Najibullah Zazi Case Illustrates Al Qaida On Its Way Out: Analysis

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Najibullah Zazi Case Illustrates Al Qaida On Its Way Out: Analysis stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 09-30-09 04:51 PM   |   Updated: 09-30-09 05:03 PM

Najibullah Zazi

By C.M. Sennott

NEW YORK -- The image of Najibullah Zazi, a 24-year-old Afghan-born bus driver from Denver and now a terror suspect, embodies the complex truths of where we are right now in the struggle against terrorism.

Zazi, who pleaded not guilty in federal court here Tuesday on charges of conspiring to set off a bomb in the U.S., represents the age-old axiom of counterterrorism that law enforcement officials have to be lucky every time and terrorists only need to be lucky once to carry out a mass killing of innocent civilians.

Thank God the FBI agents who arrested Zazi kept him from being lucky. As a result, the case reveals the level of intense investigative work that is going on every day by federal agents who keep us safe. Very often that work occurs far from view without any of us knowing how close the terror plots came to fruition.

But Zazi, with his long beard and his rag-tag appearance and the surveillance videos of him going around collecting beauty supplies allegedly for the chemicals needed to build small bombs, also embodies the current, desperate reality of Al Qaeda and those inspired by its apocalyptic vision of a holy war with the infidel, America.

Al Qaeda is very much on the run and wounded, albeit not yet dead.

Its decline has come as Muslims around the world and the governments that represent them increasingly see the movement for what it is, a cult of hatred and death that will just as easily target a Muslim as an American.

GlobalPost reported on that groundtruth this summer in our series "Life, Death and the Taliban," when we documented the shift in mood in Pakistan as the country turned against the Pakistani Taliban and supported a government offensive in the Swat Valley. That offensive, which displaced more than 2 million civilians, has nevertheless effectively served to fracture the Taliban in Pakistan and sent affiliated Al Qaeda elements out of their caves and put them on the run.

Story continues below
advertisement

US steps up attacks against a fractured Al Qaeda from Indonesia to the Horn of Africa
Consider the Pew Global Attitudes Project which has tracked opinion in the Muslim world from 2002 to 2009. According to Pew, those who believe suicide bombings are "often or sometimes justified" have dramatically declined from alarmingly high percentages in the first years after Sept. 11, 2001. In Pakistan, it has dropped from 33 percent to 5 percent. In Jordan, from 43 percent to 12. And in Indonesia, from 26 percent to 13.

That represents a significant shift in the Muslim world that Americans should acknowledge and capitalize upon by continuing to recognize that ultimately the battle against Al Qaeda is not a conventional war, but one of ideas -- a relentless struggle against what is, at the end of the day, a criminal enterprise. Effective surgical strikes and disruptive tactics will be necessary.

The CIA and the U.S. military's Special Operations unit have worked very effectively with allies to kill key terrorist leaders, as was made evident earlier this month with precise and successful strikes on top leadership in Somalia, Yemen and Indonesia.

But when we view the complex struggle against terrorism only as a conventional war, we will lose and they will win.

In his June speech to the Muslim world, President Barack Obama, then a candidate, embraced this more sophisticated sense of counterterrorism. Through public diplomacy, he was accomplishing a great deal to advance the ideas that America stands for among Muslims, and his efforts had some proven success as various opinion surveys have shown in the Muslim world.

But the recent debate over the proposed surge of troops in Afghanistan suggests a strong current within his administration and the Pentagon that wants to regress back to the conventional military approach and what is ultimately a doomed strategy against the Taliban and the Al Qaeda movement for which the now toppled Taliban government provided a base in Afghanistan.

The decline and creeping desperation of Al Qaeda may also be an inevitable historical truth among fundamentalist movements. It is a natural law of extremism that it will always inevitably implode, according to two new books on the subject.

They come from very different quarters. One emerges from the National War College and the other from Harvard University's Divinity School. But they end up in the same place: Al Qaeda is following the trend of all violent, religious extremist movements and in the process of flaming out.

In a recently published book titled "How Terrorism Ends," author Audrey Kurth Cronin, a professor at the War College in Washington, assesses the patterns of the trajectory of violent extremist groups from the Provisional Irish Republican Army to Peru's Shining Path. She recently told the New York Times: "I think Al Qaeda is in the process of imploding. This is not necessarily the end, but the trends are in a good direction."

The respected religious scholar and Harvard University professor emeritus Harvey Cox comes to a similar conclusion in his latest book, "The Future of Faith."

US steps up attacks against a fractured Al Qaeda from Indonesia to the Horn of Africa
Cox has been on the money in predicting trends in religion throughout a distinguished career that spans a half century, and this book feels as prophetic in its predictions as it is sweeping in its scholarship. To make these conclusions, Cox draws on decades of work on the subject of religious fundamentalisms in Islam, Christianity and Judaism. And it is a book that is ultimately hopeful by asserting that faith will survive where dogma will grow rigid and disappear.

Cox taught a course at Harvard in recent years called "Fundamentalisms," and I had the honor of serving as both a student and an occasional guest lecturer in his class. I would relate to the class street stories about Hamas and Hezbollah and Christian Zionists and the Jewish settler movement from years of reporting in the Middle East. And then Cox would frame those stories in historical and theological context for the class, and me.

So when I recently returned from Afghanistan, Cox and I had lunch and discussed the recent trends and once again he put all the street reporting on the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan in context.

"What you were witnessing, I believe, is a shift, the beginning of a decline," Cox said, referring to the Taliban movement on both sides of the Afghanistan-Pakistan border and the Al Qaeda elements that metastasized around it.

If the history of fundamentalism he chronicles so well teaches us about the present, Cox believes: "It is a decline that is inevitable."

Read more from GlobalPost.com.

By C.M. Sennott NEW YORK -- The image of Najibullah Zazi, a 24-year-old Afghan-born bus driver from Denver and now a terror suspect, embodies the complex truths of where we are right now in the st...
By C.M. Sennott NEW YORK -- The image of Najibullah Zazi, a 24-year-old Afghan-born bus driver from Denver and now a terror suspect, embodies the complex truths of where we are right now in the st...
Filed by Hanna Ingber Win  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
58
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- larry278 I'm a Fan of larry278 50 fans permalink

How often have those who sell CW as fact said that Al Qaeda or Taliban are dying or are dead?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 AM on 10/02/2009
- mgbgt95 I'm a Fan of mgbgt95 2 fans permalink

this optimism sounds like the Bush admin. when they said the Taliban were defeated.

Hatred will always be w/us in one form or another and the easy availability of guns, makes it easy to express that hatred.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 AM on 10/02/2009

Well, at the end extremism and fundamentalism are weaker than rationale and pragmatism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:25 AM on 10/02/2009
- Chip W I'm a Fan of Chip W 18 fans permalink

Some still think suicide bombings are sometimes justified. Presumably to defend Islam.
Someone tell me why. Eight years after 9/11 and many more suicide bombings and I still don't see their purpose. What do they strategically accomplish?
I'd like to hear a child psychologist compare them to temper tantrums.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 PM on 10/01/2009
- MillinMn I'm a Fan of MillinMn 49 fans permalink
photo

little comfort. a very few can create a lot of chaos.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 PM on 10/01/2009
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 144 fans permalink

Al Qaida was never that great a threat to begin with.

Prior to 9/11 al Qaida hand their allies were rejected in every Muslim country they tried to establish themselves in. Except Afghanistan, which was torn by war.

They were even expelled from Sudan. Who had a fundamentalist Islamic government.

9/11 was an attempt by bin Ladin to gain legitimacy within the Muslim world. A legitimacy they lacked up to that time.

And the reason they lacked that legitimacy is easy to understand. Killing fellow Muslims is not only UnIslamic, it is a stupid, self defeating strategy.

GW Bush and his negligent response to 9/11 gave al Qaida new life. Not hunting down and destroying or putting on trial al Qaida's leadership was extreme incompetence on the part of Bush/Cheney/ Rumsfeld et al.

The invasion and occupation of Iraq, which clearly had nothing to do with al Qaida was criminal.

But don't forget: Al Qaida was even rejected by the Iraqi insurgents who sought any allies they could find.

Al Qaida was never going to make it anywhere in the real world.
I
f they had a serious economic plan it might have been different.

But most Muslims of the world are not that interested in killing each other to determine who is the most Islamic.

They would rather feed their families and see their children live a better life.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:37 PM on 10/01/2009

So true.

Al Qaeda is just a bunch of punks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 AM on 10/02/2009

So, it looks like what was needed from day one were policing actions, not two wars.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 AM on 10/01/2009
- Knowbetter I'm a Fan of Knowbetter 31 fans permalink
photo

Correct! Have a cigar!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 PM on 10/01/2009

Exactamundo!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 AM on 10/02/2009
photo

Al Qaida=database=BS, also funded by the USA

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 AM on 10/01/2009
- ibsteve2u I'm a Fan of ibsteve2u 146 fans permalink
photo

al Qaeda is in trouble in large part because of that phrase "...a holy war...".

Beyond the fallacy of believing that you are entitled to usurp the right of your God to render judgment, when you begin calling the murder of innocents "holy" you have crossed the boundary between good and evil in all religions.

It is one thing to defend the people of your religion against oppression, particularly when the methods used are violent. However, It is true sacrilege to attempt to forcibly instill your religion, especially when you attempt to convert those who do not follow your religious tenets by murdering them.

The dead do not attend the mosque, church, or synagogue.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:48 AM on 10/01/2009
- Jaywalkker I'm a Fan of Jaywalkker 51 fans permalink
photo

The unfortunate thing is the number of religious that agree with the extremists and think its a good fight that they wage.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:41 PM on 10/01/2009
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 144 fans permalink

it was always my understanding that in Islam (Sunni anyhow) nobody stood between an individual and god. That ones responsibilities to God were ones own business. And not anyone else's.

Which makes bin Ladins creed even more despicable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:14 PM on 10/01/2009
- boredwell I'm a Fan of boredwell 8 fans permalink
photo

A caveat: It only takes one terrorist and one bottle of hydrogen peroxide to produce a bomb. Terrorism doesn't need to have an organizational structure because its "success" is dependent upon being more than clandestine. It is most effective when it is fluid and random. Nor should terrorism be confined to "Islamic Extremists." The provocateurs come in all ideological stripes. As for those precision strikes to take out terrorists leaders, one should remember its purported efficacy is limited and narrow-minded as it entails "collateral" damage. Death abhors a vacuum - for each there will be another vengeful adherent who will take the place of the deceased. Terrorists, whether or not they are lone wolves or members of an organization, homegrown or foreign, will continue to be a scourge on humanity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:19 AM on 10/01/2009
photo

From the article.

"Its decline has come as Muslims around the world and the governments that represent them increasingly see the movement for what it is, a cult of hatred and death that will just as easily target a Muslim as an American."

This would have happened had the targets of Al Qaida (the Western nations) offered no significant opposition to the extremists.

THIS ALWAYS HAPPENS - as the radicals in any extremist movement age, mature and become wiser with age, and are subsequently not replaced. History has shown repeatedly that the correct response to extremism is to ignore it, (AS MUCH AS IS PRACTICABLE) rather than to feed it the attention that it will grow on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:46 AM on 10/01/2009
- Jaywalkker I'm a Fan of Jaywalkker 51 fans permalink
photo

How little opposition do you suggest? After '93WTC, USS Cole, Saudi Marine Barracks, we didn't do anything. At all. There were some tomahawks launched by Clinton into Sudan and Afghanistan, but we certainly didn't lock down global bank records, conduct any extradition/rendition, invade countries, etc...they still hit us with 9/11.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:44 PM on 10/01/2009
photo

Well.. we were still screwing with people they considered "theirs". A caveat to what this guys saying is that, if the original cause for extremism isn't dealt with.. it won't go away.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:29 PM on 10/01/2009
photo

I am afraid that your reply to my comment has shown that you have not understand what I was getting at. Your thinking on the idea perpetuates retaliation. I buys into the idea of a cycle.
We should not respond to their attacks with further attacks.
We can protect ourselves without attacking them.

If we did not attack them to protect ourselves their level of support within their own communities would quickly dry up. They would be seen as the extremists that they are. Always preaching hate and an ideology of attacking the West, instead of building up their own society.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 10/01/2009
photo

Are we talking about Taliban or Al Qaida (which NEVER existed - only perpetrated).
The fictitious *war on terror* was waged on the illusion of Al Qaida (the' database)
all made up stuff - media fluff. It never existed. I just don't buy it.

The (actual) Taliban and most elements of fundamentalism common to it
I am truly fearful of it, (admittedly) direct threats to us have been
routinely grossly overstated by the government, and media
while economic slavery imposed by many modern go.vern.ments
has been cause to great hatred to be directed towards all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 AM on 10/01/2009
photo

re. "t threats to us have been routinely grossly overstated by the government, and media."
WTC 1993; August 7, 1998--Nairobi and Dar es Salaam Embassies; 9/11, Madrid, Bali, London, Mumbai, Beslan, Nord-Ost; September 17, 2008-- US embassy in Yemen, Sana'a; July 9, 2008 Istanbul U.S.. Embassy.... etc

All illusions...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:34 AM on 10/01/2009
- Hirnlego I'm a Fan of Hirnlego 115 fans permalink
photo

No, true for sure. But at least Madrid and London couldn't be tied to AQ according to a large official study.
AQ took credit for at least Madrid but couldn't be tied to the event(s).

AQ seems to be very small, almost non-existant.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:30 AM on 10/01/2009
- Khirad I'm a Fan of Khirad 304 fans permalink
photo

Yes, the "War on Terror" was a vague monstrosity of a term. Yes, al-Qa'ida was more of a network with an extreme ideology. Yes, threats were blown out of proportion as a part of cynical fear-mongering on the domestic front. But, in what sense did they not exist or still pose a threat nonetheless?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:40 AM on 10/01/2009
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 144 fans permalink

Just because Bush/Cheney were lying fools does not mean al Qaida di not exist.

It did/does and it is a real threat.

Just not a mortal threat to anyone outside the Muslim world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:28 PM on 10/01/2009

So ... does this mean that there is a job opening now for a bus driver? Don't get me wrong. This stuff is really important, but we're unemployed and underemployed out here. We need more jobs. I care, but I still gotta eat.

BTW, great job to the feds! Woo-hoo! Yay!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 AM on 10/01/2009
- eciaccio I'm a Fan of eciaccio 12 fans permalink

Horrors! What will the MIC do now to justify its gargantuan budgets and endless wars?

Oh, that's right: lie.

And corporate media will help it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 PM on 09/30/2009
photo

Get the troops out now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 PM on 09/30/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect