iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama On Climate Change: U.S. "Determined To Act"

JOHN HEILPRIN   09/22/09 08:39 PM ET   AP

China

UNITED NATIONS — President Barack Obama and Chinese President Hu Jintao each vowed urgent action Tuesday to cool an overheating planet, even as prospects dimmed for a full treaty by the end of the year.

The world's two biggest greenhouse-gas polluting nations were the focus at the U.N.'s unprecedented daylong climate change summit, which drew more than 50 presidents and 35 prime ministers, along with many environment ministers and at least one prince.

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon opened the gathering with an appeal to leaders to set aside national interests and think about the future of the globe – and a rebuke for their foot-dragging thus far.

"The climate negotiations are proceeding at glacial speed. The world's glaciers are now melting faster than human progress to protect them – and us," the U.N. chief said.

Failure to reach a new international pact on climate change "would be morally inexcusable, economically shortsighted and politically unwise," Ban warned. "The science demands it. The world economy needs it."

At the end of the summit, however, Ban and Danish Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen, who will host the treaty talks, said they were encouraged at the prospects. "This feeling of political momentum – that was very strong," said Loekke Rasmussen.

Tuesday's U.N. gathering and the G-20 summit in Pittsburgh this week are seen as an attempt to pressure rich nations to commit to a global climate treaty at Copenhagen, Denmark, in December, and to pay for poorer nations to burn less coal and preserve their forests.

With a mere 76 days to go before the pivotal conference, it appeared an interim agreement might be the most that could be expected in December, leaving difficult details for later talks.

"We are on the path to failure if we continue to act as we have," French President Nicolas Sarkozy cautioned.

Much attention was fixed on Obama's first U.N. speech, in which he pledged the United States is "determined to act."

"The threat from climate change is serious, it is urgent, and it is growing," Obama said, after receiving loud applause. "And the time we have to reverse this tide is running out."

But while Obama campaigned for the presidency vowing to push through stringent cuts in U.S. emissions, he has run up against stiff resistance among Republicans, and the Senate most likely won't have written climate legislation until after the Copenhagen meeting.

By comparison, Hu runs a command economy and was unencumbered by political opposition. He outlined an ambitious program that included plans to plant enough forest to cover about 150,000 square miles – an area the size of Montana – and generate 15 percent of its energy needs from renewable sources within a decade.

He said the communist nation would also take steps to improve energy efficiency and reduce "by a notable margin" its growth rate of carbon pollution as measured against economic growth – though he did not give any specific numerical targets.

"At stake in the fight against climate change are the common interests of the entire world," Hu said. "Out of a sense of responsibility to its own people and people across the world, China fully appreciates the importance and urgency of addressing climate change."

Still, China and other developing nations "should not ... be asked to take on obligations that go beyond their development stage," Hu said.

China and India, the world's fifth-biggest greenhouse gas emitter, both want to link emissions to their growth in gross domestic product, meaning they still may increase emissions even if they take fundamental steps to curb them in the long run.

Experts were watching China closely because it has in the past largely ignored global efforts to diminish emissions. The United States, under former President George W. Bush's administration, stayed away from international commitments citing inaction by major developing nations like China and India.

China and the U.S. each account for about 20 percent of all the world's greenhouse gas pollution, created when coal, natural gas or oil are burned. The European Union is next, generating 14 percent, followed by Russia and India, which each account for 5 percent.

In his speech Tuesday, Obama detailed the steps his administration is taking to reduce America's carbon footprint, including doubling the generating capacity from wind and other renewable resources in three years, launching offshore wind energy projects and spending billions to capture carbon pollution from coal plants.

Obama previously had announced a voluntary target of returning to 1990 levels of greenhouse emissions by 2020, but action awaits Congress passing legislation to make those goals law.

By contrast, the EU has urged other rich countries to match its pledge to cut emissions by 20 percent from 1990 levels by 2020, and has said it would cut up to 30 percent if other rich countries follow suit.

On Tuesday, Japan's new prime minister, Yukio Hatoyama, whose nation generates more than 4 percent of the world's greenhouse gases, pledged his nation would seek a 25 percent cut in greenhouse gas emissions from 1990 levels by 2020.

Hatoyama also said Japan is ready to contribute money and technical help for poorer countries to cut emissions. He called for a "fair and effective international framework" that allows all countries to make cuts.

Actor Djimon Hounsou of Benin helped open the summit, quoting late astronomer Carl Sagan and showing his "Pale Blue Dot" photo of Earth taken in 1990 from Voyager 1 within the larger cosmos.

Despite the lofty words, some international experts were disappointed.

"Someone must have switched the coffee to decaf at today's U.N. climate summit," Oxfam International spokesman David Waskow said. "Heads of state did not seem to have the necessary energy to deliver the drive we need heading into Copenhagen. We must not let poetic words cover up inadequate action."

"President Obama did not go far enough today and he really needs to throw himself in the game," Waskow said. "Other countries, however, did step up: China expressed readiness to set a carbon intensity target and Japan announced to the world its intention to achieve substantial emissions cuts by 2020."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

UNITED NATIONS — President Barack Obama and Chinese President Hu Jintao each vowed urgent action Tuesday to cool an overheating planet, even as prospects dimmed for a full treaty by the end of t...
UNITED NATIONS — President Barack Obama and Chinese President Hu Jintao each vowed urgent action Tuesday to cool an overheating planet, even as prospects dimmed for a full treaty by the end of t...
Filed by Hanna Ingber Win  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 365
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BLUEBIRD1234
A POLITICAL ANALYST
09:22 AM on 09/25/2009
The Submit ended with no serious commitments from any world leader at this juncture of when life and death on this planet is very much the question . These illustrates, their immediate worries are wealth and development of the country not climate change and its devastating effect on existence of life on the planet.

Absolutely demoralizing to hear the world leaders .The general world public are worried about existence and expect an immediate action plan to counter.

It is good that US President spelled out some practical action that he has already taken in the positive direction as action towards reversing the impact of climate change. So did China to add that public expects they would do more to reduce emission then promised as they proceed ahead and In addition will help the under developing and poor countries in this regard,

Both Presidents of USA and that of China though is on right direction to tackle the issue under consideration deserve heartfelt thanks. It epected from both that they would do more than already promised.

It will be a improper for to obstruct the passing of legislation on greenhouse emission by 2020 but also USA This problem has nothing to do with party politics as it is a matter of the survival question of life on earth. These Republicans must realize if live on this planet survives then the question of development etc will arise otherwise everything will be meaningless.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BLUEBIRD1234
A POLITICAL ANALYST
09:54 PM on 09/24/2009
Well my friends of all over the world I am totally disheartened to ventilate that, worst life threatening problem is not being handled satisfactorily This is the only issue where all countries are faced with the same problem equally; therefore there should be no difference of opinion to come out with an immediate Action plan.

And this can be immediately done by the world super powers. It only needs them to sit down and come out with an immediate at once action plan. But no, have to waste time lecturing to make people understand . A street child of yesterday also knows what global warming means to his survival. Then why waste time on giving lectures, hold seminars, meetings and conferences etc. .

It is the only time when world super power leaders can honestly exhibit personal qualities of leadership capabilities to the world public and to assure them of safety by dint of their unmatched leadership qualities. That is what need is now. The common people want pragmatic leadership from the world leaders and not leadership of uncertainty and indecision.

If they are serious then they should at once sit down, chalk-out the action plan and ask the rest of the world to implement without any excuse what so ever, that's all or else face diplomatic segregation irrespective of small or big country. To do this, wastage of time and energy is not need. Yeah, a strict supervising team is needed and is a must..
03:02 PM on 09/24/2009
Of course, capitalism based on fractional reserve banking schemes has a hard time existing if people save and conserve.....hhhhmmmm..........
02:57 PM on 09/24/2009
In other words...I believe global warming is real...just as I believe human technology and carbon fuels poison the planet...but there are upsides to the period that some powerful entities are welcoming with open arms...and in the meantime we are all arguing over a "silver bullet" scheme that the money changers have developed to create the "new money" of the world.

Cap and Trade is a crock of ch!t ponzi scheming power play by the same jack arses that are robbing us blind as we sit here and type away.

slow consumption...slow reproduction...reduce....reuse...recycle. It doesn't require a new constitution or more government or bigger corporations.

Conservation...conservatism....wow. what a concept.
02:47 PM on 09/24/2009
for crying out loud. big biz wants the north pole out of the way to open up shipping routes and expose Alaska oil to mass profits (no more need for pipeline and shipping from SW Alaska)

northern hemisphere areas will gradually get more developed as people migrate to climates now warm enough to have a plausible life

equatorial regions away from water and sea will become uninhabitable (like polar regions are now)

oil and coal will run out and hydrogen, solar, nuclear will power the globe

and by then our population will be halved by disease and natural calamity

but...by all means...lets scare everyone into adopting an unscrupulous scheme designed to entrench Goldman Sachs and Exxon as world rulers for the next 500 years...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:05 AM on 09/24/2009
Does anyone know enough about this topic to comment on the arguments made in this article? I've never heard anyone argue that Bush did anything positive for the environment, let alone that his policies went "beyond" Kyoto.

http://hotair.com/archives/2009/09/22/video-obama-claims-the-us-did-nothing-on-emissions-before-2009/
05:07 AM on 09/24/2009
Exxon Mobil Funded latest climate bill(interesting)

Industries and individual companies with a stake in the landmark House climate and energy bill poured money into lobbying early this year

Exxon Mobil Corp. spent the most within that group, paying $9.3 million on lobbying the first quarter of this year.
Last year the company spent $29 million, its highest level ever.
06:28 PM on 09/23/2009
The evidence as presented by the media, both for and against global warming, is inadequate to do anything more than reinforce our preconceived notions about the issue.

There is still plenty of room for healthy skepticism on both sides of the debate.
12:00 PM on 09/23/2009
If the hoax mongers ever went through the vetting process that active scientists go through to do their work, they’d see that a hoax is impossible. First, they make a proposal for funding that is reviewed by anonymous reviewers (from around the world) – one bad one, no, one mediocre review and the work is dead in the water. Next the best proposals go before a panel of experts (not all in their field) to select the best of the best and rank them for funding. The lucky few get a grant for three years (vetted every year, however) to conduct the work. After all that, they submit publications to a journal where they are reviewed again by several anonymous experts, any one of whom could torpedo it.

The danger of a hoax arising from such a process is virtually Z-E-R-O! The bigger danger is that some reviewer will torpedo something because they recognize a good idea for their own pursuits or a result that they would be scooped on.

But we scientists tend to be a moral lot. We take our volunteer review work seriously under the guise “do unto others as you’d have them do unto you”. To suggest a simple conspiracy of scientists is absurd. Science is all about “falsification”. No, that is not lying. Falsification is getting a result, making a hypothesis, and trying to do experiments that will disprove it. If the idea passes that test, we do another, then another, …
07:42 AM on 09/23/2009
This is the biggest political scam of our time - a way for the elites to shift money in their direction. The climate has always been changing; it isnt a man-caused issue...but there sure is a lot of money to be made off people's fears and ignorance. And suppositionally, even IF man was causing it, why in the world would we believe we have any capacity to stop it? or any obligation to hand our money over to the people who will 'save us'? We will have an over-population issue way before 'the world melts'. The fact that the people of this world sit by and apathetically let the 'leaders' of this world control money the way they do is pitiful. You want out of a recession? Well, stop giving your money to washington to 'fix' your problems. The most ridiculous thing is that 20 years down the road, when we're in a financial rut because statist democrats and squirrel huggers wouldnt let us drill on our own land while we research other energy means; they'll still be taking credit and fabricating reasons for 'saving the world' that never really needed saving to begin with. Pathetic.
07:39 AM on 09/23/2009
organic vegan diet is the only solution, green energy will fail. 80% of global warming is due to livestock production. crack down the animal factories.
07:43 AM on 09/23/2009
Obama can reduce America's CO2 emissions by 50% if he would just stop yapping.
07:33 AM on 09/23/2009
and Now Obama's (and Al Gore's) Chief climate change expert says we have been in "global cooing" for the last ten years AND that the temp of the atlantic ocean near the North Pole Region is projected to cool for the next two decades...and a growing number of climate experts are finally agreeing that there is no "global warming"...Bad news for the Libs. They will have to find a new reason to increase taxes and pass new laws.
04:18 AM on 09/23/2009
•The Kyoto Protocol commits 38 industrialized countries to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 2008-2012 to overall levels that are 5.2 percent below 1990 levels. Targets for greenhouse gas emissions reduction were established for each industrialized country. Developing countries including China and India were asked to set voluntary targets for greenhouse gas emissions.

•The United States did not ratify the Kyoto Protocol, and in February 2002 introduced the Clean Skies and Global Climate Change initiatives, in which targets for reduction in greenhouse gas emissions are linked directly to GDP and the size of the U.S. economy.

'THE UNITED STATES IS A CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL GREEN ENERGY, ANTI POLLUTION, GLOBAL WARMING, CHEAPSKATE.' The US wants to tell the world what to do about Global Warming and pollution with its idea of Green Energy and the a new Global Warming initiative, yet refuse to put any money where their mouth is. Why don't they pay their dues and put up the money they have yet to pay the world, before they open their mouths. Obama are you listening, put up the $money or just plain shut up. No one will believe you until you "show the world your share of the money."
06:15 AM on 09/23/2009
Who's money? Taxpayers?
06:19 AM on 09/23/2009
The whole point of the cap-N-trade legislation is to make some insiders rich at the expense of others. At best, third world countries can only hope for a token amount to buy their cooperation.
04:03 AM on 09/23/2009
Obama the United States and the Climate Warming Initiative amounts to a Big Zero.
On the campaign trail, Barack Obama promised to reverse the Bush administration's terrible ecological record. Yet so far the world has seen more symbolic gestures from the Obama administration than accomplishments. Its biggest achievement so far has been a disappointment. President Obama signed an executive order to increase US motor vehicle mileage standards – but only to a level that will push fuel efficiency by 2020 to a level that European and Japanese cars reached several years ago, and even China has already achieved.
Europe has announced donations of $2bn to $15bn a year for the next decade to help developing nations cope with climate warming, yet the Obama administration has not offered anything close to that amount. Europe also wants binding, near-term targets for developed nations, proposing a 20% reduction from 1990 levels by 2020, or 30% if everyone agrees. The Bush administration of course rejected such targets – but now it looks like the Obama administration is not willing to go much further. It has said such targets should be voluntary but verifiable.
The Guardian / Stephen Hill / Obama the impotent
The United States did not sign the Kyoto Agreement and didn't put any money towards it, yet Europe, Asia have made a financial investment, and even Canada its neighbor to the north has already committed in April 2005, $10bn to cut greenhouse gases by 270 megatons a year by 2008-2012.
07:35 AM on 09/23/2009
I am so tired of pseudo intellectuals spouting pseudo-science. The "ecosystem" has nothing to do with vapor pressure - that is a physical phenomenon. The "ecosystem" has a lot to do, however, with providing a natural cycle that incorporates CO2 into biomass. How do you think the fossil fuels got there in the first place? CO2 in the atmosphere is as natural and fundamental as anything in this terrestrial environment - it is not a "pollutant" as has been commonly referred to by uninformed self-styled experts. It is exhaled by all living things. Its concentration in the atmosphere has fluctuated much more wildly over eons without our puny homocentric contributions or delusions of grandeur. Yes, humans have recently been contributing to net concentration of CO2 to the atmosphere by combusting fossil fuels during a period of relatively static natural variation, but a rational analysis of the scientific evidence is not conclusive regarding the effect of this. Al Gore, the "Fundamental Transformation" Obama administration, and a large number of government grant recipients and entrepreneurs who stand to benefit handsomely from diversion of public funds to research, renewable and so-called "green" initiatives are frantically trying to panic poorly informed people and congress into giving up rights and making committments we can't take back, striking while the iron is hot and before their house of cards emergency collapses from lack of evidence.
01:55 AM on 09/23/2009
Some Americans are so behind on scientific evidence because Republicans are able to openly lie about climate issues and get away with it. Maybe the public denies global warming because it is easier for them to go on as usual. Some politicians even can claim men and dinosaurs walked the earth at the same time and they get away with it also.

The mixture of deliberately wrong information combined with religious nuttery is a laugh for anybody outside the USA. On our news last night they said yes, Obama's speech was good, but no action will follow as he is blocked heavily in the senate.
06:38 AM on 09/23/2009
I suggest you look in a mirror when you make such perjorative allegations. Al Gore's eco-fanatics are the religious zealots. Al Gore's book "An Inconvenient Truth" is a propaganda piece built on lies that contradict Science. For example on page 178 he claims Antarctic land ice is thining everywhere. This is a lie refuted by science. Scientific measurements prove the land ice is THICKENING in a very large part of Antarctica. Al Gore used that lie to add credibility to his alarmist claim Oceans would greatly rise and flood out untold millions.

ps: The Arctic polar ice cap is now growing larger. Maybe for an encore, you should extrapolate that trend out to the next ice age.
09:36 AM on 09/23/2009
My post was more in the direction of the fact Americans, although a small minority in the total world population take it as an almost birthright to have access to cheap gas, pollute the planet big time for ages and are totally unaware of all this.