First HIV Vaccine Helps Prevent AIDS Infection

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - First HIV Vaccine Helps Prevent AIDS Infection stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS
What's Your Reaction?
Hiv

BANGKOK — For the first time, an experimental vaccine has prevented infection with the AIDS virus, a watershed event in the deadly epidemic and a surprising result. Recent failures led many scientists to think such a vaccine might never be possible.

The World Health Organization and the U.N. agency UNAIDS said the results "instilled new hope" in the field of HIV vaccine research, although researchers say it likely is many years before a vaccine might be available.

The vaccine – a combination of two previously unsuccessful vaccines – cut the risk of becoming infected with HIV by more than 31 percent in the world's largest AIDS vaccine trial of more than 16,000 volunteers in Thailand, researchers announced Thursday in Bangkok.

Even though the benefit is modest, "it's the first evidence that we could have a safe and effective preventive vaccine," Col. Jerome Kim told The Associated Press. He helped lead the study for the U.S. Army, which sponsored it with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

The institute's director, Dr. Anthony Fauci, warned that this is "not the end of the road," but he said he was surprised and very pleased by the outcome.

"It gives me cautious optimism about the possibility of improving this result" and developing a more effective AIDS vaccine, Fauci said. "This is something that we can do."

The Thailand Ministry of Public Health conducted the study. The U.S. Army has long worked with that government and others to develop and test vaccines and medicines to protect troops and the general public.

The study used strains of HIV common in Thailand. Whether such a vaccine would work against other strains in the U.S., Africa or elsewhere in the world is unknown, scientists stressed.

Story continues below
advertisement

Even a marginally helpful vaccine could have a big impact. Every day, 7,500 people worldwide are newly infected with HIV; 2 million died of AIDS in 2007, UNAIDS estimates.

"Today marks a historic milestone," said Mitchell Warren, executive director of the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition, an international group that has worked toward developing a vaccine. Warren was not involved in the study.

"It will take time and resources to fully analyze and understand the data, but there is little doubt that this finding will energize and redirect the AIDS vaccine field," he said in a statement.

The study tested the two-vaccine combination in a "prime-boost" approach, in which the first one primes the immune system to attack HIV and the second one strengthens the response.

They are ALVAC, from Sanofi Pasteur, the vaccine division of French drugmaker Sanofi-Aventis; and AIDSVAX, originally developed by VaxGen Inc. and now held by Global Solutions for Infectious Diseases, a nonprofit founded by some former VaxGen employees.

ALVAC uses canarypox, a bird virus altered so it can't cause human disease, to ferry synthetic versions of three HIV genes into the body. AIDSVAX contains a genetically engineered version of a protein on HIV's surface. The vaccines are not made from whole virus – dead or alive – and cannot cause HIV.

Neither vaccine in the study prevented HIV infection when tested individually in earlier trials, and dozens of scientists had called the new one futile when it began in 2003.

"I really didn't have high hopes at all that we would see a positive result," Fauci confessed.

The results proved the skeptics wrong.

"The combination is stronger than each of the individual members," said the Army's Kim, a physician who manages the Army's HIV vaccine program.

The study tested the combo in HIV-negative Thai men and women aged 18 to 30 at average risk of becoming infected. Half received four "priming" doses of ALVAC and two "boost" doses of AIDSVAX over six months. The others received dummy shots. No one knew who got what until the study ended.

Thanad Yomha, a 33-year-old electrician from southeastern Thailand, said he didn't expect anything in return for volunteering for the project.

"I did this for others," Thanad said. "It's for the next generation."

Participants volunteered for the study and were told about the potential risks associated with receiving the experimental vaccine before agreeing to participate.

All were given condoms, counseling and treatment for any sexually transmitted infections, and were tested every six months for HIV. Any who became infected were given free treatment with antiviral medicines. All participants continued to receive an HIV test every six months for three years after vaccinations ended.

The results: New infections occurred in 51 of the 8,197 given vaccine and in 74 of the 8,198 who received dummy shots. That worked out to a 31 percent lower risk of infection for the vaccine group. Two of the infected participants who received the placebo died.

The vaccine had no effect on levels of HIV in the blood for those who did become infected. That had been another goal of the study – seeing whether the vaccine could limit damage to the immune system and help keep infected people from developing full-blown AIDS.

That result is "one of the most important and intriguing findings of this trial," Fauci said. It suggests that the signs scientists have been using to gauge whether a vaccine was actually giving protection may not be valid.

"It is conceivable that we haven't even identified yet" what really shows immunity, which is both "important and humbling" after decades of vaccine research, Fauci said.

Details of the $105 million study will be given at a vaccine conference in Paris in October.

This is the third big vaccine trial since 1983, when HIV was identified as the cause of AIDS. In 2007, Merck & Co. stopped a study of its experimental vaccine after seeing it did not prevent HIV infection. Later analysis suggested the vaccine might even raise the risk of infection in certain men. The vaccine itself did not cause infection.

In 2003, AIDSVAX flunked two large trials – the first late-stage tests of any AIDS vaccine at the time.

It is unclear whether vaccine makers will seek to license the two-vaccine combo in Thailand. Before the trial began, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said other studies would be needed before the vaccine could be considered for U.S. licensing.

"This is a world first which proves that vaccine development is possible," Supachai said. "But this is not to the level where we can license or manufacture the vaccine yet."

Mass-producing the vaccine, plus how to proceed with future studies, will be discussed among the governments, study sponsors and companies involved in the trial, Kim said. Scientists want to know how long protection will last, whether booster shots will be needed, and whether the vaccine helps prevent infection in gay men and injection drug users, since it was tested mostly in heterosexuals in the Thai trial.

The study was done in Thailand because U.S. Army scientists did pivotal research in that country when the AIDS epidemic emerged there, isolating virus strains and providing genetic information on them to vaccine makers. The Thai government also strongly supported the idea of doing the study.

___

Associated Press Medical Writer Marilynn Marchione reported from Minneapolis.

___

On the Net:

Study information: http://www.hivresearch.org/phase3/factsheet.html

Vaccine coalition: http://www.avac.org/

UNAIDS: http://tinyurl.com/krq7kr

Government AIDS info: http://www3.niaid.nih.gov/topics/HIVAIDS/

BANGKOK — For the first time, an experimental vaccine has prevented infection with the AIDS virus, a watershed event in the deadly epidemic and a surprising result. Recent failures led many scie...
BANGKOK — For the first time, an experimental vaccine has prevented infection with the AIDS virus, a watershed event in the deadly epidemic and a surprising result. Recent failures led many scie...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
200
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
- blkbtrfly1 I'm a Fan of blkbtrfly1 11 fans permalink
photo

I find it interesting that this story didn't make the Big News page or get one of those ugly, big, red, all caps headlines. Very few posts here also.

I think it really speaks to our ignorance and complacency about this disease.This is both sad and scary. But a great day for medical research (I hope).

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:53 PM on 09/24/2009
- Tim303 I'm a Fan of Tim303 80 fans permalink
photo

This should have happened yesterday so I could have given the Jehovah's Witnesses at my door a piece of my mind. On their logic (no prizes for guessing what they think of HIV) we are now better than God.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:59 PM on 09/24/2009

You can always give Jehovah's Witness a piece of your mind. Why wait for a vaccine?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:41 PM on 09/24/2009
- marbiol I'm a Fan of marbiol 6 fans permalink

THIS STORY IS VERY PUZZLING

First, why would the ARMY be interested in developing an aids vaccine---unless they were planning on innoculating soldiers who would be involved in udispersing the virus as a biological weapon.

2nd--maybe, this is just the first step towards ending dont ask dont tell? possible.

what troubles me is, despite the way the article is written, how many of these 3rd world yellow-skinned people had to DIE so that we in the west could have na aids vaccine? this all could have been evaluated using computer models--that way even mice and rabbits would have been spared. its interesting that thye mortality rate during the so-called experiments are not listed.


there is more here than meets the eye--and lets not forget--thiese so-called experiments didnt stat under THIS president--so what are the REAL reasons for this vaccine????

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:57 PM on 09/24/2009
- truthfan I'm a Fan of truthfan 9 fans permalink

"Why would the ARMY be interested in developing an aids vaccine?"

Simple. They don't want soldiers getting AIDS. Soldiers are away from home, away from spouses and partners, and so are more likely to be tempted elsewhere. And now that women go to war, sex is more available for the straight majority.

Also, unfortunately, all the killing and gore and rage engenders rape as part of that violence, or else promiscuity to get it out of their heads.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:17 PM on 09/24/2009

I think that you are mixing up being gay with HIV/AIDS. In reality, here in the US and in Africa, there are more cases in the straight population now than in the gay population.... in particular straight women.

Also, a third world country is not a blanket term. In many third world countries, major cities can be just as advanced and as forward thinking as any western city. What defines third world is economics, not intelligence. Thailand has one of the highest rates of HIV infection in Asia so it only makes sense to do some of these trials there.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:45 PM on 09/24/2009
- kiran1207 I'm a Fan of kiran1207 9 fans permalink

weird comments

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:34 PM on 09/24/2009

Now I can finally get some! Gotta buy me a leisure suit and some platform shoes!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:39 PM on 09/24/2009
photo

LOL ! R. Crumb would be proud.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:27 PM on 09/24/2009
- steel71 I'm a Fan of steel71 12 fans permalink

Oh, and Neocons too!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:55 PM on 09/24/2009
- steel71 I'm a Fan of steel71 12 fans permalink

Free vaccines for Progressives!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:36 PM on 09/24/2009
- wadenelson1 I'm a Fan of wadenelson1 222 fans permalink
photo

Remind me. Who was the REPUBLICAN senator seeking arnal sex in the Minneapolis airport?

Why do you try and make this a lib versus con thing? Don't have anything intelligent to offer?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:17 PM on 09/24/2009
- steel71 I'm a Fan of steel71 12 fans permalink

Double the vaccines to match your double digit IQ..

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:16 PM on 09/24/2009

He wasn't seeking anal sex dork. He was seeking oral sex.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:46 PM on 09/24/2009
- Tim303 I'm a Fan of Tim303 80 fans permalink
photo

What on Earth gave you the impression that we want free health care? We want JUST healthcare.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:00 PM on 09/24/2009
- Socrmom I'm a Fan of Socrmom 10 fans permalink

Those number - 51 infections and 74 infections don't seem to be a statistically relavent sample. Unless all the people involved were exposed to aids how can you know for sure that it wasn't just a case of more people in the pacebo group actually being exposed. You can't say that exactly the same amount of people in each group were exposed to the disease, unless the researches actually exposed them.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:00 PM on 09/24/2009

What reason is there to suppose that one group was exposed more than the other to HIV? In these sorts of studies the assumption - and it IS a reasonable one - is that the groups are very similar to each other because they are assigned that way by the researchers. Presumably these people were recruited nd asked to fill out some lengthy questionnaire. Then, all the lifestyle factors were taken into account by the researchers and divided up in such a way that they were equally represented in both groups.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:19 PM on 09/24/2009
- BlueZoo I'm a Fan of BlueZoo 43 fans permalink

My brother has worked on finding a cure for auto-immune diseases since he treated Ted Kennedy, Jr. when that boy lost his leg to cancer and then David, the boy in the bubble. He has devoted his life to finding a cure or, at the very least, a vaccine for AIDS. The average person cannot imagine the complexity involved and how very disheartening it is to have not hundreds but thousands of experimental tests not be successful. These researchers have long bouts of depression over these failures and each light is encouragement they do desperately need. This is but a small step but it gives hope that the larger step is nearer than we thought a day or a year ago. This isn't a homosexual disease but one that affects anyone and we all pay for it in some way. We can only hope that we will see the end of this scourge in our lifetime!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:52 PM on 09/24/2009
- troutbum I'm a Fan of troutbum 6 fans permalink
photo

You know what else prevents AIDS? Using condoms, having one partner, ans not using IV drugs.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 PM on 09/24/2009
- steel71 I'm a Fan of steel71 12 fans permalink

But that takes responsibility? Who wants that when you can blame whitey for everything?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:35 PM on 09/24/2009
- vrndavan I'm a Fan of vrndavan 3 fans permalink
photo

historically, there's a lot to blame whitey for, but very few blame whitey for the AIDS virus. those that do are just as uninformed as you are!

your comment is offensive because you're assumption is that people of color are blaming "whitey for everything". more over that people of color are irresponsible. those are too broad of statements that are not worthy of any respect.

i work in the HIV prevention, and i can assure you that this epidemic sees no color or barriers. there are very responsible people of every shade and race that are being infected. keep your racist remarks bottled up in that tiny brain of yours. JERK!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 PM on 09/24/2009

You are very uninformed. One of the highest populations of HIV infection in the US are white women. I think that you should educate yourself on the face of HIV.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:48 PM on 09/24/2009
- blkbtrfly1 I'm a Fan of blkbtrfly1 11 fans permalink
photo

I don't think any one is blaming whitey for this one -- although there are plenty of other reasons to blame whitey.

If you really want to go there though, I have just one word for you. Tuskegee.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:50 PM on 09/24/2009
- truthfan I'm a Fan of truthfan 9 fans permalink

Also not having broken skin (hard luck, eczema sufferers - or people who have an accident), not getting raped (hard luck, women and girls), and not needing a blood transfusion where contaminated blood got in the supply.

Sure, there's some responsibility. And there's some luck.

Just like with any other disease.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:57 PM on 09/24/2009
- steel71 I'm a Fan of steel71 12 fans permalink

I highly recommend that all liberals get this vaccine! Please liberals, get this vaccine like your life depends on it. Also, don't forget to get the swine flu vaccine too. You'll be protected!!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 09/24/2009
photo

I have a very strong feeling that you think this vaccine is dangerous and you don't like liberals. Feel free to tell me if I have guessed wrong, but I expect the sound of crickets on this question. BTW, I will be getting both vaccines, because I am not afraid of science.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:53 PM on 09/24/2009
- steel71 I'm a Fan of steel71 12 fans permalink

Please, continue to trust the billion dollar corporate drug companies!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:31 PM on 09/24/2009
- Jaywalkker I'm a Fan of Jaywalkker 51 fans permalink
photo

Liberals?

Do conservatives, libertarians and others have a genetic immunity to any and all viral infections?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 PM on 09/24/2009
- steel71 I'm a Fan of steel71 12 fans permalink

That's not the point. You people make no sense. You support government health care, but then want vaccines from billion dollar corporations who profit from illness not cures..

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:34 PM on 09/24/2009
- roudy I'm a Fan of roudy 28 fans permalink

Neocons are a viral infection. Need that vaccine asap.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 PM on 09/24/2009

I have a feeling that you do not possess a college education. HIV rates of infection are far higher in the South... a conservative stronghold than anywhere else in the US. So... maybe conservatives should be getting vaccinated. Eh?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:50 PM on 09/24/2009

I hope Doctors will stop trying to push circumcision as a preventative now. A recommendation based on data that is barely statistically significant (The claimed number is less than 5%), and its worth noting that it doesn't help prevent transmission of HIV to women at all. So this one was always highly dubious. The other quasi-legitimate excuse is also useless now. (It reduces risk of transmissi­on/infecti­on of genital warts slightly), and there's a vaccine for that as well.

Doubtless they'll come up with some other trumped up excuse. They've been doing it for the last 150 years.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:31 PM on 09/24/2009
photo

Nobody cares much about wattles expect ole Tom Turkey. I recommend the half coat style as it gives you a place to hide in the Winter and sports the handsome man about town look. I'll bet you don't think this is funny.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 PM on 09/24/2009
- truthfan I'm a Fan of truthfan 9 fans permalink

It also reduces the incidence of penile and cervical cancers.

Wouldn't you rather have your foreskin removed than the whole thing?!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:01 PM on 09/24/2009

If this is true, this is a really big deal, HIV has been so hard to beat because it's a virus, and it can mutate, so we well see. For the evolution deniers out there, mutations are adaptive evolution.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:57 PM on 09/24/2009

If you are dealing with Aids just say out loud now Jesus I believe and I receive you in my heart please heal me. For more information please go to leroyjenkins.com. Thank you

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:56 PM on 09/24/2009
- Jaywalkker I'm a Fan of Jaywalkker 51 fans permalink
photo

Upon receiving Jesus in the heart or the laying on of hands by Leroy Jenkins, can and will amputated limbs be regrown?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:05 PM on 09/24/2009
- BlueZoo I'm a Fan of BlueZoo 43 fans permalink

I don't know but buy $50 of his "miracle water" and the shipping is free! LOL

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:56 PM on 09/24/2009
- BlueZoo I'm a Fan of BlueZoo 43 fans permalink

The Lord helps those who help themselves! NOT Leroy Jenkins!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 PM on 09/24/2009
photo

It sounds like the only thing which can be derived from this is that 23 people out of 8,197 people didn't get an HIV infection, when vaccinated. Oh boy.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:47 PM on 09/24/2009

Not really. It means there were 23 ADDITIONAL people in the placebo group compared to the vaccinated group that got HIV.
Understand much?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 PM on 09/24/2009
photo

I understand that the figures are worthless.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:06 PM on 09/25/2009
- Jaywalkker I'm a Fan of Jaywalkker 51 fans permalink
photo

The comparison of the study is weak as it assumes each group had the same amount of exposure to HIV transmission risk. Let's for the heck of it extrapolate the figures from the control group and the vaccinated group and hypothesize that all of the were exposed to HIV.

Control = effectively 100% or 8,198 new infections
Vaccinated = effectively had 69% or just 5,656 new infections

I call that a good start.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:02 PM on 09/24/2009
photo

Unfortunately, the scientific method is based on empirical data and not assumptions. Good try, though.

Have some mercury and squalene for me.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:08 PM on 09/25/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect