iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Credit Swaps Are Back En Vogue As Market Confidence Returns

Credit Default Swaps

Huffington Post   First Posted: 11/16/09 05:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 03:05 PM ET

Credit-default swaps -- the financial instrument that helped bring down AIG and played a key role in causing the biggest financial crisis since the 1930s -- are, a year after the fall of Lehman Brothers, back en vogue on Wall Street, Bloomberg reports. Instead of being viewed as tools of financial disaster, CDSs are said to be contributing to the credit market's renewed confidence.

Here's why, according to Bloomberg:

The cost to protect against a failure by New York-based Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Charlotte, North Carolina-based Bank of America Corp., and 12 of the other biggest derivatives dealers dropped 66 percent in the past six months, according to an index of swaps compiled by Credit Derivatives Research LLC. While the U.S. struggles with the slowest recovery since 1945, the market where investors protect themselves from default and speculate on corporate debt shows confidence is the highest since June 2008.

For those who need a reminder of just what CDSs are and how they became such a phenomenon, it's worth reading (or re-reading) Matt Taibbi's story "The Big Takeover" that was published in Rolling Stone last spring.

Here is Taibbi on how the CDS was created:

The CDS was popularized by J.P. Morgan, in particular by a group of young, creative bankers who would later become known as the "Morgan Mafia," as many of them would go on to assume influential positions in the finance world. In 1994, in between booze and games of tennis at a resort in Boca Raton, Florida, the Morgan gang plotted a way to help boost the bank's returns. One of their goals was to find a way to lend more money, while working around regulations that required them to keep a set amount of cash in reserve to back those loans. What they came up with was an early version of the credit-default swap.


In its simplest form, a CDS is just a bet on an outcome. Say Bank A writes a million-dollar mortgage to the Pope for a town house in the West Village. Bank A wants to hedge its mortgage risk in case the Pope can't make his monthly payments, so it buys CDS protection from Bank B, wherein it agrees to pay Bank B a premium of $1,000 a month for five years. In return, Bank B agrees to pay Bank A the full million-dollar value of the Pope's mortgage if he defaults. In theory, Bank A is covered if the Pope goes on a meth binge and loses his job.

When Morgan presented their plans for credit swaps to regulators in the late Nineties, they argued that if they bought CDS protection for enough of the investments in their portfolio, they had effectively moved the risk off their books. Therefore, they argued, they should be allowed to lend more, without keeping more cash in reserve. A whole host of regulators -- from the Federal Reserve to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency -- accepted the argument, and Morgan was allowed to put more money on the street.

Credit-default swaps are not the only part of the pre-financial-collapse era that has returned in the last few months. As Arianna pointed out in August:

"Everybody understands," Geithner said on This Week, "that we cannot have our financial system go back to the practices that brought this economy to the brink of collapse." It's true, we all understand it. The problem is, the system has already gone back. Risky derivatives are traded again, bonuses disconnected from performance are being handed out again, bank lobbyists are spending tens of millions to undermine necessary regulatory reforms again. The only real long-term solution is for the government to ensure that there are no financial institutions too big to fail anymore, so that if they continue to act irresponsibly, then they are just allowed to fail.


FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

Credit-default swaps -- the financial instrument that helped bring down AIG and played a key role in causing the biggest financial crisis since the 1930s -- are, a year after the fall of Lehman Brothe...
Credit-default swaps -- the financial instrument that helped bring down AIG and played a key role in causing the biggest financial crisis since the 1930s -- are, a year after the fall of Lehman Brothe...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,848
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (31 total)
06:13 PM on 09/17/2009
This is the big story on HP. Too bad it can't net 10,000-plus comments like the story about the president calling Kanye West names. Why can't he called AIG execs names?
03:27 AM on 09/18/2009
Some people do not understand financial markets and credit default swaps...therefore, fewer comments. However, even a child can comment on "name calling".
03:41 PM on 09/17/2009
Everyday we, the people, get ripped off by those we put in office..and this cycle continues year after year

good articles 4 slow news day: http://www.iamned.com r
02:26 PM on 09/17/2009
Anyone know the percentage of chicks vs roosters that post on HP...perhaps the moderator who is wondering if he/she should post this...since it has nothing to do with the "credit swap"article discussion has the answer. And would answer ..if that's allowed. Hello...hellooo
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mike Keough
12:20 PM on 09/17/2009
Great read. But hey, where are all the comments from the Tea bagging, Freedom loving, Town Hall meetings saying that the Government has no business regulating this "profit machine"? I can not watch Kudlow for very long. The FACT that the rich investor class wants to start running again is only too obvious. The Dow and the S and P stock exchanges are watched on an hour to hour basis by those who create necessary regulations. The Fed, the Treasury. That they evaluate how well we are doing as a Nation, based upon how the Rich are doing, is pathetic. The only interrelation between those markets and our Nations health, is the number of layoffs, and the number of businesses who move offshore. Why is it that we can not get any meaningful regulation? The disconnect gets deeper. We have in fact lost any control over the wealth creators. We hired Obama to get this under control and he is apparently failing. Entrenched power is damned hard to fight.
03:36 AM on 09/18/2009
Keep in mind that the wealthy live in a different environment and some only have discussions with other wealthy people on any given day...they may request something from someone providing a service but rarely have "real discussions". Their lives are good so they may not "feel" the pain of others in society.

As for the tea baggers, many of them are being led by people they "believe" to have authority and whom they think are knowledgeable by virtue of being on T.V. or radio. Many probably don't even understand the function of government regulations and its purpose in our society.
11:53 AM on 09/17/2009
The ARM's are starting to default as interest rates reset higher.
Many commercial real estate loans are going bad especially motels and hotels.
10:10 AM on 09/17/2009
Come on good people. Are we going to let these crooks tank the American financial structure AGAIN?
10:09 AM on 09/17/2009
Perhaps it is time to go back to the traditional holding of deposits against credit. Ya know if the Administration got Congress to pass legislation to limit the bonuses and rewards on this instrument they would go away tomorrow.
photo
Helzapoppin
Don't Piss Down My Back And Tell Me It's Raining.
10:08 AM on 09/17/2009
I think I'm going to go into the guillotine manufacturing business. Something tells me they are going to be very popular again in the future.
09:59 AM on 09/17/2009
While I agree that all of these CDS transactions are absurd, at least from an individual's perspective, what did we expect to happen? There was NOTHING done about them....still no need to hold additional capital, no regulation, no oversight, etc. We knew that they would continue but the bigger issue is how the financial system is being reformed. Ohh - that hasnt happened yet! Shocking.
10:24 AM on 09/17/2009
It is more transparent. Something has been done, and more is in the works. But right now CDS are significantly more transparent and standardized.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mosh
05:13 PM on 09/17/2009
Hello - - I voted for Obama and expected something better than this!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:47 AM on 09/17/2009
obama hasn't even called for a public inquiry / commission about this financial system debacle...

he's already decided that the derivatives markets only need to be made more efficient, and that the fed should be in charge of making sure banks are sufficiently capitalized...

obama is in the pocket of the banksters and hedge funders who schemed to suck all the wealth out of the system...

during glass-steagall, this type of collusion was outlawed...

obama simply wants to help the banksters and hedgies get better at it...

absolutely shameful...
02:38 PM on 09/17/2009
Actually a Pecora-like Commission is in the works: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-crisis-commission17-2009sep17,0,3917434.story

Of course, what kinds of powers said commission will get and who controls the witnesses and subpoena powers will be just slightly important....
11:24 PM on 09/17/2009
The Pecora Commission should have been on this a year ago.
09:42 AM on 09/17/2009
And on the horizon; Commercial real estate defaults. That will be a mess as well. Local and State tax revenue(s) will be less, and they will need help as well.....9-17@7:42
09:29 AM on 09/17/2009
What Arianna said is spot on. We just need to make the market a place where businesses are responsible for their own risks. No more "too big to fail". We can impose limits and regulations on the amount of interweaving these businesses can do. But they have to be IMPOSED, we can't negotiate with these people. They have openly, again and again, outright displayed that they are just trying to make as much money as they can before the whole thing explodes.

We need to hold these people's feet to the fire. If Obama can't do that, forget healthcare, we're screwed.
10:21 AM on 09/17/2009
This is impossible. Too big to fail is meaningless. The top half is too interconnected to fail, and there is no way out of that box. Accept it. Bailing them out works.
11:27 AM on 09/17/2009
Oh, there's a way out of the box. It involves throwing these people in prison and nationalizing their businesses. But short of that, we can just steer them in the direction of societal responsibility.

And bailing them out works? Did you, like, read this article? We bailed them out. And what do they do? The same thing that got them bailed out.

If you're a capitalist, be a capitalist. Take your risks and accept your losses. The taxpayers aren't here to foot the bill for your adventure.
09:18 AM on 09/17/2009
Thanks to TimmyG in Treasury, and Congress, why wouldn't we think CDS would go running forward recklessly? No one has put the brakes on such gambling? Bernanke and TimmyG love bubbles.

President Obama speaks with forked tongue.

http://eye-on-washington.blogspot.com
10:22 AM on 09/17/2009
So it's gambling to insure your house or your car.

Is it gambling to insure your health?
02:42 PM on 09/17/2009
CDSs are insurance without the collateral; in other words, when the default occurs, the underwriters don't pay up. A simpler word for that scenario: fraud. Breach of contract begets bailout.
11:27 PM on 09/17/2009
Come on, man. These were naked credit-default swaps. It's like me getting paid when you and your drunken Goldman Sachs buddies wreck the limosine on your way to the next foreclosure party. The companies had no interest in the products they insured. Too bad the typical American can understand that, or else we'd have change-inducing marches.
lastpost
see biography
09:04 AM on 09/17/2009
“In theory, Bank A is covered”

Presumably, the logic is that it is impossible for all to default at one and the same time?
If it is not impossible, has Bank B ÂŁ1M available, for every ÂŁ1K policy issued? If not, then who is being expected to insure the insurers? The government?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:49 AM on 09/17/2009
taxpayers and market investors...

sucks if you are both...
photo
JackRusselTerrier
sniff out the truth and chew on facts
08:56 AM on 09/17/2009
You are just cattle_ to them.

Excerpts from
"Back to Business Wall Street Pursues Profit in Bundles of Life Insurance"
By JENNY ANDERSON

The bankers plan to buy “life settlements,” life insurance policies that ill_ and elderly_ people sell for cash — $400,000 for a $1 million policy, say, depending on the life_ expectancy of the insured_ person. Then they plan to “securitize” these policies, in Wall Street jargon, by packaging hundreds or thousands together into bonds. They will then resell those bonds to investors, like big pension funds, who will receive the payouts when people with the insurance die_.

The earlier the policyholder dies_, the bigger the return — though if people live_ longer than expected, investors could get poor returns or even lose money...

...“We’re hoping to get a herd_ stampeding_ after the first offering,” said one investment banker not authorized to speak to the news media...

...And the proponents of securitizing life settlements say it would benefit people who want to cash out their policies while they are alive_.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/business/06insurance.html?adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1253092106-li8eBUT30vL3BZ9RsowzVQ