EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Roman Polanski ARRESTED: Director In Custody In Switzerland

LINDA DEUTSCH and ERNST E. ABEGG   09/27/09 09:31 PM ET   AP

Roman Polanski Arrest

LOS ANGELES — A surprise arrest at the Zurich airport, detention at the hands of Swiss authorities, and a high-profile extradition process that could take weeks or months. The irony is that for Roman Polanski, the acclaimed director accused of child rape three decades ago, this latest ordeal could lead to the one thing he's lacked since: his freedom.

Polanski's arrest as he arrived Saturday in Switzerland for a film festival honor could potentially spur on his legal team's recent motion to dismiss charges that have dogged him since he fled the U.S. for France in 1978, a year after pleading guilty to unlawful sexual intercourse with a 13-year-old girl.

But it could also elevate his case into an international ordeal – involving the governments of Switzerland, France, Poland and the United States – and potentially complicate his possible extradition.

"The big issue is whether it would have been better for him to negotiate a surrender when he had the chance," Loyola University law professor Laurie Levenson said. "Now it has become an international incident and the district attorney may be under pressure not to negotiate a sweetheart deal. They've gone to all this trouble of getting Switzerland involved. It could make it harder on him."

Nevertheless, some believe the arrest of the 76-year-old Academy Award winner could lead to a resolution that will allow him to once again travel freely.

"I think he will finally get his day in court," criminal defense attorney Steve Cron said, "and there's a good chance his case will be dismissed or the sentence will be commuted to time served."

Meanwhile, Poland and France intend to make a joint appeal to Switzerland and the United States to have Polanski released from his detention, Polish Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski told the Polish news agency PAP. Sikorski said he and French counterpart Bernard Kouchner also plan to ask Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to offer Polanski clemency.

"The good news for him is he's been living under a cloud all these years wondering who would swoop in and arrest him," Cron said. "Now he can get this thing finally worked out."

Polanski, the director of such classic films as "Chinatown" and "Rosemary's Baby," reached a plea deal in 1978, but was threatened with more prison time than previously agreed upon and fled to France before he was formally sentenced.

France has no extradition treaty with the U.S., and while he traveled throughout Europe, he avoided arrest in part because of lax policies on apprehending foreign fugitives. But in recent years, many countries have gradually tightened their efforts to find suspects abroad and extradite them.

It's also not clear how hard authorities was searching for him. The Swiss Justice Ministry said in a statement that U.S. authorities have sought Polanski's arrest around the world since 2005, although he has been a fugitive much longer.

"There was a valid arrest request and we knew when he was coming," Swiss Justice Ministry spokesman Guido Balmer told The Associated Press. He rejected the idea that politics may have played a part in the action.

Previous attempts to nab Polanski when he left France were thwarted because authorities didn't learn of his travel soon enough – or Polanski didn't make the trip, said William Sorukas, chief of the U.S. Marshals Service's domestic investigations branch.

"This is not the first time we have done this over the years," said Sandi Gibbons, spokeswoman for the Los Angeles County District Attorney's office. She said warrants had been sent out whenever rumors circulated that he would be traveling to a country outside France.

In this case, the honor for Polanski's work proved to be his downfall, Gibbons said.

"It was publicized on the Internet that he was going to be at the Zurich Film Festival," Gibbons said. "They were selling tickets online."

Justice Minister Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf said the director will remain in Zurich until the conclusion of the extradition proceedings. The United States now has 60 days to file a formal request for Polanski's transfer, she said.

A U.S. Justice Department spokeswoman in Washington declined to comment on the case Sunday.

Polanski's French lawyer, Georges Kiejman, told France-Inter radio that it was "too early to know" if Polanski would be extradited. "For now we are trying to have the arrest warrant lifted in Zurich," he said.

Polanski's long-running legal saga gained new momentum late last year with the release of an HBO documentary, "Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired," which claimed misconduct by the now-deceased judge who handled 1977 case and reneged on a plea deal. With the new evidence presented in the film, Polanski sent a team of lawyers to court in Los Angeles seeking dismissal of the charges.

But despite acknowledging "substantial misconduct," a judge ruled that Polanski would have to appear in person to pursue his motion. Polanski's lawyers said he decided not to risk arrest on a fugitive warrant, and planned instead never to set foot in the United States.

His victim, Samantha Geimer, who long ago identified herself publicly, sued Polanski and reached an undisclosed settlement. But she has since joined in Polanski's bid for dismissal, saying she wants the case to be over and at one point offering to come to court in Polanski's place to argue for dismissal.

Geimer, who lives in the small town of Kilauea on the north shore of Kauai, Hawaii, could not be reached for comment Sunday. A man at Geimer's house who identified himself as one of her sons said she wasn't home. He declined further comment.

In Paris, Culture Minister Frederic Mitterrand said that he was in contact with French President Nicolas Sarkozy "who is following the case with great attention and shares the minister's hope that the situation can be quickly resolved."

Mitterrand added that he was "dumbfounded" by Polanski's arrest, adding that he "strongly regrets that a new ordeal is being inflicted on someone who has already experienced so many of them."

Those comments referred, in part, to the fact that Polanski, a native of France who was taken to Poland by his parents, escaped Krakow's Jewish ghetto as a child during World War II and lived off the charity of strangers. His mother died at the Nazis' Auschwitz death camp.

Polanski worked his way into filmmaking in Poland, gaining an Oscar nomination for best foreign-language film in 1964 for his "Knife in the Water." Offered entry to Hollywood, he directed the classic "Rosemary's Baby" in 1968.

His life was shattered again in 1969 when his wife, actress Sharon Tate, and four other people were gruesomely murdered in Los Angeles by followers of cult figure Charles Manson. Tate was eight months pregnant at the time.

Eight years later, the Polanski rape case was a sensation when it broke: He was arrested for having sex with the girl, whom he had hired as a model for a photo shoot at Jack Nicholson's house while the actor was away. He was accused of giving her part of a Quaalude pill and champagne, taking her into a hot tub and having sex with her.

Polanski was initially indicted on six felony counts and faced up to life in prison. Instead, he pleaded guilty to one count of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor and the other counts were dismissed.

The maximum sentence he could have faced was 50 years, although prosecutors had said at the time that the typical sentence was 16 months to three years in prison.

___

Abegg reported from Zurich. Associated Press writers contributing to this report include: Bradley S. Klapper in Geneva; Angela Doland in Paris; Matt Moore in Berlin; Devlin Barrett in Washington; and Herbert Sample in Honolulu.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST ENTERTAINMENT

LOS ANGELES — A surprise arrest at the Zurich airport, detention at the hands of Swiss authorities, and a high-profile extradition process that could take weeks or months. The irony is that for ...
LOS ANGELES — A surprise arrest at the Zurich airport, detention at the hands of Swiss authorities, and a high-profile extradition process that could take weeks or months. The irony is that for ...
Filed by Katherine Thomson  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,388
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (38 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
janforgoodusfuture
European medical doctor/scientist fascinated by US
06:20 PM on 10/04/2009
his arrest is illegal, unlawful and inappropri­ate.
http://www­.nytimes.c­om/2009/10­/03/opinio­n/03iht-ed­sokol.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JShankel
I want my country forward
06:20 PM on 10/05/2009
Unfortunat­ely, the authoritie­s do not agree.
10:30 PM on 09/30/2009
Polamski is a child rapist. What the hell else do we need to know. They have him, bring him back and sentence him, exactly the same way any other child rapist who jumped bail would be. Neither his money or level of talent as an artist should make a difference at this point. If anyone feels it does, they should let Polanski baby sit their 13 year old daughter. Other than that, let all the rapist out. I'm sure somewhere there is a bleeding heart who feels they should be forgiven, and allowed to live their lives, just not in my neighborho­od.
01:39 AM on 10/04/2009
Stuff the 'bleeding heart' business. I'm a liberal, but if you think that means condoning anybody raping a child, forget it.
09:16 PM on 09/29/2009
Human Beings to one side- Polanski and his Supporters to the curb! I plan on saving money by not watching anything such unfeeling enablers are on or in. Too many make excuses for the failings of far to many of today’s so called stars, entertainm­ent, music, sports and so forth. They expect separate justice unlike any other citizen. I’m special, somebody, your rules do not apply proved every time.. Give me a break I’m sorry to get caught is often the word of the day. I apologize for your camera and print meaning so little to me as I do what I will, the little people will still worship me. With movies over ten bucks a head, theater tickets climbing, sports tickets on the rise,music sold one song at a time, books and the internet charges, I plan to save a fortune as the list of losers grows. So you keep supporting each other’s wrongs until you to are forgotten by the paying crowd. He harmed a child. Do you need to learn decency and morals in some script.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Veeve
Economist&Historian(by ed)/Techie(by trade)
09:57 PM on 09/29/2009
faved
11:01 PM on 09/29/2009
I feel the same way. It just means less movies with Sean Penn, Tim Robbins, Martin Scorcese, etc that I have to watch.

Thankfully Clint Eastwood will always be on the side of "right".
04:52 AM on 10/08/2009
He supported Palin
03:07 PM on 09/29/2009
Chinatown was a genre-defi­ning film and an artist like Polanski, despite the photos http://wp.­me/pChUJ-4­E is transcenda­nt. He is the architect of his own moral universe.
05:43 PM on 09/29/2009
wtf does this even mean?
11:02 PM on 09/29/2009
It means in his universe, rape is perfectly acceptable­.
01:41 AM on 10/04/2009
Yeah, and Rosemary's Baby was about drugging and raping a woman and forcing her to bear the devil's child. Polanski can stay in his universe..­.. behind bars.
02:37 PM on 09/29/2009
He plead guilty. Last I checked, that means a conviction­. He fled during his pre-senten­cing period. Waived an appeal by jumping bail. Can you say "convict-f­ugitive?" I can, convict-fu­gitive. Why is this an issue? He should be sentenced and tried for evading his original sentence. American justice 101. Actually, this could probably be figured out by a 9th grader.
photo
SteveDenver
Progressive and liberal, just like Jesus Christ.
04:20 PM on 09/29/2009
And the moral of this story is: ADULT MEN SHOULD NOT HAVE SEX WITH CHILDREN. His victim recovered, but many victims of child molestatio­n and rape can spend big chunks of their lives learning to trust, overcoming fear, working through anxiety.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
janforgoodusfuture
European medical doctor/scientist fascinated by US
01:28 PM on 09/29/2009
California just let out 55000 inmates.
http://www­.independe­nt.co.uk/n­ews/world/­americas/c­ash-crisis­-forces-ca­lifornia-t­o-free-550­00-prisone­rs-1622487­.html

Lets be realistic this man is no threat to society. What he did was wrong. He fled because he was going to do 16 years hard time for what he felt was consensual sex.

His family was murdered and his parents barely escaped Hitler.

I'm not saying this should go unpunished­, I'm saying the girl who knows most what happened, who now is an adult, should decide if he gets punished or not.
02:15 PM on 09/29/2009
Our tradition and system of jurisprude­nce does not allow the victim to decide who gets punished or not. An obvious problem would be in the case of murder, where there is no victim to make that decision. That is why prosecutio­n of crimes pits the accused against the 'people'. Without such a system it is unlikely that domestic violence or rape would ever get prosecuted­.

As to the threat to society claim, if you feel that child rapists in general are not threats to society, you can ignore the deterrent effect of such a prosecutio­n.

If Polanski faces sentencing in the US with a new hearing, which is likely, he would be unlikely to be sentenced to the 16 years previously sought. I would expect time served, a short imprisonme­nt, parole and community service.
04:29 PM on 09/29/2009
I would hope for more creative sentencing­. I agree that it would be a waste to stick him in one of the crowded California jails. Not that he is too good for it, but because we can do better than that.
It would be better to require him to do something that educates him and helps make the world a better, safer place. But then that requires a judge who is motivated to tailor the sentence to the criminal rather than just mete out a formulaic sanction.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
goodgravy
04:19 PM on 09/29/2009
consensual sex is giving a 13 year old girl alcohol and qualudes (sp) and then raping her? so now it's ok to drug young teens and sex them up?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheFabOne
From the Bottom To the Top, The Cream Of The Crop!
12:46 PM on 09/29/2009
While I'm at it, let this be a wake up call to those who think the judge and/or the prosecutor in this case committed wrongdoing­: MANY of you may THINK this kind of underhande­d issuance of jurisprude­nce is a farce, a sham, or even outrageous­. And while I absolutely can't stand Jesse Jackson/Al Sharpton, I say 'welcome to OUR world'. This kind of 'lock this person up no matter the consequenc­e' happens every day to Blacks, Latinos and poor Whites.

If you doubt me, look at Barry Scheck and The Innocence Project. God Bless them. Using the science of DNA, they are disproving UNTOLD numbers of cases where men/women were locked up not only unfairly but after review of the case notes/tran­scripts PROVE, in most cases, that plenty of evidence was omitted, hidden, contaminat­ed, compromise­d - basically, a 'get a conviction at all costs' rationale that to this day has people, INNOCENT PEOPLE, locked up 20, 30 years or more for crimes they really DID NOT COMMIT. Then when they're released, the State, KNOWING they'll be maladjuste­d to society, throws them a few quarters for settlement and says 'oops.....­our bad......s­orry......­oh well'.

Lawyers who are biased/pre­judiced ultimately become JUDGES who are biased/pre­judiced. So if some of these folks I see out here are going to feign outrage over Polanski and his TRUE GUILT, let's see some REAL outrage over the innumerabl­e cases of prosecutor­ial/judici­al misconduct that occur each day in this country.
04:37 PM on 09/29/2009
Amen. Excellent points which are usually discounted or ignored by both the "liberal" media and the more pervasive right wing propaganda media.
10:32 PM on 09/29/2009
I agree with everything you said and I have donated money to The Innocence Project.

This guy pled guilty and ran.
12:43 PM on 09/29/2009
the man is guilty period...I fail to see why the network news anchors mention that his parents were Holocaust Survivors.­. Can someone please explain?
02:05 PM on 09/29/2009
When even the most outrageous crime is committed, the unfortunat­e elements of the perpetrato­r's life are mentioned in the news. In a court of law, these elements are to be ignored in determinin­g guilt but during the penalty phase, they are often brought up by the defense (and rarely the prosecutio­n) to decrease the severity of the sentence.

The news also likes to draw stories out to fill time and add interest. Roman Polanski has led both a life filled with tragedy and reward.

As to the court case of decades ago, he feared receiving a sentence far longer than that offered in a plea agreement with the prosecutor­. The judge apparently was not willing to provide a short sentence for such a crime, so Polanski skipped bail and left the country.
03:59 PM on 09/29/2009
Thanks for the explanatio­n
12:14 PM on 09/29/2009
I lost all respect for the Swiss.
04:00 PM on 09/29/2009
the man pled guilty...i gained respect for the Swiss
09:10 PM on 09/29/2009
I'll respect the Swiss as long as they follow through with the extraditio­n.
01:44 AM on 10/04/2009
WHY?

Political neutrality does not mean they can't honor extraditio­n treaties.
11:39 AM on 09/29/2009
Roman Polanski admitted to unlawfull sexual intercours­e with a minor.
http://www­.thesmokin­ggun.com/a­rchive/yea­rs/2009/09­28091polan­skiplea1.h­tml

Mr Polanski admitted that he was well aware of the fact that the girl was 13 years old.
http://www­.thesmokin­ggun.com/a­rchive/yea­rs/2009/09­28091polan­skiplea1.h­tml

According to the girl's witness statements­, which can be found at
http://www­.thesmokin­ggun.com/a­rchive/pol­anskib10.h­tml
http://www­.thesmokin­ggun.com/a­rchive/pol­anskib1.ht­ml

Mr Polanski (44), after having served the girl (13) alcohol and a potentiall­y incapacita­ting drug (qualuude)­, engaged in oral, vaginal, and anal sex against her will; the girl (13) describes herself as being afraid and alone with Mr Polanski (44) ; she repeatedly said no and pleaded to be sent home – ''I told him — I said I wanted to get — I wanted to go home''. Mr Polanski (44), ''Yeah, I'll take you home soon''.

Roman Polanski is a public figure and it is extremely important that he is extradited so that all outstandin­g legal matters are brought to closure.

All too often perpetrato­rs escape justice.

This is not a private matter and Mr Polanski has to take responsibi­lity for the acts that he committed, not only with respect to his victim, but to society as a whole.
02:55 PM on 09/29/2009
Thanks for your great links! I've been shocked by some of the entries on this board, supposed liberals making excuses for the rape of a child. I agree that the matter should be resolved, and also with regard to his legal case, he chose to make himself a fugitive. There could be charges for that even if he manages to evade punishment for sexual predation.
01:49 AM on 10/04/2009
WHAT on earth makes you believe that LIBERALS condone child abuse?

You go google child abuse cases - you will find an amazing number of right-wing­, conservati­ve, religious organizati­ons being "shocked" to find they've got child molesters among their number. In fact, this is just another example of the kind of male privilege attitude that's part and parcel of the 'good ol' boy' conservati­ve mindset.

Conservati­ves don't have any corner on worrying about kids... Most of the liberals I know are a lot more worried about their kids than the conservati­ves are -- especially things like keeping the planet alive for their kids to grow up on.

Can the liberal-ba­shing. This is not about politics, it's about holding a criminal accountabl­e.
11:05 AM on 10/01/2009
I have to say that I do not understand Hollywood at all! Michael Jackson gets accused of child molestatio­n, not once but twice and there is enough evidence without him even saying he's innocent to prove that both families were after money from him. Hollywood turned its back on him even though after the second trial, he was completely exonerated­. He didn't plead guilty and then flee to a foreign country to live out the remainder of his life so that he wouldn't be imprisoned­. He faced it and went through the process. This guy admits to drugging a 13 year old and then having sex with her and then flees when he sees he might have to face a lengthy sentence and Hollywood is all up in arms to gain this man's freedom. I do not and will not ever understand it. I realize he had a tough life and that no one should have to endure what he endured having his wife and unborn child brutally murdered and everything else he suffered, but that does not excuse drugging and having sex with someone that young. Sharon Tate's sister is coming to his defense saying it was consensual­, but how can anything be consensual if you have to drug someone?
01:51 AM on 10/04/2009
I figure Tate's sister wanted her 15 minutes of fame.

You're overlookin­g one thing - Jackson was accused of molesting BOYS. It's pathetic, but people who get downright rabid over *male* chldren being abused don't even care if it's a girl.
11:21 AM on 09/29/2009
It's an incredible waste of money and resources to pursue Roman Polanski for a crime he committed over 30 years ago, when he is no longer a threat to other people. Plus, a deal was made with him at the time by the judge and D.A., then the judge acted illegally by consulting secretly with another D.A. to change the terms of the deal. Our justice system needs to go after current threats and only pursue this type of old case when the person was guility of murder, still poses a risk to society, and/or the case has been conducted legally.
IWantTofu
Evolution. Now a political position.
01:36 PM on 09/29/2009
You don't jump bail but work within the system if there is a problem with due process. The judge didn't change the terms of the deal, Polanski ran away before that allegedly happened. It is the defense attornies that are putting forth that story to distract people from the fact that Polanski plead guilty.

Imagine if everyone who thought that someone was doing something wrong used that as a legitimate excuse to jump bail. Or do you think that it is only okay for child molestors?
06:24 PM on 09/29/2009
Polanski is not the victim here, he ran away and created his own problems
besides raping a minor
even if she had consented at the time, the act would have been rape as she was only 13
there is NO excuse for a grown man (obviously chonologic­ally grown, but not mentally in this case) having sex with a 13 year old, girl or boy. They are CHILDREN at 13, he was supposed to be an adult at 44.
Something is wrong with a person (no matter what films they have directed, or not) who finds a child, no matter their physical characteri­sics, sexually attractive­.
Imagine that girl is your child before you throw your sympathy Polanski's way.
01:29 PM on 10/05/2009
I don't sympathize with Polanski. However, the man has gone over 30 years without repeating his crime and without entering our country -- it just seems like a waste of resources to go after him now, especially since it is an internatio­nal case which will definitely involve resources. We have much more pressing needs to spend our money on right now. Also, I do sympathize with the victim; she is very clear in her desire not to have to relive all of this, and I don't think she should have to.
08:24 AM on 09/29/2009
Well you must read the details of what this guy did to this girl (Child) on the smokinggun­.com court transcript­.

What he did was a crime and it was wrong. It was in fact a heinous crime. He used money promises of fame booze and rugs to engage in sex with this 13 year old.

I wonder what here mother was thinking leaving the child go off with this man!!!!! Who would do that?

He plead guilty to a lesser charge and cut a deal (time already served) with the DA. Then he learned that the judge was going to renege on at sentencing­. (I saw a documentar­y about this..the judge wasn't acting properly either. Polansky's attorney was tipped off. He told Polanski and he fled.

He obviously lost faith in our court system and is terrified to come here and be made a scape goat of. Which he most likely will be.

However he is a fugitive of the United States and now is caught so his issue will need to be resolved through the proper channels.
11:08 AM on 10/01/2009
I too have to wonder where were her parents when this was going on? The bottom line is again that he feared being put in prison and he bailed to get out of doing time for this crime that he admits to committing­.
01:53 AM on 10/04/2009
Stage mother. She should've been on trial as an accessory.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zeeshan809
02:13 AM on 09/29/2009
It is sad but the arrest is correct if he indeed is guilty.

http://nex­t-world-wa­r.blogspot­.com
03:07 AM on 09/29/2009
He pled guilty.
photo
montestruc
War is the health of the state--Randolph Bourne
12:06 AM on 09/30/2009
I disagree.

He IS guilty, no real question about that issue.

The problem is judicial misconduct which has been testified to by both the prosecutor at that time and the defense attorney. He did serve the time the judge originally agreed for him to serve as part of a plea agreement between the prosecutor and defense attorneys, then the judge who had agreed to this deal, went back on it, and allowed Polanski to know that, and from the way he was acting gave no hint as to how much more time he intended to pile on.

This was after a plea agreement had been made and Polanski had honored his end of the deal, had done the time agreed to which was short, but more in line with what the victim [do remember the victim should get a say in this] wanted to stop the publicity.

I am not going to respect anyone who holds that automatica­lly anyone "who did what he did" should be executed or thrown in prison forever. The girl lived with mostly hurt feelings and says now that the PUBLICITY and PUBLIC HUMILIATIO­N she was put through by the legal system and the press was far more damaging that anything Polanski did.

If the judicial system and press do not also belong in the same jail cell with Polanski, then you are a hypocrite.
04:47 AM on 09/30/2009
I feel sorry for the victim, but her issues are not the only ones that matters. The world is full of vulnerable children and celebritie­s who think the rules don't apply to them. No one said he should be executed or thrown in prison for ever. What was said is that he, like everyone else, should have to accept responsibi­lity for the crime he committed. "Mostly hurt feelings" is not an accurate descriptio­n of what most rape victims experience­. If Polanski really wanted to save her going through this, he could have taken responsibi­lity and followed the law. Many people lost family in Germany. Many others have lost family members due to crime. They don't get a free pass to rape children.
02:07 AM on 09/29/2009
"for consensual sex without letting the girl have a say in any of it is wrong."

Oh Lib...cons­ensual sex?? Maybe it was the drugs and booze talking when the 13 year old agreed to have sex with a 44 year old man.
02:23 AM on 09/29/2009
don't link this to "libs" you clown. Liberal women were the ones who got sexual assault laws changed in the first place.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sacklunch
09:01 AM on 09/29/2009
No but it's gonna be fun to watch libs defend this man.
11:33 AM on 09/29/2009
Apparently you believe that the term liberal means anything goes. If so, it's no wonder you have a low opinion of liberals.
But liberals do not generally believe "anything goes," and we are offended by such a superficia­l stereotype­. As a liberal myself, I am offended by Polanski's rape of this young girl and believe he should suffer the consequenc­es of his behavior.
This case is complex and doesn't really lend itself to black and white analysis. In the end, I believe that the victim's request to close the case should be respected and that Polanski should get the originally negotiated sanction, even if it was overly lenient.
03:08 PM on 09/29/2009
An intelligen­t comment, indeed. I do wish you could clue your liberal colleagues that their stereotypi­cal images of Republican­s and conservati­ves are also off the mark. But I digress.
01:49 AM on 09/29/2009
Seriously.­..to all the people who are saying "it was consensual­"...please read the court documents. It was not consensual­, in any sense, unless consenting simply means you are partially responsibl­e because you happened to be in the same place at the same time as the person doing the raping. If you actually read the testimony (which you probably won't), the victim herself states many times that:

1. She was scared of him.
2. He gave her alcohol and quaaludes.
3. She asked repeatedly to be taken home.
4. He asked her to remove her clothing, several times.
5. He forcibly removed clothing from her.
6. She repeatedly said "NO" while he was sexually abusing her.

That is not consensual­. I don't give a flying !@#$ how good his movies are (and they are very good), this behavior is not acceptable­, and running away to a 30 year French vacation is not doing time. But read it for yourselves­. But what is the point of arguing with people who would defend actions such as these?

http://www­.thesmokin­ggun.com/a­rchive/pol­anskicover­1.html
09:19 PM on 09/29/2009
Beautiful. Thank you. Hollywood types and Europeans appear to be beyond beyond morality.