More

Poll: Glenn Beck Enjoying Higher Favorability Than Rush Limbaugh

First Posted: 11/23/09 05:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 03:10 PM ET

Tvbeckobama

Over at FiveThirtyEight, Nate Silver digs down into the recent NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll and unpacks some interesting data on Fox News' paranoiac firebrand Glenn Beck.

The takeaway? For all the melodramatic on-air pyrotechnics that Beck indulges in, as far as the court of public opinion, Beck hasn't really made too many negative waves. If there's a "bad news" component, it is that 57 percent of those polled "either don't know Beck or are indifferent toward him."

But, in terms of generic favorability ratings, Beck fares pretty well: "While just 24 percent of Americans have a favorable view of him (13 percent strongly so), only 19 percent have an unfavorable one (14 percent strongly)."

In this regard, Beck is making out much better than the godfather of conservative talk, Rush Limbaugh:

Silver analyzes the findings:

The difference between Beck and Limbaugh is that Beck is much more of an anti-establishment figure. I have posited before that running perpendicular to the traditional liberal-conservative spectrum is an establishment/anti-establishment spectrum; Beck is conservative but anti-establishment. And that may be working out pretty well for him, since the country seems to be becoming more anti-establishment too.

This all dovetails back to a point I made yesterday: Beck adjusts and moderates his positions depending on his audience. Back when he was on CNN and the country was in the nascent throes of the financial apocalypse, Beck was a bailout fan, criticizing the government for not funneling more money to Wall Street. But now that time has passed and Beck has changed networks, he's become a fiery critic of bailouts (thus exploiting the anti-establishment sympathies that are rising on all points on the left-right spectrum). There's no intellectual consistency to be found in the two positions -- Beck just started espousing something different because doing so worked to his personal advantage.

When Beck joined Katie Couric for an interview and bizarrely suggested that he'd be a supporter of universal health-care advocate Hillary Clinton, he was, similarly, shrewdly probing for the affections of Couric's demographic. Couric, largely availed this effort by conducting what amounted to a softball interview in which none of these logical inconsistencies were ever discussed.


Watch CBS Videos Online

Over at The Feed, Eric Deggans criticizes Couric at length for this and pulls out another moment that illustrates Beck's moderating tactics:

Couric did spend a fair amount of time pressing Beck on what he meant by white culture when he said President Obama has a deep-seated hatred of white people and white culture. His answer to her: "I can't think of a way to answer that that isn't a trap."

Deggans asks: "But isn't it a trap of his own making?" Indeed, it is. When Beck can't avail himself of the advantages of being a moving target, he knows better than to stand in front of the bull's eye. And Beck's next line of defense is to point out that he's only ever raising questions, never saying anything definitively.

And so, Beck has managed to get as far as he has without accruing all of the negative public opinion that sticks to Rush Limbaugh. But this should not be surprising. This is precisely how pandering is supposed to work.

RELATED:
Glenn Beck, Post-Modern Conservative [FiveThirtyEight]
Katie Couric barely lays a glove on Glenn Beck in hyped Webcast interview [The Feed]

PREVIOUSLY, on the HUFFINGTON POST:
Conservative Radio Host Blasts "Mindless...Pathetic" Beck For McCain Criticism

[Would you like to follow me on Twitter? Because why not? Also, please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com -- learn more about our media monitoring project here.]

FOLLOW HUFFPOST MEDIA

Over at FiveThirtyEight, Nate Silver digs down into the recent NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll and unpacks some interesting data on Fox News' paranoiac firebrand Glenn Beck. The takeaway? For all...
Over at FiveThirtyEight, Nate Silver digs down into the recent NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll and unpacks some interesting data on Fox News' paranoiac firebrand Glenn Beck. The takeaway? For all...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 260
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
photo
hypnotoad72
Real democracy = living wages.
08:23 PM on 10/14/2009
Well, more people prefer herpes over HIV too. So what?

/ducksforcover
05:48 PM on 10/14/2009
Beck has a higher favorability then Congress. What does that say folks?
photo
hypnotoad72
Real democracy = living wages.
08:30 PM on 10/14/2009
One steadfast, resolute-sounding individual versus a gaggle of individuals who can't make up their minds on anything, or at least aren't being bought and sold by the same john - oops, I mean lobbyist... but I digress... Replace Beck with a talking head of iceberg lettuce and people would still vote for the lettuce. I'm not sure why; a flaking leafy vegetable that has little nutritional value... but that describes 99% of television shows to begin with... how's that for collecting three disparate tangents with one common focal point? :-D
04:28 PM on 10/14/2009
"Aaaachie look your favorite guy, Glenn Beck, is popular, he has all of your ideals too." I can just hear Edith saying that to her husband in All in the Family during the 1970's. We all laughed at how silly Archy was saying all the things that made us cringe and sit up and think, what a bastard that guy can be.

Now we have an All in the Family guy Glenn Beck to laugh at every day. Unfortunately some people actually take him seriously which is very disturbing in deed.

For those who don't know Archie, here is a clip of him: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_UBgkFHm8o
photo
hypnotoad72
Real democracy = living wages.
08:32 PM on 10/14/2009
This clip is better:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmkoDXt3uK0

:-D
photo
SteveDenver
Progressive and liberal, just like Jesus Christ.
12:59 AM on 10/07/2009
That poll is like asking: "Which do you like better? Rancid ham or rancid turkey?"
01:27 PM on 10/13/2009
Or "which pile of dung do you like least; the great big steaming pile or the smaller one named Glenn?"
09:56 AM on 09/28/2009
Lets face it, Glen Beck has never been afraid to show his frightened blubbery side and DAMMIT- thats why all the thin skinned right wing loves him.
photo
BaronWVS
Turn off the Cable News! It's bad for ya!
03:21 PM on 09/27/2009
Incredible. A year ago this guy was just another face in a seemingly endless sea of Limbaugh-clones, and now he's the king of them all. Let's face it: he connects with legions of small-minded, bigoted, incurious, willfully ignorant people in a way that's almost magical. And sooner of later, one of them is going to obey the dog-whistle calls Beck is sending out and do something drastic. Right now, there's no way we can stop that. But what we can and should do, is make sure Beck to held to account when it happens.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alyseven
Religion is the root of all evil.
04:49 PM on 09/26/2009
What's up with these "polls"? Everywhere you look, the media is coming out with random polls, but very little information about how the results were obtained. To say "24 percent of Americans..." is misleading and inaccurate. Really? So the entire US population was polled? Guess they forgot me. Even so, exactly how many people were polled? What is the breakdown of the population polled? Where and how was the poll conducted? What were the questions in the poll? Who collected and analyzed the data to form the results? What is the margin of error? Etc. It's all SUCH a sham. I'm so sick of reading articles where polls are cited as though they provide any meaningful insight whatsoever into the true state of where Americans stand on various issues.

Anyone can create a poll and post it on their site or blog and the results are not going to reflect anything about the responders. In addition to spam-bots and organized efforts by a minority to skew poll results, internet polls are even more ridiculous to use as a gauge of the American public. I mean, come on, people! THINK about what you read. THINK about the source. Just THINK. Journalism has taken a very different turn and it's all about being sensational and grabbing headlines, so please- question what you read, since journalists are obviously not thinking about what they report any more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
munki
Global to Local now Local to Global
01:45 PM on 09/26/2009
Not a great comp, but Limbaugh may not learn...
12:23 PM on 09/26/2009
It’s fun to bash politicians. It’s become sport! However… back in the ‘90’s, most folks were doing pretty good. People had jobs. Health Care didn’t cost an arm and a leg, (though it was “creeping upâ€), and then President Clinton got caught with his pants down. Enter Rush-bo. This guy has made a career out of bashing the dems/liberals or whatever you want to call them.
Now, after 8 years of neoconservative rape & pillage of our country and our economy, folks aren’t doing pretty good. A lot of people DON’T have jobs. Health Care costs are astronomical.
All of a sudden, Rush-bo “ain’t so funny no-moreâ€. When people were doing well, it was fashionable to rip on politicians, government waste etc.
But now, Rush-bo and Glenn-bo are trying to sell a concept that people associate with job loss and sickness. The neoconservative ride is over. No one is laughing any more. No one cares what neo-con radio and tv people say. Everybody KNOWS what happened under Bush. From here on out, look for people like Rush-bo to slip away in the ratings. Why do you think he was on Leno? Desperate times call for desperate measures. You rarely see him away from his back-up staff and computers.
Beck has already proven he cannot avoid putting his own foot into his mouth. Once the novelty of his “freak-show†wear off, he will fade as well.
IT AIN’T FUNNY NO MORE, BOYS!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doublels
say it out loud...I'm a Lib & I'm proud
11:35 AM on 09/26/2009
Oh, I bet Rush has his knickers in a twist about this! Ouch...that's not a pretty pciture, is it?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LittleRedHenSez
07:12 PM on 09/26/2009
Doubt he cares as long as his salary remains significantly higher than Beck's.
04:28 AM on 09/26/2009
Why not compare Beck's popularity with any of the more (but barely) visible left wing pundits like Olbermann?
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
09:04 AM on 09/26/2009
Because that would reaffirm your misconception that politics is a battle of extreme rhetorics instead of the way we prepare the world for our children.
03:26 AM on 09/26/2009
Glenn Beck. The voice of the conservative movement. Makes things pretty clear, doesn't it?
01:26 PM on 09/26/2009
Yep! Pretty clear.
photo
SteveDenver
Progressive and liberal, just like Jesus Christ.
01:00 AM on 10/07/2009
The conservative movement is all mouths and no ears.
12:28 AM on 09/26/2009
The crazier you are the more the rubes love you.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JessWonderin
12:11 AM on 09/26/2009
Think we are getting to the BOTTOM of the gene pool . . . .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:48 AM on 09/26/2009
Jess ,why did you bring up olbermann in this debate?
11:26 PM on 09/25/2009
Olby was a close second!l