More

Goldman CEO Says Pay Backlash Is 'Appropriate'

DANIEL WAGNER   09/ 9/09 06:08 PM ET   AP

Goldman

WASHINGTON — After years spent raking in millions as a top executive of Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Lloyd Blankfein said Wednesday that outsized banker pay encouraged excess and worked "against the public interest."

The furor over bankers' pay after last year's financial crisis often was "understandable and appropriate," Blankfein told the Handelsblatt Banking Conference, according to remarks prepared for delivery in Frankfurt, Germany.

"There is little justification for the payment of outsized discretionary compensation when a financial institution lost money for the year," the Goldman CEO said. He said bonuses are important to attracting and retaining top talent, but "misapplied, they can also encourage excess."

Experts on executive compensation were skeptical that Blankfein's remarks would lead to action, and critics said he may be trying to avoid tougher government rules on pay.

Blankfein agreed last spring not to take a bonus for his work in fiscal year 2008. But in 2008 he topped the list of highest-paid Wall Street executives, with a pay package totaling $42.9 million, according to an Associated Press analysis. Most of that was in the form of stocks and options awarded for his performance in 2007.

In the speech Wednesday, Blankfein laid out compensation principles that he said should apply throughout the financial industry. They included: making the largest pay packages more performance-based, deferring compensation to reflect long-term performance, banning contracts that guarantee high bonuses and making top managers keep most of their pay in stock until they retire.

New York-based Goldman first released the standards in May. They are similar to ideas under discussion at the Federal Reserve, which is developing new guidance for compensating financial executives.

But as it has returned to health, Goldman has set aside significantly more to pay its employees. Goldman's costs for compensation and benefits rose to about $11.4 billion in the first half of 2009, up 33 percent from a year earlier. All of that wasn't paid out; the company can use it for discretionary compensation at the end of the year.

Based on the latest compensation and benefit figures Goldman disclosed, that breaks down to $386,429 for each of its 29,400 employees.

As big banks return to profitability, the impulse to retain top performers by giving them outsized pay packages becomes greater, said Mark Borges, a principal with Compensia, Inc., a Northern California compensation consulting firm.

"There's a fear that we're going back to the same pay system that got us into trouble," Borges said. "He may be advocating for linking pay to long-term performance, but the problem is that the pay system in the banking industry isn't set up that way. "

Public outrage about bankers' pay erupted last winter as the global financial system faltered. The first explosion came when the failed insurance giant American International Group Inc. paid $165 million in bonuses after the government committed $180 billion to bail out the company.

The Obama administration appointed a pay czar, Kenneth Feinberg, to address pay practices at banks that took money from the $700 billion financial bailout. Feinberg's rules will not affect Goldman because the bank repaid its $10 billion in June.

The House of Representatives passed a bill in July that would give shareholders more say in executive compensation and expand regulators' power over pay packages. The Senate has yet to take up the measure.

European governments have taken a tougher line, arguing for strict caps on individual payouts and collective bonus pots at financial institutions. But that idea was rejected at a meeting of top finance officials from major governments in London last week. The group, which includes Europe, the United States, Russia, India, South Korea and other major economies, instead agreed to draft principals for consideration at a meeting of national leaders in Pittsburgh later this month.

The policies that group will consider are likely to resemble Blankfein's call for greater accountability to limit risk.

Blankfein's call for banks to change their pay practices could be an attempt to ward off tougher federal regulation, critics said.

"I think he's trying to put out the message that the government shouldn't feel the need to meddle in compensation matters and that companies like Goldman are going to voluntarily do the right thing," said Sarah Anderson, a director at the Institute for Policy Studies, a Washington-based think tank that has been critical of Wall Street pay practices.

In a report released last week, Anderson's group reported that the top five executives at the 20 banks that took the most federal bailout money received average compensation of $32 million each from 2006 to 2008.

Blankfein also addressed concerns that overly complex financial products destabilized the financial system, and laid out broad principles for regulation that would limit systemwide risk. He has been chairman and CEO of Goldman since 2006, and was president and chief operating officer starting in 2004.

___

AP Business Writers Rachel Beck and Stevenson Jacobs in New York contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

WASHINGTON — After years spent raking in millions as a top executive of Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Lloyd Blankfein said Wednesday that outsized banker pay encouraged excess and worked "against th...
WASHINGTON — After years spent raking in millions as a top executive of Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Lloyd Blankfein said Wednesday that outsized banker pay encouraged excess and worked "against th...
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 31
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TomHunter
Author of "The Butcher of Leningrad" (a thriller)
06:45 PM on 09/11/2009
Thank you.
05:03 PM on 09/10/2009
There needs to be more than a backlash. When people who barely survive on welfare break the rules, there are reimbursement bills, penalties, prosecution, and loss of benefits. If Goldman Sachs proportionately met with justice, we would have to stretch our imaginations to determine how they could pay for their astronomical crimes.

good articles 4 for slow news day: http://www.iamned.com
11:37 PM on 09/10/2009
What crimes were those?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TomHunter
Author of "The Butcher of Leningrad" (a thriller)
06:49 PM on 09/11/2009
Let's start with Dec 2008. Do you know what Goldman-Sachs did that month? They walled off that month forever from their books. That month applies NEITHER to Fiscal year 2008 nor fiscal year 2009. And why would Goldman-Sachs want to do that? Well, because they claimed to have walled off all those toxic assets there.
The actions of GS on that month were akin to a family seeing a fire in one of their bedrooms and reacting by closing the door and acting like it wasn't there.

The bonuses allegedly earned all this year by Goldman-Sachs are complete fiction. And they WILL pay themselves for these fictional profits with REAL money. Goldman-Sachs is a dishonest company that has parlayed its connections in government for a wildly unfair advantage. Yes, sir, there is no shortage of crimes at Goldman-Sachs.
iridium53
Semper Fi
10:54 AM on 09/10/2009
Still no new regulations from Obama, Geithner, Bernanke and Summers.
Not one bit of proposed legislation.
Not one bit of action from the Obama Administration to curb the excesses of the banksters.
Not one bit of investigation.
Not one bit of action.

It is clear from Obama's lack of action that the support for the bankers is total.

Not much change I can believe in.
photo
Annieke
Rules are not necessarily sacred, principles are.
08:30 AM on 09/10/2009
The Dutch banks have come to a mutual set of rules (in order to avoid government regulations) that bankers can get a bonus that is maximized (to one year of wages).
Besides that the money is refundable in some situations; for example if the companny makes a loss in a year. No matter how an individual did, if the bank does not make a profit no bonuses will be paid.

It is a small step but at least a step forward.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
DiogenesOfAlaska
Mitt Romney for president - of the Cayman islands!
05:32 AM on 09/10/2009
2/2


There may be a philosophical excuse available to Goldman Sachs: if they are indeed the smartest guys in the room, then it is possible that the premium they would have to pay is negligibly small in comparison to what others would owe. But that's probably not true, and it would have to be defended first. The reason it's probably not true is because smartness doesn't have a lot of impact when it comes to dancing on the verge of collapse - which is an activity that in itself some people would hesitate to call smart.

Another problem is that he is still employing the rhethoric of 'talent'. It may be true with the current status quo that there's competitive pressure resulting from that direction, but that's only because the compensation system on the whole precisely is not set right for most banks. As soon as it is done right, and pay also reflects the impact of the balance sheet and reputation a 'talent' employs with its institution backing up, things will start to be viewed from a different angle. The plausibility of the argument about talent rests almost entirely on the assumptions about the status quo which are already known to be deficient. So it's circular and self-serving.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
DiogenesOfAlaska
Mitt Romney for president - of the Cayman islands!
05:32 AM on 09/10/2009
1/2

No doubt Blankfein is trying to set a precedent in the hope of convincing regulators that the self-interested solution of the banks is good enough.

And that's a good thing. Also, it's only part of the solution. Because it is equally obvious that he is offering too little. The proposals serve only to align the interests of shareholders and managers, but do little or nothing to also align the interests of the firm with the public interest, as embodied by those who implicitly write insurance against a failure of the banks, which in the case of Goldman Sachs would be: the taxpayer - since they don't pay much into the FDIC, which is bad enough.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
03:00 AM on 09/10/2009
BLANKFE1N WANTS NO GOVERNMENT ENFORCED INCOME LIMITS ON EXECUTIVES!

B1ankfe!n said “bonuses are important to attracting and retaining top talent, but ...can also encourage excess." Perhaps the way to increase the number of such TALENTED BANKSTERS is to BUILD a Special University that teaches Stea1ing and Theft without Ethics as they clearly are NOT getting enough people without scruples! I forgot we have a lot of those covered with 1VY!

Perhaps Blankfe!n would prefer a return to 63% to 94% Top Tax Rates like we had for 50 years before Reagan! A 70% Top Tax Rate on Gross Personal Income over $3 Million would STOP MUCH OF THE SKIMMING when the payouts go mostly to the Government Budget and reducing the Deficit!

Blankfein also admitted overly complex financial products destabilized the financial system. He did NOT admit to "Misrepresentation in SALE of High Risk Products as "AAA" Low Risk Products and he did NOT admit to "Manufactured Insider Trading" or Automated Theft."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
03:02 AM on 09/10/2009
The House of Representatives passed a bill in July that would give shareholders more say in executive compensation and expand regulators' power over pay packages.

The Wall Street 0wned Senate has yet to take up the measure probably because as CBS reports: $7.5 Million/4 years is Avg Wall Street Campaign Funding per Senator.

European governments have taken a tougher line, arguing for strict caps on individual payouts and collective bonus pots at financial institutions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
01:56 AM on 09/10/2009
WHAT BANKSTERS DO NOT WANT - Must Do Opposite F1GHT like Cuomo is doing (Where is H0LDER?):

1. Investigation and Prosecution of their WH1TE-C0LLAR CR1MES.

2. Oversight by any Non-Bankster Owned Entity - So they support the Bankster Owned FED!

3. Regulation of any of their activities that Interrupts or Interferes with their Schemes, Scams, and Massive Profit Skimming into Employee Pockets!

4. Loss of Control of Government and Law Making favorable to them and their Pocket Books. Campaign Funding System is Central to their Control.

5. High Top Tax Rate that brings funds back into Government. (For 50 Years before Reagan rates were 63% to 94%)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
01:58 AM on 09/10/2009
Something Else they DO NOT WANT: Calling ALL FAIR-MINDED Judges!

Wall Street Banks DO NOT WANT Homeowners to SUCCEED!

Wall Street Banks and their Hedge Fund Managers make OUTRAGEOUS PROFITS on FORECLOSURES as they own "MASSIVE and REPETITIVE CASINO BETS" that your mortgage will fail!

They want you to FAIL so they get the BIG PAY0FF!
__________ __________

There EV1L STEPS:

Make Loans to FAIL!

Bet the loans WILL FAIL!

Collect on Bets!
_______________

Add in Derivatives and it is “MANUFACTURED INSIDER TRADING” by Wall Street Banks and their Hedge Funds!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
01:59 AM on 09/10/2009
PLANNED+AUTOMATED THEFT! At your nearest Wall Street Branch BANK going on NOW!

DOWNSIZE 5 BIGGEST BANKS: BY ENFORCING LAWS

Same CEOs that brought America to its KNEES still ON DUTY!

Prosecute Big Banks' CEOs:

1. Misrepresentation of HighRiskProducts as LowRisk"AAA" -selling all over World

2. Manufactured Insider Trading - Far more manipulative than Chef Martha!

3. Regarding St0len G0LDMAN Software: "GS has raised possibility there is danger somebody who knew this program could use it to manipulate markets in unfair ways." MOST AMAZING ADM1SS1ON in a C0URTofLAW?

4. Automated Scheme intercepts real time order messages+insert GS Trades ahead of others trades capturing BOUNCES from BigTRADES. Automatic+ILLEGAL!
______________

Laws on books - LACKING IS AN HONEST ADMINISTRATION TO PROSECUTE!

“Misrepresentation” is contract law concept, meaning false statement of fact made by one party to another party, which has effect of inducing that party into a contract. For example, false statements/promises made by seller of goods regarding the quality/nature of the product that the seller has may constitute misrepresentation.

“Insider Trading” is trading of securities by individuals with access to non-public information about product/company. Taking advantage of non-public information by an insider during performance of insider's duties, or in breach of fiduciary duty or relationship of trust/confidence.

“PREMED1TATED MANUFACTURED 1NSIDER TRAD1NG”
a. Make SureFailMo rtgageProd uct knowing it will fail
b. Buy Massive A1G CreditDefaultSwaps Betting “SURE FAIL Products” will FAIL!
Make it to fail&bet it will fail: "Manufactured-Insider-Trading" 100% Sure BETS!
11:03 PM on 09/09/2009
Just exactly what jailtime is Blankfein trying to avoid? There's a catch in there somewhere, keep looking.
11:39 PM on 09/09/2009
Lady, you're on to something. His ilk isn't about to throw its coterie under the bus for no reason! Like some wise folks said, follow the money. You're quest might very well be duly rewarded by sharp observers like Matt Taibi in the very near future!
10:30 PM on 09/09/2009
And what is keeping the Justice and Treasury Department from investigating this skulduggery and the bilking of Americans ? Is there someone out there not afraid of 21st century version of Tammany Hall AKA Goldman Sachs ?
10:27 PM on 09/09/2009
Yeah, the backlash is appropriate, but business will continue as usual.
No changes. Just more of the same.
These people really believe they are worth thousands of times more than most of their employees.
And apparently our legislators and executive branch are unwilling to do anything more extreme than a mild verbal reprimand from time to time as they wait for their turn back on the gravy-train.
09:43 PM on 09/09/2009
There needs to be more than a backlash. When people who barely survive on welfare break the rules, there are reimbursement bills, penalties, prosecution, and loss of benefits. If Goldman Sachs proportionately met with justice, we would have to stretch our imaginations to determine how they could pay for their astronomical crimes. Rev. Bookburn - Radio Volta
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TomHunter
Author of "The Butcher of Leningrad" (a thriller)
07:51 PM on 09/09/2009
Lloyd Blankfein received $42 Million in 2008 and now he wants us to give him credit for not taking a bonus this year. Boy, Lloyd, you really took one there for the team. You're really going to be scraping by next year.

Methinks thou dost protest too much, Lloyd. You're merely trying to avoid regulations on pay.

Your actions are PRECISELY like a man who has just been caught speeding and who tries to drive slowly as the cop catches up with him. You're busted, Lloyd.
01:57 PM on 09/10/2009
That analogy (simile actually) was better than my cattle ranch one....Well put.
06:58 PM on 09/09/2009
Now if only the CEO of Goldman Sachs was in a position to do something about a system of bonuses that he knew "encouraged excess" and "worked against the public interest"....
06:49 PM on 09/09/2009
No. Don Lloyd is serious! These cows WILL BE corralled. Or at least these last three heifers. The other 26,364,659,277,194 vacas done left the barn and was last seen down around the Rio Grande! Don Lloyd he say he "crack the whip"! O.K. , bye-bye. Jaime, Cowboy/Economist, Juarez