2010 Election: Trouble Brewing For House Democrats

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - 2010 Election: Trouble Brewing For House Democrats stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

BETH FOUHY | 09/13/09 06:56 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
FILE - In this Nov. 27, 2006 file photo, Franklin County commissioner Mary Jo Kilroy is seen during a news conference in Columbus, Ohio. (AP Photo/Kiichiro Sato, FILE)

NEW YORK — Despite sweeping Democratic successes in the past two national elections, continuing job losses and President Barack Obama's slipping support could lead to double-digit losses for the party in next year's congressional races and may even threaten their House control.

Fifty-four new Democrats were swept into the House in 2006 and 2008, helping the party claim a decisive majority as voters soured on a Republican president and embraced Obama's message of hope and change. Many of the new Democrats are in districts carried by Republican John McCain in last year's presidential contest; others are in traditional swing districts that have proved tough for either party to hold.

From New Hampshire to Nevada, House Democrats also will be forced to defend votes on Obama's $787 billion economic recovery package and on energy legislation viewed by many as a job killer in an already weak economy.

Add to that the absence of Obama from the top of the ticket, which could reduce turnout among blacks, liberals and young people, and the likelihood of a highly motivated GOP base confused by the president's proposed health care plan and angry at what they consider reckless spending and high debt.

Taken together, it could be the most toxic environment for Democrats since 1994, when the party lost 34 House incumbents and 54 seats altogether. Democrats currently have a 256-178 edge in the House, with one vacancy. Republicans would have to pick up 40 seats to regain control.

"When you have big sweeps as Democrats did in 2006 and 2008, inevitably some weak candidates get elected. And when the environment gets even moderately challenging, a number of them are going to lose," said Jack Pitney, a political science professor at Claremont McKenna College in California.

Since the mid-19th century, the party that controls the White House has lost seats in virtually every midterm election. The exceptions were in 1934, when President Franklin D. Roosevelt navigated the Great Depression, and in 2002, after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, strengthened George W. Bush's image as a leader.

With history as a guide, Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., who heads the party's House campaign committee, said he has warned colleagues to be prepared for an exceptionally challenging environment going into 2010.

Story continues below
advertisement

But Van Hollen said voters will make their choices on the strength of the national economy and will reward Democrats for working aggressively to improve it.

"We passed an economic recovery bill with zero help from Republican colleagues," he said. "I think voters will see that and will ask themselves, 'Who was there to get the economy moving again, and who was standing in the way?'"

Democrats have gotten off to a much faster start than Republicans in fundraising for 2010. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee had $10.2 million in the bank at the end of July, with debts of $5.3 million. The National Republican Congressional Committee had just $4 million in cash and owed $2.75 million.

The economy poses the biggest problem for Democrats, with job losses of 2.4 million nationwide since Obama took office. Despite recent signs the country is pulling out of the recession, the unemployment rate in 15 states still was in double digits in July, led by Michigan at 15 percent.

Democrats must defend as many as 60 marginal seats next year, as opposed to about 40 for Republicans. Among those, about 27 Democratic and just 13 Republican seats are seen as especially ripe for a party switch.

Some involve incumbents stepping down to run for higher office.

For example, Rep. Joe Sestak, D-Penn., is mounting a primary challenge to Sen. Arlen Specter. Sestack's seat, until then safely Democratic, now becomes a top GOP target. The same goes for Louisiana Rep. Charlie Melancon, a Democrat in a GOP-leaning district who also is seeking a Senate seat.

But Republicans are on the losing side of that equation as well. Two Republicans in heavily Democratic districts – Reps. Mark Kirk of Illinois and Joe Gerlach of Pennsylvania – are vacating their seats to run for Senate and governor, respectively.

At least one Republican is considered extremely vulnerable: Joseph Cao of Louisiana, who defeated Democrat William Jefferson after the nine-term incumbent was indicted on corruption charges. The district, which includes most of New Orleans, is considered one of the most Democratic in the country.

Beyond that, most of the closest races involve Democrats who rode the Obama tide in 2008.

They include at least four in Ohio, a perennial presidential swing state that has been battered for years by a persistently weak economy. Two represent bellwether areas: Rep. Mary Jo Kilroy, whose district covers most of Columbus and its suburbs, and Rep. Steve Driehaus, whose district includes much of Cincinnati and its suburbs.

Each won with the help of a strong showing among Obama supporters, and each faces face a rematch with the candidate who narrowly lost last year.

"I don't know if Kilroy or Driehaus have any particular problems, but we have a bad economy, the president's popularity has gone down, and conservatives are aroused and angry about government spending, cap and trade and the health care plan," said John Green, a political science professor at the University of Akron.

Indeed, the "cap and trade" bill that narrowly passed the House last spring is creating headaches for several Democrats. The legislation, which would cap carbon emissions and tax industries that exceed the cap as a way to reduce global warming, is largely unpopular in areas of the country where jobs rely on oil, gas or coal production.

One Democrat most affected is New Mexico Democrat Harry Teague. His district, which McCain carried last year, is one of the largest oil and gas producing areas in the country, and Teague has faced angry crowds back home ever since voting yes.

Teague will face Republican Steve Pearce, who held the seat for three terms before giving it up to run unsuccessfully for the Senate last year.

Without Obama on the ticket, a lower predicted black turnout in 2010 could also affect Democrats in several tight races in the South. These include Reps. Bobby Bright and Parker Griffith of Alabama, Travis Childers of Mississippi, and Tom Perriello of Virginia, who won by just 745 votes last year in a district that is 24 percent black.

Concerns about Obama's health care plan and the mounting federal debt could ensnare two first-term Florida Democrats, Alan Grayson and Suzanne Kosmas. Both represent districts along the state's competitive I-4 corridor, which is heavily populated by independent voters and retirees. Polls show Obama has lost ground among both of those demographic groups nationwide.

NEW YORK — Despite sweeping Democratic successes in the past two national elections, continuing job losses and President Barack Obama's slipping support could lead to double-digit losses for the...
NEW YORK — Despite sweeping Democratic successes in the past two national elections, continuing job losses and President Barack Obama's slipping support could lead to double-digit losses for the...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
1824
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (33 pages total)
photo

When are Americans going to get tired of our two party who stinks less system?

If everyone only voted for who they thought would do an outstanding job we could eliminate the corruption within a few years. Don't vote for who you think will do the least worse job. If no candidate impresses you then you are better off not voting for any of them. And look at all candidates from all the parties. The internet makes it easy to research all of them. There is no excuse for not doing your homework.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 PM on 09/22/2009
- jorjan I'm a Fan of jorjan 14 fans permalink

What the heck did the Democrats think they were elected to do???? They are just like the clueless Repugs - they just don't get it or maybe they do but think they can thumb their noses at us while they take money and favors from insurance lobbyists behind our backs. They people are wise to them and are just waiting to send them packing but getting Repugs back is not the answer either. What we need are SOLID finance reform bills that put the people's voice back in government. If they keep on shafting us like they did with the bank bailouts and keep on feeding Corporate America's greed, sooner or later they are going to have a full blown Revolution on their hands.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 AM on 09/19/2009

The Democrats will most likely be hit hard in the 2010 elections. Since they are the leading party right now and things are not going according to plan for them they might lose a few seats. Since Obama is putting the United States into even more debt with his reform plans people are going to want the Republicans to take control again. It has always been this way. Whenever a Democrats or Republicans are in power and something goes wrong the power usually switches to the other party like what happened with the bush administration. When it came time to elect a new president, the people decided it was time to let Democrats have a go at the presidency. Since they haven’t done a good job so far it’s time to the Republicans take control again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 AM on 09/16/2009
- research I'm a Fan of research 287 fans permalink

Trouble? Only if Americans are truly self destructive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:04 PM on 09/15/2009
- coastalwa I'm a Fan of coastalwa 3 fans permalink
photo

Of course the Democrat's are going to be in trouble in 2010. If they can't pass a bill that we've been trying for since 1945, with 60 seats, what use are they? How many seats do they need - 70?90? According to everything we've heard, they are going to pass an almost purely Republican bill, with more than 100 Republican amendments, mandatory purchase of high-priced insurance by every American, and tort reform, thus strengthening and enriching the insurance industry and Republicans beyond their wildest dreams.

My husband and I were lifetime Democratic voters until this month. Now we totally agree with conservatives that Democrats are corrupt and spineless. Of course, Republicans are corrupt and disgusting, so we have no place to go but Greens or Peace & Freedom. It'll be easier to just not vote. We've agreed to never vote for any Democrat again, even for local office, and we're going to give money to any opponent of the blue dogs (insurance industry shills) as long as they're not a Democrat (we'll even fund a Republican in those races). This is because the betrayal of us as Democratic voters for 40 and 46 years, respectively, is something we cannot forgive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:03 PM on 09/15/2009
photo

Given that nearly "three-quarters of physicians supported some form of a public option"
http://bit.ly/4hG8F

and that 60% of voters want at least a public option.

SHOULDN'T We Voters make sure our Congressional Democrats pay a price in the 2010 Election
IF they pass "any" health care reform bill "without a strong public option or Single Payer"?

KILL THE BILL If No PUBLIC OPTION

and

KEEP ASKING ALL POLITICIANS AT ALL PUBLIC EVENTS

"WHY DO YOU SUPPORT TORTURE?"
If they aren't actively calling for enforcement of our Federal Torture Laws,
They DO Support Torture.

SIGN THE PETITIONS
Demanding
both a Commission of Inquiry
and prosecution for all those leaders
in Bush's Administration that
Conspired to Torture at ANGRYVOTERS.ORG

http://ANGRYVOTERS.ORG

Only Prosecution Stops Torture, Abuse of Power and
of Our Constitution and Rule Of Law

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 AM on 09/15/2009

Go ahead and stick your heads in the sand. Hussein has awakened a sleeping giant.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 PM on 09/14/2009
- Buddy McCue I'm a Fan of Buddy McCue 137 fans permalink
photo

No, the "Silent Majority" has just turned into a Loud Minority.

That's no "sleeping giant."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:01 PM on 09/14/2009
- milkman I'm a Fan of milkman 13 fans permalink

sleeping is right...asleep when Reagan quadrupled the national debt, asleep when Bush II doubled it again, asleep when Bush destroyed our military with two failed wars, asleep when Bush destroyed the economy and put us into the second depression. You're awake now aren't you!!! Must be all that tea in the koo laid you're drinking!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:12 PM on 09/14/2009
photo

This isn't going to happen because the GOP implosion is a game changer, so no pendulum swing this time. Demographic trends are not going to reverse themselves in the next year, and most likely never.

Plus- the majority of the American public is not so naive as to place the blame for the recession that was fully in progress when Obama took office on the dems.

On the other hand, if the media decides that the "trouble for dems" story line makes an easy to write and understand excuse for real reporting, then it may actually become trouble.

I predict gains for dems and the GOP freefall has not hit bottom.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:25 PM on 09/14/2009
- judesuper I'm a Fan of judesuper 30 fans permalink
photo

I second that opinion!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:29 PM on 09/14/2009
photo

Spot on!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:35 PM on 09/14/2009
photo

Good point. There are intelligent people out there watching the debates and all that is happening while making decisions to either vote Democrat or become Independent. Either way the GOP loses.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 AM on 09/15/2009
- vlm1948 I'm a Fan of vlm1948 10 fans permalink

There may be trouble for all incumbents in 2010, 2012, etc., we are all getting pretty fed up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:19 PM on 09/14/2009
- Mister Wu I'm a Fan of Mister Wu 14 fans permalink

So incumbents lose in the primaries and we get better Democrats, like as if we'd every vote for a Republican again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 PM on 09/14/2009
- judesuper I'm a Fan of judesuper 30 fans permalink
photo

Exactly!

More progressive, less wimpy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:31 PM on 09/14/2009
- MSaxe I'm a Fan of MSaxe 30 fans permalink

If the Obama administration would couple policy and politics, the Democrats could easily gain seats in 2010. There are so many areas they could do it, but I don't think Axelrod and Emmanuel have figured it out yet.

They have to propose all of their policies knowing the political reaction and sculpting them to identify and brand the far right as the loony leaders of the GOP. You know, the way the conservatives did with the 60's and 70's liberals, uncovering a "silent majority" slightly right of center. They should be easily able to taint these Beckheads and dittoheads as totally incompetent as leaders. The middle majority has no use for either scary extreme.

If Obama's team had the guts and ability, they would already be doing a great job of it. Instead they are playing "bi-partisanship" while they are in control.

Good grief.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:09 PM on 09/14/2009
photo

reason why MSNBC numbers are in the tank

During the 4PM ET hour of live coverage on MSNBC Thursday, co-host David Shuster denounced the behavior of Republicans at President Obama’s address to Congress, declaring: "You look at the image of the Republican Party, all white males with short haircuts. They look sort of angry. No women, no minorities, and it looks like they’ve sort of become unhinged." Read more ...
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/kyle-drennen/2009/09/10/msnbc-s-david-shuster-gop-all-white-males-short-hair-cuts

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 PM on 09/14/2009
- judesuper I'm a Fan of judesuper 30 fans permalink
photo

I love David Shuster. He tells it like it is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:28 PM on 09/14/2009

I love him too and I always watch MSNBC hoping to hear the truth (something nobody ever gets from CNN or Fox).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 PM on 09/14/2009
photo

it must suck to be a solitary lib watching the least watched cable channel on TV...numbers speak louder than words

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:32 PM on 09/14/2009
- den1953 I'm a Fan of den1953 56 fans permalink
photo

I wonder what it will look like come spring of 2010 when the economy turns around and people start working again kiss the doom & gloom good bye,i have a feeling this is a Republican wishful thinking exercise just look at the Republican hopefuls they have a lot of work to do!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 PM on 09/14/2009
- Collielady I'm a Fan of Collielady 90 fans permalink
photo

Newsflash: therawstory is reporting that the president has enjoyed a surge in the polls; the polls also show that the news media’s credibility has plunged to an all-time low.

I guess that bit of news cancels out this silly, hyperbolic, anxiety laden story.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:01 PM on 09/14/2009
- touchman I'm a Fan of touchman 8 fans permalink

Too bad voting majorities swing back and forth between the 2 major BIG money parties. We never learn that they both like to take from us and give to their rich friends. Libs and cons wake up and let's work together to rid ourselves of the concerted effort by gubment and the controllers to make us fight amongst ourselves instead of fighting the real enemy...gubment growth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:49 PM on 09/14/2009
- MSaxe I'm a Fan of MSaxe 30 fans permalink

You could run Ralph Nader and Lyndon LaRouche.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 PM on 09/14/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (33 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect