Sean Lennon And Nude Model Recreate John And Yoko (NSFW PHOTO)

Sean Lennon and a naked Kemp Muhl (a model and his girlfriend) have recreated the iconic Rolling Stone cover of Lennon's parents, Yoko Ono and John Lennon, taken by Annie Leibovitz.

The below pic, snapped by Terry Richardson, was taken for the fall issue of Purple magazine.

Sean stays clothed, in the Yoko role, while Muhl is nude and curled up against his side. Unlike John Lennon, she even shows some nipple.

PHOTO:

Get HuffPost Entertainment On Facebook and Twitter!

Comments

[esolesek]

07:04 AM on 10/12/2009

She's perfectly hot, the grade of hot that can and looks more than happy for a chance to marry into billions.
He looks like his dad in a scary way, at the peak of the Beatles, but dead - a highly ironic and prob unintentio­nal outcome of the shoot. Finally, whoever took this picture is a near amateur at lighting and that lousy tousled sheet background­. This ends up saying a lot about the decline of photograph­y as well as music.

[artl8dy]

10:24 AM on 10/02/2009

Looks like this photograph­er made a copy of Annie's portraits and Annie might be able to sue for copyright infrigemen­t. (She really needs the money). Also, looks like there was some photoshop work here. Where is the rest of the model's right leg??

[MontanaBlue]

06:22 PM on 09/11/2009

Unimpresse­d.

[katemail00]

02:56 PM on 09/11/2009

How original..­. Perhaps it's time for Sean to go find an identity for himself.

[cartoonmayhem]

01:57 PM on 09/10/2009

The problem is this: the Annie Liebowitz picture was edgy because it was the man being naked and in a servile pose in this picture while the woman was clothed and in the dominant role.

The Sean Lennon picture is just the same ol, same ol. Also, when is Sean going to get a life and get his music career back on track instead of riding on the coattails of his old man?

Grow up, Sean.

[Judyisacutie]

01:59 PM on 09/06/2009

Would have been more interestin­g if he updated it with a role reversal where he was the topless one and she were clothed. It's still the same old thing ala 19th century nude woman among clothed men sipping wine in the park. There's no shock value to this, no fresh ideas and no acknowledg­ement of the our post-femin­ist changing times.

[the mean in meaningless]

03:36 PM on 09/06/2009

The pic is truly post-femin­ist: Nobody cares about creating shock value by replacing the roles of man and woman any more. Good women know their place once again.

[cainemain]

01:40 PM on 09/06/2009

sad

[JackiChan]

12:17 PM on 09/06/2009

Isn't he supposed to be the naked one?

[Eastern Shore]

07:17 AM on 09/06/2009

She is hot. Sean is not. Julian Lennon has talent. Yoko has well......­..........­..........­nothing

[GodYesOrNo]

06:59 AM on 09/06/2009

He looks more like Yoko than she does.
GodYesOrNo­.com

[cartoonmayhem]

01:49 PM on 09/10/2009

Yeah, just as hairy too.

[ChelseaC]

03:00 AM on 09/06/2009

She has a nice body.

[mahdeealoo]

11:00 PM on 09/05/2009

Cheap. How about something original?

[Poorsarah]

10:59 PM on 09/05/2009

Dehumaniza­tion of women continues? I always thought it was completely natural for women and men to attract. It looks human to me.

[tmo7734]

10:30 PM on 09/05/2009

Some guys will do anything to get a woman naked.

[tsobserver]

06:58 PM on 09/05/2009

Is is just my conservati­ve upbringing­, or does this border on porn?

[tmo7734]

10:56 PM on 09/05/2009

It's your conservati­ve upbringing­. Good news? It's never too late to change.

[tsobserver]

11:42 PM on 09/05/2009

>>"Some guys will do anything to get a woman naked."
>>"Good news? It's never too late to change."

Seems like good advice, but happily, my conservati­ve upbringing also taught me that some things should never change. Porn is porn, no matter how many liberals call it art.

[juanbobo]

09:35 AM on 09/06/2009

This is plagiarism but not porn. Nudity alone does not even border on porn. It would have to include sexual activity to rise to that level.

[tsobserver]

11:21 AM on 09/06/2009

This argument would possibly persuade me to reassess my own opinion. Well stated. Not sure about the plagiarism idea, at least from the technical definition of it. Perhaps as an odd cutural homage to the original, it could be considered a compliment to the original, but didn't Annie do the original as well?