More

Specter Tells AFL-CIO He Backs Employees' Choice

SAM HANANEL   09/15/09 03:11 PM ET   AP

Specter Sestak

PITTSBURGH — Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter took another step in his political transformation on Tuesday, telling hundreds of labor activists that he will support legislation that would make it easier to form unions.

In a speech to the AFL-CIO convention, Specter also boldly predicted a compromise version of the bill would be passed in Congress this year. The bill has been stalled for months under withering attack from business groups and a lack of support from several moderate Democrats.

"We have pounded out an employees' choice bill which will meet labor's objectives," Specter told cheering union delegates.

Specter's assurance was a reversal from his stance earlier this year, when he declared on the Senate floor that he could not vote for the Employee Free Choice Act.

Since then, Specter switched from the GOP to the Democratic Party, giving Democrats a 60-vote majority in the Senate.

Facing a strong primary challenge from Pennsylvania Rep. Joe Sestak, Specter is counting on union support to help him hold onto his seat. Sestak is not speaking at the convention.

Specter spoke just hours before President Barack Obama addressed the delegates. Later Tuesday, Obama was to attend a fundraiser for Specter in Philadelphia, where he was expected to tell donors how crucial Specter is for pushing through the White House agenda.

Meeting with reporters, Specter said the compromise would drop a controversial provision that would give workers the right to form unions by signing cards instead of holding a secret ballot election.

Organized labor has long insisted the "card check" language was necessary to give workers the freedom to organize without intimidation from company managers during the days leading up to secret ballot elections.

But union leaders now indicate they are willing to drop the "card check" demands in favor of other provisions that would help unions fill their depleted ranks.

Specter said the compromise would also speed up the process for holding secret ballot elections to certify unions and call for binding "baseball style" arbitration when workers and management cannot agree on a first contract. And it would allow unions organizers some access to the workplace before elections.

Specter told reporters he is confident that, once a new senator from Massachusetts is in place, Democrats will have the 60 votes needed to overcome an expected Republican filibuster. Such news would be a major blow to business groups opposing the measure.

U.S. Chamber of Commerce attorney Steven Law said the groups' top concern is not "whether the AFL-CIO has cut a new back-room deal on the bill."

Instead, "it is whether it can be sold to Senate moderates who are worried about saving jobs, especially their own," Law said.

President Obama has told union leaders he would work to pass the union bill once health care reform is done.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

PITTSBURGH — Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter took another step in his political transformation on Tuesday, telling hundreds of labor activists that he will support legislation that would make it...
PITTSBURGH — Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter took another step in his political transformation on Tuesday, telling hundreds of labor activists that he will support legislation that would make it...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 60
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
courtreporter
02:59 PM on 09/16/2009
oh, Arlen .... who can believe a word you say? You're a Democrat-Republican-Democrat today. You only say this to win election and when the vote comes up (and the Republicans will make sure it never will .....) he'll vote against it.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Louisknyc
09:43 AM on 09/16/2009
Arlen's an opportunist. Anyway the wind blows. No cred in my book. And frankly, at 79 or 80 years old, I think it's time for some new blood.
02:32 AM on 09/16/2009
i can't take mr. single bullet theory seriously...
01:31 AM on 09/16/2009
yada yada yada

what else do you want to hear?
11:44 PM on 09/15/2009
Arlen is a stand-up guy. He kicked cancer to the c-u-rb and came back roaring!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rinpochet
Do unto others ...
10:38 AM on 09/16/2009
And changed parties because he knew he would lose as a Republican. This guy would do anything to win!! Sestak is the man.
09:31 PM on 09/15/2009
I'm glad to see Specter come around. I guess the threat of a primary against Sestak was affective.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rinpochet
Do unto others ...
10:39 AM on 09/16/2009
But only until he wins! Then he will become just another DINO.

Sestak is a REAL Democrat. Specter can't be trusted with a 10 foot pole.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RadCenter
06:50 PM on 09/15/2009
To all of you who are accusing Senator Specter of "flip-flopping" or "waffling": Do you not see the difference between a bill that eliminates the secret ballot and a bill that does not? The provision in the bill that eliminated the secret ballot has been removed. Therefore Specter can now vote for it in good conscience, which he could not before. This seems like a principled stance to me, and not opportunism. I have disagreed with Specter on many occasions, but I have found that he votes based on his beliefs, not according to polls. Sestak, on the other hand, strikes me as insincere.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:12 PM on 09/15/2009
The 'secret ballot' is and has always has been a ruse. They want 'fast track'...secret ballot would be just a bonus. The turncoat Specter has known this and knew very well when he switched parties.
06:12 PM on 09/15/2009
see i said it --how many votes can you deliver ---i have a career record to glorify
06:06 PM on 09/15/2009
Flippity-flop, Flippity-flop, Flippity-flop, Flippity-flop! There goes Senator Arlen Specter down the aisle.
Although I support EFCA, I will beleive Specter does, when he actually votes for it. Perhaps he has seen the handwriting on the wall. But he'll lose in 2010 anyway. His history is too republican.
05:41 PM on 09/15/2009
Specter can sense that their is a real Democrat in Sestak.
09:33 PM on 09/15/2009
Yes indeed. I remember when Specter said "I am not a guaranteed 60th vote." That didn't last very long after Sestak decided to run for his seat! ROFTL!
04:34 PM on 09/15/2009
Yeah..wait another week. He'll change his mind. If he has a mind left.
04:26 PM on 09/15/2009
Of course he does! for now.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sueinmn
04:22 PM on 09/15/2009
We dont need anymore Blue Dogs. Will Arlen respect the Dem party of be a blue dog?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheThinkerCometh
05:04 PM on 09/15/2009
At least he's better than Lieberman.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rinpochet
Do unto others ...
10:40 AM on 09/16/2009
Sestak is better than both of them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thepoliticalcat
Eradicate your microbioflora
04:12 PM on 09/15/2009
Arlen Specter is being forced to a more moderate position by the fact that Joe Sestak is running against him, and labour represents a major constituency in his state. He's like Lieberman, untrustworthy. Personally, I hope Sestak wins. OTOH, if Sestak's chances are slim, it's better to have Specter moving towards more rational and acceptable positions on labour issues.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sueinmn
04:11 PM on 09/15/2009
Hes running scared from a real Dem! He will lie until he wins his seat and then his true colors shows again! Dont be fooled. Remember the almost 400 billion of stimulus to tax cuts because of him! This money could have been brisges, roads, new schools, Oh yes they prevent NEW schools from being built. Dont forget, we need to remember! Im union and I dis trust this man big time!