Roman Polanski ARRESTED: Director In Custody In Switzerland

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Roman Polanski ARRESTED: Director In Custody In Switzerland stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

LINDA DEUTSCH and ERNST E. ABEGG | 09/27/09 08:31 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
FILE - In this May 19, 2007 file photo, French director Roman Polanski arrives for the screening of the film "No Country For Old Men," at the 60th International film festival in Cannes, southern France. Polanski was taken into custody, Swiss police confirmed Sunday, Sept. 27, 2009 on a 1978 U.S. arrest warrant for having sex with a 13-year-old girl. (AP Photo/Francois Mori, File)

LOS ANGELES — A surprise arrest at the Zurich airport, detention at the hands of Swiss authorities, and a high-profile extradition process that could take weeks or months. The irony is that for Roman Polanski, the acclaimed director accused of child rape three decades ago, this latest ordeal could lead to the one thing he's lacked since: his freedom.

Polanski's arrest as he arrived Saturday in Switzerland for a film festival honor could potentially spur on his legal team's recent motion to dismiss charges that have dogged him since he fled the U.S. for France in 1978, a year after pleading guilty to unlawful sexual intercourse with a 13-year-old girl.

But it could also elevate his case into an international ordeal – involving the governments of Switzerland, France, Poland and the United States – and potentially complicate his possible extradition.

"The big issue is whether it would have been better for him to negotiate a surrender when he had the chance," Loyola University law professor Laurie Levenson said. "Now it has become an international incident and the district attorney may be under pressure not to negotiate a sweetheart deal. They've gone to all this trouble of getting Switzerland involved. It could make it harder on him."

Nevertheless, some believe the arrest of the 76-year-old Academy Award winner could lead to a resolution that will allow him to once again travel freely.

"I think he will finally get his day in court," criminal defense attorney Steve Cron said, "and there's a good chance his case will be dismissed or the sentence will be commuted to time served."

Meanwhile, Poland and France intend to make a joint appeal to Switzerland and the United States to have Polanski released from his detention, Polish Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski told the Polish news agency PAP. Sikorski said he and French counterpart Bernard Kouchner also plan to ask Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to offer Polanski clemency.

"The good news for him is he's been living under a cloud all these years wondering who would swoop in and arrest him," Cron said. "Now he can get this thing finally worked out."

Story continues below
advertisement

Polanski, the director of such classic films as "Chinatown" and "Rosemary's Baby," reached a plea deal in 1978, but was threatened with more prison time than previously agreed upon and fled to France before he was formally sentenced.

France has no extradition treaty with the U.S., and while he traveled throughout Europe, he avoided arrest in part because of lax policies on apprehending foreign fugitives. But in recent years, many countries have gradually tightened their efforts to find suspects abroad and extradite them.

It's also not clear how hard authorities was searching for him. The Swiss Justice Ministry said in a statement that U.S. authorities have sought Polanski's arrest around the world since 2005, although he has been a fugitive much longer.

"There was a valid arrest request and we knew when he was coming," Swiss Justice Ministry spokesman Guido Balmer told The Associated Press. He rejected the idea that politics may have played a part in the action.

Previous attempts to nab Polanski when he left France were thwarted because authorities didn't learn of his travel soon enough – or Polanski didn't make the trip, said William Sorukas, chief of the U.S. Marshals Service's domestic investigations branch.

"This is not the first time we have done this over the years," said Sandi Gibbons, spokeswoman for the Los Angeles County District Attorney's office. She said warrants had been sent out whenever rumors circulated that he would be traveling to a country outside France.

In this case, the honor for Polanski's work proved to be his downfall, Gibbons said.

"It was publicized on the Internet that he was going to be at the Zurich Film Festival," Gibbons said. "They were selling tickets online."

Justice Minister Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf said the director will remain in Zurich until the conclusion of the extradition proceedings. The United States now has 60 days to file a formal request for Polanski's transfer, she said.

A U.S. Justice Department spokeswoman in Washington declined to comment on the case Sunday.

Polanski's French lawyer, Georges Kiejman, told France-Inter radio that it was "too early to know" if Polanski would be extradited. "For now we are trying to have the arrest warrant lifted in Zurich," he said.

Polanski's long-running legal saga gained new momentum late last year with the release of an HBO documentary, "Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired," which claimed misconduct by the now-deceased judge who handled 1977 case and reneged on a plea deal. With the new evidence presented in the film, Polanski sent a team of lawyers to court in Los Angeles seeking dismissal of the charges.

But despite acknowledging "substantial misconduct," a judge ruled that Polanski would have to appear in person to pursue his motion. Polanski's lawyers said he decided not to risk arrest on a fugitive warrant, and planned instead never to set foot in the United States.

His victim, Samantha Geimer, who long ago identified herself publicly, sued Polanski and reached an undisclosed settlement. But she has since joined in Polanski's bid for dismissal, saying she wants the case to be over and at one point offering to come to court in Polanski's place to argue for dismissal.

Geimer, who lives in the small town of Kilauea on the north shore of Kauai, Hawaii, could not be reached for comment Sunday. A man at Geimer's house who identified himself as one of her sons said she wasn't home. He declined further comment.

In Paris, Culture Minister Frederic Mitterrand said that he was in contact with French President Nicolas Sarkozy "who is following the case with great attention and shares the minister's hope that the situation can be quickly resolved."

Mitterrand added that he was "dumbfounded" by Polanski's arrest, adding that he "strongly regrets that a new ordeal is being inflicted on someone who has already experienced so many of them."

Those comments referred, in part, to the fact that Polanski, a native of France who was taken to Poland by his parents, escaped Krakow's Jewish ghetto as a child during World War II and lived off the charity of strangers. His mother died at the Nazis' Auschwitz death camp.

Polanski worked his way into filmmaking in Poland, gaining an Oscar nomination for best foreign-language film in 1964 for his "Knife in the Water." Offered entry to Hollywood, he directed the classic "Rosemary's Baby" in 1968.

His life was shattered again in 1969 when his wife, actress Sharon Tate, and four other people were gruesomely murdered in Los Angeles by followers of cult figure Charles Manson. Tate was eight months pregnant at the time.

Eight years later, the Polanski rape case was a sensation when it broke: He was arrested for having sex with the girl, whom he had hired as a model for a photo shoot at Jack Nicholson's house while the actor was away. He was accused of giving her part of a Quaalude pill and champagne, taking her into a hot tub and having sex with her.

Polanski was initially indicted on six felony counts and faced up to life in prison. Instead, he pleaded guilty to one count of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor and the other counts were dismissed.

The maximum sentence he could have faced was 50 years, although prosecutors had said at the time that the typical sentence was 16 months to three years in prison.

___

Abegg reported from Zurich. Associated Press writers contributing to this report include: Bradley S. Klapper in Geneva; Angela Doland in Paris; Matt Moore in Berlin; Devlin Barrett in Washington; and Herbert Sample in Honolulu.

LOS ANGELES — A surprise arrest at the Zurich airport, detention at the hands of Swiss authorities, and a high-profile extradition process that could take weeks or months. The irony is that for ...
LOS ANGELES — A surprise arrest at the Zurich airport, detention at the hands of Swiss authorities, and a high-profile extradition process that could take weeks or months. The irony is that for ...
Loading...
 
Report Corrections
 
Comments
3396
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (38 pages total)

his arrest is illegal, unlawful and inappropriate.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/03/opinion/03iht-edsokol.html

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:20 PM on 10/04/2009
- JShankel I'm a Fan of JShankel 83 fans permalink
photo

Unfortunately, the authorities do not agree.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:20 PM on 10/05/2009
- duze I'm a Fan of duze 22 fans permalink

Polamski is a child rapist. What the hell else do we need to know. They have him, bring him back and sentence him, exactly the same way any other child rapist who jumped bail would be. Neither his money or level of talent as an artist should make a difference at this point. If anyone feels it does, they should let Polanski baby sit their 13 year old daughter. Other than that, let all the rapist out. I'm sure somewhere there is a bleeding heart who feels they should be forgiven, and allowed to live their lives, just not in my neighborhood.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 PM on 09/30/2009
- weatherwaxx I'm a Fan of weatherwaxx 253 fans permalink

Stuff the 'bleeding heart' business. I'm a liberal, but if you think that means condoning anybody raping a child, forget it.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 AM on 10/04/2009
- SonnyRice I'm a Fan of SonnyRice 14 fans permalink
photo

Human Beings to one side- Polanski and his Supporters to the curb! I plan on saving money by not watching anything such unfeeling enablers are on or in. Too many make excuses for the failings of far to many of today’s so called stars, entertainment, music, sports and so forth. They expect separate justice unlike any other citizen. I’m special, somebody, your rules do not apply proved every time.. Give me a break I’m sorry to get caught is often the word of the day. I apologize for your camera and print meaning so little to me as I do what I will, the little people will still worship me. With movies over ten bucks a head, theater tickets climbing, sports tickets on the rise,music sold one song at a time, books and the internet charges, I plan to save a fortune as the list of losers grows. So you keep supporting each other’s wrongs until you to are forgotten by the paying crowd. He harmed a child. Do you need to learn decency and morals in some script.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:16 PM on 09/29/2009
- Veeve I'm a Fan of Veeve 30 fans permalink
photo

faved

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 PM on 09/29/2009
- edyang I'm a Fan of edyang 3 fans permalink

I feel the same way. It just means less movies with Sean Penn, Tim Robbins, Martin Scorcese, etc that I have to watch.

Thankfully Clint Eastwood will always be on the side of "right".

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:01 PM on 09/29/2009
- nakedhand I'm a Fan of nakedhand 3 fans permalink
photo

He supported Palin

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:52 AM on 10/08/2009


Yup, and I will cheer for my local dvd pirates too.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:00 AM on 09/30/2009

Chinatown was a genre-defining film and an artist like Polanski, despite the photos http://wp.me/pChUJ-4E is transcendant. He is the architect of his own moral universe.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 PM on 09/29/2009

wtf does this even mean?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:43 PM on 09/29/2009
- edyang I'm a Fan of edyang 3 fans permalink

It means in his universe, rape is perfectly acceptable.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 PM on 09/29/2009
- weatherwaxx I'm a Fan of weatherwaxx 253 fans permalink

Yeah, and Rosemary's Baby was about drugging and raping a woman and forcing her to bear the devil's child. Polanski can stay in his universe.... behind bars.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:41 AM on 10/04/2009
- Tigerpath I'm a Fan of Tigerpath 2 fans permalink
photo

He plead guilty. Last I checked, that means a conviction. He fled during his pre-sentencing period. Waived an appeal by jumping bail. Can you say "convict-fugitive?" I can, convict-fugitive. Why is this an issue? He should be sentenced and tried for evading his original sentence. American justice 101. Actually, this could probably be figured out by a 9th grader.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:37 PM on 09/29/2009

Spot on.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:47 PM on 09/29/2009
photo

And the moral of this story is: ADULT MEN SHOULD NOT HAVE SEX WITH CHILDREN. His victim recovered, but many victims of child molestation and rape can spend big chunks of their lives learning to trust, overcoming fear, working through anxiety.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:20 PM on 09/29/2009
- robbyJ I'm a Fan of robbyJ 32 fans permalink

California just let out 55000 inmates.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/cash-crisis-forces-california-to-free-55000-prisoners-1622487.html

Lets be realistic this man is no threat to society. What he did was wrong. He fled because he was going to do 16 years hard time for what he felt was consensual sex.

His family was murdered and his parents barely escaped Hitler.

I'm not saying this should go unpunished, I'm saying the girl who knows most what happened, who now is an adult, should decide if he gets punished or not.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 PM on 09/29/2009
- cardtosser I'm a Fan of cardtosser 6 fans permalink
photo

Our tradition and system of jurisprudence does not allow the victim to decide who gets punished or not. An obvious problem would be in the case of murder, where there is no victim to make that decision. That is why prosecution of crimes pits the accused against the 'people'. Without such a system it is unlikely that domestic violence or rape would ever get prosecuted.

As to the threat to society claim, if you feel that child rapists in general are not threats to society, you can ignore the deterrent effect of such a prosecution.

If Polanski faces sentencing in the US with a new hearing, which is likely, he would be unlikely to be sentenced to the 16 years previously sought. I would expect time served, a short imprisonment, parole and community service.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 PM on 09/29/2009
- LCLA I'm a Fan of LCLA 21 fans permalink
photo

I would hope for more creative sentencing. I agree that it would be a waste to stick him in one of the crowded California jails. Not that he is too good for it, but because we can do better than that.
It would be better to require him to do something that educates him and helps make the world a better, safer place. But then that requires a judge who is motivated to tailor the sentence to the criminal rather than just mete out a formulaic sanction.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:29 PM on 09/29/2009
- goodgravy I'm a Fan of goodgravy 15 fans permalink

consensual sex is giving a 13 year old girl alcohol and qualudes (sp) and then raping her? so now it's ok to drug young teens and sex them up?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:19 PM on 09/29/2009

yes, I like my consensual sex with quaaludes.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:38 PM on 09/29/2009
photo

Your suggestion would be anathema to our system of justice.

For one thing, allowing victims to decide punishment or give us a system based on revenge. (Similarly, we don't let perpetrators select their punishment, for obvious reasons.) Those who do not have an interest in the outcome must be the ones who determine guilt/innocence and punishment if guilty.

For another, those who, like Polanski, openly, deliberately, and criminally defy the system of justice must suffer significant consequences for their acts. The fact that the judge in Polanski's case engaged in misconduct does NOT provide justification for his continuing to remain a fugitive. Judge Rittenband died in 1993, and Polanski could have returned to the US to face a different judge.

Also, the story above said a typical sentence would have ranged from 16 MONTHS (not years) to 3 years. Polanski had already spent 42 days in a maximum security prison for a psychiatric evaluation but was released. That being said, it seems Polanski was not even facing the 16 months. According to CNN, Judge Rittenband "on the eve of sentencing ... informed the attorneys that he was inclined to send Polanski back to prison for another 48 days." [http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/02/17/polanksi.fugitive.hearing/index.html]

Finally, he was a 43 year old guy who got a 13 year old drunk, gave her drugs, sexually assaulted her, got caught but then ran away. Which part of that sequence of events argues for leniency?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:05 PM on 09/29/2009
- perrylove I'm a Fan of perrylove 5 fans permalink
photo

So as long as any pedophile claims he felt it was consensual, then he is no threat to society? You are sick.
And PS: I live in Cali and we have not let 55,000 inmates go. I wish they would let out the non-violent drug offenders (victimless crime) and give them counseling treatments instead of prison time. NOTE that raping a 13 year old IS a violent act and I would not support letting them out...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:33 PM on 09/29/2009
- robbyJ I'm a Fan of robbyJ 32 fans permalink

You're right they haven't yet but, they are going to. I just read more about it, apparently, a judge demanded at least 40000 prisoners be set free because the over crowding in the jails was deemed unconstitutional.

After reading the transcripts, I've changed my mind this guy should to hard time.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:22 PM on 09/30/2009
- TheFabOne I'm a Fan of TheFabOne 32 fans permalink
photo

While I'm at it, let this be a wake up call to those who think the judge and/or the prosecutor in this case committed wrongdoing: MANY of you may THINK this kind of underhanded issuance of jurisprudence is a farce, a sham, or even outrageous. And while I absolutely can't stand Jesse Jackson/Al Sharpton, I say 'welcome to OUR world'. This kind of 'lock this person up no matter the consequence' happens every day to Blacks, Latinos and poor Whites.

If you doubt me, look at Barry Scheck and The Innocence Project. God Bless them. Using the science of DNA, they are disproving UNTOLD numbers of cases where men/women were locked up not only unfairly but after review of the case notes/transcripts PROVE, in most cases, that plenty of evidence was omitted, hidden, contaminated, compromised - basically, a 'get a conviction at all costs' rationale that to this day has people, INNOCENT PEOPLE, locked up 20, 30 years or more for crimes they really DID NOT COMMIT. Then when they're released, the State, KNOWING they'll be maladjusted to society, throws them a few quarters for settlement and says 'oops.....our bad......s­orry......­oh well'.

Lawyers who are biased/prejudiced ultimately become JUDGES who are biased/prejudiced. So if some of these folks I see out here are going to feign outrage over Polanski and his TRUE GUILT, let's see some REAL outrage over the innumerable cases of prosecutor­ial/judici­al misconduct that occur each day in this country.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 PM on 09/29/2009
- LCLA I'm a Fan of LCLA 21 fans permalink
photo

Amen. Excellent points which are usually discounted or ignored by both the "liberal" media and the more pervasive right wing propaganda media.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 09/29/2009
- liamd1 I'm a Fan of liamd1 11 fans permalink
photo

I agree with everything you said and I have donated money to The Innocence Project.

This guy pled guilty and ran.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:32 PM on 09/29/2009
- ray01 I'm a Fan of ray01 24 fans permalink

the man is guilty period...I fail to see why the network news anchors mention that his parents were Holocaust Survivors.. Can someone please explain?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:43 PM on 09/29/2009
- cardtosser I'm a Fan of cardtosser 6 fans permalink
photo

When even the most outrageous crime is committed, the unfortunate elements of the perpetrator's life are mentioned in the news. In a court of law, these elements are to be ignored in determining guilt but during the penalty phase, they are often brought up by the defense (and rarely the prosecution) to decrease the severity of the sentence.

The news also likes to draw stories out to fill time and add interest. Roman Polanski has led both a life filled with tragedy and reward.

As to the court case of decades ago, he feared receiving a sentence far longer than that offered in a plea agreement with the prosecutor. The judge apparently was not willing to provide a short sentence for such a crime, so Polanski skipped bail and left the country.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:05 PM on 09/29/2009
- ray01 I'm a Fan of ray01 24 fans permalink

Thanks for the explanation

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 PM on 09/29/2009
- Omegaomni I'm a Fan of Omegaomni 2 fans permalink

I lost all respect for the Swiss.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 PM on 09/29/2009
- ray01 I'm a Fan of ray01 24 fans permalink

the man pled guilty...i gained respect for the Swiss

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:00 PM on 09/29/2009
photo

I'll respect the Swiss as long as they follow through with the extradition.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:10 PM on 09/29/2009
- weatherwaxx I'm a Fan of weatherwaxx 253 fans permalink

WHY?

Political neutrality does not mean they can't honor extradition treaties.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:44 AM on 10/04/2009

Roman Polanski admitted to unlawfull sexual intercourse with a minor.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2009/0928091polanskiplea1.html

Mr Polanski admitted that he was well aware of the fact that the girl was 13 years old.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2009/0928091polanskiplea1.html

According to the girl's witness statements, which can be found at
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/polanskib10.html
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/polanskib1.html

Mr Polanski (44), after having served the girl (13) alcohol and a potentially incapacitating drug (qualuude), engaged in oral, vaginal, and anal sex against her will; the girl (13) describes herself as being afraid and alone with Mr Polanski (44) ; she repeatedly said no and pleaded to be sent home – ''I told him — I said I wanted to get — I wanted to go home''. Mr Polanski (44), ''Yeah, I'll take you home soon''.

Roman Polanski is a public figure and it is extremely important that he is extradited so that all outstanding legal matters are brought to closure.

All too often perpetrators escape justice.

This is not a private matter and Mr Polanski has to take responsibility for the acts that he committed, not only with respect to his victim, but to society as a whole.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 AM on 09/29/2009

Thanks for your great links! I've been shocked by some of the entries on this board, supposed liberals making excuses for the rape of a child. I agree that the matter should be resolved, and also with regard to his legal case, he chose to make himself a fugitive. There could be charges for that even if he manages to evade punishment for sexual predation.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 PM on 09/29/2009
- weatherwaxx I'm a Fan of weatherwaxx 253 fans permalink

WHAT on earth makes you believe that LIBERALS condone child abuse?

You go google child abuse cases - you will find an amazing number of right-wing, conservative, religious organizations being "shocked" to find they've got child molesters among their number. In fact, this is just another example of the kind of male privilege attitude that's part and parcel of the 'good ol' boy' conservative mindset.

Conservatives don't have any corner on worrying about kids... Most of the liberals I know are a lot more worried about their kids than the conservatives are -- especially things like keeping the planet alive for their kids to grow up on.

Can the liberal-bashing. This is not about politics, it's about holding a criminal accountable.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:49 AM on 10/04/2009

I have to say that I do not understand Hollywood at all! Michael Jackson gets accused of child molestation, not once but twice and there is enough evidence without him even saying he's innocent to prove that both families were after money from him. Hollywood turned its back on him even though after the second trial, he was completely exonerated. He didn't plead guilty and then flee to a foreign country to live out the remainder of his life so that he wouldn't be imprisoned. He faced it and went through the process. This guy admits to drugging a 13 year old and then having sex with her and then flees when he sees he might have to face a lengthy sentence and Hollywood is all up in arms to gain this man's freedom. I do not and will not ever understand it. I realize he had a tough life and that no one should have to endure what he endured having his wife and unborn child brutally murdered and everything else he suffered, but that does not excuse drugging and having sex with someone that young. Sharon Tate's sister is coming to his defense saying it was consensual, but how can anything be consensual if you have to drug someone?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 AM on 10/01/2009
- weatherwaxx I'm a Fan of weatherwaxx 253 fans permalink

I figure Tate's sister wanted her 15 minutes of fame.

You're overlooking one thing - Jackson was accused of molesting BOYS. It's pathetic, but people who get downright rabid over *male* chldren being abused don't even care if it's a girl.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 AM on 10/04/2009
photo

It's an incredible waste of money and resources to pursue Roman Polanski for a crime he committed over 30 years ago, when he is no longer a threat to other people. Plus, a deal was made with him at the time by the judge and D.A., then the judge acted illegally by consulting secretly with another D.A. to change the terms of the deal. Our justice system needs to go after current threats and only pursue this type of old case when the person was guility of murder, still poses a risk to society, and/or the case has been conducted legally.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 AM on 09/29/2009
- IWantTofu I'm a Fan of IWantTofu 16 fans permalink

You don't jump bail but work within the system if there is a problem with due process. The judge didn't change the terms of the deal, Polanski ran away before that allegedly happened. It is the defense attornies that are putting forth that story to distract people from the fact that Polanski plead guilty.

Imagine if everyone who thought that someone was doing something wrong used that as a legitimate excuse to jump bail. Or do you think that it is only okay for child molestors?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 PM on 09/29/2009

Polanski is not the victim here, he ran away and created his own problems
besides raping a minor
even if she had consented at the time, the act would have been rape as she was only 13
there is NO excuse for a grown man (obviously chonologically grown, but not mentally in this case) having sex with a 13 year old, girl or boy. They are CHILDREN at 13, he was supposed to be an adult at 44.
Something is wrong with a person (no matter what films they have directed, or not) who finds a child, no matter their physical characterisics, sexually attractive.
Imagine that girl is your child before you throw your sympathy Polanski's way.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:24 PM on 09/29/2009
photo

I don't sympathize with Polanski. However, the man has gone over 30 years without repeating his crime and without entering our country -- it just seems like a waste of resources to go after him now, especially since it is an international case which will definitely involve resources. We have much more pressing needs to spend our money on right now. Also, I do sympathize with the victim; she is very clear in her desire not to have to relive all of this, and I don't think she should have to.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:29 PM on 10/05/2009
- liamd1 I'm a Fan of liamd1 11 fans permalink
photo

Well, i guess it's ok to rape a child if you can get away with it for a long time.
Way to enable child rapists.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 PM on 09/29/2009
- gtdh I'm a Fan of gtdh permalink

Well you must read the details of what this guy did to this girl (Child) on the smokinggun.com court transcript.

What he did was a crime and it was wrong. It was in fact a heinous crime. He used money promises of fame booze and rugs to engage in sex with this 13 year old.

I wonder what here mother was thinking leaving the child go off with this man!!!!! Who would do that?

He plead guilty to a lesser charge and cut a deal (time already served) with the DA. Then he learned that the judge was going to renege on at sentencing. (I saw a documentary about this..the judge wasn't acting properly either. Polansky's attorney was tipped off. He told Polanski and he fled.

He obviously lost faith in our court system and is terrified to come here and be made a scape goat of. Which he most likely will be.

However he is a fugitive of the United States and now is caught so his issue will need to be resolved through the proper channels.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:24 AM on 09/29/2009

I too have to wonder where were her parents when this was going on? The bottom line is again that he feared being put in prison and he bailed to get out of doing time for this crime that he admits to committing.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 AM on 10/01/2009
- weatherwaxx I'm a Fan of weatherwaxx 253 fans permalink

Stage mother. She should've been on trial as an accessory.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:53 AM on 10/04/2009

It is sad but the arrest is correct if he indeed is guilty.

http://next-world-war.blogspot.com

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:13 AM on 09/29/2009
- LaPeche I'm a Fan of LaPeche 2 fans permalink

He pled guilty.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 AM on 09/29/2009
- montestruc I'm a Fan of montestruc 5 fans permalink
photo

I disagree.

He IS guilty, no real question about that issue.

The problem is judicial misconduct which has been testified to by both the prosecutor at that time and the defense attorney. He did serve the time the judge originally agreed for him to serve as part of a plea agreement between the prosecutor and defense attorneys, then the judge who had agreed to this deal, went back on it, and allowed Polanski to know that, and from the way he was acting gave no hint as to how much more time he intended to pile on.

This was after a plea agreement had been made and Polanski had honored his end of the deal, had done the time agreed to which was short, but more in line with what the victim [do remember the victim should get a say in this] wanted to stop the publicity.

I am not going to respect anyone who holds that automatically anyone "who did what he did" should be executed or thrown in prison forever. The girl lived with mostly hurt feelings and says now that the PUBLICITY and PUBLIC HUMILIATION she was put through by the legal system and the press was far more damaging that anything Polanski did.

If the judicial system and press do not also belong in the same jail cell with Polanski, then you are a hypocrite.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 AM on 09/30/2009
- lrgphd I'm a Fan of lrgphd 6 fans permalink

I feel sorry for the victim, but her issues are not the only ones that matters. The world is full of vulnerable children and celebrities who think the rules don't apply to them. No one said he should be executed or thrown in prison for ever. What was said is that he, like everyone else, should have to accept responsibility for the crime he committed. "Mostly hurt feelings" is not an accurate description of what most rape victims experience. If Polanski really wanted to save her going through this, he could have taken responsibility and followed the law. Many people lost family in Germany. Many others have lost family members due to crime. They don't get a free pass to rape children.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:47 AM on 09/30/2009
- dadd I'm a Fan of dadd 5 fans permalink

"for consensual sex without letting the girl have a say in any of it is wrong."

Oh Lib...consensual sex?? Maybe it was the drugs and booze talking when the 13 year old agreed to have sex with a 44 year old man.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 AM on 09/29/2009

don't link this to "libs" you clown. Liberal women were the ones who got sexual assault laws changed in the first place.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 AM on 09/29/2009
- sacklunch I'm a Fan of sacklunch 2 fans permalink

No but it's gonna be fun to watch libs defend this man.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:01 AM on 09/29/2009

Seriously...to all the people who are saying "it was consensual­"...please read the court documents. It was not consensual, in any sense, unless consenting simply means you are partially responsible because you happened to be in the same place at the same time as the person doing the raping. If you actually read the testimony (which you probably won't), the victim herself states many times that:

1. She was scared of him.
2. He gave her alcohol and quaaludes.
3. She asked repeatedly to be taken home.
4. He asked her to remove her clothing, several times.
5. He forcibly removed clothing from her.
6. She repeatedly said "NO" while he was sexually abusing her.

That is not consensual. I don't give a flying !@#$ how good his movies are (and they are very good), this behavior is not acceptable, and running away to a 30 year French vacation is not doing time. But read it for yourselves. But what is the point of arguing with people who would defend actions such as these?

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/polanskicover1.html

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:49 AM on 09/29/2009

Beautiful. Thank you. Hollywood types and Europeans appear to be beyond beyond morality.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:19 PM on 09/29/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (38 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect