iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Imposes Tariffs On Chinese Tires

JENNIFER LOVEN   09/12/09 12:47 AM ET   AP

China Tires

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama on Friday slapped punitive tariffs on all car and light truck tires entering the United States from China in a decision that could anger the strategically important Asian powerhouse but placate union supporters important to his health care push at home.

Obama had until Sept. 17 – next week – to accept, reject or modify a U.S. International Trade Commission ruling that a rising tide of Chinese tires into the U.S. hurts American producers. A powerful union, United Steelworkers, blames the increase for the loss of thousands of American jobs.

The federal trade panel recommended a 55 percent tariff in the first year, 45 percent in the second year and 35 percent in the third year. Obama settled on slightly lower penalties – an extra 35 percent in the first year, 30 percent in the second, and 25 percent in the third, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said.

"The president decided to remedy the clear disruption to the U.S. tire industry based on the facts and the law in this case," Gibbs said.

By taking "this unprecedented action, the Obama administration is now at odds with its own public statements about refraining from increasing tariffs above current levels," said Vic DeIorio, executive vice president, GITI Tire (U.S.), the largest manufacturer of tires in China.

The decision comes as U.S. officials are working with the Chinese and other nations to plan an economic summit of the Group of 20 leading rich and developing nations in Pittsburgh, to be held Sept. 24-25. China will be a major presence at the meeting, and the United States will be eager to show it supports free trade.

Many of the nearly two dozen world leaders Obama is hosting have made strong statements critical of countries that protect their key industries. Obama, too, has spoken out strongly against protectionism, and other countries will view his decision on tires as a test of that stance.

Governments around the world have suggested the United States talks tough against protectionism only when its own industries are not threatened. U.S. rhetoric on free trade also has been questioned because of a "Buy American" provision in the U.S. stimulus package.

The decision could have ramifications in other high-priority areas, too.

The White House badly needs Chinese help to confront climate change, nuclear standoffs with Iran and North Korea and global economic turmoil. China is the world's third-largest economy and a veto-holding member of the United Nations Security Council.

Beijing says the duties would be a violation of global free-trade principles and has complained about U.S. protectionism.

And Roy Littlefield, executive vice president of the Tire Industry Association, which opposes the tariff, said it would not save American jobs but only cause tire manufacturers to move production to another country with less strict environmental and safety controls, less active unions and lower costs than the United States.

At the same time, Obama needs support from unions – also a key backer of the Democratic Party in elections – as he makes a high-stakes push for national health care legislation.

Rep. Louise M. Slaughter, D-N.Y., who chairs the House Rules Committee, said that although the 35 percent levy was less than the 55 percent recommended in July by the ITC, it was still a significant statement of administration support for organized labor.

To reach a compromise on health care, Obama may need concessions from pro-labor Democrats who support a strong stand against China.

The steelworkers union brought the original case in April, accusing China of making a recent push to unload more tires ahead of Obama's expected action. The union says more than 5,000 tire workers have lost jobs since 2004, as Chinese tire overwhelmed the U.S. market.

The U.S. trade representative's office said four tire plants closed in 2006 and 2007 and three more are closing this year. During that time, just one new plant opened. U.S. imports of Chinese tires more than tripled from 2004 to 2008 and China's market share in the U.S. went from 4.7 percent of tires purchased in 2004 to 16.7 percent in 2008, the office said.

"When China came in to the (World Trade Organization), the U.S. negotiated the ability to impose remedies in situations just like this one," U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk said. "This administration is doing what is necessary to enforce trade agreements on behalf of American workers and manufacturers. Enforcing trade laws is key to maintaining an open and free trading system."

The new tariffs, on top of an existing 4 percent tariff on all tire imports, take effect Sept. 26.

Obama's action marks a shift from the Bush administration, which was routinely criticized for being too delicate in confronting Beijing's alleged trade violations. Obama promised during his presidential campaign that he would do it differently.

For the Chinese government, the tire dispute threatens an economic relationship crucial to China's economic growth. There was speculation before the decision that new tariffs could produce public pressure on Beijing to retaliate, potentially sparking a dangerous trade war.

Soaring Chinese imports of American chicken meat already have been mentioned by Chinese state media as a possible target. Beijing also could sell some of its extensive holdings of U.S. Treasury debt, which could unsettle markets.

The decision was announced by the White House late Friday evening, a time when significant news often gets less attention because of the hour and the upcoming weekend. Administration officials had to wait until it was morning in China so that they could notify Chinese officials before publicizing the decision.

___

Associated Press writer Foster Klug contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama on Friday slapped punitive tariffs on all car and light truck tires entering the United States from China in a decision that could anger the strategically imp...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama on Friday slapped punitive tariffs on all car and light truck tires entering the United States from China in a decision that could anger the strategically imp...
Filed by Nicholas Sabloff  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,116
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (16 total)
02:35 PM on 10/19/2009
Defective and toxic drywall manufactured in and imported from China has forced thousands of Americans to leave their new homes. It has caused skin irritations and trouble breathing.

As more time passes, more homes are being tested and eventually gutted of this serious health concern. No home is safer than another. If you live in new home, it is possible it was constructed using this inferior and dangerous product.

New homes in Louisiana and Nevada to multi-million-dollar condos in Florida, where the problem started, are included. If you've been affected, or know someone who has or may be, please read this Web site for a complete dossier on the subject: http://chinesedrywall.org/
06:40 PM on 09/14/2009
The tire unions are turning the tire industry into auto industry. Goodyear will not leave china the current largest auto market in the world just like GM never left china even when they never import cars from china. Except tire industry cannot support multiple production companies in every country. This will drive up costs and drive tire companies into bankrupcy just like GM went bankrupt. GM china and GM north america has been seperated and GM north america is now TAX PAYER COMPANY. Capitalism and free trade is under assault.
09:08 PM on 10/04/2009
Unregulated capitalism and unregulated free trade Crashed.

Regulated Markets, capitalism and fair trade are what's needed.
03:03 PM on 09/14/2009
I'm getting tired of Obama doing nothing. He promised us Wall street reform, Heathcare reform, and more jobs and we got NOTHING except more debt.

hat tip to http://www.iamned.com

the economy is rigged against middle class, anyway .....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:06 PM on 09/13/2009
We gotta protect those Japanese, German and French tire makers from foreign competition.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:02 PM on 09/13/2009
We need to know if there will be testing of the Chinese tires to be absolutely certain that the manufacturers are not putting additives in their rubber formulation that will give us an environmental problem as bits of rubber and other chemicals are cast-off as the tires wear, as well as when they are finally discarded.
photo
RedneckDem
The top 1% stole my made in china bootstraps
07:31 PM on 09/13/2009
uh oh, maybe China will charge us high tariffs in rataliation. OH WAIT.... no need for retaliation, they already charge us high tariffs.
05:43 PM on 09/13/2009
The Chinese government is obsessed with saving face and their fortune. Foreign policy towards the China is basically met with kid gloves, because American culture and government systems originated and continues to utilize the "oppresser-oppressed" business model. Capitalism is now a system based on finding the poorest ppl on the planet, offering them peanuts to provide high demand services and products to other areas of the planet who want to buy cheap products, because supply and financial chains in their own countries have been inflated by the same companies that are getting rich off of these poor ppl. So the question remains if putting tarriffs on any Chinese products is a political move or simply a position that maybe the current business model is not correct?
05:05 PM on 09/13/2009
Everyday it's the same old rethreads. NO change form Washington.

good articles: http://www.iamned.com
04:22 PM on 09/13/2009
China subsidizes its industrial production. America subsidizes its agricultural production. China dumps cheap goods on the global markets. America dumps cheap food on the global markets. China displaces factory labor in the developed world. America displaces farm labor in the developing world.

If you're upset about import tariffs, then you should be upset about export subsidies, and we're both guilty.
11:23 PM on 09/13/2009
Double Bingo
02:12 PM on 09/13/2009
I heard the Chinese are willing to send us those tires for free now, and completely subsidize the labor. Do you think we should accept the free tires?

If yes, they why not take the discounted tires as well?

If you think no, we should not accept free tires to save union jobs, please explain why not?
outnow
Ban the bomb
02:34 PM on 09/13/2009
It is OK for politicians to talk out of both sides of their mouths on any given issue. That's what capitalism is all about. We care just giving free trade a "little time" out as Hillary Clinton suggested. Just to make it appear that the contradictions of free trade can be reconcilled with collective bargaining and union labor. I'll coin a new term "semi-protectionism" to illustrate the point. Fence-sitting on an issue is another word for it. People-pleasing is another. Trying to serve two masters is yet another.
01:04 PM on 09/13/2009
If you all think this will be good for our economy maybe we should ban all imports or just ban the cheap ones or just ban the ones that compete with well connected unions. Oh wait, we're doing that last one already. Why is it right to tax society as a whole for charity for the steelworkers? The tire mechanics make less than the steelworkers.
Maybe we should go back to the Smoot Hawley Act
01:12 PM on 09/13/2009
yes maybe we should go back to S-H or something like it

Of course that was a time the US had trade suprluses and someone may have made a very tenuous case that it would have caused harm, it didn't chave any causal effect one way or another. the "trade war" was already under way at the time before Smoot was passed and was one of the lead ups to the war

Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman, himself a free trader says right on his website any attempts to link the depression to Smoot Hawley are inaccurate and revisionist. Other respected economists also agree that any plausible effect were minimal at best and most likely non existant

today we have a massive trade deficit and according to section 421 of the WTO agreement a tariff is an appropriate vehicle to address trade imbalance and unfair trading practices
01:17 PM on 09/13/2009
hmm me thinks perhaps you work for a discount tire store or otherwise benefit from the sale of cheepo chinese tires?
02:44 PM on 09/13/2009
So you must think Smoot Hawley would be a good idea. It certainly would increase American manufacturing, right? And it wouldn't impact any other industries or consumers, would it?

What will Obama do when the Chinese increase tariffs on movies or software?
11:35 AM on 09/13/2009
+

Some people cal this protectionism but really it is levelism.

Levelism merely neutralizes the advantage gained through low wages, low environmental controls and manipulating exchange rates. It is the best approach.

http://corporate-statesmen.org/images/LEVELISM.pdf

Hopefully we will see more of it while we still have a middle class ...

+
outnow
Ban the bomb
02:39 PM on 09/13/2009
There's the term I was looking for. How about "flexible free trade"? The rules will be "highly elastic" to adapt to the realities on the ground. That's better than the dogma of free trade.
09:07 PM on 09/13/2009
Thank you for agreeing !
03:27 PM on 09/13/2009
I don't understand what's wrong with the term "protectionism." YES we want to PROTECT American jobs and PROTECT the middle class. I'm all for using it.
09:06 PM on 09/13/2009
+

There are two things wrong with the term:

1) It has become a pejorative whose use stops rational thought.

2) We do not want to fully protect our industries from all competition because they might become inefficient - we just want to level the playing field so that there is no unfair competition.

+
photo
hypnotoad72
Real democracy = living wages.
09:04 AM on 09/13/2009
YES!!!!!!! Hope has returned, and more!!
08:27 AM on 09/13/2009
Interesting. I'm torn.

Good: some long-overdue pushback against the unfair business practices of the Chinese government and industrial sector, where the two are not an identity.

Bad: hypocrisy on the world stage, and possibly writing a check we may not be able to cash. Right or wrong, the Chinese will perceive this tariff as a grave insult, and will retaliate. And given the state of the US economy, the US is ill-equipped for a trade war. Worse, Chinese interests hold and continue to buy a huge proportion of the debt that finances the administration's spending initiatives. If Beijing closes, or even tightens, the taps . . . .

And to what purpose? Goodyear is a fine company, but protecting a domestic industry that also brought us the Firestone Wilderness AT, ATX and ATX II (the ones made in the US), so instrumental in the Ford Explorer rollover debacle? Incidentally, Firestone's questionable engineering and business practices predate its sale to Japanese Bridgestone: Liberian rubber plants and the Firestone 500.

Tough decision.
08:49 AM on 09/13/2009
news flash we are already in a trade war and losing it

and at leat with us made tires, you have legal recu=ourse on defective or unsafe product

good lyuck trying to track down a chinese manufacturer - the minute they get into a problem the company evaporates and sets up shop womewhere else under a new name
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
BearsLeft
They were just here a minute ago...
11:15 AM on 09/13/2009
The Explorer rollover debacle had as much to do with Ford's recommendation to use a lower air pressure in those tires as it did with Firestone's quality. And I say this as a Ford fan and Firestone detractor, but the facts are that Ford wanted to increase the car-like-ride feeling of what was essentially a Ranger pickup with enclosed back end. The result was stress and overheating that contributed significantly to early, catastrophic failure.

My wife's 2000 Explorer still has the free Goodyears that replaced the Firestones. She doesn't drive much.
04:50 AM on 09/13/2009
So now Americans are going to pay more for tires... Cool.

I wonder which American tire company was able to bribe the president into signing this bill?
07:44 AM on 09/13/2009
pay the same for US made tires that we always have, but yes more for poor quality, potentially unsafe chinese tires that are being dumped on the market below cost.

actually many of the tire companies were against it because they were busy offshoring operations to china.

this trade complaint was filed by the tire worker unions representing the displaced workers who lost their jobs and saw teir plans close as a result
08:34 AM on 09/13/2009
we didn't have cheap chinese tires flooding our country in the 90's and the economy was doing terrific, go figure.

tell china to float their currency, stop barriers to imports, and stop subsidizing their industries, and all of this will go away
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
BearsLeft
They were just here a minute ago...
11:19 AM on 09/13/2009
Get some of that toxic Chinese drywall while you're at it. It's cheap too.