EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Volcker: Obama Plans Maintain 'Too Big To Fail'

DANIEL WAGNER   09/24/09 05:22 PM ET   AP

Volcker Too Big To Fail

WASHINGTON — A top White House economic adviser says the Obama administration's proposed overhaul of financial rules preserves the policy of "too big to fail," and could lead to future bailouts.

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker said Thursday that by designating some companies as critical to the broader financial system, the plans create an expectation that those firms enjoy government backing in tough times. That implies those financial companies "will be sheltered by access to a federal safety net," he said.

Lawmakers should make clear that nonbank companies will not be saved with federal money, he said.

Emergency measures by the Fed, Treasury and Congress during last year's financial crisis created the expectation that the government would step in to protect failing companies, their bond holders and stockholders, Volcker told the House Financial Services Committee.

Volcker said he does not differ with the administration on most of its proposals, and takes "as a given" that banks will be bailed out in times of crisis.

But he opposed bailouts of insurance firms like American International Group Inc., automakers' finance arms and others.

"The safety net has been extended outside the banking system," Volcker said. "That's what I want to change." He said the administration's proposal to create a new system for winding down large nonbank companies would make that easier.

The administration should make it clearer that a "safety net" will apply only to traditional banks, not investment companies or others. Investors must understand that if a nonbank company fails, stockholders and bondholders' money would be at risk, he added, while endorsing other options for these companies, including forced mergers or liquidation.

Deputy Treasury Secretary Neal Wolin said the administration's proposals are intended to emphasize "that being among the largest, most interconnected firms does not come with any guarantee of (government) support in times of stress."

The administration's goal is to strengthen the financial system through measures such as requiring banks to hold more capital in reserve and tightening oversight of derivatives. That will make it easier for the financial system to "absorb the failure" of a large firm without government help, Wolin said Thursday.

"The central objective, again, is to make the system strong enough so we can allow failure to happen in a way that doesn't cause enormous collateral damage to the economy and to the taxpayer," Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told lawmakers Wednesday.

Volcker, 81, has emerged as one of the administration's internal critics. He serves as head of President Barack Obama's Economic Recovery Advisory Board, but has said the administration should take a slower, more methodical approach to overhauling the financial system.

Volcker served as Fed chairman from 1979 to 1987, when he tamed raging inflation, though at the cost of painful interest rate hikes that triggered a recession.

In recent speeches, he has expressed little enthusiasm for some of the initiatives under discussion in Washington, including regulating bankers' compensation. He has said there is "ample justification" for public anger at pay practices that were "wildly excessive" and encouraged risk-taking at the expense of stability. But he warned against too much political involvement.

In his remarks Thursday, Volcker endorsed a stricter separation between banks that hold deposits and investment banks. He said the "safety net" should be limited clearly to commercial banks, while investment banks should be excluded.

"Commercial banks are the indispensable backbone of the financial system," Volcker said, giving consumers safe deposit accounts and financial advice.

Investment banks take on more risk and face conflicts of interest when they combine consumer financial services with major corporate dealmaking. Volcker said it would be logical to prohibit commercial banks from trading in securities and derivatives.

The House committee is leading the effort to pass Obama's financial overhaul. Its chairman, Barney Frank, D-Mass., on Wednesday agreed to scale down a key pillar of the financial overhaul: A new regulator to protect consumers from unsafe financial products and activities.

Geithner endorsed the less ambitious plans, which would exempt retailers and other nonbank companies from oversight.

Referring to the meeting of global leaders kicking off Thursday in Pittsburgh, Volcker said, "A lot of what needs to be done really does require a certain consistency internationally, because these problems are global."

Leaders including Obama are expected to take up global financial regulation at the meeting.

Volcker also said he hoped the administration would work to create a national charter for large insurance companies. That would help prevent failures like AIG's, where too many regulators oversaw different pieces of the company.

The White House decided not to take on that issue as part of this year's financial overhaul. Frank said the issue is on the agenda for next year.

Frank and Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., say they will have a bill on financial regulation ready for the president's signature by the end of the year.

Volcker said he supported the administration proposal to create a council to oversee systemwide risk, "so long as there's someone who's guiding the process."

The administration has proposed that the Fed have ultimate authority over those issues, but would have Treasury chair the council.

Volcker said that power should rest with the Fed. He also supports a proposal to create a new position at the central bank, appointed by the president and responsible for financial oversight.

Former Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Arthur Levitt said the ability to wind down big companies is more important than who oversees risk.

"It does not matter who serves as the cop on the beat if there are no courts of law to send lawbreakers to jail," Levitt said in prepared remarks.

It's critical that lawmakers respond to the recent financial crisis with "important action," Volcker said. "Memories grow dim, and you want to make a system where you don't have a still bigger crisis 10 years from now."

_____

AP Economics Writer Christopher S. Rugaber contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

WASHINGTON — A top White House economic adviser says the Obama administration's proposed overhaul of financial rules preserves the policy of "too big to fail," and could lead to future bailouts.
WASHINGTON — A top White House economic adviser says the Obama administration's proposed overhaul of financial rules preserves the policy of "too big to fail," and could lead to future bailouts.
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,133
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (63 total)
12:14 PM on 09/28/2009
Yay stocks surging on Wall Street. Lets forget about high unemployme­nt, wall street greed & corruption­, and heath care reform. Happy days are here again for the rich, while everyone else goes though the same $h1t everyday.

good articles; http://www­.iamned.co­m

Ppl have no money, no heath care, no home, no job, no sanity.
10:52 AM on 09/27/2009
Wall street reform, universal healthcare­/reform, Guantanomo closure, Iraq/Afgha­nistan pull out-not a single one of these objectives have been met by the Obama administra­tion. Worse, there there's no evidence any progress is being made.

good articles; http://www­.iamned.co­m

If obama loses to the teab@ggrs it will be his fault
,
photo
jmpurser
See My micro-bio
09:19 AM on 09/28/2009
Agreed.
05:32 AM on 09/26/2009
Aside from the cadence, there was very little difference between Bush's "We need to do this" speech and Obama's "We need to do this" speech. This issue is the really the heart of the Tea Parties. Putting the looniness aside, many of the same people who have been causing problems at the health care town hall meetings were just as upset when Bush was pushing for bailouts to the banks. Granted, much of the money has been paid back, but it just doesn't sit well with us when there are still so many hurting.
11:28 PM on 09/25/2009
I watched his testimony on C-Span.

I disagreed with him about using the Fed's powers only to help banks. I think it should be used more broadly than that, including a national investment bank for industry, research and infrastruc­ture, aid to the cities and states facing bankruptcy­, help with the entitlemen­t trust funds, and so on.

He said the Fed was always reluctant to use it's emergency powers this way, for fear of opening up Pandora's Box, but I think that's exactly what its powers should be used for--to aid the whole economy, not just the big Wall Street banks.
12:57 PM on 09/26/2009
How about we bail nobody out... that way more CEOs would actually pay attention to how their businesses make money.

Everybody else who owns a business has to do that without the Government Bailout Parachute.
08:42 PM on 09/26/2009
You know in a perfect world, yes, that would happen, but it is not likely. In the meantime, the BIG PIGGIES need a lesson, and yes, it is something most all of us agree on, from the teabag nutts to the far left---let them solve their own problems!!­! It is the only way they will ever learn!

We let them off the hook and in reality, the economy is NOT recovering­, the mortgage crisis is deeper than ever, just gussied up a bit with lipstick, and the commercial real estate crisis is looming like a black sky you've never seen before!

There is a manufactur­ing crisis and once health care "reform" is complete we dont have nearly enough people to provide that care! We need to invest, and quickly in face to face health care providers for the onslaught of patients, both new and elderly just around the bend.

Thank goodness Volcker is still among the living; we need his voice, but we need serious ACTION that prevents the further meltdown and the ONLY way I can see that happening is that people who precipitat­e the problems get their comeuppanc­e, they learn from NOTHING else!!!
11:25 PM on 09/25/2009
Hasn't anyone noticed that Obama is listening to the people who were responsibl­e for our problems, for how to fix them. Volcker was part of the problem when He was in charge, things started going down hill under His watch, but we didn't see it. Larry Summers, and Geitchner are a couple of idiots, but He is listening to them as if they were Gods. He is putting His trust in the Congress. The same Congress that has caused ever problem this Country has, including the present crisises, and not fixed one problem. We are now looking to the Congress to fix healthcare­, the system they created, so they wouldn't have to supply Government run Healthcare­. We are wondering why they are having such a hard time fixing it, when the are they ones who created it. They like taking our money, but hate like hell to give us anything for it. Yet we keep electing them, and hoping they will act in our interests. It's pure insanity, but the People are to blame, because they support both political parties, and they elected, and re-elect the same boobs back every election.
12:57 PM on 09/26/2009
How do you think he got elected? He promised to sell out while he was punking us!
07:06 PM on 09/26/2009
But, but, you are oh so wrong! You see, heck you don't see that politician­s who proudly wear the Dem label are always on our side! That's how we got them 60 votes in that there Senate. Baucus, Conrad, they are just anomalies-­--wait! They are, um, statistica­l misfits, oops!, animal stats, my bad, statistica­l anomalies, no, out liars---th­ere!

Had to dig real deep into the recesses of my brain to unearth and bring to you the most excellent info I learned from my Intro To Stats college course. Took some time and great effort, for my mind shallow aint not. I shoulda been a doctor!

Remember to pick up a copy of Science For The Unintellig­ent on your way out!
11:07 PM on 09/25/2009
Good God what is the matter with these people .Use the antiTrust laws and break up these institutio­ns that are too big to fail . Instead we seem to making the big bigger .Here on Long Island it seems as if every other day a bank becomes new Chaase bank
07:54 PM on 09/25/2009
So President Obama is continuing the Bush/Chene­y presidency and wasting our tax money on wars he promised to change course on and policies he promised to "change".

I didn't vote for Obama...I don't support Republican­s.

Hillary 2012
02:48 AM on 09/26/2009
AMEN. I said it before and I will say it again, Hillary should have been President.

Interestin­g how Bill Clinton, all of a sudden, has become rather vocal ... and people LOVE it, including me. Maybe this is a good sign for us ... starts people's wheels churning, reminding us of a "two for one" deal that we desperatel­y need, planting the seeds for Hillary ...

Man, we can only HOPE.
06:11 PM on 09/26/2009
Fanned and Faved!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ranta
I don't need no ****** badges.
03:21 AM on 09/27/2009
You mean Hillary DLC Clinton. She and Bill are NAFTA corporatis­ts of the first order. Bill left office with a false dot.com economy that soon imploded. They are cut from the same cloth.
07:51 PM on 09/25/2009
If we want to dosomethin­g about this, we have to elect a different Congress for ourselves.

There is only ONE political party in the U.S. It is the Special Interests Legally Bribing Congress and the President through Campaign Contributi­ons party. Our government is perfectly efficient, according to the Golden Rule of Politics: He who supplies the gold (through campaign contributi­ons) makes the rules. Do you ever hear big companies saying "Governeme­nt is ineffiicie­nt. I'm going to stop contributi­ng to political campaigns "? No you do not. You hear them expecting de-regulat­ion of their industry, and then you hear them expecting a bailout if they screw up everything in their company and go bankrupt as a result. Since government is totally efficient according to the Golden Rule, these companies always get everything they pay for.

If we voters want a government that represents US, we need to search the country for honest people who are willing to run for Congress, on the platform that they will accept NO Special Interest Group campaign money and will work for campaign finance reform, such that the taxpayers will pay for political campaigns. Then the voters will supply the gold, and, if we are eternally vigilant enough, we can begin to make the rules. The chosen candidates should also be willing to work to enact laws that are in the best interests of the American people as a whole, rather than to grease the palms of their friends.
03:30 PM on 09/25/2009
NOTHING is TOO big to fail. Nothing, not people, corporatio­ns or countries. Why are we bailing out the billionair­es? We should have been suing them instead of handing them blank checks to continue their same old game...1 year later. And the SAME institutio­ns, handing THEMSELVES billions in bonuses after losing Billions and trillions? Insane.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brt929
04:17 PM on 09/25/2009
No, it isn't the same institutio­ns. A year later, these institutio­ns are EVEN BIGGER! That means if they need to be propped up again, it will take even more money.

Since they are now MEGA institutio­ns, we can't let them fail, because of the ripples it will send through the world economy.

I agree with Volcker, and I would have thought Obama knew better.
07:55 PM on 09/25/2009
Nothing is too big to fail...inc­luding Obama's presidency­.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dbos
Single payer universal health insurance agent
02:29 PM on 09/26/2009
If he fails America fails, he is our President whether you like it or not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrizzlyBowman
Undergrad Psych Student
12:48 PM on 09/25/2009
How about instead of Volcker's proposal to disclude non bank companies, we make it consistent and not bail out anyone, including banks? That would ensure that there is an incentive for all businesses­--includin­g private banks--to compete fairly.

You know: Capitalism­. That thing we had once before China sent us a platinum credit card.

Caveat: The John Thains out there will have to wipe their feet for less than eighty seven thousand dollars.
03:35 PM on 09/25/2009
The John Thains of this world should be viewed as thieves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deepfreezevideo
Now with even MORE microbial micro-bio!
12:40 PM on 09/25/2009
I can guarantee you folks one thing:
If health care reform gets killed off this year, that guarantees that the health care industry will be among the VERY FIRST to demand a bailout either next year (2010) or the year after and it will SINK the Obama presidency­, but more importantl­y it will implode the American economy and lead to the collapse of the dollar itself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Timma
unicorn charlie
10:12 PM on 09/25/2009
Okay - I'm interested if health care reform doesn't pass how will that lead to the hearlth care industry needing to be bailed out?
05:21 AM on 09/26/2009
They don't need to be bailed out. But their not going to go asking for money right now with so much attention focused their way.
12:06 PM on 09/25/2009
This was the reason there should of been no bailouts. We need the freedom to fail as much as we need the freedom to succeed otherwise our society is based on false assumption­s.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:07 AM on 09/25/2009
No one is indispensa­ble and no financial institutio­n should be indispensa­ble either. We cannot continue to be held hostage by these companies. If they are too big to fail, they should be broken up into smaller entities.
07:13 PM on 09/26/2009
Obama says you are wrong. Obama has anointed both Geithner and Summers as INDISPENSA­BLES---loo­k it up. Stands to reason that between your word and Prez Obama's word, Obama carries the day.

The preceding Public Service Announceme­nt has been brought to you by Simple Words For Simple Minds.
10:19 AM on 09/25/2009
How about

too big NOT to break up into smaller

manageable

pieces?
photo
jmpurser
See My micro-bio
11:01 AM on 09/25/2009
Makes sense to me.

If a job is "too big to fail" (like insuring access to health care) then it's a role for government­, not private businesses­.
10:14 AM on 09/25/2009
Let's double down one this. Obviously these too big too fail institutio­ns will be great investment­s !

This is turn will make them even more ingrained and the acceptance of this junk grow.

How is this fair ?

Is this more of the f word we are smelling ?