Two Weeks Later, NEA Weighs In On Yosi Sergant Demotion

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Two Weeks Later, NEA Weighs In On Yosi Sergant Demotion stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 09-22-09 05:01 PM   |   Updated: 09-22-09 05:24 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Yosi

It's not quite what you'd get from a rapid-response war room, but roughly two weeks after the National Endowment for the Arts demoted communications director Yosi Sergant, the agency is getting its side of the story out.

NEA Chairman Rocco Landesman sends the following statement to HuffPost:

As chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts, I would like to clarify the issues concerning an August conference call in which an NEA employee participated.

Here are the facts.

Fact 1: The former NEA Director of Communications helped organize and participated in an August 10th conference call to introduce members of the arts community to United We Serve and to provide them with information on how the Corporation for National and Community Service can assist groups interested in sponsoring service projects or having their members volunteer on other projects.

Fact 2: The former NEA Director of Communications acted unilaterally and without the approval or authorization of then-Acting Chairman Patrice Walker Powell.

Fact 3: This call was not a means to promote any legislative agenda and any suggestions to that end are simply false. Rather, the call was to inform members of the arts community of an opportunity to become involved in volunteerism.

Fact 4: Some of the language used by the former NEA Director of Communications was, unfortunately, not appropriate and did not reflect the position of the NEA. This employee has been relieved of his duties as director of communications.

Fact 5: This call was completely unrelated to NEA's grantmaking, which is highly regarded for its independence and integrity. Artistic quality, excellence and merit are the guidelines for decision-making; favoritism or political affiliation plays no role in NEA grantmaking.

Fact 6: The NEA is a successful, independent federal agency that has supported the best of the arts and arts education for nearly 45 years. We take our responsibility to the American public very seriously and are committed to upholding this public trust.

Although my time here has been brief - in fact I arrived at the agency on August 11th the day after the conference call - I am proud to lead the National Endowment for the Arts, proud to work with its capable and energetic staff, and proud to play a role in enhancing the quality of life for the people of our great nation.

It's not quite what you'd get from a rapid-response war room, but roughly two weeks after the National Endowment for the Arts demoted communications director Yosi Sergant, the agency is getting its si...
It's not quite what you'd get from a rapid-response war room, but roughly two weeks after the National Endowment for the Arts demoted communications director Yosi Sergant, the agency is getting its si...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
114
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- larry278 I'm a Fan of larry278 46 fans permalink

Spin is another word for bovine scat. The statement of the NEA is nothing save, spin.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:24 AM on 09/23/2009

This statement is a humiliating thing to have to read. The MSM is having a ratings field day pushing 'race' as a driving force behind the vitriol of the rabid fringe, they shy from suggesting it might be 'culture'. Culture is far more difficult to frame. It is dynamic within a society and can only really be measured and qualified in retrospect. America has had a rich culture, and an impoverished culture, most recently more the later. (example; our society's obsession with train wreck celebrity over the astounding developments in Human Genome Research) One could frankly state, a society without culture is dead. For those who rail against funding the NEA; just because you insist on being an idiot, don't drag your country down with you. You will find yourself a victim of your being the weakest link. The NEA provides a critical function in maintaining the cultural vitality of our country, just because you don't see it doesn't make it not so.The NEA operates in a year on what the Military Industrial Complex burns off in the time it took for you to read this. I resent that use of my tax dollars, so don't begrudge me the right to believe that a few of our tax dollars are going to keep our country's culture on life-support.
The fact that the Director of the NEA has had to grovel for the few pearls cast out by the swine is simply humiliating.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:43 AM on 09/23/2009
- alexdog I'm a Fan of alexdog 10 fans permalink

I have not seen or read anything (doesn't mean if is not there) calling for defunding of the NEA. By their own admission their actions in this matter have been "inappropriate." IF (and I do not know if this has occurred) NEA grants were awarded to any ot those groups or individuals to "to further the president's very aggressive agenda (Buffy Wick's words) then it is more than inappropriate. What I am appalled by is the trend of many to hold this myopic view that because an agency or group does good work then we should look the other way when they overstep their bounds. If the Red Cross were to transport guns or drugs because they have space on the plane after dropping off supplies during a humanitarian effort, would that be okay because they do so much "good" work. It seems that so many who passionately stand behind one sector of government spending turn and point to another area that they don't agree with. I encourage those people to aggressively lobby for those areas that they are passionate about and lobby against those that they disagree with.
Here is an interesting take on this NEA situation:
http://www.city-journal.org/2009/eon0921ak.html

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 AM on 09/23/2009
- Terypat I'm a Fan of Terypat 9 fans permalink

I would say the Obama administration is more like Bush III. Change I can believe in? I'm still waiting.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:21 AM on 09/23/2009
- Benton I'm a Fan of Benton 36 fans permalink

Change your attitude.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:51 AM on 09/23/2009

This is why everyone thinks liberals are p***ys!!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:30 AM on 09/23/2009

I'm at a loss. There is NOTHING to apologize for here. When I read the full (offending) quote from Yosi I thought for sure this was going to be a letter of vindication from the NEA. Instead the White House issues the new regulations, demotes the fall guy and generally put their tail b/w their legs.

The quote said, “I would encourage you to pick something, whether it’s health care, education, the environment, you know, there’s four key areas that the corporation has identified as the areas of service.”

The corporation is the Corporation for National and Community Service. They actually appear to have 5 areas of service - including also community renewal and safety & security. I wonder if he would have mentioned these, there would have been this uproar. Are the GOP really arguing that education, health care and environment are Democray only issues? Come on.

Obama needs to grow a pair and stop caving in to every little BS story. The "stories" will surely keep coming if they keep getting results.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:47 AM on 09/23/2009

I agree!! The biggest let down so far is that the white house seems to be a little on the whi*py side. Just because their progressives does not mean they have to act like liberals!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:31 AM on 09/23/2009

There is PLENTY to apologize for. Maybe it's missing from your story, but here's more of it, from Politico (although I've seen the transcript elsewhere):

[[Wicks later told the NEA artists listening in that “we’re going to come at you with some specific asks here.”

Sergant followed by explaining he “would encourage you to pick something, whether it’s health care, education, the environment, you know, there’s four key areas that the corporation has identified as the areas of service.”

“My ask would be to apply artistic, you know, your artistic creative community’s utilities and bring them to the table,” Sergant said. “This is a chance for us to partner with the White House and the Corporation for National and Community Service along [with] the arts community in immediately affecting some change in our communities.”]]

That is absolutely, positively, unequivocally inappropriate. The White House pressuring the NEA to pressure artists to product art to promote the president's agenda? I would have been livid if Bush had pulled such nonsense -- and so would you. It's not right when Obama does it, either.

And by the way, does Wicks report to Jarrett? If so, that means this is something Obama signed off on. Bad, bad policy, Obama.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27456.html#ixzz0RvDnONjr

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:54 AM on 09/23/2009
- Sweetbay I'm a Fan of Sweetbay 138 fans permalink
photo

I'm lost.

Is this the website I go to when I want to count how many times the word ACORN can be used in a sentence?

Hey, Neos. Has there ever been a conspiracy theory you didn't believe? DUCK & COVER!!!! Just kidding.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:16 PM on 09/22/2009
- GeorgeP922 I'm a Fan of GeorgeP922 101 fans permalink
photo

Hey ratings pay, just sad they are marginalizing a very talented reporter for this yawn fest garbage.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 PM on 09/22/2009
photo

So much for free thinking. Control is the new thought process. Just dress it up and make it look perty!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:02 PM on 09/22/2009
- GeorgeP922 I'm a Fan of GeorgeP922 101 fans permalink
photo

Wow, when did you flip to puma?

Seriously, drop the wonkette title.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 PM on 09/22/2009
photo

It was actually during the primaries when the Clintons were called the R word and the O campaign went with it. Also, when the DLC gave away unearned delegates in Michigan and Florida, thus leaving the dem meme of "every vote counts" as hogwash. And then I tok advice from Donna Brazile who said she "would leave the party." Then there's the flip on NAFTA, FISA, Iraq, Campaign Finance, no single payer even near the table, etc.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 PM on 09/22/2009
- Jack78 I'm a Fan of Jack78 12 fans permalink
photo

What are you the new internet czar?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 PM on 09/23/2009
photo

GOP 28% approval rating...Nothing else better to do these day eh ?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:01 PM on 09/22/2009

"Analysis: Why everyone is saying no to Obama
By AMIR MIZROCH

Everybody is saying no to the American president these days. And it's not just that they're saying no, it's also the way they're saying no. The Saudis twice said no to his request for normalization gestures towards Israel (at Barack Obama's meeting with King Abdullah in Saudi Arabia, and in Washington at meetings with Hillary Clinton). Who says no to the American president twice? What must they think of Obama in the desert kingdom?

The North Koreans said no to repeated attempts at talks, by test-launching long-range missiles in April; Russia and China keep on saying no to tougher sanctions on Iran; the Iranians keep saying no to offers of talks by saying they're willing to talk about everything except a halt to uranium enrichment; Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas is saying no by refusing to meet with Binyamin Netanyahu until Israel freezes all settlement construction; the Israelis said no by refusing to agree to a settlement freeze, or even a settlement moratorium until and unless the Arabs ante up their normalization gestures.

Which brings us back to the original Saudi no. The only thing Obama did manage to get Bibi and Abbas to say yes to is a photo-op at the Waldorf Astoria hotel in NY. Mazel tov. So why is everyone saying no to Obama?

It's the economy, stupid. "

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:16 PM on 09/22/2009
- psnyder I'm a Fan of psnyder 11 fans permalink

Gross overgeneralization. "Everyone"? You mean, domestically, the minority that didn't vote for him to begin with, and, internationally, the leaders of countries involved in some of the most intractable international problems? Gee, whoever could have guessed that the likes of them would say "no" to Obama once, twice, and even more than twice?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:47 PM on 09/22/2009
- Sweetbay I'm a Fan of Sweetbay 138 fans permalink
photo

I would love it if you could provide the link to the U.S. President who got a peace deal while giving a speech at the U.N.

I can't seem to find it.

And, could you please provide the link to the conversations you cited above. I can't seem to find any reference to your assertions of any leaders who have had actual meetings with the President saying "No" to him.

Thank you.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 PM on 09/22/2009

You lie.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 AM on 09/23/2009

This is the d*mbest peace of analysis I've wasted my time reading in a while.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:33 AM on 09/23/2009

Was ANYONE at The White House on the call in question?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:53 PM on 09/22/2009
- JulieSA I'm a Fan of JulieSA 164 fans permalink
photo

Yes. Valerie Jarrett's deputy, Buffy Wicks.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:12 PM on 09/22/2009
- JulieSA I'm a Fan of JulieSA 164 fans permalink
photo

Also someone from Serve.gov (which finally took down their ACORN link), and someone from a huge PR firm affiliated with Axelrod. They're the ones who slimed Palin with an astroturf youtube.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:26 PM on 09/22/2009
- GeorgeP922 I'm a Fan of GeorgeP922 101 fans permalink
photo

Wow Julie, you got me to turn against Obama, congrats.

Im sure you were boiling mad when Monica Goodling was exposed.

And Palin, your gonna defend Palin, someone who wouldn't spit on you if it would save your life.
Man Freedworks is brilliant!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 PM on 09/22/2009
- JulieSA I'm a Fan of JulieSA 164 fans permalink
photo

Go to biggovernment.com for the whole story. The White House was asking NEA-supported arts groups to promote Obamacare, and most of them complied.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 PM on 09/22/2009
- Iccarus I'm a Fan of Iccarus 31 fans permalink
photo

Is that a bad thing?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 PM on 09/22/2009
- Sweetbay I'm a Fan of Sweetbay 138 fans permalink
photo

Are you suggesting that reasonable people should go to a blog called "biggovernment"?

Really?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 PM on 09/22/2009
- thaneb I'm a Fan of thaneb 11 fans permalink
photo

As the link you provide demonstrates the White House was NOT asking the arts group to "promote Obamacare"
“I would encourage you to pick something, whether it’s health care, education, the environment, you know, there’s four key areas that the corporation has identified as the areas of service.”
“And then my ask would be to apply artistic, you know, your artistic creative communities utilities and bring them to the table.”
Where in these excerpts from the conference call is there a request to promote? As the author writes, "the organizers never discussed any specific policies"
Do you ALWAYS mischaracterize?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 PM on 09/22/2009
- sassy I'm a Fan of sassy 17 fans permalink

Julie is a good student of Beck's...he covered all this just today...co­incidence? I think not.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 PM on 09/22/2009

biggovernment.com is hardly a respectable news source.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:34 AM on 09/23/2009
- Lorianne I'm a Fan of Lorianne 58 fans permalink
photo

Yoshi, meet bus.
Bus, meet Yoshi

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:25 PM on 09/22/2009
- mg moore I'm a Fan of mg moore 4 fans permalink

Its hilarious to me how many people you guys are going to let 'the annointed one' throw under the bus and not make a peep.

You're too proud and self deluded to accept that you've been had.... just another hack politician with a gift for oratory....

I honestly was really frightened by the tone of the country on Jan. 20th.... but now all I see is the 'Change' that I want to believe in....

to Conservatives in 2010... Yes We Can!!!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:08 PM on 09/22/2009
photo

Conservatives can't DO anything.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:14 PM on 09/22/2009
- zanzig I'm a Fan of zanzig 38 fans permalink

They can plagiarise others' slogans.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:18 PM on 09/22/2009

Wrong.......we have a army behind us........Obama could possibly destroy the left for decades

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:41 PM on 09/22/2009
- c2morow I'm a Fan of c2morow 9 fans permalink

I can understand someone who posts a comment like yours to not understand the difference between real leadership and authoritarianism. Pres. Obama believes in accountability, thus the reason for the demotion. This is a sign of a true leader, unlike Bush, who did not throw people under the bus, and now we are in the mess we are in.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:17 PM on 09/22/2009

Obama is a major cause of this crisis......key a eye out....we have tied Obama to every criminal group.....news about Acorn "coming soon"

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:42 PM on 09/22/2009
- GeorgeP922 I'm a Fan of GeorgeP922 101 fans permalink
photo

Ryan, lets hope this is the last Glen Beck powered story.

Aren't you tired of all the tr0lls that come here, why don't you write a story how they completely avoid the Mike Ross scandal, but focus on the "way too black for me" ACORN

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:00 PM on 09/22/2009
photo

That chip is really big!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 PM on 09/22/2009
photo

Three states and at least 5 different ACORN offices that come up with the same advice and the people in charge of ACORN say it's a few bad apples?

Someone is teaching them what to say and it doesn't sound like a local thing.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:57 PM on 09/22/2009

You know the Red Cross and other agencies that have lots of volunteer workers have the same issues from time to time right?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:28 PM on 09/22/2009
- GeorgeP922 I'm a Fan of GeorgeP922 101 fans permalink
photo

Also Ryan if you are reading, try getting to work on how Nancy Pelosi just killed the deal with the house blue dogs, the SAME day it comes out that blue dog leader Mike Ross might be faces some serious criminal charges.

It's top of the rec list on Kos, how long will you guys wait (as I see the Ross story shot strait to the bottom of the politics page)

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:56 PM on 09/22/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect