Leon Panetta's Job Is Secure Despite Losing High-Profile Battles Over CIA Missteps

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Leon Panetta's Job Is Secure Despite Losing High-Profile Battles Over CIA Missteps stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

PAMELA HESS | 09/ 4/09 11:05 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this Feb. 25, 2009 file photo, CIA Director Leon Panetta speaks with reporters at CIA Headquarters in Langley, Va. Panetta has been on the losing end of a string of high-profile battles over the agency's past missteps, stoking questions about the ultimate bureaucratic insider's future at a time when his agency is under intense public scrutiny. But despite the rumors, intelligence officials close to Panetta insisted Friday that he is not going anywhere, saying he retains a comfortable perch in Obama's inner circle. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, file)

WASHINGTON — CIA Director Leon Panetta has been on the losing end of a string of high-profile battles over the agency's past missteps, stoking questions about the ultimate bureaucratic insider's future at a time when his agency is under intense public scrutiny.

A Washington veteran with a reputation as a hard-nosed infighter, Panetta lost battles with Attorney General Eric Holder, first over the release of long-classified interrogation records and, then late last month, over Holder's decision to investigate some agency officials involved in Bush-era interrogations of terror detainees.

The Obama administration's decisions to overrule Panetta's attempts at protecting the agency's secrets and some of its personnel spurred a report that the CIA chief threatened to resign.

But intelligence officials close to Panetta insisted Friday that he is not going anywhere, saying he retains a comfortable perch in Obama's inner circle.

"The stories that have been out there about shouting matches and threats to resign are wrong, pure and simple," said CIA spokesman Paul Gimigliano.

According to one senior intelligence official, several senior Obama administration officials told Panetta at the White House this week that the spy agency's work was vital and appreciated.

According to the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to reveal internal White House discussions, administration officials felt the assurance was necessary to offer in the wake of Holder's controversial Aug. 24 decision to investigate whether CIA interrogators broke laws against torture during the Bush administration.

Tension between the two agencies, officials said, built up over the summer as Holder mulled the decision and peaked once he had made up his mind.

Story continues below
advertisement

The senior intelligence official said that Panetta urged Holder several times not to appoint a prosecutor, opposing any reopening of cases because lawyers from the Bush administration's Justice Department had already made the decision five years ago to decline prosecutions.

In Panetta's view, the official said, those issues had already been decided, and the review would be a distraction for the CIA.

Panetta again called Holder the morning of the Aug. 24 announcement and the two men had a brief conversation, the official said. Despite several subsequent news reports that the conversation grew heated and was laced with obscenities, the official backed Gimigliano's account that there were no curse words or arguments. Panetta had a simple message for Holder, the official said, asking that the probe be narrowly focused and as short-lived as possible.

On that front, Panetta has been satisfied, according to the official. Holder assigned the review to John Durham, who is nearly two years into an investigation into the CIA's destruction of interrogation videotapes. Little information, if any, has leaked about that probe, and Durham was not given the wide-ranging investigative powers of a special prosecutor.

Several Washington veterans who have observed Panetta say he accepted a thankless mission from Obama – point man for a president intent on tightening a leash on the CIA after its officials spearheaded harsh interrogations and secret prisons during the Bush era.

"Seeing how he has handled it, he hasn't been flawless. But given the CIA being attacked by a Democratic Congress particularly on the House side I'd be hard-pressed to think of a better guy to lead this agency," said Fran Townsend, President George W. Bush's former homeland security and counterterrorism adviser.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., who heads the Senate Intelligence Committee, gives Panetta high marks for navigating very rocky shoals so far.

"Leon Panetta has a strong internal compass," she said in a statement to The Associated Press. "It's true that he's had a learning curve, but all evidence indicates that he has weathered that learning curve. I believe he is a good, sound manager and administrator for the CIA."

She echoed CIA statements that Panetta has no intention to resign.

(This version CORRECTS the story by removing an erroneous reference to a conversation between Panetta and Holder.)

WASHINGTON — CIA Director Leon Panetta has been on the losing end of a string of high-profile battles over the agency's past missteps, stoking questions about the ultimate bureaucratic insider's...
WASHINGTON — CIA Director Leon Panetta has been on the losing end of a string of high-profile battles over the agency's past missteps, stoking questions about the ultimate bureaucratic insider's...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
164
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
- tnkeating I'm a Fan of tnkeating 20 fans permalink
photo

Leon, take all the evidence they haven't already taken and put a blow torch to it, what good is a secretive society if you keep records and evidence for all to politicise. Stand up for your people, grow a pair and tell the DOJ and Holder to stick it up there a$$.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 PM on 09/07/2009
- PaiaGirl I'm a Fan of PaiaGirl 110 fans permalink
photo

Ah. Advocating the illegal destruction of records?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:29 PM on 09/07/2009
- StillAmused I'm a Fan of StillAmused 252 fans permalink

"... given the CIA being attacked by a Democratic Congress particularly on the House side I'd be hard-pressed to think of a better guy to lead this agency," said Fran Townsend, President George W. Bush's former homeland security and counterterrorism adviser."

There, you have it... the kiss of d e a t h.

We're all really happy for you, Leon. Your job is safe, so you can go on losing battles in peace.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:29 AM on 09/07/2009
- LeeCalif I'm a Fan of LeeCalif 65 fans permalink

Another worthless AP story. ..........­.........y­awn.......­.........

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:32 AM on 09/07/2009
photo

Obama needs him more than he needs Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:42 PM on 09/06/2009
photo


Prominet Advocates and Rights Groups Urge the International Courts to define Rape and other Sexual Violence as Torture... IE Agent that TORTURE RAPE BE HELD TO THE HIGHEST COURT IN THE INTERNATIONAL RULE OF LAWS.

PRESS RELEASE SEPT 4, 2009

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 AM on 09/06/2009

Panetta go the way of the" Ho Ho Ho Green Jobs Czar" - resign!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 AM on 09/06/2009
- WryAwry I'm a Fan of WryAwry 5 fans permalink
photo

Tell me I.m not the only one to recognize the uncanny resemblence between Mr. Panetta

and Inspector Clouseau .............. ? (sp?)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 AM on 09/06/2009
- PaiaGirl I'm a Fan of PaiaGirl 110 fans permalink
photo

LOL!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 09/07/2009
- jqcitizen I'm a Fan of jqcitizen 6 fans permalink

Hard-nosed Washington insiders can be a problem.

The Attorney General has a bigger problem than Panetta's 'hard-nose'. That is to be a legal representative for 307 million citizens, of our country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:59 AM on 09/06/2009
photo

I'll take panetta over holder anyday, although they're both sc**um*bag politicians...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:41 PM on 09/06/2009
- stylenease I'm a Fan of stylenease 18 fans permalink
photo

Panetta just looks guilty. He has such a troubled look about him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 AM on 09/06/2009

Leon has the toughest job in DC right now. Isn't it sad that when the liberals are in power, those leaders tasked with protecting our country are least appreciated. And when the conservatives are in power, those leaders tasked with serving the weakest in our country are least appreciated.

How do you run a spy agency for an administration whose ideals run counter to everything you have to do in order to successfully provide sufficent intelligence to prevent further attacks on our country?

How do you run an intelligence gathering and parsing operation using published, liberal approved, techniques that would not shake loose an intransigent granny (apologies to Granny) let alone a hardened terrorist?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 AM on 09/06/2009
- eilish I'm a Fan of eilish 15 fans permalink
photo

I'm waiting for all those big plans to prevent further attacks on this country. Coulda prevented that first one if our President actually read ........

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:44 AM on 09/06/2009

Even better. Clinton could have prevented it if he'd have taken bin Laden when given the chance. Water long gone under that bridge. Let's look forward to the day when we won't need the CIA, but until then, let's consider allowing Leon to do his job without tying up his operatives in endless legal battles that will invite our enemies to do more, not less.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 09/06/2009
- PaiaGirl I'm a Fan of PaiaGirl 110 fans permalink
photo

Or a better question:

How do you run a spy agency whose ideal run counter to the U.S. CONSTITUTION that they swore to uphold?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 09/07/2009
- bascombe I'm a Fan of bascombe 28 fans permalink
photo

why are there so many dire predictions for Dems when the repuglyKKKans stole America without so much as a credible threat to replace a single one of them, including Libby, Ridge, Ashcroft or the inimitable Fredo Gonzales?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 PM on 09/05/2009
photo

Because as oft has happened in history. When dems get control everything goes to hell. There worse than 2 year olds on sugar. You know what's going to happen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 PM on 09/05/2009
photo

The Pubs stole squat. Squat. Kerry or Gore, give me a friggin break.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 PM on 09/05/2009
photo

Ya know. It occurs to me that everyone is so po'd at Bush. They'll believe anything. People hate the United States. We have been liberator's for years. Bush in particular. Vietnam was nothing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 PM on 09/05/2009
- sviolette I'm a Fan of sviolette 72 fans permalink
photo

Yes torture is real liberating. I can see how you can back that. What in the world have we liberated since 1945?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 AM on 09/06/2009
- eilish I'm a Fan of eilish 15 fans permalink
photo

Our wallets.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:45 AM on 09/06/2009
- Airmail56 I'm a Fan of Airmail56 21 fans permalink
photo

Korea, Kuwait, Grenada, Haiti, Afganastan and Iraq.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:28 PM on 09/06/2009
photo

Viet nam was not nothing.
52,000 killed in action
10,000 MIA
10,000 suicides

Untold lives messed up forever because of what took place there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:35 AM on 09/06/2009
- eilish I'm a Fan of eilish 15 fans permalink
photo

Viet Nam is the biggest stain on our country's honor - to date. The slaughter was unimaginable. But I've spent a lot of time in a VA hospital lately, and what with our advanced medical procedures, the guys surviving Iraq/Afghanistan but would have died in Viet Nam are going to live lives of sheer hell.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:48 AM on 09/06/2009
photo

Smoke and mirrors. K-no?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 PM on 09/05/2009
- Gnrshrtd I'm a Fan of Gnrshrtd 12 fans permalink
photo


Both Panetta and Holder have job descriptions, and from where I stand it appears they are endeavoring to satisfy those job descriptions. There have been rivalries between Justice and CiA (and FBI for that matter) for as long as I can remember - and to the extent that rivalry keeps them on their toes that's fine.

The departments they inherited are in disarray because of the mis-management of the last administration, and it is going to be a long, difficult and messy job cleaning it up. A few broken eggs should be expected. In any case, protecting the conscientious in those agencies should be a priority.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 PM on 09/05/2009
- Airmail56 I'm a Fan of Airmail56 21 fans permalink
photo

So, when no one is left at the CIA, and America is attacked again, who will barry blame?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:45 PM on 09/05/2009
photo

American has all kinda of other forces and BTW_ That culture of corruption- look at it this way- when a person dies anyone they die- they are replaced- People can and have to be replaced. Like any profession

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 PM on 09/05/2009
- Airmail56 I'm a Fan of Airmail56 21 fans permalink
photo

If you send a solider to war with one set of rules, and then punish him with another set of rules later on, you will soon not have soliders who will fight to win.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 AM on 09/06/2009
photo

Bush of course.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 PM on 09/05/2009
- sviolette I'm a Fan of sviolette 72 fans permalink
photo

The CIA did a great job of protecting us from the last attack. We lost 4000 people then went to Iraq and killed 500,000 to make up for it. The next time we are attacked who are we going to attack? Do you have a wish list?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 AM on 09/06/2009
- eilish I'm a Fan of eilish 15 fans permalink
photo

Don't you read, silly! They want Iran next.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:49 AM on 09/06/2009
- Airmail56 I'm a Fan of Airmail56 21 fans permalink
photo

The same CIA that was blind sided by by clintons 'Chinese wall.' But that does not matter to you anyway, since you think all injustice is our fault. Are you comfortable with barry killing children in afghanistan over a few gallons of fuel? What flavor of hypocrite are you?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 AM on 09/06/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect