 for 'earners' and $150,000 for 'non-earners'.
The families of the Lockerbie bombing's victims received $10 million EACH, regardless of their status.
Once again, we are reminded that American lives are worth more than any others..
11:42 AM on 08/25/2009
At the moment the US has a higher percentage of it's population in prison than either the regimes of Stalin or Hitler. You have such a perfect judicial system and have such confidence in it that the US is the only advanced country to still have the death penalty.

Scotland is a small country and is aware that it's legal system is fallible and therefore is prepared to exercise clemency, to show mercy. Both the Catholic Church in Scotland and the Church of Scotland have voiced support of Scotland's decision to deal mercifully with a dying man. It was a decent decision. Scotland is not a player on the world stage and is one of the few countries involved that is not cutting deals with Libya.
Americans who are angered by this decision need to ask themselves why they feel such emotion at a display of compassion. If this same man had been publicly dismembered would you feel comforted?
What does this say about you?
08:58 AM on 08/25/2009
I understand being compassionate, but isn't he still a convicted terrorist until proven otherwise? And there are other ways to be compassionate without nullifying the evidence against him. Family visits or even a visit back home before he dies. But not total freedom. By conflating the two - his cancer and his guilt - they are basically saying that he is innocent by sending him home to die.
12:03 PM on 08/25/2009
You don't understand compassion. He was convicted. He is dying. Compassion for the innocent is easy.
08:52 AM on 08/25/2009
We Americans are ignorant of history and arrogant into the bargain. Libya and the USA were the major sources of support for Irish terrorist attacks on the UK for many years. Libya is now being sued in the courts. The USA should be answerable for encouraging terrorist fund-raising here.
08:44 AM on 08/25/2009
Americans really need to understand that, in their support for terrorism, they are no better than Libya. Both the USA and Libya supported Irish terrorist attacks on the UK with substantial amounts of cash and material. Unlike citizens the USA, Scotland does not finance international terror.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wisdo
semantics shamantics
08:02 AM on 08/25/2009
Here we go again.

From now on Scotch will be known as Freedom Water,
Scottish terriers will become 'Democracy Dogs'
FInally doing a Sean Connery impression will be outlawed (overdue, that one).
07:29 AM on 08/25/2009
Prince Andrew should take his own advice and let Scotland go free after hundreds of years of domination. Yes boycott Scotland
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deluk
hot mess...
09:04 AM on 08/25/2009
Scotland will "go free" (leave the union) when Scotland votes for it, they haven't yet, and Prince Andrew will have **** all to do with it.

readBOOKSgetCLEVER
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mazzetta
06:47 AM on 08/25/2009
Mr Berlusconi on the contrary is going to celebrate the anniversary of Gadhafi dictatorship, bringing also the Italian airforce acrobatic patrol to celebrate him

italy (as US) is signing lots of contracts with Lybia, who cares if Lybia is a dictatorship and lacks of free media and usual basic freedoms?

let the money flow in the right pockets under the usual veil of hypocrisis
photo
kapalabhati
Lokah Samasta Sukhino Bhavantu
06:43 AM on 08/25/2009
The Libyans broke a "promise" not to give him a heroes welcome. Kenny, these are the people who BOMBED A PLANE and killed hundreds, and you take offense at their breaking a promise. No right winger here, but Scotland was wrong, wrong, wrong. Their release of this prisoner is indefensible.
06:13 AM on 08/25/2009
So Andrew pulls out of going to Libya. Big deal. I say one thing for these "royal" scroungers though, they sure as hell know on which side their very expensive bread is buttered.

Professor Dr. Stanley Collymore.
06:10 AM on 08/25/2009
Instead of just threatening to boycott Scotland and Scottish goods the US should go one further and pull their sorry A*SS*S out of the UK entirely. Like removing all of your bases there.

And even though defence is the remit of the central UK government the Scottish government should call for a referendum to insist that no US bases or military flight encroach on sovereign Scottish territory.

A significant number of soldiers; the Scottish government should now recall all of them thus hastening your VIETNAM 2, as there's no doubt that the Afghans will whip your backsides just as they did the Soviets and as the Vietcong did with you.

So go ahead and boycott. Can’t say I'd be sorry to see the back of you Yanks.

Professor Dr. Stanley Collymore.
06:03 AM on 08/25/2009
Utter CR*P. The US and UK relationship will remain the same with the US consistently ignoring the UK until it needs it as a cover for its global atrocities and imperialist acts; and the UK quite willing to abide with this as it enables it to delude itself that it's still an imperial power with global influence.

Both attitudes are asinine and the Scottish government thank Heavens, have showed us the way forward in this poodle and poodle-master relationship that for decades the UK central government has created and deluded itself about.

Professor Dr. Stanley Collymore.
05:55 AM on 08/25/2009
Scotland has NOTHING to defend. It's government and particularly it's Justice Minister Kevin Macaskill made the correct decision and I wholeheartedly applaud him.

Professor Dr. Stanley Collymore.
05:11 AM on 08/25/2009
Ronnie Biggs, was recently release from his prison sentence on compassionate grounds and so there is precedence. the UK government was the final decider and they must have gotten some concession from the Libyans in return for Abdel Baset al-Megrahi release.

The UK government is simply using the “Scotland is a country” argument as a cover. Such big decision wouldn't have been left to Scotland (like the bailing of Scottish banks). Beside, outside the UK, FIFA, and EUFA, how many people know wee Scotland as a country?
05:37 AM on 08/25/2009
"they must have gotten some concession from the Libyans in return for Abdel Baset al-Megrahi release."

They did. Al-Megrahi dropped the appeal that would have brought all the pigeons home to roost.
06:39 PM on 08/25/2009
silly idea! Scotland has an independent judiciary and has always had one. The Scots make their own decisions about legal matters and dont kow-tow to either the English government or the Americans in this area. As to who has heard of Scotland....well, i doubt many Americans havel they seem to know very little about anywhere outside their own borders despite an infinite desire to meddle in other peoples' affairs! Some of the stuff I have read about the NHS, for example, is little more than fiction. Engage brain before opening mouth please!