Obama Trip To Copenhagen Sparks Olympic-Sized Derangement

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama Trip To Copenhagen Sparks Olympic-Sized Derangement stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 09-30-09 10:44 AM   |   Updated: 09-30-09 03:53 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Chicago Olympics

Whenever President Barack Obama goes abroad to talk to the world about America, it usually goes like this: the president offers up some generalities on how his foreign policy approach will differ from previous administrations, he'll beseech foreign governments to modify their behavior, and his media critics will selectively edit his remarks and then bitch about how Obama is "apologizing" for America. But tomorrow, President Obama plans to go to Copenhagen to make an unequivocal pitch about the greatness of America in an effort to win the 2016 Olympic games, during which he will highlight the superiority of Chicago, a great American city, as a potential host. Naturally, his critics are quick to point out what a total bastard he is for doing so.

You wouldn't think it would be controversial for the president of the United States to make a pitch before the International Olympic Committee in an effort to win glory for the nation and carve out a new chapter in the nation's history of sport, but since we're all about breaking new ground in crazy these days, we might as well go all in. It's nevertheless a remarkable turnaround. Why, it seems like only last year that working on the Olympic games was viewed as a critical piece of managerial acumen for a presidential candidate.

But! Presidenting: it's hard! So much to do, so many things which need tending. And ever since Obama was sworn in, we've learned that it is just impossible for the president to work on so many things at the same time. So a new vision of the office has been put forward, which forbids multi-tasking, and which insists that the president must tackle single issues, one at a time, and solve them, before moving on. What to do first? Whatever the loudest presidential critic has a chubby for, of course. Of course, presidents typically have the authority to delegate responsibilities and policy portfolios to appointed experts, but nowadays, it's more important to hound such people out of the White House, because as everyone knows, management hierarchies are Marxist.

Yesterday, Representative Pete Hoekstra (R-Mich.) took time off from whining about how hard he has to work to complain to MSNBC's David Shuster that Obama does not have enough time to fly to Copenhagen on his high-tech plane with state-of-the-art telecommunications technology to talk about how awesome America is to the IOC. Instead, the president needs to be flying to Afghanistan, with 40,000 more troops for General McChrystal.

HOEKSTRA: Well, you know, the president is pressed on issues all day long. He and his staff have to make choices each and every day. You know, we've got the issue. We are at war. We've got the issue of the economy. We have the issue of Gitmo. We have the issues on health care, and a whole range of issues. The president needs to make the choices. I really believe that this is a choice that he could have passed on and focused on some other things. I think we can close. I would hope that we could close a sale on Chicago without the president personally having to invest his time, his energy, and his credibility on this type of a decision.

Seriously! Why is the President even sleeping! He needs to work hard on these issues, and proffer solutions that Pete Hoekstra will unilaterally reject out of pure political calculations!

In fairness to Hoekstra, Obama had initially "said he couldn't make the trip because he needed to tend to the health care debate at home". But, look, isn't Max Baucus and his lobbyist friends taking care of all that? More to the point, isn't Pete Hoekstra aware that the war in Afghanistan has been going on for about eight years? Back when President George W. Bush was managing the war, he had all kinds of time to do things like tell America the Taliban had been defeated, and take bike rides, and, uhm...attend the Olympic Games. Although it should be pointed out, Bush did give up golf for a few hours... you know -- FOR THE TROOPS. And that's probably why Iranians started the whole "Green Revolution," taking to the streets and chanting, "Now watch this drive!"

Of course, if you are not concerned about the awesomely ruinous opportunity cost to safety and prosperity that a brief jaunt to Denmark represents, surely you are worried about all the CHICAGO MACHINE OLYMPIC CORRUPTION, where all the Medals of Gold are tainted! Glenn Beck sure is, and he invited someone with a demonic goatee on his teevee show yesterday to blather on and on about it, in alarmist fashion, saying, "This is the biggest scandal! This is going to be corruption on a scale unimaginable!"

Listening to this, I'm thinking, "No! No! Teapot Dome! Watergate! Iran-Contra! All of these scandals are much larger than a trip to Denmark to win an Olympics!" More to the point, there's already been a massive American Olympic scandal that Chicago will have to work very hard to top: the Salt Lake Olympic Committee bribery scandal, which forced the resignation of top SLOC officials and required the efforts of Mitt Romney, to his credit, to right the ship. Naturally, in the world of Glenn Beck and his coterie of facial-hair daemons, the Chicago Olympics will be a sin-drenched affair, where Tony Rezko builds the Valerie Jarrett Thunderdome in Hyde Park, and William Ayers lights the Olympic Torch with Weather Underground bombs.

At any rate, this is all, undeniably insane, but I nevertheless have to admire to spirit of Obama's Olympic detractors, because when the 2016 games inevitably go to Rio De Janeiro, they'll all get to come back on the air and deride Obama for being the useless loser that cost America the Olympics. You can just bet the HONEYMOON WILL BE OVER then!

[Would you like to follow me on Twitter? Because why not? Also, please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com -- learn more about our media monitoring project here.]


Whenever President Barack Obama goes abroad to talk to the world about America, it usually goes like this: the president offers up some generalities on how his foreign policy approach will differ from...
Whenever President Barack Obama goes abroad to talk to the world about America, it usually goes like this: the president offers up some generalities on how his foreign policy approach will differ from...
Loading...
 
Report Corrections
 
Comments
300
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
- Tags I'm a Fan of Tags 11 fans permalink

Just another day for the Faux Muck Club.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 PM on 10/01/2009
- mmonarch I'm a Fan of mmonarch 21 fans permalink
photo

Has any country in S. America ever hosted the Olympics? As far as I have researched, the Olympics have never been held on the South American continent. So there is your answer. Rio.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:16 PM on 10/01/2009
- tlgeiger62 I'm a Fan of tlgeiger62 59 fans permalink
photo

I was living in Atlanta for the 1996 Olympics - it ain't no picnic. I guess it makes the state and city a lot of money with the influx of people but the inconvenience was MAJOR! Good luck with all THAT!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:31 AM on 10/01/2009
photo

Jobs now and tomorrow, Mr Steele. Simple as that.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:34 AM on 10/01/2009
- ChelseaC I'm a Fan of ChelseaC 152 fans permalink
photo

I agree with Obama on this one.
The Olympics would bring, jobs, fun and excitement to Chicago! A boost for the USA.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:51 AM on 10/01/2009
- chedet I'm a Fan of chedet 28 fans permalink
photo

Not good means we have to spend more money. Especially to rival china because of the show they put last year.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 AM on 10/01/2009
photo

Doesn't London have to match them and then we have to contend with London?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:11 AM on 10/01/2009
- EconPadawan I'm a Fan of EconPadawan 280 fans permalink
photo

Have republicans limited the number of bathroom breaks the President can make yet?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:17 AM on 10/01/2009
- jde I'm a Fan of jde 48 fans permalink
photo

Using the bathroom AT ALL is disrespectful of the office of the President.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 AM on 10/01/2009
- EconPadawan I'm a Fan of EconPadawan 280 fans permalink
photo

On the other hand, who would want to use the same toilet Bush used for 8 years?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:29 AM on 10/01/2009
- EconPadawan I'm a Fan of EconPadawan 280 fans permalink
photo

Why does EVERY SINGLE INNOCUOUS THING the POTUS does create a controversy among Republicans?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:02 AM on 10/01/2009
- tlgeiger62 I'm a Fan of tlgeiger62 59 fans permalink
photo

Because they can't live with the fact that they lost the 2008 election to a young black man who shows too much intelligence and integrity. It threw a wrench into their plans to protect the rich upper class while oppressing the middle class and enslaving the lower classes.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:39 AM on 10/01/2009
- Meteor I'm a Fan of Meteor 11 fans permalink


Reading through just this first page of (five pages of) opinions, the thought struck me, "It is a good thing we can't hear what everyone is thinking at once because the effect would be chaotic in one's head and the results would be impossible to describe, certainly not orderly."

It is good to remember that the President can shut out all the noise and take the time to consider what he needs to consider or choose to think of nothing at all, in other words, to meditate peacefully and then make his best decision when the time is right. He can do this wherever he is, on a plane or in The White House.

In the morning this opinion may be on page 5 or deeper into the pile, but often the best decision is to just get some sleep.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 AM on 10/01/2009
- Tommygun264 I'm a Fan of Tommygun264 193 fans permalink
photo

The man could crap ice cream and these haters would say, "what, no sprinkles?". They only know that they hate.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 AM on 10/01/2009
- Tim303 I'm a Fan of Tim303 86 fans permalink
photo

!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 AM on 10/01/2009
- timmmahhhh I'm a Fan of timmmahhhh 67 fans permalink
photo

Don't tell the righties that Copenhagen is a lot like Amsterdam in terms of the porn and peep shows. They'll say that's his reason for going. Then they'll quietly book their flights.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:32 AM on 10/01/2009

You think they don't know? I'm sure all of them have been there before.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 PM on 10/01/2009

It's not going to look great when the President returns home empty-handed; while Chicago hasn't lost for sure, it's very likely that Rio de Janeiro is going to receive the 2016 games.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:14 PM on 09/30/2009

Maybe the Olympics thing is a cover for a visit to Afghanistan.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 PM on 09/30/2009
photo

Can anyone name anything even tangentially involving Obama this year that hasn't triggered Olympic-sized derangement from the right?

Yeah, neither can I.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 PM on 09/30/2009
- mmonarch I'm a Fan of mmonarch 21 fans permalink
photo

You're right, even in Germany.lol. I understand that Merkel won with a mandate - she no longer has to share with liberals. She is now working with pro business Free Democrats. She is forging ahead with tax cuts and labor market deregulation. According to Bloomberg's site : "With Germany struggling to recover from the deepest economic slump since World War II, voters spurned plans by Merkel’s Social Democratic challenger to raise taxes on top earners. Frank-Walter Steinmeier’s SPD had its worst postwar result in what he called a “bitter day” after sharing power with Merkel for four years and governing for the previous seven. “There’s a clear sentiment in favor of economic changes, especially on income taxes,” Tilman Mayer, head of the Bonn- based Institute for Political Science, said in an interview. “Voters have turned their back on grand coalition-style compromise politics.” Well, well, well, isn't that special. I remember Obama giving a speech on the crowded mall, in Germany. All so excited and happy for a liberal Democrat to displace cowboy George. So how does Germany vote in THEIR election? Pro-business. Anti-"grand coalition". Hahahahaha. Explain that, someone, please? They must have Obama derangement syndrome.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 PM on 09/30/2009
- jde I'm a Fan of jde 48 fans permalink
photo

They probably should have asked us how well all that conservative spending and deregulation worked out for us. It would have saved them the need to eventually reform all the nonsense on which they are about to embark.

Regardless, now you conservatives have a place to go.

Auf Wiedersehen.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 AM on 10/01/2009
- Phxflyer I'm a Fan of Phxflyer 72 fans permalink
photo

Excellent point.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 PM on 09/30/2009
- timmmahhhh I'm a Fan of timmmahhhh 67 fans permalink
photo

So true. They failed at governing when the had the chance - their only hope is to hope people forget by creating O's issues. The more they do the more they give ammo to Carter's statement.

They need to go back to school and relearn the fable "The Boy who Cried Wolf."

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 AM on 10/01/2009
- globality I'm a Fan of globality 16 fans permalink

London (the games have not started yet)

Accountants at KPMG have discovered that the funding gap in the London Development Agency’s 2012 Olympics budget could be as high as £159 million.

Vancouver (the games have not started yet)

VANOC has a shortfall of up to $37 million on its $1.75 billion operating budget. Organizers have said they don’t expect a complete bailout, and the IOC has not said how much it would kick in

Athens

Greece is facing a massive budget deficit as it tries to absorb the cost of the Olympic Games.
The expected 7bn euro ($8.6bn; £4.8bn) burden means the national deficit is set to hit 5.3%

Barcelona

Barcelona is still paying back a $1.4 billion Olympic deficit.

Sydney

Australian taxpayers are still paying off an Olympic debt from the 2004 Sydney Games that could cost them $32 million a year for a decade

Montreal

the "Montreal effect." That city was plunged into such a financial slump after the 1976 Games that it won't finish paying off its Olympic debt until 2006.

Salt Lake

Lake City Winter Olympics in 2002 left Utah with a $155 million deficit.

http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0901/p07s01-woeu.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/3649268.stm

http://www.cnplus.co.uk/sectors/education/ldas-olympic-deficit-could-be-159m/5207952.article?referrer=RSS

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 PM on 09/30/2009
- mmonarch I'm a Fan of mmonarch 21 fans permalink
photo

Thank you, thank you, thank you. Chicago and Illinoisans should thank you too.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:24 PM on 09/30/2009
- aztecdiva I'm a Fan of aztecdiva 4 fans permalink
photo

Little different here in Chicago. The plans for the buildings are not to be permanent which greatly reduced the costs. But moreover, Chicago's proximity to Indiana, Iowa, Wisconsin and Michigan will bring greatly needed jobs to the area over an extended period of time. With the massive job losses, the Olympics would provide a huge boost to sectors that have experienced massive down turns. This is a positive for the states touching Illinois.

Obama's election night festivities did a lot for Chicago's Olympic bid. It went off with out a hitch. That bumped up Chicago's profile greatly. I was there that night, and it was safe, orderly and joyous.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 AM on 10/01/2009
- jde I'm a Fan of jde 48 fans permalink
photo

And we were joking when we said the teabaggers would be all anti Olympics by Friday.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:18 AM on 10/01/2009
- chedet I'm a Fan of chedet 28 fans permalink
photo

Olympic uses a lot of money... China can afford it last year but even that they said it amounts to a lot of money. Brazil is not in a recession so I guess that games should go to them. It's only fair since we already had it in 1996 in Atlanta.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:45 AM on 10/01/2009
photo

You're right about one thing. Baucus and his lobbyists got Obama's backroom deal covered.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:04 PM on 09/30/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect