nytimes.com:
Many fans of The Wall Street Journal worried that the newspaper would become a cat toy for Rupert Murdoch after he bought it, but the paper's shift toward a more general interest newspaper has not been accompanied by tendentious politics, near as we can tell.
Ben Cohen: Why Rupert Murdoch Will Fire Glenn Beck
Glenn Beck is unlikely to moderate his position unless his corporate paymasters instruct him to do so. And if they do, he'll lose the base of fringe right idiots who tune into his show on a nightly basis.
Murdoch’s Latest Money Grab: Charge for Mobile Access to WSJ
John Mackey: The Whole Foods Alternative to ObamaCare - WSJ.com
Best of the Web Today - WSJ.com
Senator Edward 'Ted' Kennedy Dies at Age 77 After Battle With ...
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Every asset Rupert Murdoch touches becomes a vessel for nothing more than extreme right wing propoganda. Greed, fear and hate sell well in America unfortunately.
As a regular reader of the WSJ, I have to wonder where the writer of this article has been since Murdoch bought the paper. And the idea that there used to be a strict separation between the editorial and news departments of the paper is a myth. It has always been a conservative, pro-business periodical.
What? That's like asking if fish can swim.
You really have to ask if the Faux street journal is biased.
What suprizes me is that there is no Bill O's stock picks " for the true born again rightwing conservative biggoted christian billionair
The WSJ has lost all it's integrity since Murdock took over. Don't believe one word written in the WSJ.
Dumb story OF COURSE it is biased. Murdoch is a stain upon humanity with his lies, character assassination and half truths. He should have his citizenship stripped and sent packing back to the outback of Austrailia.
I'm still trying to understand how he got fasttracked for citizenship and was allowed to control so much of our information for the sole benefit of one political party without having to be forced to tell the truth.
Ya think?
Jeez it happened the second he bought it.
You just noticed?
Creeping? It's not that subtle.
A Murdoch news rag displaying bias???? Surely not!
Anything Murdoch touches is tarnished and a sham.
Sounds like his son is following in his footsteps.
If any of these repubs want to talk about socialism.
the opinion page has been right wing cheer-leading for years, so who cares?
Trick question right?
Why is the Times sending Murdoch a love letter?
And also, lying in the process?
No need to read any further than the headlines to answer the question. Yes.
Loading comments…
First Posted: 09-28-09 02:42 PM | Updated: 09-28-09 04:22 PM