More

Annie Leibovitz Loan Due: Copyrights, Home At RIsk

ULA ILNYTZKY   09/ 8/09 10:25 PM ET   AP

Annie Leibovitz

NEW YORK — Celebrity photographer Annie Leibovitz risks losing the copyright to her images – and her entire life's work – if she doesn't pay back a $24 million loan due Tuesday.

The lender, Art Capital Group, sued Leibovitz in July claiming she breached an agreement that authorized it to act as the agent in the sale of her photography and real estate.

Leibovitz spokesman Matthew Hiltzik said Tuesday that the photographer was working to "resolve the situation."

Art Capital spokesman Montieth Illingworth said Friday that the company has "clear contractual rights and will protect them in any scenario."

"Our preference is for this to be resolved," he added.

The deadline to pay back the loan is 11:59 p.m. Tuesday. It's unclear what will happen if the deadline passes without the loan being repaid.

Neither side would say Tuesday whether they were meeting or if an agreement was possible. Representatives for both Leibovitz and the art lending company had made no public statements by the afternoon.

ACG is a Manhattan-based company that issues short-term loans against fine and decorative arts and real estate.

Last year, the 59-year-old photographer put up as collateral her three historic Greenwich Village townhouses, a sprawling upstate New York property and the copyright to every picture she has ever taken – or will take – to secure the loan with ACG.

The company said she needed the money to deal with a "dire financial condition arising from her mortgage obligations, tax liens and unpaid bills to service providers and other creditors."

ACG consolidated all her loans in September 2008. In its lawsuit, it charged that Leibovitz breached a December 2008 sales agreement with the company granting ACG the right to sell the collateral before the loan came due. The lawsuit claimed she refused to allow real estate experts into her homes to appraise their value and blocked the company from selling her photographs.

ACG has estimated the value of the Leibovitz portfolio at $40 million; real estate brokers say her New York properties are worth about $40 million.

Under the sales agreement with Leibovitz, Illingworth said, the company would get 10 percent commission on the sale of Leibovitz's real estate and 15 percent on the sale of her portfolio. Leibovitz would get the remainder after paying off the $24 million loan, interest and other fees, he said. If she defaults, the company would get a net 12 percent commission, after paying approximately 13 percent for costs and fees.

More legal problems for the photographer emerged last week when an Italian photographer accused Leibovitz in a Manhattan federal lawsuit of using his images in a calendar without his permission. The suit seeks unspecified damages. Hiltzik declined to comment.

Leibovitz's artsy, provocative portraits of celebrities regularly grace the covers of Vanity Fair and Vogue.

Over the years, her lens has captured such famous faces as John Lennon, Queen Elizabeth II and Bruce Springsteen. She gave the world its first glimpse of baby Suri, newborn daughter of Hollywood's superstar couple Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes, on the cover of Vanity Fair, which she joined in 1983.

____

Adam Goldman in New York contribued to this story.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST MEDIA

NEW YORK — Celebrity photographer Annie Leibovitz risks losing the copyright to her images – and her entire life's work – if she doesn't pay back a $24 million loan due Tuesday. The...
NEW YORK — Celebrity photographer Annie Leibovitz risks losing the copyright to her images – and her entire life's work – if she doesn't pay back a $24 million loan due Tuesday. The...
Filed by Danny Shea  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 58
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
susou
hmm...
09:48 AM on 09/09/2009
It's Wednesday.... what happened???
photo
Bettysdad
The arc of human history is to the left.
03:11 AM on 09/09/2009
1- Every publisher of significance agrees not to pay to use any of her existing work.

2- She hires someone to take pictures for her, standing next to the person, "suggesting" lighting, props, exposure, etc. That person sells the work, and pays her a major portion. This was common in the good ol
blacklist days in Hollywood.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:29 AM on 09/09/2009
So, what happened?
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
09:20 PM on 09/08/2009
I never expected this to happen to the world's greatest photographer.
10:19 PM on 09/08/2009
"greatest?" absolutely not.
10:38 PM on 09/08/2009
Not by a long shot.
photo
Goliadkin
Who Is He In Yonder Stall?
04:57 AM on 09/09/2009
Most famous, maybe. Greatest? Not even close. She pretty low on the list.
05:13 PM on 09/08/2009
She's obviously been living above her considerable means. If your artistic property is worth $40 million and her real estate is worth $40 million, why is she unable to remortgage this at a low interest rate in order to pay off the $24 million loan in time before they sell off her assets?

It's a sad situation, but people really need to learn to handle their financial responsibilities better.
photo
Mattie
My Daddy taught me to beware the good Christian
05:09 PM on 09/08/2009
good grief, talk about living beyond your means. How do you get that far in debt, and make so many bad decisions.
05:05 PM on 09/08/2009
If you are rich, frugal living is still the best way to go.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CATNIP1
native Texan
09:45 PM on 09/08/2009
She did live that way up untill a few years ago. Started spending some that money and Bam the bottom falls out of the economy. No one is spending that kind of money for photos right now.
04:31 PM on 09/08/2009
It is amazing that people see every thing that she do as great. Her work is not that impressive, it seems that her name is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CATNIP1
native Texan
09:46 PM on 09/08/2009
No really, it's that impressive!
10:39 PM on 09/08/2009
No it isn't.
04:26 PM on 09/08/2009
Jeez, you'd think she'd have an accountant or at least a financial advisor.
Excellent photographer? Yes.
What makes her famous more than any other excellent photographer? She takes photos of celebrities.
Fine Art "People" magazine portraits.

On subject matter I give her a "big whooop".

Don't worry folks, she won't become a suffering artist.
She'll be just fine.
04:14 PM on 09/08/2009
for 24 mill. i could have the entire libowitz portfolio painted on the end of the fingernails of the rockettes
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Laserbeam
Nothing is permanent except change...
03:55 PM on 09/08/2009
Why does anyone need that many homes? A 24 million dollar LOAN? Annie, I love your work and I hope you get to keep it, but why not sell a few houses and be done with it? Why did you wait?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
lukebenward
03:00 PM on 09/08/2009
MSNBC To Air Bill Cosby Town Hall
Howard University panel to explore poverty in America

http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/339745-MSNBC_To_Air_Bill_Cosby_Town_Hall.php

The event will be held Sept. 20 at Howard University and will be
broadcast live on MSNBC from 7 to 9 p.m.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
lukebenward
03:30 PM on 09/08/2009
Just to give you something that will actually make a positive impact on America (unlike this arrogant old broad who spent money like water).

She must hate herself for getting herself in this position where she loses her catalogue.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
puppymama
02:50 PM on 09/08/2009
Artists aren't famous for their business savvy.
overcat
My micro-bio is so full, it's bursting at the seam
07:42 PM on 09/08/2009
So it must be the case that all of the millions of people in the US who are now over their heads in debt have that problem because they're artists? No? So how is there a connection between being an artist and having bad business savvy? There's not. And there are plenty of artists who are financially astute and successful.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:37 AM on 09/09/2009
Just not this particular commercial photographer.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mrcontinental
02:47 PM on 09/08/2009
Maybe she should have just photographed celebrities instead of trying to be one.

What in the world could she have been thinking?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
lukebenward
02:45 PM on 09/08/2009
Pay... The... Piper!!!!

If you wanted to keep up w/ the Joneses, you pay the price for it. Live within your means and give your ego a rest.